Google removes nearly 11,000 YouTube channels tied to China and Russia, here is why
China and Russia top list in YouTube takedown campaign
According to a Google blog, more than 7,700 of these channels were tied to China
Google has removed nearly 11,000 YouTube channels and other accounts during the second quarter of 2025 as part of its efforts to tackle coordinated disinformation campaigns linked to several state actors, including China and Russia. According to a recent report by CNBC and Google's official blog, more than 7,700 of these channels were tied to China. These accounts mainly posted content in Chinese and English promoting the People's Republic of China, praising President Xi Jinping, and commenting on US foreign policy.
Google also terminated over 2,000 YouTube channels linked to Russia. These accounts spread messages in multiple languages that were supportive of Russia while criticising Ukraine, NATO, and Western nations. Some of the content was linked to Russian state-sponsored entities and consulting firms.
The takedowns are part of ongoing work by Google's Threat Analysis Group (TAG), which monitors and counters influence operations around the world. A YouTube spokesperson said the latest findings are in line with the company's expectations for this regular and ongoing work.
In May, Google removed 20 YouTube channels, four advertising accounts, and one Blogger blog tied to RT, Russia's state-controlled media outlet. RT has previously been accused of paying popular conservative influencers in an effort to sway opinion ahead of the 2024 elections. YouTube had already blocked RT's main channels in March 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Beyond China and Russia, Google also took down influence campaigns linked to Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Israel, Romania, and Ghana. The content targeted political opponents and touched on regional issues like the Israel-Palestine conflict and internal elections.
For example, 457 channels connected to Azerbaijan were removed for promoting pro-Azerbaijani narratives while criticising Armenia and domestic critics. In Iran's case, the content was often supportive of the Iranian government and Palestine while being critical of the US, Israel, and the West.
In total, Google removed thousands of accounts in April, May, and June, each linked to well-planned campaigns across YouTube, Ads, AdSense, Blogger, and Google News. Several domains were also blocked from appearing in Google News and Discover for spreading similar propaganda content.
In the first quarter of 2025, Google removed more than 23,000 accounts. The second quarter's figures bring the year-to-date tally to well over 30,000 account takedowns, reflecting the increasing scale of such operations.
Separately, Meta recently also announced the removal of 10 million fake profiles designed to impersonate large content creators. These removals were part of its broader initiative to reduce spam and misleading content.
Google has removed nearly 11,000 YouTube channels and other accounts during the second quarter of 2025 as part of its efforts to tackle coordinated disinformation campaigns linked to several state actors, including China and Russia. According to a recent report by CNBC and Google's official blog, more than 7,700 of these channels were tied to China. These accounts mainly posted content in Chinese and English promoting the People's Republic of China, praising President Xi Jinping, and commenting on US foreign policy.
Google also terminated over 2,000 YouTube channels linked to Russia. These accounts spread messages in multiple languages that were supportive of Russia while criticising Ukraine, NATO, and Western nations. Some of the content was linked to Russian state-sponsored entities and consulting firms.
The takedowns are part of ongoing work by Google's Threat Analysis Group (TAG), which monitors and counters influence operations around the world. A YouTube spokesperson said the latest findings are in line with the company's expectations for this regular and ongoing work.
In May, Google removed 20 YouTube channels, four advertising accounts, and one Blogger blog tied to RT, Russia's state-controlled media outlet. RT has previously been accused of paying popular conservative influencers in an effort to sway opinion ahead of the 2024 elections. YouTube had already blocked RT's main channels in March 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Beyond China and Russia, Google also took down influence campaigns linked to Iran, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Israel, Romania, and Ghana. The content targeted political opponents and touched on regional issues like the Israel-Palestine conflict and internal elections.
For example, 457 channels connected to Azerbaijan were removed for promoting pro-Azerbaijani narratives while criticising Armenia and domestic critics. In Iran's case, the content was often supportive of the Iranian government and Palestine while being critical of the US, Israel, and the West.
In total, Google removed thousands of accounts in April, May, and June, each linked to well-planned campaigns across YouTube, Ads, AdSense, Blogger, and Google News. Several domains were also blocked from appearing in Google News and Discover for spreading similar propaganda content.
In the first quarter of 2025, Google removed more than 23,000 accounts. The second quarter's figures bring the year-to-date tally to well over 30,000 account takedowns, reflecting the increasing scale of such operations.
