Uber drivers are now more concerned about charging than EV cost
Advertisement
Uber does have an ace up its sleeve in mitigating this issue. Last year, the company hired Rebecca Tinucci, the former head of charging infrastructure at Tesla Inc., to oversee its electrification efforts. Nine months into the job, she's brokered a partnership the company expects will improve charging access for 55,000 drivers in London, Boston, and Phoenix, and is rolling out a tool to help 40 cities decide on where to locate their next public plugs.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'We've got to get to work,' Tinucci said in an interview. 'As comfortable as I am in the charging space, I fully recognize how difficult it is to do charging well.'
Uber is partnering with London, Boston and Phoenix as part of C40 Cities, a group affiliated with Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority owner of Bloomberg News parent Bloomberg LP.
Advertisement
In addition to contributing technical support, research and policy advocacy to those three cities, the company is launching what it calls an Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Estimator tool that will project future demand for EV charging from Uber drivers. The company is rolling out the service to cities covering almost 60 percent of EV drivers on the Uber platform.
The tool is more than just in Uber's self-interest.
The name of the game for charging-station operators is driving high utilization. Drivers doing pickups and drop-offs around the clock are just the sort of customer operators are looking for.
'There's an incredible base of demand there that we at Uber should be able to rally in support of developing more infrastructure,' Tinucci said.
Uber already has seen this play out.
Three years ago, the company invested £5 million ($6.73 million) toward installing 700 EV chargers across north and east London. Its chargers in the borough of Newham are being used at more than twice the national average rate.
'The challenge at Tesla was kind of single-focused around Tesla vehicles,' Tinucci said of her previous role. 'What brought me to Uber was the potential for impact. We have the largest EV fleet in the world, and we're just getting started.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
20 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Peter Thiel Says Elon Musk Doesn't Understand His Own Robot Revolution
Far-right tech investor Peter Thiel sat down for an interview with the New York Times' Ross Douthat and talked about the billionaire's recent political escapades and the future of humanity. Thiel also discussed his thoughts on the Antichrist, a topic that the Times chose to highlight, giving the written version of the interview the salacious headline, 'Peter Thiel and the Antichrist.' But it was Thiel's thoughts on his friend Elon Musk that were arguably the most illuminating for those of us interested in the current collision of politics, business, and tech—especially since Thiel suggested Musk doesn't actually believe in a lot of what he's saying. Either that, or Musk just isn't very bright, another possibility Thiel subtly suggested was on the table. Ever since Musk debuted his 'robot' in 2021, which was actually just a person in a robot costume, the Tesla CEO has been hyping the idea that everyone would eventually have a personal humanoid robot in their home. In fact, Musk thinks these robots will be so popular that there will be a billion of them in the U.S. within 10 years. But Thiel believes that if that's actually going to happen, Musk is worrying about the wrong things when it comes to his politics. Musk is obsessed with budget deficits and has held up America's debt as one of the main reasons he supported Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, tossing at least a quarter of a billion dollars into the race. Well, there was the debt and Musk's other passion projects, like demonizing trans people and immigrants. But the debt was definitely a high priority for Musk. Thiel told the New York Times he thought that if Musk really believed in his robot revolution, the deficit would take care of itself. I had a conversation with Elon a few weeks ago about this. He said we're going to have a billion humanoid robots in the U.S. in 10 years. And I said: Well, if that's true, you don't need to worry about the budget deficits because we're going to have so much growth, the growth will take care of this. And then — well, he's still worried about the budget deficits. This doesn't prove that he doesn't believe in the billion robots, but it suggests that maybe he hasn't thought it through or that he doesn't think it's going to be as transformative economically, or that there are big error bars around it. But yeah, there's some way in which these things are not quite thought through. Thiel's view is actually pretty common in Silicon Valley, though it's never phrased in quite that way. The guys on the All-In podcast, for example, are all friends with Musk as well and similarly talk about how growth is going to take care of budget deficits. The difference is that they talk about it as a way to rationalize their support for tax cuts while insisting they're deficit hawks. Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' is going to increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, largely because it's giving tax cuts skewed to older people and the wealthy. But the All-In bros think the growth in AI will fix it all while also insisting deficits will bankrupt the economy. But Thiel is taking a slightly different angle on his version of our robot-filled future, and it's one that anyone who's being intellectually honest should take seriously. If robots are really going to deliver this revolutionary productivity, a future where we're all just sitting around while robots do the work for us, why are Republicans like Musk so worried about deficits? Tesla's version of the humanoid robot is called Optimus, and Musk has been trying to play catch-up with other robot companies like Boston Dynamics and Figure. Boston Dynamics' Atlas was doing backflips almost a decade ago, while Optimus is still being tele-operated for Musk's smoke and mirrors shows. Back in January of 2024, Musk posted a video of Optimus folding laundry, but it was only revealed later that there was nothing autonomous about any of it. If you watched closely, you could see a hand slip into frame, showing that a human was doing the real work, which was mimicked by the robot, tech that's been around since the middle of the 20th century. The promise of robots doing all the work while humans embrace a kind of leisure society has been around for over a century. It was extremely common in the 1960s for very serious people to predict that we'd be working anywhere from just 16 to 30-hour weeks on average by the year 2000. They believed automation would make such a future inevitable. And Musk has been promising the exact same thing. He's even suggested that humans would need to have some kind of guaranteed basic income since there wouldn't be much work for humans to engage in anymore. It's all a fantasy, of course. At least it's a fantasy if you apply Musk's version of politics to this future. And it's extremely likely that Musk understands it as a fantasy. Even if humanoid robots did become commonplace and did most of the manual labor in society, that doesn't mean everyone gets a free paycheck. In fact, Musk has been fighting against exactly that idea, insisting that supposed freeloaders shouldn't get government benefits. And that's where Thiel is absolutely 100% correct. Musk doesn't understand the political implications of his own technology. It would take engaging in radically different politics to give everyone a universal basic income. Because in a world where productivity is radically increased, the wealth created isn't going to be shared with the workers. American productivity has improved radically since the 1970s, while wages have remained stagnant, relative to that growth. All that we've seen is a transfer of wealth to the richest people in the world, while everyone else struggles. Over the past decade, the top 1% have seen their wealth increase by at least $33.9 trillion, according to figures released today by Oxfam International. It's not just robots where Thiel thinks Musk doesn't understand his own tech. Thiel, who has known Musk since the 1990s when both were at PayPal, also suggested during his interview with the Times that Musk doesn't get how this would apply to Mars. Thiel had been a big proponent of seasteading, the movement to build artificial island nations and create an entirely new libertarian world on the ocean. And Musk's vision for Mars wasn't entirely different. As Thiel told the Times: There is a political dimension of getting 'Back to the Future.' You can't — this is a conversation I had with Elon back in 2024, and we had all these conversations. I had the seasteading version with Elon where I said: If Trump doesn't win, I want to just leave the country. And then Elon said: There's nowhere to go. There's nowhere to go. And then you always think of the right arguments to make later. It was about two hours after we had dinner and I was home that I thought of: Wow, Elon, you don't believe in going to Mars anymore. 2024 is the year where Elon stopped believing in Mars — not as a silly science tech project, but as a political project. Mars was supposed to be a political project; it was building an alternative. And in 2024 Elon came to believe that if you went to Mars, the socialist U.S. government, the woke A.I. would follow you to Mars. Musk has been obsessed with getting to Mars, even with some high profile fuck-ups from SpaceX in recent months. And it's really interesting to hear Thiel discuss these topics because he's absolutely right. If Musk actually believed in the things he's selling, his political outlook would be radically different. But he's stuck in this 20th-century mode while tinkering with his silly science projects, as Thiel puts it. Thiel, a fascist who doesn't believe women should be able to vote, is a very dangerous man. But he at least seems to understand the world he's trying to create. Douthat referred to Thiel during the interview as a 'venture capitalist for politics,' a funny rebranding of the term oligarch. But Musk doesn't seem to understand the world he's creating. Whether that turns out to be better or worse for humanity is less clear.
