The New Partisan Divide Is Old Gen Z vs. Young Gen Z
New data out of
Yale's Youth Poll
broke the internet last week when it revealed a partisan split within Gen Z. Given a generic Democrat vs. Republican ballot for 2026, respondents ages 18-21 supported Republicans by nearly 12 points, while those ages 22-29 backed Democrats by about 6 points.
It was a stunning gap that undermined the longstanding notion of younger voters always trending more liberal. On the contrary, today's youngest eligible voters are more conservative than their older counterparts: According to the poll, they are less likely to support transgender athletes participating in sports, less likely to support sending aid to Ukraine and more likely to approve of President Donald Trump. Fifty-one percent of younger Gen Zers view him favorably, compared to 46 percent of older Gen Z.
That split might seem surprising, but it's only the latest example of an emerging dynamic I've noticed developing over the last few years: It's increasingly clear that there are actually two different Gen Z's, each with a particular political worldview.
Since just after the 2022 midterm elections, I've held listening sessions — open-forums for discussion — with teens and young adults across the country to find out how young people think and feel about politics. I've traveled to high school and college campuses, community centers and even homes. And
as I've written before
, these conversations with young people illuminated the distinctions between Gen Z 1.0 and Gen Z 2.0.
Gen Z 1.0, the older segment, graduated high school and tasted independence prior to the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. Their coming of age coincided with Trump's first term in office and the rise of anti-Trump resistance movements for racial justice and gender equity. Social media apps like Instagram and Snapchat, with all their filters and made-for-social media aesthetics, were commonplace — but TikTok wasn't yet the massively popular platform it is today.
Fast forward to 2020 through today, and those in Gen Z 2.0 came of age under different circumstances. They graduated high school during or after the start of the pandemic, which disrupted their K-12 experience. When many in this cohort began college, it was largely on Zoom, or in a campus environment that barely resembled pre-pandemic times. The political situation was also starkly different: With President Joe Biden in office, Trump and his MAGA movement felt like the counterculture — especially for young men, who swung hard to the right.
Indeed, gender played a prominent role in shaping the youth vote in 2024. An analysis by Blue Rose Research found a 20-point gender gap in Democratic support between men and women ages 25 and younger — the largest such gender gap in any generation by far. 'It's normal to see women supporting Democratic candidates at like a five- to 10-point higher rate than men do,' said Ali Mortell, Blue Rose's research director. 'Among the youngest cohort of Gen Z, it's north of 20 points. So this is really jarring, and I think, caught the Democratic Party somewhat flat-footed.'
That gender gap has attracted a lot of media attention, but the headlines gloss over some important nuances. While young men turbo-charged Trump's success in November, they're not the only Gen Zers shifting right. Despite the overall gender gap, the Yale poll found that, while women ages 22-29 have a net-negative favorability of Trump, those ages
18-21 are more supportive of him
, roughly split between a favorable and unfavorable view of the president. Young white women in particular are trending more conservative. Data from Tufts University's Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) shows that, while women of color ages 18-29 overwhelmingly supported former Vice President Kamala Harris,
young white women were split between Harris and Trump
, 49 percent to 49 percent. That's a huge jump from 2020, when, according to CIRCLE's data, young white women voted for President Joe Biden over Trump by a 15-point margin.
That could be in part because some of the most formative experiences separating Gen Z 1.0 and 2.0 cut across gender — the most obvious being the pandemic. 'We've definitely been cognizant that there feels like there's a change between the kids who got through high school before and after Covid,' said Jack Dozier, the 19-year-old deputy director of the Yale survey. 'There is a huge variation that came up between just the college-age young adults, and then the young adults who are over 22.'
In my own research, I started to hear about Covid's impact in conversations with young Americans in 2022. Throughout history, young people haven't liked being told what to do, and for many younger Gen Zers, the pandemic restrictions chafed against their youthful discomfort with authority. At first, they expressed annoyance with what they saw as prolonged social distancing on campuses that impacted the student experience. As one 20-year-old told me in a listening session at the end of March: 'The adults don't have it all together, and they don't have my back.' When students finally went back to school, they complained about the policing of their behavior — not just regarding Covid protections like social distancing and masking, but also broader issues around language. Our national online discourse, these young people said, had adopted an overt political correctness and cancel culture – the tendency, particularly in online spaces, to denounce others for controversial statements or action. Many young people perceived this as promoted by Democrats — those in control, not just in D.C., but in pop-culture and on social media.
As recently as late March, I checked in with a number of Gen Zers to see how they felt about cancel culture. Asked if it has been a net-positive or net-negative for American politics,
young adults told me
that, while there should be some social practice to hold people accountable for their words and actions, cancel culture limits freedom of speech and has the potential to radicalize those with already controversial opinions.
Beyond the impact of the pandemic on these younger Gen Zers, Dozier said the schism within Gen Z might stem from how young those in Gen Z 2.0 were during Trump's first term in office.
