logo
London restaurants hit customers with £100 ‘minimum spend' charge

London restaurants hit customers with £100 ‘minimum spend' charge

Telegraph21-02-2025

Diners are being hit with minimum spend requirements at top London restaurants after Labour's non-dom raid triggered an exodus of ultra-wealthy families.
Charges of as much as £100 per reservation are on the rise in the city's fine dining scene.
Britain's non-dom crackdown and internet bots were blamed for the measures that are intended to deter 'reservation squatting,' as first reported by the Financial Times.
Gymkhana, a two-Michelin-starred Indian restaurant in Mayfair, currently requires customers to pay a £100 minimum spend upfront when making a reservation.
Hutong, another high-end eatery in London's Shard skyscraper, charges £80 upfront per adult reservation on Fridays and Saturdays, while Chutney Mary in St James's says its dinner minimum spend is £60 per person.
Gymkhana told the Financial Times it had introduced the policy in November 2024 'in part due to the number of cancellations and no-shows we were seeing per service'.
It also said the booking requirements were necessary because of 'the large volumes of bots and reservation resale websites' directed at the restaurant after it won its second Michelin star.
MW Eat, the company that owns Chutney Mary, an Indian restaurant, claimed to have introduced the measures to combat 'curry-house hangover experiences', where large groups order few main dishes but many cheaper sides.
Rachel Reeves last month announced plans to water down her tax raid on ultra-wealthy non-doms after the number of millionaires leaving the UK doubled last year to hit 10,800.
The Chancellor has prepared an amendment to the Finance Bill that will make it easier for non-doms to bring money instantly to the UK following growing fears that the super-rich will quit the UK en masse.
Chris D'Sylva, owner of one-Michelin-starred, Dorian, in Notting Hill, said he had imposed 'a slightly punitive deposit' of £25 per head because too many people make multiple bookings at restaurants in London using online platforms before only turning up to one.
He said this practice was 'reservation-squatting' because 'there's no penalty associated with making a reservation'.
Mr D'Sylva said minimum spends for small parties were 'a very dangerous idea' because they sent a negative message, but he understood the reasons for restaurant bosses wanting the measures.
'It's something to drive away influencers that come and all they want to do is say that they were there and get the benefit of the social currency and post on their Instagram to the detriment of the business,' he said.
Mr D'Sylva added that high-grade food ingredients from Japan now needed to be flown around Russia, which increased costs, and that some of his customers had left Britain because of non-dom tax changes.
Victims of their own success
Martyn James, a consumer expert, said the recent exodus of wealthy non-doms from Britain could be partly to blame for restaurants imposing 'stringent' measures on clientele.
'I suspect quite a lot of the wealthier set may have moved on or may just not be engaging in displays of conspicuous wealth anymore, and it may factor in that some of them have left, but when you create a destination venue you effectively become a victim of success.'
He said that some high-end restaurants now attract more tourists than locals, who can be less reliable than locals.
'What they have done is created tourist destinations to go on holiday. By making them tourist destinations that aren't restaurants they are experiences.
'They are a victim of their own success by creating demand for their seats and [people] will use bots to get their reservations but they might not end up going because they have booked through a third party.
'Ultimately, the service industry and the leisure industry have been hurt by people not turning up for bookings. Lots of restaurants have said since the pandemic lots of people won't turn up. We have seen more stringent policies but this is a big chunk of money and it's presumptuous that people will want to spend £100.'
Wealthy non-doms living in the capital have fled the UK in record numbers in the year Labour came to power, after the previous Conservative government removed tax benefits enjoyed by foreigners that were kept by Ms Reeves.
The number of high net-worth individuals – with liquid assets of more than $1m (£821,153) – leaving the country rose by 157pc in 2024, according to figures compiled by analytics firm, New World Wealth, for advisors Henley & Partners.
They showed more than 10,000 millionaires left last year, a significant rise on the previous year's figures of just 4,300. No other country except for China saw greater capital flight than the UK between January 2024 and December of 2024, according to the figures.
The restaurant industry has faced significant inflation in costs in recent years including for staff, rent and food prices. The rise in employers' National Insurance contributions has also alarmed restaurateurs amid a fall in the hospitality workforce.
The number of people employed in accommodation and food services – broadly, the hospitality trade – fell by 58,000 between January 2024 and January 2025, according to the latest payroll data.
The same pressures are hammering shops. Employment in retail, wholesale and car garages dropped by just over 36,000 over the same period, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nervous families freeze spending in blow to growth hopes
Nervous families freeze spending in blow to growth hopes

Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Nervous families freeze spending in blow to growth hopes

Nervous families are freezing spending in a blow to hopes that the UK economy will continue its growth spurt. Retail sales rose by just 1pc in the year to May, according to new figures from the British Retail Consortium (BRC). The study, which suggests households are cutting back, will pile fresh pressure on Rachel Reeves amid concerns that the economy's surprisingly strong momentum in the first three months of 2025 is evaporating. The beleaguered Chancellor will likely be forced to find tens of billions of pounds more in the autumn to repair her fiscal headroom if her hopes of a growth miracle fall short. It raises the prospect of further tax rises. Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, said families were already cutting back on non-essentials amid growing nervousness. She added: 'Consumers put the brakes on spending, with the slowest growth in 2025 so far. This was due largely to declines in non-food sales, as fashion and full price big-ticket items were held back by lower consumer confidence.' Figures from Barclays separately showed card spending grew well below inflation at 1pc in the year to May, down from 4.5pc in April. Sarah Bradbury, from the Institute of Grocery Distribution, said confidence improved slightly in May but remained 'fragile' beneath the surface, adding: 'Shoppers are still navigating financial uncertainty and continue to rely on money-saving tactics like planning ahead and buying on promotion. 'While the mood has brightened, we've yet to see this translate into meaningful changes in behaviour.' Hiring slump It comes as Donald Trump's trade war and Britain's deteriorating job market spark uncertainty for households. Hiring confidence has fallen at the fastest rate since the height of Covid in summer 2020, according to ManpowerGroup UK. Figures from the recruiter revealed that employer confidence has plunged by 12 points to a net score of 19 since the start of the year. It is now at the lowest level since early 2023. In several large industries such as communications, energy and the public sector, more employers are now looking to reduce rather than increase their workforce for the first time since the pandemic. The share of bosses blaming headcount changes on economic challenges almost doubled from the start of the year, to 64pc from 36pc. Petra Tagg, at ManpowerGroup UK, said: 'Hitting this new low is a symptom of the entire labour market re-aligning after the changes imposed by the National Insurance and living wage increases, alongside the recent uncertainties of the US trade tariffs. 'From here, employers will 'wait and see' to gauge the volume of the reset rather than making any swift decisions towards the end of the year.' Meanwhile, BDO said there was a risk of companies 'being paralysed by fear' and stagnating if they put off hiring and investment decisions. The consultancy surveyed 500 C-suite executives at global businesses with more than $100m (£74m) in revenue. Some 84pc described global risks as more defined by crisis than ever.

Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?
Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?

Scotsman

time27 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Rachel Reeves spending review: What will be in the spending review and what does it mean for Scotland?