TechCrunch
43 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Elon Musk reportedly fires Tesla's top sales exec
Omead Afshar, Tesla's vice president in charge of sales and manufacturing in North America and Europe, has reportedly been fired by CEO Elon Musk, according to Forbes. It's not immediately known why Musk fired Afshar, who was one of his top lieutenants and closest confidants at the company. Afshar, Musk, and Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Afshar's departure was first reported by Bloomberg News. Afshar was posting support for the limited rollout of Tesla's robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, as recently as Tuesday. 'Absolutely historic day for Tesla,' he wrote on June 23 on X, the social media platform his former boss owns. 'Thank you, Elon, for pushing us all!' Afshar's departure comes at a time when the company's sales growth has vanished. Tesla sold fewer cars in 2024 than it did in 2023, the first annual drop since it started mass producing EVs more than a decade ago. Musk's involvement in U.S. politics has not helped, despite his recent pledge that he was leaving the Trump administration. Sales continued to struggle through the first half of 2025. The company's industry-leading profits fell 71% year-over-year in the first quarter. European sales fell nearly 28% percent year-over-year in May. Tesla will report global delivery figures for the second quarter next week, and financial results for the period in mid-July. Afshar was not a particularly public-facing executive at Tesla. He joined the company in 2017 and spent years working in the 'office of the CEO.' He took on increasing responsibilities ever since; Musk has previously credited Afshar with leading the construction of Tesla's massive factory in Austin, Texas. Not long after that, though, Afshar found himself in hot water. In 2022 he became a subject of an internal probe after he was allegedly involved in a plan to purchase special material for a glass building Musk reportedly wanted. Both the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating those purchases in 2023. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW Afshar moved over to SpaceX during some of that time period and reportedly was involved with X for a while. Musk elevated him to the role of vice president in late 2024 after another top executive, Tom Zhu, moved back to China. Bloomberg News also reported Thursday that Tesla's director of HR for North America, Jenna Ferrua, is no longer with the company. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's What It Costs To Charge a Tesla Monthly vs. Using Gas for a Honda Civic
Filling up your car is going to cost you money one way or another. For an electric vehicle, like a Tesla, you need to find a charging station to give your battery the juice it needs to operate. For other cars, like a Honda Civic, the price of gas can be fairly high if you are planning on getting a full tank at the pump. For You: Trending Now: So let's do the math: read below to find out what it actually costs to charge a Tesla each month compared to the price of gas for a Honda Civic in the same month. Joseph Nagle, head of Corporate Strategy at Pando Electric, broke down this question in a few ways, looking at monthly fuel costs, which will vary based on state, analyzing national costs versus two of the larger electric vehicles (EVs) states that also have a fairly wide variance between electricity pricing and gas. Nagle outlined an example based on 1,000 miles driven each month, with Tesla Model 3 efficiency clocking in at approximately 4 miles per kWh and Honda Civic coming to 33 MPG combined. When it comes to national averages, Nagle listed the cost of electricity at 15 cents per kWh while gas came to about $3.75 per gallon. Check Out: Looking at annual costs, Tesla Model 3's calculation is $37.50 per month (250 kWh x 15 cents), equaling $450 yearly and the Honda Civic calculation looks like $113.63 per month (30.3 gal x $3.75), equaling $1,363.56 yearly. This means that across the country, the savings go to Tesla at $76.13 a month, which equals $913.56 per year. To further illustrate the cost comparison between a Tesla and Honda Civic, Nagle analyzed two states: California, which has a high-cost market for transportation expenses and Florida's lower-cost region for fuel. In California, electricity costs on average 33 cents per kWh and gasoline is $4.78 per gallon. Examining annual vehicle costs in the state, the Tesla Model 3's bill comes out to $82.50 per month (250 kWh x 33 cents), equaling $990 a year, while the Honda Civic is $144.08 per month (30.3 gal x $4.78), equaling $1,728.96 a year. This means the Tesla has a savings of $61.58 a month or $738.96 per year. Florida, on the other hand, has average costs of 16 cents per kWh for electrics and $3.08 per gallon for gasoline. Factoring the yearly vehicle costs in Florida would have a Tesla Model 3 amounting to $480 a year based on $40 per month (250 kWh x 16 cents) and a Honda Civic at $1,119.84 a year coming from $93.32 per month (30.3 gal x $3.08). Again, the Tesla wins with $53.32 per month, adding up to $639.84 a year. In every scenario-national average, California's high-cost market and Florida's lower-cost region — Nagle had some insights to share. 'The Tesla Model 3 substantially outperforms the Honda Civic in terms of fueling costs. Even with California's significantly higher electricity prices, Tesla remains the cheaper choice monthly and annually,' Nagle said. 'This highlights a key advantage of EV ownership: regardless of location, driving electric consistently costs significantly less than fueling a gasoline-powered vehicle,' he added. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Warren Buffett: 10 Things Poor People Waste Money On 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Here's What It Costs To Charge a Tesla Monthly vs. Using Gas for a Honda Civic
