Metro opens long-awaited LAX station
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Raising a family, doing business in California not easy, In-N-Out boss says
There's something about In-N-Out that strikes a fierce if not irrational sense of pride among many Angelenos and Southern Californians. There are several fan clubs and awards, including Yelp's No. 1 Fast Food chain honor earlier this year and Market Force's 2022 'best burger experience.' For some reason, there isn't the same fervor for Southern California's own McDonald's, one of the top 10 brands in the world, or for Santa Barbara's The Habit, which beat In-N-Out in July 2024 for USA Today's best fast food burger accolade. Times readers even lambasted former food columnist Lucas Kwan Peterson when he placed L.A.'s Fatburger atop his fast food burger rankings in 2022. Maybe that's what made the news that Lynsi Snyder, billionaire owner and chief executive of the iconic Baldwin Park brand, was leaving the Golden State last week all the more jarring. Colleague Piper Heath broke down the announcement Monday, while columnist Lorraine Ali opined on what the decision meant. Snyder made an appearance on the podcast 'Relatable' on July 18, hosted by conservative commentator Allie Beth Stuckey. During the interview, Snyder uttered a statement that created shockwaves locally. 'There's a lot of great things about California, but raising a family is not easy here. Doing business is not easy here,' she said as part of her announcement that her business was continuing its eastward expansion. The move to Tennessee represents a seismic shift for the leader of the brand. Currently operating more than 400 locations across eight states — California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Oregon, Colorado, Texas and Idaho — In-N-Out has long thrived on being the burger chain you couldn't find everywhere. Snyder's comments set off a disinformation blitz, launching the Double-Double into the middle of a red-state/blue-state culture war where, clearly, nothing is sacred, Ali wrote. Anti-Cali factions incorrectly crowed about yet another business fleeing the West Coast. More proof that Gov. Gavin Newsom's 'failing' state sucks! It appeared that In-N-Out was following Tesla and Charles Schwab, companies that cited regulatory challenges and operational costs among their reasons for relocating. Chevron also fled. Many in SoCal felt abandoned and disrespected. They, after all, propped up the chain for 76 years, only to be told by its owner that the place that made her family's business — their home — is no longer to her liking. On X, Oracle Park Seagull posted ''Not easy for In N Out to do business in California…' Said the person who became a billionaire doing business almost exclusively in California. So much so, it was a point of pride for the chain. Gotcha.' During the podcast, Snyder discussed elements of California policy that make the state hard to operate in, referencing pandemic-era restrictions as particularly challenging. She told Stuckey 'the bulk of our stores are still going to be here in California.' The relocation of both corporate operations and the CEO signals a fundamental change in the company's center of gravity. 'It will be wonderful having an office out there, growing out there, and being able to have the family and other people's families out there,' Snyder said, though she maintains limits on expansion. Newsom even chimed in, starting his X post with, 'For those interested in the facts, rather than fiction, In-N-Out is expanding East — creating a second HQ in Tennessee.' Snyder responded Monday in an Instagram post: 'Where I raise my family has nothing to do with my love and appreciation for our customers in California.' Immigration and ICE raids Trump Administration policy, actions and pushback Crime, courts and policing Health and medicine Get wrapped up in tantalizing stories about dating, relationships and marriage. Have a great weekend, from the Essential California team Jim Rainey, staff writerDiamy Wang, homepage internIzzy Nunes, audience internKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew J. Campa, reporterKarim Doumar, head of newsletters How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Time Business News
2 days ago
- Time Business News
delta flight dl275 diverted lax
