
Need a Job? Who's a Target for Chinese Spies
On February 6, this notice appeared on a Craigslist.org Washington DC job board:
Job Opportunities for Recently Laid-Off US Government Employees
Wavemax Innovation Co, Ltd
The linked advertisement included the following language:
As many dedicated public servants are facing job transitions, we are proud to extend a warm invitation to those affected by recent layoffs to explore exciting new career opportunities with us.
At Wavemax Innovation Co, Ltd, we value the experience, skills, and commitment that government employees bring to the workforce. We are actively seeking talented professionals with backgrounds in project management, research, technology, communications, policy analysis, etc to join our team.
Wavemax Innovation claims to be a Singapore-based company. But according to a May 16 report by Max Lesser, a senior analyst on emerging threats at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), it is likely a dummy company. And it is part of a broader network of websites, LinkedIn pages, and job advertisements from fake consulting and headhunting firms used by Chinese intelligence to target former government employees and artificial intelligence researchers worldwide.
The US National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) recently warned that foreign intelligence services are posing as recruiters and headhunting firms on professional networking platforms to gather information. And it is hardly a problem limited to the United States.
In 2017 German intelligence reported that China used LinkedIn to target at least 10,000 Germans as potential intelligence sources. Thereafter, in 2019 French authorities claimed that more than 4,000 French citizens had been contacted by Chinese operatives via social media. In 2023 British intelligence pegged the number of Britons approached by active Chinese state actors on LinkedIn at 20,000.
The situation in Japan is probably not much different. Consider, for example, that nearly 100,000 Japanese are still living in China, although the social media approach likely differs. Aldrich Ames was a CIA analyst who famously sold US secrets to the Soviet Union and Russia. He was convicted of espionage in 1994. (Public domain image)
One case is that of Kevin Mallory. He was recruited in 2017 by a Chinese intelligence officer posing as a headhunter on LinkedIn. The former CIA officer, who had fallen $230,000 USD into debt and was late on his mortgage, eventually agreed to spy for China. Later, the FBI and National Counterintelligence and Security Center produced a film ( The Nevernight Connection - FBI ) loosely inspired by the Mallory affair. However, it hardly captures the gravity of his crime.
Mallory even gave his Chinese handlers highly classified information about US intelligence officers who were scheduled to go to China. As one of the US attorneys who prosecuted the case put it, "Mallory not only put our country at great risk, but he endangered the lives of specific human assets who put their own safety at risk for our national defense."
The Nevernight Connection is a fictional account about a former US intelligence community official who was targeted by a Chinese agent via a professional networking site. It explains how he was recruited to turn over classified information and ended up arrested. Frankly, the plot is rather ludicrous in some respects. For example, the main character ー despite being a former intelligence agent ー is unaware that a foreigner in China cannot access the worldwide Internet without use of a VPN.
However, the fact that China's intelligence services have targeted thousands of individuals in the US and other Western nations for recruitment using social networking platforms is certainly no laughing matter. Those targeted include current and former officials, business professionals, academics and researchers. Individuals who agree to spy for China are typically paid through overseas bank transfers, frequently through front companies. American businessman Elon Musk headed the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE. (©AP via Kyodo)
According to a report issued by Challenger, Gray & Christmas dated May 1, during the first quarter of 2025, the US Government shed 282,227 jobs. Of those, 281,452 were attributed to DOGE-related cost-cutting. The number was up 680 percent from the same period a year before.
Another 75,000 Federal workers accepted buyouts before the February 12 deadline set by DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency).
Many of the jobs cut were sensitive positions in intelligence, defense or other fields requiring a security clearance. According to the National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC), as of October 2019, over 1.25 million US government employees, contractors and others held top-secret clearances.
There have also been multiple media reports that many employees let go by DOGE did not receive the mandatory security exit briefing. However, that exact number is unknown.
Experts emphasize that the failure to conduct exit briefings for employees with high-level security clearances is a grave concern for counterintelligence efforts. That is because during these debriefings it is emphasized that after leaving government service the employee must not divulge any confidential information and doing so is a violation of the Espionage Act.
Veteran US officials like Mallory or the infamous counterintelligence officer Aldrich Ames who spied for the Soviet Union were willing to sell out their country. Therefore, confused, angry former government employees who suddenly find themselves in dire financial straits could also at least be tempted.
