UK likely to relocate 20,000 Afghans after data leak reveals 33,000 identities
The government is also facing lawsuits from those affected by the breach, further adding to the ultimate cost of the incident.A Ministry of Defence-commissioned review of the data breach, a summary of which was also published on Tuesday, said more than 16,000 people affected by it had been relocated to the UK as of May this year.The British government was forced to act after the breach revealed the names of Afghans who had helped British forces in Afghanistan before they withdrew from the country in chaotic circumstances in 2021.The details emerged on Tuesday after a legal ruling known as a superinjunction was lifted. The injunction had been granted in 2023 after the MoD argued that a public disclosure of the breach could put people at risk of extra-judicial killing or serious violence by the Taliban.The dataset contained personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to be relocated to Britain and their families.It was released in error in early 2022, before the MoD spotted the breach in August 2023, when part of the dataset was published on Facebook.The former Conservative government obtained the injunction the following month.Prime Minister Keir Starmer's centre-left government, which was elected last July, launched a review into the injunction, the breach and the relocation scheme, which found that although Afghanistan remains dangerous, there was little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
35 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump worried about embarrassing and massive protest on UK state visit - itinerary changed, here's what's planned
What does Donald Trump's revised UK itinerary look like? Live Events Are protests still expected during the visit? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump's second UK state visit has been scaled back amid concerns over protests and negative optics. To avoid big protests and public embarrassment, British and American officials have worked behind the scenes to make the schedule more efficient, with a focus on Windsor instead of won't give a speech in Parliament or go to public events. Instead, he will go to a royal banquet in Windsor and meet with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The goal of the trip is to avoid having more street protests and problems like those that have happened to Britain's former Washington envoy Sir Kim Darroch, Donald Trump's aides pushed to protect him from the irate crowds in London during his first state visit, as per a report by the Daily date of Trump's second state visit, and the decision to bar him from the lectern of the British House of Commons, was purely political, according to Whitehall sources who previously told The was because Labour MPs threatened to leave the green benches in protest, and organizers were afraid of television footage showing a half-empty chamber and the blimp to the Financial Times, Darroch, who oversaw protocol discussions for Trump's 2019 trip, now suggested that the president of the United States was aware that not much had changed from the first time, when White House planners urged him to avoid parliament and permit virtually no public interaction."That made them very happy," he said. They didn't mention that he desired to meet his devoted British audience. They were constantly aware of the possibility of humiliation, unfriendly crowds, or low attendance. Regarding Trump's first visit, he continued, "We were concerned about protesters with their enormous Trump-shaped balloon."Although a White House official previously told the Daily Beast that Trump's speech to parliament was "never expected or even discussed" this time, Darroch's remarks give some color to the recently revealed itinerary for his second state visit to Britain, which is scheduled for September 17– being denied the parliamentary address that Trump's political rivals, such as Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and Emmanuel Macron, enjoyed, the trip will make Trump the first American leader to be granted two state visits, according to reports on a clever move, lawmakers will not have to debate whether the divisive world leader deserves the honor again because Westminster will be in recess during Trump's second to Darroch's 2019 leak of classified cables labeling Trump "inept," U.K. officials had alerted their counterparts to the possibility of protests in central London. During that previous visit, footage of the 20-foot "Trump Baby" blimp hovering over Whitehall became the most memorable time, a state banquet with King Charles III and an itinerary limited to Windsor are intended to give Trump the royal opulence he desires without resorting to the street theater he despises, as public opinion of Trump in the United Kingdom has not changed will meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who in February personally delivered Charles's invitation to the White House. According to a Friday Telegraph story, Downing Street is still rearranging schedules to meet with Starmer during what officials emphasize will be a deliberately low-key order to prevent new flashpoints, insiders have told the FT that an earlier side trip to his Scottish golf courses will remain "semi-private."Organizers were concerned about a backlash from lawmakers and protesters, particularly after Labour MPs threatened to boycott. The Commons will also be in recess, preventing any will attend a royal banquet with King Charles in Windsor and meet with Prime Minister Starmer. Public appearances are kept to a minimum.