In an unexpected turn of events, Delta Flight DL275 Diverted LAX, en route from Atlanta (ATL) to Seoul-Incheon (ICN), was diverted mid-flight to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) due to a potential in-flight emergency. The incident occurred recently and caught the attention of both passengers and aviation enthusiasts around the world. While the airline has remained cautious in disclosing detailed reasons behind the diversion, initial reports suggest the flight crew decided out of an abundance of safety and operational concerns, which is standard protocol in the aviation industry. Regardless of the specific cause, the safety-first approach once again proved crucial. Delta Flight DL275 Diverted LAX, is a long-haul international route that connects Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) with Seoul–Incheon International Airport (ICN). The flight is typically operated by a wide-body aircraft, often a Boeing 777 or Airbus A350, designed for long-distance travel and capable of carrying hundreds of passengers across continents. This flight represents one of Delta's key transpacific routes, and it carries a mix of business travelers, students, and tourists heading to South Korea. A diversion on this route is rare and, therefore, worthy of analysis. The exact reason for the diversion has not been officially confirmed by Delta Airlines at the time of writing. However, reports from passengers and aviation trackers indicate it may have been caused by a medical emergency, technical issue, or weather-related complication. These are some of the most common causes of emergency landings and in-air course changes. According to Flightradar24 and other live tracking services, the plane began a steady descent several hours into the flight before landing safely at LAX – Los Angeles International Airport. The flight path deviation was noted by several real-time aviation watchers, who quickly identified the unscheduled landing. To understand more details and real-time updates, you can visit the complete report here: 👉 Delta Flight DL275 Diverted LAX – Full Story Passengers on DL275 were understandably concerned during the diversion, but multiple firsthand accounts have emphasized that the Delta flight crew maintained professionalism and clear communication throughout the situation. Cabin crew kept passengers informed about the change in route and made sure safety procedures were followed diligently. On social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter), several passengers shared their surprise at the sudden landing but also expressed relief and gratitude that the airline prioritized their safety. Some even complimented the smooth handling and landing at LAX despite the unexpected situation. Flight diversions are not taken lightly in the aviation world. When a flight changes course after departure, it usually involves close communication between the cockpit crew and Air Traffic Control (ATC), airline dispatchers, and sometimes emergency medical teams on the ground. In most cases, a flight is diverted when continuing on the original route could pose health, safety, or operational risks. Common causes include: Medical emergencies onboard Mechanical or technical issues Bad weather at the destination airport Security concerns or unruly passengers In this case, LAX served as the best available alternative due to its proximity, facilities, and Delta's existing operations at the airport. After safely landing at LAX, Delta likely arranged for: Medical or technical checks of the aircraft Alternate flights or hotel accommodations for passengers Coordination with U.S. Customs and Border Protection Crew rest and duty time adjustments Depending on the length of delay and nature of the issue, passengers may have been rebooked on connecting flights or resumed their journey on the same aircraft after clearance. For more real-time updates or deeper analysis, visit the original article here: 👉 Click to read the full report on Delta Flight DL275 Although flight diversions are relatively rare, they highlight the rigorous safety protocols in place in modern commercial aviation. In this case, Delta Airlines made the right decision to land at LAX instead of continuing to Seoul, ensuring passenger and crew safety above all else. This event also serves as a reminder to travelers that unexpected flight changes can happen, and it's always wise to stay alert, cooperative, and flexible during international journeys. While the diversion of Delta-flight-dl275-diverted-lax caused an interruption in travel plans, it also showcased the airline industry's ability to respond to in-flight challenges with efficiency and calm. The aircraft landed safely, no injuries were reported, and all passengers were handled with care and professionalism. Such incidents, though unexpected, reinforce the fact that in aviation, safety always comes first. Delta's response to this situation aligns with industry best practices and further strengthens the airline's reputation for handling emergencies responsibly. For the latest developments and a full timeline of events from takeoff to landing, you can visit: 👉 TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Los Angeles Times
4 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Group seeks to repeal L.A.'s $800-million business tax, citing ‘anti-job climate'
