Five questions that Stormont leaders delayed answering for months
Draft answer provided: May 21, 2024
Question answered: February 25, 2025
Delay: 280 days
Q: Detail any engagement they have had with (i) the UK government; (ii) the European Union; and (iii) the US government in relation to (a) divestment and sanctions against the State of Israel relating to its military operation in Gaza; and (b) funding protection and enhancement for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency.
A: Decisions on the matters raised in the question relate to foreign policy and are therefore excepted. There has been no engagement with the UK Government, the European Union, or the US Government on them.
There is no joint agreement on this issue.
Question from SDLP MLA Justin McNulty
Submitted: May 16, 2024
Draft answer provided: May 21, 2024
Question answered: February 25, 2025
Delay: 280 days
Q: Whether they will undertake a review of contracts awarded by their Department to identify whether public funds are being used, directly or indirectly, to fund the State of Israel during its military operation in Gaza.
A: There are no plans at present to undertake a review. There is no joint agreement on this issue.
Question from Alliance MLA Kellie Armstrong
Submitted: February 15, 2024
Draft answer provided: February 20, 2024
Question answered: November 19, 2024
Delay: 273 days
Q: To ask the First Minister and Deputy First Minister for an update on the Equality Act.
A: There are extensive legal protections in place in respect of equality in this jurisdiction. There is also work being undertaken that will enhance the current legislative framework specifically in respect of the Review of the Race Relations (NI) Order 1997.
There is no agreement on a single Equality Bill.
Question from SDLP MLA Justin McNulty
Submitted: May 22, 2024
Draft answer provided: May 28, 2024
Question answered: February 25 2025
Delay: 273 days
Q: Whether they will write to (i) An Taoiseach following Ireland's decision to recognise the State of Palestine; and (ii) the Prime Minister in relation to the recognition of a Palestinian state.
A: Foreign Relations including the formal recognition of states is an excepted matter for the UK Government. There are no plans at present to write to either An Taoiseach or the Prime Minister in relation to this matter. There is no joint agreement on this issue.
Question from Alliance MLA Kellie Armstrong
Submitted:
Draft answer provided: November 6, 2024
Question answered: May 8, 2025
Delay: 183 days
Q: Detail why a Citizens' Assembly has not progressed in line with the commitment in New Decade, New Approach.
A: Civic engagement plays an important role in supporting policy development. We continue to assess options for the way forward.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
John Swinney to consider imposing state boycott on Israel
Scottish Greens co-leader Ross Greer has written to the First Minister demanding that he adopt the principles of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, which aims to put pressure on the Israeli economy in the mould of the anti-apartheid boycott of South Africa. A Scottish Government spokesperson said ministers would 'consider' the proposal, which would see official guidance issued to businesses urging them to end trade with Israel, as was done with Russia in 2022. Greer's letter to John Swinney welcomed the First Minister's acknowledgement that 'there is a genocide in Palestine', but the MSP said he disagreed with the assertion that he was 'trying to do everything I possibly can do to make sure that we apply the pressure' on Israel. Before setting out a raft of measures to implement the BDS campaigns' demands, Greer (below) said: 'As we both know and have previously discussed, there is much more which the Scottish Government can be doing to put pressure on Israel to end its genocide in Palestine.' (Image: Gordon Terris) He called for the Scottish Government to scrap part of the Local Government Act 1988 to allow councils to bar companies from winning contracts if they participated in the illegal occupation of Palestinian territory. Greer suggested this could be achieved through an amendment to the Community Wealth Building Bill. As well as issuing guidance to businesses recommending that they halt trade with Israel, Greer suggested that the Scottish Government should stop funding arms companies which have supplied Israel during the genocide and 'all other companies directly complicit in the occupation'. READ MORE: David Lammy contradicted as UK 'shares Gaza spy plane data with Israel' Pension funds should also be encouraged to divest from companies 'complicit in Israel's apartheid regime', Greer added. Finally, he suggested imposing financial penalties on 'complicit companies' through the Scottish Government's powers to impose surcharges on non-domestic rates. Speaking to The National, Greer said: 'Unfortunately the First Minister's claim that he is doing everything possible for Palestine just isn't true. Most foreign policy powers lie with Westminster, but there are still meaningful actions the Scottish Government could take, yet hasn't. (Image: AP) 'John Swinney now rightly recognises what is happening as a genocide. Those words must be matched with action, but we've seen very little of that from his government. Taxpayers' money is still being handed to companies who the United Nations has identified as being directly complicit in Israel's campaign of ethnic cleansing. 'The worst crime against humanity of our time is being inflicted on the Palestinian people right in front of our eyes. 'Scotland has a moral responsibility to act. The same approach helped end apartheid in South Africa. Now we must show that solidarity with the people of Palestine.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government has repeatedly called for an immediate and sustainable ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages and an urgent increase in humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Scottish Government will continue to press the UK Government to recognise a sovereign Palestinian state, as part of a two-state solution to secure lasting peace in the region. 'Ministers will consider and reply to Mr Greer's letter.'
