
Fed's Hammack sees more runway for Fed balance sheet cuts
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Conditions still support ongoing reductions in the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack said on Wednesday, as she also noted that amid great uncertainty now is not the time to change monetary policy."This is not a good time to be preemptive" with monetary policy, she said, adding that now is a time to be patient and see how the data come in before acting on interest rates.Hammack, at a meeting of the Money Marketeers of New York University, spoke at length on her views on the Fed's balance sheet."We still appear to have more than enough reserves in the system so that active management isn't needed," Hammack said.With more room to run on shrinking Fed holdings - the process widely referred to as quantitative tightening , or QT - Hammack said there are risks for financial stability in keeping Fed holdings too large."To the extent that a large balance sheet with more-than-ample reserves dampens money market volatility , it also promotes risk-taking in financial markets," she said.Hammack said that over time, temporary market interventions by the Fed to manage short-term swings in volatility could be warranted."There may be scenarios in which the Federal Reserve would need to add temporary liquidity," she said. "In that case," she said, "nothing would prevent" the New York Fed "from using its standard tools of open market operations to maintain the fed funds target range even if reserves were ample."The Fed last month decided to substantially slow the ongoing drawdown of its holdings of Treasury and mortgage bonds. Since 2022 the Fed has been allowing bonds it owns to mature and not be replaced. It has twice slowed the pace of that contraction to better allow policymakers to ensure they are not pulling out liquidity too swiftly.Hammack said she supported the slower drawdowns. While there were still enough reserves in the system to press forward, "I expect that by slowing the pace of runoff, we will be able to let the process continue for longer," she said."I interpret this slower pace to emphatically not be a signal of a permanently larger balance sheet than would have been the case without a slowdown."Via QT, the Fed has been withdrawing money it added during the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath. Bond purchases aimed at stabilizing markets and providing stimulus more than doubled the size of Fed holdings to $9 trillion. The contraction process has brought the balance sheet down to $6.8 trillion.It is unclear how far the Fed will be able to shrink its holdings, as it works toward a landscape where there is enough liquidity to allow for normal market volatility and for the Fed to retain firm control over its short-term interest rate target.Fed officials believe the newly reduced pace of drawdown will allow QT to reach its natural endpoint without creating market disruptions.Comments from Hammack ahead of the Fed's March policy meeting suggest she would have preferred another path for the balance sheet. In a February Reuters interview, she noted her desire for a steady QT pace and the use of repo operations to deal with any liquidity needs the market might have around market volatility tied to government efforts to manage its cash.Focus on the Fed balance sheet has been renewed amid high levels of market volatility tied to the twists and turns of President Donald Trump's tariff regime. Stress has been such that some have wondered if the Fed might have to intervene with market-stabilizing bond purchases if trading became truly disordered.Hammack said that markets have appeared orderly amid the high levels of volatility, with investors being able to reposition money. Echoing recent comments from Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, Hammack said, "I think there has to be incredibly high bar for the Fed to step in and say things aren't working. We need to be there" to support markets.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Commodity Talk: 2 reasons why July could be an inflection point for gold. Accumulate, says Augmont's Renisha Chainani
July could be a critical inflection point for gold for two reasons - one is Trump's tariff pause ends and second will be the July FOMC where the US Federal Reserve could signal if it would begin the rate cut cycle, says Renisha Chainani, Head - Research at Augmont . For now, he suggested accumulation on dips around Rs 90,000–Rs 94,000, with a view of holding over the next 12-18 months. Q: Gold has been trading in a range for quite some time and has reclaimed the Rs 1 lakh mark (physical markets). What is the near to medium-term outlook? Gold's outlook in the near to medium term remains constructive. The retrieval of Rs 1 lakh/10g in physical markets is a sign of strength in underlying demand. While prices have consolidated in the past few months alongside mixed global cues, important drivers, such as sticky inflation, central bank buying, and geopolitical tensions, are providing support. Gold could be in new high