'In Trump's first presidency, these 18-year-olds were only nine or 10 years old, at least when the campaign started,' he said. 'We found that there's a potential causality from the reasoning that these 18- to 21-year-olds just don't quite remember the impacts of the first Trump presidency, whether that be in global isolationism or in a change in American politics.' Put simply, older Gen Zers had a sense of what they were getting themselves into by voting for Trump; younger ones didn't.
Meanwhile, news consumption has dramatically changed over the last few years. Dozier called the online landscape for Gen Z 1.0 and 2.0 'a whole different world of media.' Similarly, Ali Mortell, the director of research at the Democratic Blue Rose Research, credited Gen Z's rightward movement to a 'radical shift in the digital media environment,' adding that 'TikTok has exploded as a platform.'
While TikTok was around during the 2020 election, it really gained in popularity over the past five years and has become a go-to source for news and politics for young voters especially. When I conduct listening sessions with members of Gen Z, I ask where they get their news. TikTok is always at the top of the list. And while its mysterious algorithm feeds users' varying content, on the whole,
an internal review of the platform ahead of the 2024 election
found twice as many posts in support of Trump as those in support of Biden, signaling a mood shift on the app frequented by young voters.
'Young people are not only consuming digital media content, non-traditional sources at much higher rates than older generations, but they're increasingly getting their news from non-political, non-traditional sources,' Mortell told me. But she took it one step farther: 'We are seeing this very clear relationship between defection away from the Democratic Party and TikTok consumption.'
The rapid onset of TikTok encapsulates the head-spinning pace of change younger Gen Zers have experienced. There are cleavages within every generation, but perhaps none more so than Gen Z, which has grown up amid the fastest speed of technological and political change in recent memory. When it comes to their politics, time will tell if the rightward shift sticks. Until then, anyone trying to understand this generation's politics will need to figure out just which Gen Z they're asking about.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Breaking down Craigslist ad seeking seat fillers on day of Trump's DC parade
On June 11, 2025, a screenshot of an alleged Craigslist advertisement seeking "seat fillers" for an event in Washington, D.C., on June 14, 2025 — the same day as a military parade on U.S. President Donald Trump's birthday — began to make the rounds on social media. The purported ad read, in part: T-Mellon Events is looking for seat fillers and extras to provide their time for space maximization and attendance perception for an event taking place in Washington DC on June 14th. Extras and Seat fillers will check in on the morning of June 14th at 9:00 a.m. Extras are required to wear Red, White and Blue clothing and will be provided a RED hat to wear. GOLD accessories are acceptable as well. The team will advise the extras where to stand or sit according to the line of sight from a VIP viewing platform area. Extras and Seat fillers will be paid a flat daily fee and will be provided a lunch of fast food and encourage people of color and ethnic groups to sign up for maximum perception control and these individuals will be prominently displayed on the televised broadcast and local viewing screens to be seen by the VIP platform. It also listed compensation as a "flat fee of $1,000 paid in cryptocurrency - Provided by FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT LLC." One X post (archived) that shared the alleged advertisement garnered more than 1 million views and 28,000 likes as of this writing: Posts about the Craigslist ad seeking seat fillers also gained traction on TikTok (archived) and Facebook (archived). Dozens of Snopes readers emailed us and searched our website to ask if the Craigslist ad was real. The ad itself was real and was posted on Craigslist (archived) on June 10, 2025. Snopes was unable to definitively confirm whether the ad was a prank or posted by someone from Trump's camp, which is why we've left this claim unrated. However, several elements of the ad suggest it may have been intended as a joke. First, the company mentioned in the advertisement was listed as T-Mellon Events. Searches for "T-Mellon Events" on Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo and Yahoo did not return any results directing us to the supposed company. Instead, they showed news articles and social media posts about the Craigslist ad. The alleged company name could be a reference to billionaire and Trump megadonor Timothy Mellon, heir to Pittsburgh's Mellon banking family. Snopes also looked into the photo in the ad and found it wasn't taken in the United States. Using RevEye, a reverse image search tool, we found the original image shared by The Associated Press on May 9, 2025, captioned, "Russian servicemen attend the Victory Day military parade in Moscow, Russia, Friday, May 9, 2025, during celebrations of the 80th anniversary of the Soviet Union's victory over Nazi Germany during the World War II." The ad also said participants would receive a flat fee of $1,000 paid in cryptocurrency, which could be poking fun at Trump's crypto-related ventures. Fight Fight Fight LLC, the company listed in the ad as providing payment to seat fillers, administers Trump's meme coin. A customer support representative for the meme coin's website, told Snopes via an emailed statement: "It's fake, we have nothing to do with it." Snopes reached out to the White House and Craigslist for comment on the ad's authenticity, and will update this story if we