Australia says it cancelled Kanye West's visa over 'Heil Hitler' song
SYDNEY (Reuters) -Kanye West, also known as Ye, has had his Australian visa cancelled after he released 'Heil Hitler', a song promoting Nazism, the country's home affairs minister said on Wednesday.
The U.S. rapper released the song that praised the Nazi leader Adolf Hitler across social media and music streaming platforms in May this year.
The song came a few months after West made a string of antisemitic posts on X, which included comments such as "I love Hitler" and "I'm a Nazi".
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said that while previous offensive comments made by West had not affected his visa status, officials 'looked at it again' after the song's release.
'It was a lower level (visa) and the officials still looked at the law and said you're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism, we don't need that in Australia," he told national broadcaster ABC on Wednesday.
"We have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry."
Burke added that West had family in Australia and had been a longtime visitor prior to the visa cancellation. The singer married his wife Bianca Censori, an Australian architect, in December 2022.
Burke's office declined to comment on the exact date of the visa cancellation. West's management did not respond immediately to a request for comment outside U.S. business hours.
In October 2024, U.S. conservative influencer Candace Owens was also barred from entry into Australia. Burke said 'Australia's national interest is best served when Candace Owens is somewhere else'.
(Reporting by Christine Chen in Sydney; Editing by Kate Mayberry)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Oil prices jump 3pct as Iran suspends cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog
NEW YORK: Oil prices rose 3 per cent on Wednesday as Iran suspended cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog and the US and Vietnam reached a trade deal, but a surprise build in US crude supplies limited price gains somewhat. Brent crude settled US$2.00 higher, or 3 per cent, to US$69.11 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate crude gained US$2.00, or 3.1 per cent, to US$67.45 a barrel. Brent has traded between a high of US$69.21 a barrel and low of US$66.34 since June 25, as concerns of supply disruptions in the Middle East have ebbed following a ceasefire between Iran and Israel. Iran enacted a law stipulating any future inspection of its nuclear sites by the International Atomic Energy Agency will need approval by Tehran's Supreme National Security Council. The country has accused the agency of siding with Western countries and providing a justification for Israel's air strikes. "The market is pricing in some geopolitical risk premium from Iran's move on the IAEA," said Giovanni Staunovo, a commodity analyst at UBS. "But this is about sentiment, there are no disruptions to oil." Prices also gained after President Donald Trump and Vietnamese state media said the US and Vietnam had struck a trade agreement that sets 20 per cent tariffs on many of the Southeast Asian country's exports following last-minute negotiations. "Risk appetite appears emboldened by an apparent tariff deal between the US and Vietnam today," analysts at energy advisory firm Ritterbusch and Associates said in a note. Prices pared gains earlier in the session after the US Energy Information Administration said domestic crude inventories rose by 3.8 million barrels to 419 million barrels last week Analysts in a Reuters poll had expected a drawdown of 1.8 million barrels. Gasoline demand dropped to 8.6 million barrels per day, prompting concerns about consumption in the peak summer driving season. "During summer time, 9 million (bpd) is basically the line in the sand to define a healthy market," said Bob Yawger, director of energy futures at Mizuho. "We're now well below that. That's not a good sign." Meanwhile, planned supply increases by OPEC+, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies including Russia, appeared priced in and were unlikely to catch markets off-guard again imminently, said Priyanka Sachdeva, senior market analyst at brokerage Phillip Nova. Four OPEC+ sources told Reuters last week the group plans to raise output by 411,000 bpd next month when it meets on July 6, a similar amount to the hikes agreed for May, June and July. Saudi Arabia lifted shipments in June by 450,000 bpd from May, according to data from Kpler, its biggest increase in more than a year. However, overall OPEC+ exports are relatively flat to slightly down since March, Staunovo said. He expects this trend to persist over the summer as hot weather drives higher energy demand. The release of the key US monthly employment report on Thursday will shape expectations around the depth and timing of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve in the second half of this year, said Tony Sycamore, an analyst at IG. Lower interest rates could spur economic activity, which would in turn boost oil demand. (Reporting by Stephanie Kelly in New York; additional reporting by Laila Kearney in New York, Anna Hirtenstein in London, Sudarshan Varadhan and Trixie Yap in Singapore; Editing by Rachna Uppal, David Evans and Paul Simao)
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Iranian nuclear program degraded by up to two years, Pentagon says
A graphic showing Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant is seen in this phtograph released by the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 26, 2025. U.S. Department of Defense/Handout via REUTERS THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Pentagon said on Wednesday that U.S. strikes 10 days ago had degraded Iran's nuclear program by up to two years, suggesting the U.S. military operation likely achieved its goals despite a far more cautious initial assessment that leaked to the public. Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, offered the figure at a briefing to reporters, adding that the official estimate was "probably closer to two years." Parnell did not provide evidence to back up his assessment. "We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department (of Defense) assess that," Parnell told a news briefing. U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22 using more than a dozen 30,000-pound (13,600-kg) bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles. The evolving U.S. intelligence about the impact of the strikes is being closely watched, after President Donald Trump said almost immediately after they took place that Iran's program had been obliterated, language echoed by Parnell at Wednesday's briefing. Such conclusions often take the U.S. intelligence community weeks or more to determine. "All of the intelligence that we've seen (has) led us to believe that Iran's -- those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated," Parnell said. Over the weekend, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months, raising doubts about how effective U.S. strikes to destroy Tehran's nuclear program have been. Several experts have also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes and could be hiding it. But U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said last week he was unaware of intelligence suggesting Iran had moved its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes. A preliminary assessment last week from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggested that the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by months. But Trump administration officials said that assessment was low confidence and had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged. According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage. "No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged," Araqchi said in the interview broadcast by CBS News on Tuesday. (Reporting by Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
CIA review finds flaws but does not dispute finding Putin sought to sway 2016 vote to Trump
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A CIA review released on Wednesday found flaws in the production of a U.S. intelligence assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to sway the 2016 U.S. presidential vote to Donald Trump, but it did not contest that conclusion. The review "does not dispute the quality and credibility" of a highly classified CIA report that the assessment's authors relied on to reach that conclusion, it said. But the review questioned the "high confidence" level that the CIA and FBI assigned the conclusion. It should have instead been given the "moderate confidence" rating reached by the communications-monitoring U.S. National Security Agency, the review said. Trump, who has a history of quarreling with U.S. intelligence analyses, has previously rejected that intelligence assessment, which was made public in an unclassified version in January 2017. After a November 2017 meeting with Putin, he said that he believed the Russian leader's election meddling denials. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, a former congressman who served as director of national intelligence in Trump's first term, ordered the review and its "lessons learned" section "to promote analytic objectivity and transparency," said a CIA statement. The CIA's Directorate of Analysis, which conducted the review, "identified multiple procedural anomalies" in how the December 2016 classified assessment of Russian election interference was prepared. They included "a highly compressed timeline ... and excessive involvement of agency heads" and "led to departures from standard practices in the drafting, coordination, and reviewing" of the report, it said. "These departures impeded efforts to apply rigorous tradecraft, particularly to the assessment's most contentious judgment," it continued. The review, however, did not overturn the judgment that Putin employed a disinformation and cyber campaign to sway the 2016 vote to Trump over his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton. A 2018 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report reached the same conclusion. (Reporting by Jonathan Landay; Editing by Don Durfee and Chizu Nomiyama)
