
Ever Brought Up Siri Accidentally? You Might Be Eligible for Apple's Big Privacy Settlement
Apple is now accepting claims for its major Siri privacy settlement and you could get a piece of the $95 million payout.
Viva Tung/CNET
Accidentally turning on Siri is probably one of the more annoying parts of owning Apple products -- at least, if you're me it is -- but you know what might definitely make up for that? Getting paid for it.
Years after it was initially sued for allegedly having voice assistant Siri listen in on conversations, Apple at the start of 2025 chose to settle the class-action suit to the tune of $95 million. Now, some of that money could be yours as a claims website has been launched. Here's everything you'll need to know.
The settlement period covers a full decade and given the ubiquity of Apple products, there's a good chance you'll be eligible for a piece of the payout. If you meet the eligibility standards, you can claim a payment for up to five Siri-enabled devices, with a cap on how much you can receive per device. We'll get into the specific amount a little bit later.
The impact of this settlement has the potential to be wide-ranging, given the reach of Apple's product ecosystem. According to a Business of Apps report from November, citing company and market research data, there were roughly 155 million active iPhones in the US as of 2024, a number that's been steadily increasing since the product's debut. Similarly, active Apple TV streaming boxes in the US have also been increasing year to year, with more than 32 million active in the US as of 2023.
To find out if you're eligible for this settlement, read on. For more, find out what's up with the recent delay of T-Mobile data breach settlement checks.
Who sued Apple and why?
This class action lawsuit, Lopez et al v. Apple Inc., was first brought against Apple in 2019, with plaintiffs alleging that they were routinely recorded by their Apple devices after unintentionally activating the Siri virtual assistant, violating their privacy in the process. They further alleged that these recordings were then sold to advertisers and used to target them with ads online.
Specific incidents mentioned in the suit include plaintiffs seeing ads online for brands like Air Jordan and Olive Garden after Apple device users discussed them out loud. In some instances, plaintiffs claimed that their devices began listening to them without them having said anything at all. At least one plaintiff involved in the case was a minor when it was first filed.
Though it agreed to the settlement, Apple hasn't admitted any wrongdoing.
"Siri has been engineered to protect user privacy from the beginning," Apple said in a statement sent to CNET. "Siri data has never been used to build marketing profiles and it has never been sold to anyone for any purpose. Apple settled this case to avoid additional litigation so we can move forward from concerns about third-party grading that we already addressed in 2019. We use Siri data to improve Siri and we are constantly developing technologies to make Siri even more private."
Who is eligible for this class action settlement?
The eligibility requirements for this settlement are fairly broad, as it's open to anyone who owned a Siri-enabled Apple device between Sept. 17, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2024. In order to opt in, you'll have to swear under oath that at some point during that period, you accidentally activated Siri on each device you want to get a payment for, and that these activations occurred during a conversation meant to be private.
Siri-enabled devices include iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches, MacBooks, iMacs, Apple TV streaming boxes, HomePod speakers and iPod Touches.
How can I opt in to this Apple settlement?
As of Thursday, May 8, a website has been launched where Apple customers can claim a portion of the settlement, if they believe they qualify. If you're looking to submit a claim, you have until July 2, 2025, to do so.
It's not clear at this time when payments will be disbursed to approved claimants but it will surely be sometime after Aug. 1, 2025, when a final approval hearing is scheduled.
How much can I get from the class action settlement?
Payments per device are to be capped at $20, although depending on how many people opt in to the settlement, claimants could receive less than that. Each individual can only claim payments for up to five devices, meaning the maximum possible payment you could receive from the settlement is $100.
For more on Apple, see why a majority of users don't care for Apple Intelligence and find out which iOS setting can stop apps from tracking you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
44 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
This Ugreen 4-Port USB-C 65W Charger Is Now Almost Free, Amazon Clearing Stock at All-Time Low Price
Carrying a tangled mess of chargers and cables in your bag can get very annoying, especially when you have multiple devices that are trying to stay charged throughout the day. Whether you are traveling on business or just trying to stay productive at home, you know you need a dependable and flexible charging option. That's where Ugreen comes in – a brand that's established a presence for quality and innovation with charging options. Right now, Amazon is offering the premium Ugreen 65W USB-C/USB-A 4-Port charger at the lowest price ever: At only $29, which is a 30% off the list price of $42, this small but mighty charger is a no-brainer. The deal is so good that Amazon is rapidly clearing out its stock, so you need to make sure you get it before it runs out of stock. See at Amazon Perfect Charger For All Your Devices The Ugreen 65W USB-C (and USB-A) charger is a real asset if you have multiple devices you manage. Whether you are charging a MacBook Pro, iPhone, iPad, Galaxy S25 or even a Steam Deck, this charger will work. With 65W of charging power, you can charge a MacBook Air to 51% in a quick 30 minutes so it's great for a quick charge as you're heading out the door. With three USB-C ports and one USB-A port simultaneously charge four devices, so there is no need for a tangly mess of chargers littering your workspace or travel bag. This Ugreen charger uses GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology instead of traditional silicon: GaN is a smaller, more efficient and safer material than its silicon-based counterparts. Not only does GaN provide faster charging speeds, but it also has built-in overcurrent and overheating protection so your devices stay safe while charging. The foldable plug design also provides a more compact way to store the charger in your bag or pocket. With dimensions of 2.64 x 1.65 x 1.5 inches, that's small enough to fit in your hand but strong enough to withstand every day. If charging needs have you working from home, on a commute or traveling, this charger checks all the boxes as an appropriate charging solution. With folding prongs, you can use it on a desk in your office, in a hotel room, or anywhere else you need to charge devices. Plus, it works with any device that can be charged via USB, so you will never have charging compatibility concerns. Considering its price on Amazon at an all-time low, this is best deal you will find at this time. See at Amazon


CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
I Used MindStudio AI to Help With Research. It Was Remarkably Handy
The most taxing thing about being a journalist, apart from the job insecurity, is all the required reading. Working on a piece means reading through stacks of articles, studies and other reports just to paint a full picture for readers. Even then, you'll invariably miss things that'll immediately be pointed out in the comment section. However, AI can help streamline research and reduce missteps. As an AI reporter, I'm constantly being sent pitches about the latest AI wares from companies the average person hasn't heard of. Most don't seem particularly useful for the average person, but speaking with Dmitry Shapiro, a former product manager at Google and current CEO of MindStudio, and seeing a video he posted on LinkedIn for his Do Your Research AI agent, made me want to give it a try. AI is increasingly becoming the go-to tool for reporters, researchers and students. Its ability to synthesize nearly the entire trove of human knowledge and give a bespoke output to any question saves time that would have otherwise been dedicated to cross-referencing material. At the same time, there's a worry that relying too heavily on AI systems atrophies the human mind, making it less capable of problem-solving and critical thinking. Despite this, people, companies and universities are all in on offloading the arduous task of human analysis to neural networks. In some cases, AI can greatly outperform human output, doing 1 billion years of doctoral research in one year. On the other hand, AI can make grave mistakes, such as telling businesses to break the law. While AI optimists say that the tech will maximize human potential in a fraction of the time, there's worry about the effects of the workforce being supplanted by AI systems and whether society is ready to deal with the potential of mass layoffs. Despite the concerns, AI is here, everyone is using it, and only the most useful tools will survive. In concept, Do Your Research seems like a godsend for reporting. In practice, it's good overall, but it has some issues that need fixing. For example, in researching the changes to Twitter's moderation policies after Elon Musk's takeover, Do Your Research did a great job painting a history of all the changes the Tesla CEO made and how it immediately led to an increase in hate speech on the platform. It also highlighted the externalities to Musk's abrupt firings and moderation changes, including an advertiser revolt and an exodus of customers, backed by actual data. The conclusion also gave a position -- I hadn't asked for one, but it shows that the tool can connect all the facts presented. Per my spot checks, the data that Do Your Research presented was accurate and backed up with correct sources. However, I wish that factoids could be hyperlinked directly to sources, like Wikipedia. If you're a student, you'll want to be careful with copying and pasting directly from Do Your Research. Upon checking with a plagiarism detection site, Do Your Research's text came up as 20% plagiarized. Unsurprisingly, AI detection tools dinged Do Your Research as 46% AI-generated, which is pretty low considering it's 100% AI-generated. An example of MindStudio's Do Your Research AI agent looking into Twitter's content moderation. Screenshot by CNET The thing I like about Do Your Research over ChatGPT and Gemini is the way it breaks down different points into subheads and tacks on a full list of sources at the bottom. While the other chatbots do this too, Do Your Research lists it out like a detailed bibliography. Given that AI systems can get things wrong, easily being able to go back to the actual source immediately is handy. Perplexity has a function called Pages that works similarly to Do Your Research. In my tests, the writing read much more like a human and was at a level I'd deem publishable. The sourcing was also well detailed and correctly documented. Granted, Pages was immediately dinged by plagiarism checking tools as more than 93% plagiarized. It's a criticism Perplexity has received in the past. It also explains why Perplexity reads so much better than other AI-generated content. Do Your Research does need further optimization. A single run of the model can take minutes to compile. In my case, it would fail about 40% of the time. Obviously, these instances are annoying, and it requires more time to rerun the model. After about five successful Do Your Research reports, I ran out of the $5 in token credits allotted to me by MindStudio for my press account. Tokens are essentially the amount of output the AI model can generate before the customer will need to pull out a credit card. Is Do Your Research worth your time and investment? Yes. It's an incredibly handy tool that does a fantastic job of grabbing various bits of information and collecting it all into an article-like package. The output isn't good enough to be publishable, as its text can read as anodyne and lacking in personality. However, it's a strong jumping-off point to help expand your own research and reporting.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Where the Stock Market Stands Now After a Wild Start to the Year
The stock market's crazy first five months of 2025 have left Wall Street pros in a bit of a pickle. Coming off the best month for the S&P 500 Index in a year and a half and the best May since 1990, the benchmark is still basically flat for 2025 and putting up one of its worst starts to a year since the 1950s. In a rare switch, it's also getting handily beaten by stock markets around the world.