A group of business leaders submitted paperwork on Wednesday for a ballot measure that would repeal Los Angeles' gross receipts tax, delivering some financial relief to local employers but also punching an $800-million hole in the city budget. The proposed measure, called the 'Los Angeles Cost of Living Relief Initiative,' would strip away a tax imposed on a vast array of businesses: entertainment companies, child care providers, law firms, accountants, health care businesses, nightclubs, delivery companies and many others, according to the group that submitted it. Backers said that repealing a tax long reviled by the business community would help address the city's economic woes, creating jobs, allowing businesses to stay in the city and making the economy 'more affordable for all Angelenos.' 'This initiative is the result of the business community uniting to fight the anti-job climate at City Hall,' said Nella McOsker, president and CEO of the Central City Assn., a downtown-based business group. McOsker, one of five business leaders who signed the ballot proposal, said city officials have 'ignored the pleas of small- and medium-sized businesses for years.' As a result, scores of restaurants and other establishments, including the Mayan Theater, are closing, she said. The filing of the ballot proposal immediately set off alarms at City Hall, where officials recently signed off on a plan to lay off hundreds of city workers in an attempt to balance this year's budget. The city's business tax generates more than $800 million annually for the general fund — the part of the budget that pays for police patrols, firefighters, paramedic response and other core services. 'Public safety is almost exclusively paid for by the general fund,' said City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo, in an email to The Times. 'This measure is an assault on public safety. Proponents of this measure will be directly responsible for cutting police or fire staffing in half if it passes.' McOsker, asked about L.A.'s financial woes, said the city had a $1-billion shortfall this year and still succeeded in balancing the budget. She is the daughter of City Councilmember Tim McOsker, who sits on the five-member budget committee. The proposed measure is backed by executives and board members with various groups, including the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, the Greater San Fernando Valley Chamber of Commerce and VICA, the Valley Industry and Commerce Assn. VICA president Stuart Waldman said the city's economy has faltered amid a spate of increased taxes, higher city fees and new regulations. The most recent, he said, is the ordinance hiking the minimum wage for hotel employees and workers at Los Angeles International Airport to $30 per hour by 2028, which was approved by the City Council over objections from business leaders. 'We're usually playing defense,' said Waldman, who also signed the ballot proposal. 'We've decided the time has come to play offense.' The business tax proposal is part of a larger ballot battle being waged this year between businesses and organized labor. Last month, a group of airlines and hotel industry organizations turned in about 140,000 signatures for a proposed ballot measure aimed at overturning the newly approved hotel and LAX minimum wage. L.A. County election officials are currently verifying those signatures. Unite Here Local 11, which represents hotel employees, responded with its own package of counter measures. One would require a citywide election on the construction or expansion of hotels, sports stadiums, concert halls and other venues. Another would hike the minimum wage for all workers in the city, raising it to the level of hotel and airport employees. Two other measures from Unite Here take aim at companies that pay their CEOs more than a hundred times their median employee in L.A., either by forcing them to pay higher business taxes or by placing limitations on their use of city property. The ongoing ballot battle is 'escalating in ways that are reckless and disconnected from the real work of running a city,' said Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, who heads the council's budget committee. Yaroslavsky, in a statement, said the fight is 'unproductive and needs to stop.' 'We just closed a billion-dollar budget gap, and basic services are already severely strained,' she said. 'You don't fix that by removing one of our largest revenue sources with no plan to replace it. We have to fix what is broken and that requires working together to offer real solutions.' Josue Marcus, spokesperson for the Los Angeles City Clerk, said proponents of the latest ballot measure would need to gather about 140,000 valid signatures for it to qualify. The next city election is in June 2026. McOsker, for her part, said she believes that state law sets a lower threshold — only 44,000 — for measures that result in the elimination of taxes. Industry leaders have long decried L.A.'s business tax, which is levied not on profits but on the gross receipts that are brought in — even where an enterprise suffers financial losses. Former Mayor Eric Garcetti argued for eliminating the tax more than a decade ago, saying it puts the city's economy at a competitive disadvantage. Once in office, he only managed to scale it back, amid concerns that an outright repeal would trigger cuts to city services. Organizers of the latest proposal said it would not rescind business taxes on the sale of cannabis or medical marijuana, which were separately approved by voters.