The Spending Review will be delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver the Spending Review on Wednesday, in what is expected to lead to a significant amount of money for Scotland. While some areas with the greatest uptick in spending are devolved, the nature of the Barnett Formula means the Scottish Government will be allocated extra funds, in what The Scotsman understands will be a significant increase. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Reform UK has suggested the Barnett Formula and block funding grant from Westminster should go to be replaced with more tax powers for the Scottish Parliament The formula is used to work out the level of public spending for each of the devolved administrations. The Barnett Formula aims to be fair mechanism by giving each of the devolved administrations the same pounds-per-person change in funding. Here's what is expected to be in the spending review and what it means for Scotland. Winter fuel Scottish pensioners now face being worse off than those in England and Wales after the UK government confirmed its U-turn over the winter fuel payment. The Chancellor announced on Monday the payment, worth up to £300 for each recipient, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it because anyone with an income of under £35,000 a year will now get the payment automatically. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, Scotland has already created a devolved benefit of £100 for all pensioner households, which is less generous than the UK government version, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of Scots worse off than their English and Welsh counterparts. With Holyrood being sent more money through the Barnett Formula, Scottish Labour has urged the Government at Holyrood to increase its payments. Energy UK energy secretary Ed Miliband endured a battle with the Treasury over funding, but is now expecting several big announcements. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre), Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) and Ed Miliband, Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary (left), during a visit to St Fergus Gas Terminal, a clean power facility in AberdeenshirePicture: Jeff J Mitchell/PA Wire Most notably, the UK government has announced a £14.2 billion investment to build the Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk - a project that could boost energy in Scotland, despite being based elsewhere. For Scotland, it is also understood the government is set to commit to a multi-decade, multi-billion redevelopment of HMNB Clyde, with funding in the hundreds of millions for the next few years. There are also hopes the Chancellor could finally sign off on the Acorn project. Based near Peterhead, it has been in the pipeline for years and would allow fossil fuels to continue to be burnt without, in theory, releasing harmful carbon emissions. The project is seen as key to scaling up the low-carbon hydrogen sector in Scotland and future plans for Grangemouth, but the technology has not yet been demonstrated at commercial scale. One way or the other, a decision is expected during the spending review. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Health Wes Streeting's department is expected to get one of the biggest funding boosts, which will in turn lead to more money for Scotland through the Barnett Formula. Shortly after the statement from Ms Reeves, the UK government will publish groundwork for its NHS ten-year plan. This will give an idea of the financial boost to Scotland and also what Labour might try to do to NHS Scotland if they win the Holyrood election next year.

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C
Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

Glasgow Times

time3 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Reeves signs off on £14bn to build new nuclear plant Sizewell C

The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding at the GMB Congress on Tuesday. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance'. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves is set to confirm £14.2 billion of investment in the new Sizewell C nuclear plant(Stefan Rousseau/PA) Trade unions welcomed the move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the Government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The last time Britain completed one was in 1987, which was the Sizewell B plant. Hinkley Point C, in Somerset, is under construction and is expected to produce enough power for about six million homes when it opens, but that may not be until 2031. The Energy Secretary said: 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. 'This is the Government's clean energy mission in action – investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security.' It will get the UK off the 'fossil fuel rollercoaster', he separately told The Guardian. 'We know that we're going to have to see electricity demand at least double by 2050. All the expert advice says nuclear has a really important role to play in the energy system. 'In any sensible reckoning, this is essential to get to our clean power and net zero ambitions.' The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' At the peak of construction, Sizewell C is expected to provide 10,000 jobs and the company behind the project has already signed £330 million worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The Government is also due to confirm one of Europe's first small modular reactor programmes and will invest £2.5 billion over five years in fusion energy research as part of plans to boost the UK's nuclear industry. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Ed Miliband said new nuclear power capacity was needed to deliver a 'golden age of clean energy abundance' (Kin Cheung/PA) Regional Secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Nuclear power is essential for clean, affordable, and reliable energy – without new nuclear, there can be no net zero. 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the Government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' Mike Clancy, general secretary of Prospect, said: 'Delivering this funding for Sizewell C is a vital step forward, this project is critical to securing the future of the nuclear industry in the UK. 'New nuclear is essential to achieving net zero, providing a baseload of clean and secure energy, as well as supporting good, unionised jobs. 'Further investment in SMRs and fusion research shows we are finally serious about developing a 21st-century nuclear industry. All funding must be backed up by a whole-industry plan to ensure we have the workforce and skills we need for these plans to succeed.' Alison Downes of Stop Sizewell C said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could be some £40 billion. 'There still appears to be no final investment decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2 billion in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. 'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? 'Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark 2.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store