receive a response. We also emailed an address associated with the ad and await a response. Social media posts that call out supposed Craigslist ads soliciting paid actors frequently pop up before events connected to Trump. Snopes investigated a Craigslist ad that offered to pay "minority actors" to hold signs at a Trump rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in June 2020, and another soliciting actors to play Trump supporters in Phoenix in November 2019. For further reading, Snopes also looked into claims that a Craigslist ad proves the 2025 anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles were orchestrated. "Seat Fillers Needed - June 14th - Constitution Avenue - DC - Talent Gigs - Craigslist." Craigslist, 10 June 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Debusmann Jr, Bernd. "Who Is Donald Trump's Reclusive New Mega-Donor, Timothy Mellon?" 21 June 2024, Accessed 12 June 2025. "AP PHOTOS: Russia's Victory Day Parade Begins." AP News, 9 May 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Weissert, Will, and Alan Suderman. "Trump Hosts Dinner for $TRUMP Meme Coin Investors, Raising Ethical Concerns." AP News, 22 May 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Khalili, Joel. "Trumpworld Is Fighting over 'Official' Crypto Wallet." WIRED, 4 June 2025, Accessed 12 June 2025. Ibrahim, Nur. "Did a Craigslist Ad Seek 'Minority Actors' for Trump's Tulsa Rally?" Snopes, 15 June 2020, Accessed 12 June 2025. Huberman, Bond. "Did a CraigsList Ad Seek Actors to Play Trump Supporters in Phoenix?" Snopes, 22 Nov. 2019, Accessed 12 June 2025. June 12, 2025: This story was updated to include comment from Fight Fight Fight LLC.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paramount-CBS And Trump Legal Teams Say They Are In 'Continued Mediation' To Settle '60 Minutes' Lawsuit, Ask Judge To Extend Some Filing Deadlines
The CBS-Paramount Global legal team and representatives for Donald Trump said that they were in 'continued mediation' to settle the president's $20 billion lawsuit against the network over the way that a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris was edited. The update came in a new filing in federal court in Texas in Friday, as the sides asked the judge for an extension of deadlines in filing motions to compel and responses. More from Deadline Networks Return To Special Reports On Iran's Retaliatory Strikes On Israel - Update Taylor Tomlinson Says Goodbye To 'After Midnight', Wishes CBS Had Replaced Her 2025 Premiere Dates For New & Returning Series On Broadcast, Cable & Streaming Trump claimed that CBS was deceptive in the way that the Harris interview was edited, as she was shown giving a different answer to the same question on the 60 Minutes broadcast in October than one shown on a Face the Nation preview the day before. CBS has maintained that there was no deception and, in standard industry practice, one part of her answer was shown on Face the Nation and the other on 60 Minutes, due to time constraints. Trump sued the network under Texas' Deceptive Trade Practices Act and the Lanham Act, typically used in cases of false advertising. The president claims that the interview cost his media entities, including Truth Social, an audience that was diverted to 60 Minutes. A number of legal experts see the lawsuit as meritless, but CBS parent Paramount Global is seeking administration approval for its merger with Skydance Media. Paramount-CBS has offered millions to settle the case, in what has been described to Deadline as an 'eight-figure discussion.' The Wall Street Journal reported that Paramount offered $15 million, but Trump's team is seeking $25 million and apology. There also has been speculation that a settlement could go even higher. The settlement talks have created consternation within the news division. Last week, in an interview with CNN, 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley said that a settlement and apology would be 'very damaging' to the reputation of CBS and Paramount. The legal teams told the judge that they are not asking him to extend a June 23 deadline for CBS to file a response to Trump's opposition to their motion to dismiss the case. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Nevada traffic ticket laws to go into effect
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Nevada lawmakers unanimously passed and Gov. Joe Lombardo signed a proposal to amend the state's traffic-ticket system. Senate Bill 359, which will become law Oct. 1, gives courts flexibility to reduce the amount a driver needs to pay upfront. Courts interpreted the current law as a driver having to pay the full amount of a ticket before a hearing. The 8 News Now Investigators first looked into the issue this spring when a retiree had to pay her $417 ticket in full before her court hearing. Before Senate Bill 359, Nevada law required her to pay the fine in full — whether she wanted to fight the ticket or not. Since 2021, Nevada lawmakers, both Democrats and Republicans, have changed most traffic infractions, like a speeding ticket, to be a civil infraction, not a criminal one. That means tickets no longer carry the threat of jail time, and missed court appearances do not really matter in the long run since the court may already have your money. Democratic State Sen. Melanie Scheible sponsored the change, which passed unanimously. The governor signed it last week. In addition, changes written in Senate Bill 359 now combine civil and criminal infractions — minor speeding offenses versus driving without a license — and allow a judge to deal with both in one hearing. The new law also gives judges more discretion, not a 'presumption in favor' to reduce a traffic ticket to a nonmoving violation should the driver pay all their fines and have a good driving record. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.