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
Thousands Of Afghans, Who Worked With Forces, Secretly Resettled In UK
London: Thousands of Afghans, including many who worked with British forces, have been secretly resettled in after a leak of data on their identities raised fears that the could target them, the British government revealed Tuesday. The government said it is closing the program, which a rare court order had barred the media from disclosing. "To all those whose information was compromised, I offer a sincere apology today," Defense Secretary John Healey said in the House of Commons. He said he regretted the secrecy and "have felt deeply concerned about the lack of transparency to Parliament and the public." Healey told lawmakers that a spreadsheet containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 people who had applied to come to Britain after the Taliban takeover of was accidentally released in 2022 because of a defense official's email error. The government only became aware of the leak when some of the data was published on Facebook 18 months later. The then-Conservative government sought a court order barring disclosure of the leak, in an attempt to prevent the personal information being made public any further. The High Court issued an order known as a super injunction that barred anyone from revealing its existence. The government then set up a secret program to resettle the Afghans judged to be at greatest threat from the country's Taliban rulers. The injunction was lifted on Tuesday in conjunction with a decision by Britain's current Labour Party government to make the program public. It said an independent review had found little evidence that the leaked data would expose Afghans to a greater risk of retribution from the Taliban. The review said the Taliban had other sources of information on those who had worked with the previous Afghan government and international forces, and in any case was more concerned with curent threats to its authority. Some 4,500 Afghans - 900 applicants and approximately 3,600 family members - have been brought to Britain under the program, and about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the time it closes, at a total cost of about 850 million pounds ($1.1 billion). Around 36,000 Afghans have been relocated to the U.K. under other resettlement routes since 2021. Critics say that still leaves thousands of people who helped British troops as interpreters or in other roles at risk of torture, imprisonment or death. Sean Humber, a lawyer at the firm Leigh Day, which has represented many Afghan claimants, said the "catastrophic" data breach had caused "anxiety, fear and distress" to those affected. Nooralhaq Nasimi, founder of the U.K.'s Afghanistan and Central Asian Association, said "thousands of Afghans who supported the U.K. mission - many of whom placed their trust in this country - have had that trust gravely betrayed." He urged the government to "offer meaningful compensation, and take urgent steps to protect those still at risk." British soldiers were sent to Afghanistan as part of an international deployment against al-Qaida and Taliban forces in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. At the peak of the operation, there were almost 10,000 U.K. troops in the country, mostly in Helmand province in the south. Britain ended combat operations in 2014, and its remaining troops left Afghanistan in 2021 as the Taliban swept back to power, two decades after they were ousted. The Taliban's return triggered chaotic scenes as Western nations rushed to evacuate citizens and Afghan employees. Super injunctions are relatively rare, and their use is controversial. Unlike regular court injunctions, super injunctions bar reporting that they were even ordered. The handful of cases in which they have come to light involved celebrities trying to prevent disclosures about their private lives. This is the first known case of a super injunction being granted to the government. Healey said he was not aware of any others. Judge Martin Chamberlain, who ruled that the injunction should be lifted, said Tuesday at the High Court that the gag order had "given rise to serious free speech concerns." "The super injunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability, which operate in a democracy," he said. "This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump worried about embarrassing and massive protest on UK state visit - itinerary changed, here's what's planned
What does Donald Trump's revised UK itinerary look like? Live Events Are protests still expected during the visit? FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump's second UK state visit has been scaled back amid concerns over protests and negative optics. To avoid big protests and public embarrassment, British and American officials have worked behind the scenes to make the schedule more efficient, with a focus on Windsor instead of won't give a speech in Parliament or go to public events. Instead, he will go to a royal banquet in Windsor and meet with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The goal of the trip is to avoid having more street protests and problems like those that have happened to Britain's former Washington envoy Sir Kim Darroch, Donald Trump's aides pushed to protect him from the irate crowds in London during his first state visit, as per a report by the Daily date of Trump's second state visit, and the decision to bar him from the lectern of the British House of Commons, was purely political, according to Whitehall sources who previously told The was because Labour MPs threatened to leave the green benches in protest, and organizers were afraid of television footage showing a half-empty chamber and the blimp to the Financial Times, Darroch, who oversaw protocol discussions for Trump's 2019 trip, now suggested that the president of the United States was aware that not much had changed from the first time, when White House planners urged him to avoid parliament and permit virtually no public interaction."That made them very happy," he said. They didn't mention that he desired to meet his devoted British audience. They were constantly aware of the possibility of humiliation, unfriendly crowds, or low attendance. Regarding Trump's first visit, he continued, "We were concerned about protesters with their enormous Trump-shaped balloon."Although a White House official previously told the Daily Beast that Trump's speech to parliament was "never expected or even discussed" this time, Darroch's remarks give some color to the recently revealed itinerary for his second state visit to Britain, which is scheduled for September 17– being denied the parliamentary address that Trump's political rivals, such as Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and Emmanuel Macron, enjoyed, the trip will make Trump the first American leader to be granted two state visits, according to reports on a clever move, lawmakers will not have to debate whether the divisive world leader deserves the honor again because Westminster will be in recess during Trump's second to Darroch's 2019 leak of classified cables labeling Trump "inept," U.K. officials had alerted their counterparts to the possibility of protests in central London. During that previous visit, footage of the 20-foot "Trump Baby" blimp hovering over Whitehall became the most memorable time, a state banquet with King Charles III and an itinerary limited to Windsor are intended to give Trump the royal opulence he desires without resorting to the street theater he despises, as public opinion of Trump in the United Kingdom has not changed will meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who in February personally delivered Charles's invitation to the White House. According to a Friday Telegraph story, Downing Street is still rearranging schedules to meet with Starmer during what officials emphasize will be a deliberately low-key order to prevent new flashpoints, insiders have told the FT that an earlier side trip to his Scottish golf courses will remain "semi-private."Organizers were concerned about a backlash from lawmakers and protesters, particularly after Labour MPs threatened to boycott. The Commons will also be in recess, preventing any will attend a royal banquet with King Charles in Windsor and meet with Prime Minister Starmer. Public appearances are kept to a minimum.