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Mossad's secret allies in Operation Wrath of God
More than half a century ago Palestinian terrorists stormed the 1972 Munich Olympics, murdering two of the Israeli team and taking another nine hostage. The West German authorities, ill-equipped to deal with such incidents, agreed to fly the terrorists and their hostages to Egypt. Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, offered to mount a rescue operation. The Germans launched their own, resulting in the deaths of a police officer, four of the seven terrorists and all the hostages. One consequence was the Israeli government's Operation Wrath of God, a programme to assassinate any leaders or planners associated with the massacre. Ten missions were organised in Europe, each signed off by the Israeli prime minister Golda Meir on condition that no innocent bystanders were killed. There have been several books about the operation and a 2005 film by Steven Spielberg. Aviva Guttmann's account does not merely rehearse the stories, though each operation is outlined. Rather, she shows how the security services of European nations cooperated in identifying, monitoring and investigating international terrorists in general and how this aided Mossad in its pursuit of vengeance. Cooperation was via the Club de Berne, an intelligence exchange between eight countries founded in 1969 in response to the growth of international terrorism. Soon expanded to include other countries, among them Israel, it handled communications via encrypted telegrams (which Guttmann calls cables) using the code word Kilowatt. Guttmann found these communications in publicly available Swiss archives. She analyses each assassination, showing how the exchange of Kilowatt information helped Mossad identify and locate their targets, how the various security services learned about terrorist tactics, such as the recruitment or duping of young European women, and how hitherto unknown plots to murder or hijack were prevented. The first assassination was only a month after Munich. Wael Zwaiter, a young Palestinian translator in Rome, returned to his flat to find two men on the stairway leading to his apartment. They shot him 11 times, a bullet for each Munich victim. Journalistic opinion at the time and since concluded that Mossad got the wrong man – a bit-part player at best. But the Kilowatt telegrams show that he had an important logistical role. One operation that Mossad very definitely got wrong was in the small Norwegian town of Lillehammer in 1973 when they shot an innocent Moroccan waiter alongside his seven-months pregnant wife. Not only that, but the assassins were caught. Contributing factors to this debacle were an inexperienced, hurriedly assembled team and insufficient research – the poor man was confused with a real terrorist solely on photographic resemblance. Mossad teams generally comprised about 15 people – two to do the killing, two to guard them, two to organise cover and facilities, six to eight to research the target's routines and movements and two to communicate both within the team and back to Israel. Guttmann's principal concern – oft-repeated – is that European security services 'played a vital role in the organisation and execution of Operation Wrath of God'. The extent to which they did so knowingly is not always clear, although they could not have failed to know after Lillehammer. There is no doubt, though, that the information they exchanged with Israel (including their own investigations into Mossad killings) facilitated assassinations within their own borders. 'One would simply not expect Europeans to help kill Palestinians… Governments… failed in their duty to keep safe all citizens,' Guttmann notes. Her disapproval is evident throughout, though not explicitly stated or argued. This is a pity because the opposite case – whether it can be justifiable to murder those seeking to murder you – is nowadays too prevalent to be dismissed without argument. We witness its effects daily on our screens. She concedes, however, that all participants benefitted from the exchange and that Israel was itself a significant contributor. But in claiming that the various agencies 'did not need to respect the same normative considerations as official foreign policy lines' she implies that they acted independently or against their own governments' policies. On this side of the Channel at least, actions by the intelligence agencies, including exchanges with liaison services, require government approval. MI5 does not simply do what it likes. It is not the case that relying on 'foreign intelligence shows… weakness and dependency', as Guttmann says of Mossad. Nor are attributing information to 'friendly services within the region', or claiming a source has 'direct access', forms of boasting; they and other formulae are necessary and conventional guides to assessing reports. She is on firmer ground in questioning the effectiveness of targeted killings, as assassinations are now often called. In the short term they can be highly disruptive and satisfy an understandable thirst for revenge; but in the longer term leaders may be succeeded by those with renewed determination and security. Half a century on, the causes that prompted Wrath of God are with us still.
Leader Live
8 hours ago
- Leader Live
Starmer defends Palestine recognition plan but hits out at Hamas
Sir Keir Starmer has said the UK will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to meet certain conditions, including addressing the humanitarian crisis, implementing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. But he insisted the move was not a propaganda boost to Hamas, saying the 'terrorist organisation' could play 'no part in any future government'. The Prime Minister's approach has been criticised by the Israeli government and a protest over his stance is due to take place in London at the weekend. Demonstrators, including some British family members of hostages still held by Hamas, will march on Downing Street calling for the release of the remaining hostages before any talk about the recognition of Palestine. Asked if he had given Hamas a public relations boost by talking about recognition, Sir Keir told Channel 5: 'They should release the hostages straight away and they should play absolutely no part in the governance of Palestine at any point.' He said the hostages taken during the October 7 2023 attacks had been held for a 'very, very long time in awful circumstances, unimaginable circumstances, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, and that's why I'm really clear about Hamas'. Sir Keir added: 'We do, alongside that, have to do all that we can to alleviate the awful situation on the ground in Gaza. We need aid in volume and at scale.' People have seen the 'images of starvation' in Gaza, he said, adding that 'the British public can see it and there's a sense of revulsion of what they're seeing'. The Government had to do 'everything we can' to get aid in, working with other countries 'and it's in that context that I set out our position on recognition'. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said on Tuesday that 'Keir Starmer has made a mistake' and 'what we need to focus on now is a ceasefire and getting the hostages home'. Tzipi Hotovely, Israeli ambassador to the UK, said the actions of Hamas 'must never be rewarded'.