price test territory if global interest rate cuts come through by H2 2025. A range of Rs 94,000 – 1,05,000 seems plausible in the next 3 – 6 months. Q: While there is no clarity on the contours of the Trump tariff deals US is making with other countries, do you think the real impetus in bullion would come once the July pause ends? Is it time to use dips to accumulate gold? Sure, July could be a critical inflection point. If the US Fed signals that we are about to start a rate cut cycle, then real yields could soften—benefitting gold. Any resolution or escalation in trade or geopolitical tensions can also provide a trigger. For the now, I suggest clients consider accumulating on dips, and ideally the dips around Rs 90,000–Rs 94,000, with a view of holding over the next 12-18 months. Q: What is the bull and bear case for gold and silver in 2025? Bull case: Fed rate cuts and weaker dollar Continued central bank buying Persistent geopolitical risks Rising demand for silver in green tech and EVs Bear case: Rapid decline in inflation may push real yields up Strong equity market rotation out of safe havens Reduced industrial activity may weigh on silver Q: Do you think gold will outperform equities in 2025, and if so, should one increase portfolio allocation? If economic uncertainties persist or recessions hit and the Fed starts lowering in 2025, gold could outperform equities. Equities could remain volatile in 2025, while gold, as an asset class, will bring stability to a portfolio. You should consider an allocation increase to a modest 10-15% from a current 5%. Gold is worth a hedge and upside play on uncertainty. Q. Gold-to-silver ratio is at its highest point—does silver make a more compelling case than gold? Yes definitely, silver does look more attractive on a relative basis. The gold to silver ratio above 85 is historically indicative of silver being undervalued. There are strong long-term tailwinds from solar and vehicles, and industrial recovery has begun. In most scenarios, silver should offer better percentage returns. Under the premise that the bullish macro plays out, silver is riskier, but offers more reward potential. Q: What should be the trading strategy in gold and silver? Gold: Add on dips below Rs 95,000 | Medium target is Rs 1,05,000+. Look to use ETFs or Digital gold for risk-managed exposure. Silver: Buy on correction back towards Rs 95,000/kg. Carry the upside potential as far as Rs 1,20,000/kg in 2025. Traders should ideally be higher-risk traders; staggered buying; trailing-stop losses are an option. Keep in mind, both metals should be considered as part of a wider diversification strategy rather than be considered a short-term trade.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
8th Pay Commission: Payment Regarding 18-Months Frozen DA Arrears During Covid Gets Renewed Hope, Why So?
3 / 7 The staff side of the NC-JCM reiterated its demand for restoration of 18 months of DA/DR arrears to government employees which were frozen during the COVID-19 period. The department informed that as the adverse financial impact of the pandemic in 2020 and the financial welfare measures taken by the government had a fiscal spillover beyond FY 2020-21, arrears of DA/DR were not considered feasible.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
CreditAccess Grameen shares in focus after securing $100 million syndicated loan from Asian banks
Live Events CreditAcces Grameen share price target and performance (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel Shares of CreditAccess Grameen will be in focus on Wednesday after the company raised $100 million through external commercial borrowing from a group of banks across South Asia and the Far syndicated loan facility, structured in dual currencies—Japanese yen and US dollars—was led by Standard Chartered Bank, the company said in a regulatory Grameen is India's largest non-banking financial company focused on microfinance (NBFC-MFI).The facility was initially launched with a base size of $70 million in November 2024 but was later upsized to $100 million, with participation from seven banks, primarily from Korea and proceeds will be used to fund eligible social projects, the company to Trendlyne, the average target price for CreditAccess Grameen is Rs 1,191, suggesting a marginal downside of about 1% from current levels. Of the 16 analysts tracking the stock, most have a 'Buy' the technical front, the stock's Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 59.5—well within the neutral zone (below 30 is oversold, above 70 is overbought). Meanwhile, the MACD is at 20.3 and remains above its centerline and signal line, indicating a bullish stock is currently trading above all key moving averages — including its 5-day, 10-day, 20-day, 30-day, 50-day, 100-day, 150-day, and 200-day simple moving averages (SMAs) — reinforcing the positive of CreditAccess Grameen closed 0.75% lower at Rs 1,196.2 on the BSE in the previous session. The stock is up 34% year-to-date but is down 21% over the past 12 months.: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)