DOGE finally delivers what Elon Musk promised earlier, changing a 'mid-20th century' US govt tradition
Retirement benefits, which have traditionally taken months to process, will soon be delivered much faster, thanks to a major digital overhaul announced by the Department of Government Efficiency (
DOGE
).
In a post on X, DOGE revealed that as of June 2, the government has officially adopted online digital retirement as the new standard through Retire.opm.gov. The initiative was described as a major milestone achieved in partnership with the
Office of Personnel Management
(OPM).
'On June 2, online digital retirement became the government standard! Great teamwork by OPM and DOGE,' the department posted. 'Next up (end of July): getting the first retirement benefit payments to retirees faster (currently takes multiple months). Will report back in July!'
In a follow-up post, DOGE added: 'Collaboration win by @USOPM and @DOGE: After 35+ years of failed modernization attempts, OPM has announced that, as of June 2, they are replacing their 65+ year-old paper process with an all-digital alternative. This will reduce the average time people wait to receive their retirement check from 3–5 months to less than 1 month.'
The digital transformation drew praise from former DOGE head
Elon Musk
, who has long criticized the antiquated retirement processing system.
Live Events
— elonmusk (@elonmusk)
'Great work turning a lengthy paperwork retirement process into a simple digital one!' Musk wrote on X.
Musk previously spotlighted the slow pace of retirement processing for federal employees, especially the manual system based in an underground limestone mine in Boyers, Pennsylvania.
The Limestone Mine and Decades of Delay
Located about 45 miles north of Pittsburgh, the facility is managed by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and has handled government retirement paperwork by hand since the mid-20th century.
Despite multiple efforts to digitize the system dating back to 1987, the process has remained largely unchanged. The facility can process only 10,000 retirement applications per month due to the labor-intensive, manual methods still in use.
'Well, because all that retirement paperwork is manual on paper. It's manually calculated. Then it goes down a mine — and I mean a literal mine,' Musk once remarked, highlighting the inefficiency of the system. 'Yeah, there's a limestone mine where we store all the retirement paperwork.'
The mine was originally owned by US Steel, which operated it between 1902 and 1952. By 1960, the U.S. government began using it for record storage. In 1998, Iron Mountain took over ownership and has continued to lease the space to federal agencies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Elon Musk's daughter mocks father's feud with Trump: ‘Love being proven right'
Elon Musk's daughter appeared to mock her father's highly publicised feud with US President Donald Trump on Friday, expressing satisfaction over the situation on social media. Vivian Wilson, 21 — who previously vowed to leave the US after Trump's election — shared an Instagram post that hinted at amusement over the clash. The Instagram post of Elon Musk's daughter. 'I love being proven right,' she wrote, followed by uncontrollable laughter and a refusal to comment further, according to a report by the New York Post. The conflict between Musk and Trump escalated Thursday when Musk criticized one of Trump's policies, prompting Trump to question whether their relationship could ever be repaired. Trump said on Friday that Elon Musk had "lost his mind" but added that he was ready to move past their heated fallout. The dramatic rift between the world's richest man and the most powerful political figure has sparked concerns, carrying both political and economic implications. "Honestly I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk, I just wish him well," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One en route to his New Jersey golf club late Friday, as reported by AFP. After Elon Musk slammed Trump's spending bill as an 'abomination' on Tuesday, the former president responded sharply from the Oval Office on Thursday, expressing he was 'very disappointed' in the billionaire entrepreneur. I love being proven right. The controversial bill is expected to face stiff resistance in Congress, as it significantly increases the U.S. deficit. Critics also warn that it could slash healthcare coverage for millions of low-income Americans. (With inputs from agencies) Key Takeaways Public feuds can have significant political and economic ramifications. Family dynamics can add complexity to high-profile conflicts. Social media serves as a platform for personal opinions on public matters.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
38 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Elon Musk could lose billions depending on how spat with Trump unfolds