In December 2023, the European Intelligence Academy published a research paper by Nicholas Eftimiades, entitled "China's Espionage Recruitment Motivations: Getting Rid of the MICE." Eftimiades is also the author of the book, Chinese Intelligence Operations .
He explains the traditional motivations of individuals who spy for a foreign power, namely Money, Ideology, Coercion and Ego, summed up in the acronym MICE. However, in the paper, he argues that the traditional motivations of individuals who spy for a foreign power are not sufficient to explain China's "whole of society" approach towards collecting vast amounts of commercial, scientific and national security information for the PRC.
This effort involves several Chinese Communist Party entities, such as the United Work Department. Government ministries, state-owned enterprises and private businesses are also involved. According to Eftimiades "hundreds of thousands of people are available to support these varied intelligence collection efforts."
In the paper, Eftimiades proposes a new acronym to account for several added dimensions of complexity when considering motivational factors in Chinese espionage recruitment efforts. That is BEWARE (Business Opportunities, Ethno-Nationalism, Wealth/Money, Academic Advancement, Repression/Coercion and Emotional Bonds). Chinese American historian Shujan Wang was convicted of espionage for China, but he also explained how he got caught in the recruitment process. (Radio Free Asia YouTube, screenshot)
The "thousand grains of sand" metaphor has also frequently been used to describe how China spies on other countries. It conjures up an image of spymasters in Beijing running a supercomputer that collates and synthesizes all the intelligence that legions of Chinese spies have collected worldwide.
However, that is not how things actually work.
Many different parties with their own distinct motivations are involved. They also have a vast range of collection targets. Those include national secrets, commercial and military technology, academic research, intellectual property and trade secrets.
When the Ministry of State Security (MSS) is involved, its case officers typically try to win the trust and cooperation of individuals targeted for recruitment.
The primary exception is intelligence concerning dissident groups abroad. Those include especially democracy advocates, Falun Gong believers, Taiwan "separatists," Uyghurs and Tibetans. For these individuals, the gloves are off and coercion, appeals to ethno-nationalism and financial rewards are the preferred tools.
Eftimiades warns, "If Western law enforcement, intelligence and security agencies are to meet the current challenge posed by Beijing's massive global intelligence program, they will need to start by better understanding recruitment process and motivations."
That warning includes Japan.
Continues in Part Two: An Offer You Should Definitely Refuse
Author: John Carroll
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Cision Canada
an hour ago
- Cision Canada
Green Fertilizer Made with Air and Plasma: NitroCapt (Sweden) wins $2M Food Planet Prize 2025 for developing low-emission fertilizers
STOCKHOLM, /CNW/ -- The Curt Bergfors Foundation is honored to announce that NitroCapt was awarded the Food Planet Prize, the world's biggest environmental award, on June 13 in Stockholm, Sweden. This recognition highlights their exceptional contributions and potential to disrupt the global nitrogen fertilizer industry. Nitrogen fertilizers are used for 50% of the world's food production and emit as much carbon dioxide as the aviation industry. Sweden-based NitroCapt has developed a novel, energy-efficient process that makes fertilizer through plasma-produced nitrate. NitroCapt's technology could improve access to green fertilizer across the world. In awarding the Prize to NitroCapt, the Food Planet Prize jury Co-Chair Johan Rockström commented: "Through NitroCapt's innovation, nitrogen fertilizer can now be produced by splitting nitrogen from the air with plasma technology simply needing green electricity as input. This technology reduces the use of energy tenfold, can be produced locally, avoids fossil-fuels entirely, while producing a nitrate fertilizer that can improve soil health and may be used sustainably by farmers across the world." Gustaf Forsberg, CEO and Founder of NitroCapt, added: "NitroCapt's mission is to decarbonize the nitrogen fertilizer industry. The current fossil-based process has reached its end point. We can also contribute to increased food production in areas that today have difficulties producing sufficient amounts. We are just about to finalize our industrial-scale pilot, and we have fertilizer in the field, but we're still not at the scale where we want to be. This Prize will be very important for us to bring our technology to the stage where we can start making a difference." About the Food Planet Prize The Curt Bergfors Food Planet Prize was established in Sweden in 2019, in acknowledgement of the perils that our current food systems pose to the health of people and the planet. The Prize supports initiatives that significantly reduce the environmental impact of the way we eat today. Unlike many awards, the Food Planet Prize recognizes initiatives for their potential future impact on the environment rather than past achievements. The Food Planet Prize's international jury consists of 10 leading specialists in complex Food Planet challenges. The jury is co-chaired by Johan Rockström and Magnus Nilsson.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Republican enthusiasm for Musk cools after his feud with Trump