Trump can mess things up for Tesla by encouraging federal safety regulators to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis AP New York The world's richest man could lose billions in his fight with world's most powerful politician. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump could mean Tesla's plans for self-driving cars hit a roadblock, SpaceX flies fewer missions for Nasa, Starlink gets fewer overseas satellite contracts and the social media platform X loses advertisers. Maybe, that is. It all depends on Trump's appetite for revenge and how the dispute unfolds. Joked Telemetry Insight auto analyst Sam Abuelsamid, Since Trump has no history of retaliating against perceived adversaries, he'll probably just let this pass. Turning serious, he sees trouble ahead for Musk. For someone that rants so much about government pork, all of Elon's businesses are extremely dependent on government largesse, which makes him vulnerable. Trump and the federal government also stand to lose from a long-running dispute, but not as much as Musk. Tesla robotaxis: The dispute comes just a week before a planned test of Tesla's driverless taxis in Austin, Texas, a major event for the company because sales of its EVs are lagging in many markets, and Musk needs a win. Trump can mess things up for Tesla by encouraging federal safety regulators to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis. Even before the war of words broke out on Thursday, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration requested data on how Musk's driverless, autonomous taxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request follows an probe last year into 2.4 million Teslas equipped with full self-driving software after several accidents, including one that killed a pedestrian. The Department of Justice has also probed the safety of Tesla cars, but the status of that investigation is unclear. The DOJ did not respond immediately to requests for comment. The promise of a self-driving future led by Tesla inspired shareholders to boost the stock by 50 per cent in the weeks after Musk confirmed the Austin rollout. But on Thursday, the stock plunged more than 14 per cent amid the Trump-Musk standoff. On Friday, it recovered a bit, bouncing back nearly 4 per cent. Tesla's recent rise was almost entirely driven by robotaxi enthusiasm," said Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein. Elon's feud with Trump could be a negative. Carbon credits business: One often-overlooked but important part of Tesla's business that could take a hit is its sales of carbon credits. As Musk and Trump were slugging it out Thursday, Republican senators inserted new language into Trump's budget bill that would eliminate fines for gas-powered cars that fall short of fuel economy standards. Tesla has a thriving side business selling regulatory credits to other automakers to make up for their shortfalls. Musk has downplayed the importance of the credits business, but the changes would hurt Tesla as it reels from boycotts of its cars tied to Musk's time working for Trump. Credit sales jumped by a third to $595 million in the first three months of the year even as total revenue slumped. Reviving sales: Musk's foray into right-wing politics cost Tesla sales among the environmentally minded consumers who embraced electric cars and led to boycotts of Tesla showrooms. If Musk has indeed ended his close association with Trump, those buyers could come back, but that's far from certain. One analyst speculated earlier this year that Trump voters in so-called red counties could buy Teslas in a meaningful way. But he's now less hopeful. There are more questions than answers following Thursday developments, TD Cowen's Itay Michaeli wrote in his latest report, and it's still too early to determine any lasting impacts. Michaeli's stock target for Tesla earlier this year was $388. He has since lowered it to $330. Tesla was trading Friday at $300. Moonshot mess: Trump said Thursday that he could cut government contracts to Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, a massive threat to a company that has received billions of federal dollars. The privately held company that is reportedly worth $350 billion provides launches, sends astronauts into space for Nasa and has a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year. But if Musk has a lot to lose, so does the US SpaceX is the only US company capable of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. The other alternative is politically dicey: depending wholly on Russia's Soyuz capsules. Musk knew all this when he shot back at Trump that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft. But it is unclear how serious his threat was. Several hours later in a reply to another X user he said he wouldn't do it. Starlink impact? A subsidiary of SpaceX, the satellite internet company Starlink, appears to also have benefited from Musk's once-close relationship with the president. Musk announced that Saudi Arabia had approved Starlink for some services during a trip with Trump in the Middle East last month. The company has also won a string of other recent deals in Bangladesh, Pakistan, India and elsewhere as Trump has threatened tariffs. It's not clear how much politics played a role, and how much is pure business. On Friday, The Associated Press confirmed that India had approved a key license to Starlink. At least 40 per cent of India's more than 1.4 billion people have no access to the internet. Ad revival interrupted? Big advertisers that fled X after Musk welcomed all manner of conspiracy theories to the social media platform have started to trickle back in recent months, possibly out of fear of a conservative backlash. Musk has called their decision to leave an illegal boycott and sued them, and the Trump administration recently weighed in with a Federal Trade Commission probe into possible coordination among them. If Trump sours on X, "there's a risk that it could again become politically radioactive for major brands, said Sarah Kreps, a political scientist at Cornell University. She added, though, that an exodus isn't obvious, and it would depend heavily on how the conflict escalates, how long it lasts and how it ends. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Social Security privacy concerns mount as US Supreme Court authorises DOGE's access to data of millions of Americans
The US Supreme Court on Friday sided with the Trump administration in two critical decisions involving the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The rulings allow DOGE broad access to personal records held by the Social Security Administration (SSA) and delay enforcement of transparency rules sought by a government watchdog group. By a 6-3 vote, the conservative-majority court granted DOGE permission to access sensitive SSA databases containing the personal details of millions of Americans. This includes financial, educational and medical data. The court also paused a lower court's ruling requiring DOGE to comply with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), allowing the administration to withhold internal documents about DOGE's operations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Belly Fat Removal Without Surgery in Algeria: The Price Might Surprise You Belly Fat Removal | Search Ads Undo Rising concerns over privacy and oversight Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented sharply, writing: 'This court has now greenlit unfettered data access to DOGE regardless—despite its failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards, and all before we know for sure whether federal law countenances such access.' Her concerns were echoed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Together, they warned that the court's action posed 'grave privacy risks' to millions of Americans. Live Events The SSA holds data on anyone with a Social Security number, Medicare, or Supplemental Security Income. It administers $1.5 trillion in federal payments annually, distributing benefits to over 70 million recipients. Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works , said, 'There is no way to overstate how serious a breach this is. And my understanding is that it has already occurred.' Fallout after Musk's departure from DOGE Elon Musk, who once led DOGE, formally cut ties with the agency on 30 May. His split with President Trump became public shortly after, igniting tensions on social media. The two previously worked closely, with Trump assigning DOGE and Musk to investigate fraud within SSA. In February, SSA's acting commissioner Michelle King resigned after refusing to provide DOGE staff access to personal records. She stepped down after 30 years in government service, citing concerns over data misuse. A day later, the White House said it had appointed a temporary 'anti-fraud expert' to oversee SSA. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated, 'They haven't dug into the books yet, but they suspect that there are tens of millions of deceased people who are receiving fraudulent Social Security payments.' Leavitt added the mission was to, 'Number one, to identify duplicate payments and to end them. Number two, to identify payments that are going to deceased people who are no longer living and should no longer be receiving that money. And number three, to protect the integrity of the system for hardworking Americans who have been paying into it their entire lives.' Legal battle over Government transparency In a separate ruling, the court also halted an order from Judge Christopher Cooper, who had instructed DOGE to comply with FOIA requests. The suit, filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), sought records about DOGE's internal decision-making, particularly its role in mass federal layoffs and restructuring. CREW argues that DOGE functions as a de facto government agency and must follow federal transparency laws. The administration insists DOGE is merely an advisory body and is therefore exempt. Judge Cooper previously concluded that DOGE likely exercises 'substantial independent authority' and ordered a deposition of DOGE official Amy Gleason. The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit refused to block his order, prompting the administration to appeal to the Supreme Court. In its unsigned opinion, the court noted that Judge Cooper's orders 'are not appropriately tailored' and stressed that 'judicial deference and restraint' were required in reviewing internal executive branch communications. CREW responded in court filings that if the administration prevails, presidents could 'create new entities that would functionally wield substantial independent authority but are exempt from critical transparency laws.' DOGE has become a key tool in Trump's broader plan to cut government spending and reduce federal workforce numbers. It has also faced mounting legal challenges from labour unions and advocacy groups. Solicitor General D. John Sauer called earlier judicial rulings an 'overreach' into executive power. However, critics argue that unchecked access and lack of oversight could result in lasting harm to public trust and data security . Maryland District Judge Ellen Hollander, whose SSA data access restriction was overturned, earlier warned that DOGE's search for fraud was a 'fishing expedition.' Her order allowed only limited access to anonymised data unless DOGE could demonstrate a specific need. Despite Friday's rulings, the future of DOGE remains uncertain. With Musk gone and legal scrutiny intensifying, its role in reshaping federal oversight continues to spark debate over accountability, privacy, and the limits of executive power.