Elon Musk listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) WASHINGTON — Tech billionaire Elon Musk has lost some of his luster with Republicans since his messy public falling-out with President Donald Trump last week, a new survey finds. Fewer Republicans view Trump's onetime government efficiency bulldog 'very favorably' compared with April, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Though most Republicans continue to hold a positive view of Musk, their diminished fervor suggests his vocal opposition to Trump's signature spending and tax cut legislation, and Musk's subsequent online political and personal taunts, may have cost him some enthusiasm within the party. 'Some things have happened lately that have changed how I feel about him a little,' said Alabama Republican Katye Long, whose feelings for Musk have cooled to 'somewhat favorable.' 'I liked what he was doing when he was helping. But now I feel like he's kind of hurting,' said the 34-year-old automotive component factory employee and mother of three from Woodstock, Alabama. 'I also don't feel like he matters that much. He's not actually part of the government. He's just a rich guy who pushes his opinions.' Musk's overall popularity hasn't shifted, the poll found, and most of the shift among Democrats and Republicans was between 'very' and 'somewhat' strong opinions. Americans are less likely to view him favorably than his electric vehicle company, Tesla. That said, about half of Americans have a negative opinion of Tesla, highlighting another challenge for Musk when the company has dropped in value and been the target of protests in the U.S. and Europe. About one-third have a favorable view of Tesla, while about two in 10 don't know enough to say. Republicans' enthusiasm waned, but so did Democrats' antipathy Even a subtle shift in the intensity of Republicans' feelings about Musk could be important as the electric car and aerospace mogul weighs a second political act after spending about US$200 million in service of Trump's 2024 election effort. After decrying the GOP's massive tax and budget policy bill as 'a disgusting abomination,' Musk wrote on X, his social media platform, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The poll suggests the messy feud with Trump may have rubbed some Republicans the wrong way, as the share of Republicans viewing Musk as 'very favorable' has dropped from 38 per cent in April to 26 per cent now. At the same time, antipathy toward Musk among Democrats has waned a little. About two-thirds, 65 per cent, of Democrats have a very negative view of Musk, down slightly from about three-quarters, 74 per cent, in April. Musk's bitter back-and-forth with Trump has business implications, too. Tesla was already struggling with a backlash against Musk's association with Trump. Sales across Europe plunged by half in May, even as growth in the electric car market accelerated. Then the company's shares plunged in value when Musk began sparring publicly with the president. Victoria Brown, of Kansas City, Kansas, rated Tesla 'somewhat unfavorable' because she objects to how Trump is conducting his administration and links the company's owner with the president's agenda. 'I don't favor Trump. So, pretty much the fact that they have been working together means I don't care too much for Tesla,' said Brown, 63, a political independent and an insurance agent. Musk's overall approval remains unchanged While the intensity of people's feelings about Musk may have changed, their overall opinions have not. About one-third of U.S. adults have a favorable opinion of Musk, compared with about six in 10 who hold an unfavorable view, while about one in 10 don't know enough to say. That's unchanged from the April poll. The new poll was conducted from June 5 to 9, after Musk left his government role and began attacking Trump's marquee legislative priority. Musk's public clash with Trump began four days after Trump honored Musk effusively during an Oval Office event discharging him from duties as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. After first tearing down the budget bill, Musk two days later complained he had never seen the language, and he aimed his fire at Trump, suggesting the president didn't sufficiently appreciate the role Musk assumed as the chief benefactor to Trump's reelection effort. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' Musk went on to claim without evidence that the federal government was concealing information about Trump's association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Musk deleted the post, and early Wednesday he stepped back from his attacks on Trump, writing on X that he regretted some of his posts and they 'went too far.' Views of Tesla are far more negative than other car companies Tesla endured a difficult first quarter in 2025, with its sales falling while the world's leading electric car manufacturer faced protests in showrooms. The new poll also shows that Tesla is viewed far more negatively than some of its peers — notably, Ford, Toyota and General Motors. Only about one-third of U.S. adults have a 'very' or 'somewhat' favorable view of Tesla. About half of U.S. adults have an unfavorable opinion of Tesla, including 30% of Republicans. Democrats, at 66%, are more than twice as likely as Republicans to have a negative view of Tesla. But even among Republicans, Tesla is viewed less favorably than the other brands. Marisa Mills is no Musk fan. The 41-year-old teacher from Oakland, California, objects to his association with Trump and what the Democrat sees as their misguided notion that government is always well served by operating like a business. And yet she was once proud to have Tesla building cars in her own county. She soured on the company in 2020, when Musk sued Alameda County over its workplace restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic, before he moved the company to Texas in 2021. 'My government is supposed to serve the people, not his company. We were all glad to see him go,' Mills said. 'I do regret that we now have feelings of regret for the Tesla car product. We were once so proud.' ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. Thomas Beaumont And Linley Sanders, The Associated Press
Montreal Gazette
an hour ago
- Montreal Gazette
As Trump turns U.S. inward, Quebec is missing chance to attract international students, study says
Applications from international students to Quebec universities dropped by 46 per cent for 2025-26 — a decline a new study links to recent restrictions it calls ill-timed, warning the province is missing a chance to attract talent deterred by U.S. policies under Donald Trump. Students from other countries are essential to the 'vitality and viability' of Quebec's universities and play a major role in the province's economy, spending $4.2 billion and supporting 48,000 jobs annually, according to the study by the consulting firm Volume 10. Since 2020, there have been 10 changes to international student admission policies in Quebec, according to the report, titled Knowledge Without Borders. The most recent involved major cuts to international admissions. 'The repeated changes to the system regulating international students, both in Quebec and Canada, have created confusion in student networks,' the study said. 'In a context where word of mouth plays a central role, this uncertainty is detrimental to Quebec's image at a time when global competition is becoming more intense.' In addition, Quebec's English universities complain that the Legault government has alienated many potential international recruits by suggesting non-Quebec students who don't speak French are a major threat to the province's majority language. There are 57,000 international students in Quebec universities, making up 17 per cent of the student population. These students 'help keep many programs, weakened by demographic stagnation, afloat,' the study said. 'Their presence is especially decisive at the graduate — mainly doctoral — level, where international students represent almost half of all PhD students in Quebec. These students contribute to research in strategic fields such as artificial intelligence, engineering, and health sciences.' In areas such as engineering and engineering technology, international students make up 72 per cent of those pursuing Master's and doctoral degrees. In mathematics, computer science, and information science, they account for more than half of graduate students. 'There just aren't enough Quebecers pursuing graduate studies in science,' Rémi Quirion, Quebec's chief scientist, told the study's authors. 'When I was a researcher, my lab would never have achieved such international success without the work of international students.' Quirion, a former vice-dean in the faculty of medicine at McGill University, advises the Quebec government on science issues and promotes Quebec research in Canada and around the world. International students cost a lot less to educate if you account for the fact that their pre-university studies were undertaken elsewhere. The Quebec and Canadian governments spend $337,000 to take young people from birth through CEGEP, the study said. That expense is not required for students brought up elsewhere. Upon graduation, about 31 per cent of international students remain in Quebec. 'Among those who choose to stay, 86.6 per cent quickly integrate into the job market,' the study found. 'Those who leave become scientific, economic, and cultural intermediaries for Quebec on the world stage. In both cases, international students contribute to the growth of Quebec's economy and the expansion of international markets.' The study suggests Quebec can benefit from turmoil in the research and university sectors in the U.S. since Trump began his second term as president in January. His administration has cut the budgets of major government agencies, restricted research funding in some scientific sectors and blocked specialists from some countries from entering the U.S. 'This hostile climate has made researchers and academics question their future in the U.S., creating a brain drain other countries are working hard to capitalize on,' the study said. 'For Quebec, this is a unique opportunity to show the world that it is a destination of choice for the brightest scientific minds.' The study was sponsored by several major Quebec foundations.