Separately, Meta recently also announced the removal of 10 million fake profiles designed to impersonate large content creators. These removals were part of its broader initiative to reduce spam and misleading content. Join our WhatsApp Channel
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
US VP Vance Says Zelenskyy Meeting Putin Before Trump 'Not That Productive'
Last Updated: US VP JD Vance downplayed the impact of a meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin, suggesting progress in the Ukraine war would be more likely with US President Trump involved. US Vice President JD Vance downplayed the potential impact of any meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin before a planned summit with US President Donald Trump, calling such talks 'not that productive." Speaking in an interview on Sunday, Vance suggested that meaningful progress toward resolving the war in Ukraine would be more likely once Trump is directly involved in negotiations. 'I actually don't think it would be that productive. I think fundamentally, the President United States has to bring these two together. We're going to talk to Ukrainians. There is something where the President needs to force President Putin and President Zelenskyy to sit down to figure out….You can't wag your finger at someone and say you're wrong, we're right," Vance said. 'NOT that productive' for Putin to meet Zelensky before TrumpVance shoot down Kiev's chances of being at Alaska table Adds in a decent Zelensky impression too: 'You can't wag your finger at someone and say 'you're wrong, we're right"' — RT (@RT_com) August 10, 2025 This comes after speculation grows over a potential face-to-face meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin, which some diplomats have framed as a possible step toward ending the nearly three-year conflict. Zelenskyy on Sunday expressed gratitude to several European leaders who called for Kyiv's inclusion in the Alaska summit set to take place on Friday. During the Alaska summit, Trump and Putin will hold talks over ending the war in Ukraine. The Ukrainian President has expressed deep concern over being excluded from the upcoming US-Russia summit, warning that any peace deal excluding Kyiv will lead to dead solutions. On Saturday, the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the European Commission issued a joint statement, saying any diplomatic solution must protect the vital security interests of Ukraine and Europe. 'The path to peace cannot be decided without Ukraine," they said, urging 'robust and credible security guarantees" to allow Ukraine to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. In response to European leaders, Zelenskyy said on Sunday, 'The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations." The summit has raised concerns in Kyiv and across Europe, with Ukraine fearing that Washington and Moscow could try to broker a deal to end the 3.5-year war that might come at the cost of its sovereignty. A White House official said Trump is open to Zelenskyy's participation, but the current agenda still calls for a one-on-one meeting with Putin. The Kremlin has rejected including Ukraine, citing unmet conditions for holding talks with Zelenskyy. Trump has suggested 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both (sides)," further raising Ukrainian fears of being pressured into ceding land. Meanwhile, Russia has responded angrily over European leaders' call for including Ukraine in the summit, with former president Dmitry Medvedev calling them 'Euro-imbeciles" and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova likening EU-Ukraine relations to 'necrophilia." 'The Euro-imbeciles are trying to prevent American efforts to help resolve the Ukrainian conflict," former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev posted on social media on Sunday. The Alaska summit, arranged after a recent trip to Moscow by Trump's envoy, has renewed concerns that Trump could reach a deal advantageous to Putin in return for political or economic concessions, potentially sidelining Ukraine and Europe. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : JD Vance view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hindustan Times
44 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Shared strategic interests bind New Delhi and Manila
President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s recent visit to India marks a decisive inflexion point in India–Philippines relations. By upgrading ties to a strategic partnership, Manila and New Delhi are signalling that the Indo-Pacific's centre of gravity is increasingly shaped by agile middle powers forging intent-led coalitions. The convergence of strategic priorities, countering Chinese assertiveness, diversifying partnerships, and building maritime resilience has positioned India-Philippines ties as a pragmatic and purposeful partnershi (Rashtrapati Bhavan) The upgrade in ties is about two confident democracies leveraging shared interests to shape the contours of engagement in an increasingly contested Indo-Pacific. The growing alignment between Manila and New Delhi indicates that the two countries are asserting strategic agency — deepening defence ties, expanding maritime cooperation, and reinforcing their commitment to a rules-based regional order. But this acknowledgement is a recent development. Compared to India's ties with other Southeast Asian nations, its partnership with the Philippines has been a relatively late development. While India began conducting bilateral naval exercises with Southeast Asian countries in the 1990s, its first such engagement with the Philippines was in 2021, when they conducted their first (contactless because of the pandemic) bilateral naval exercise in the South China Sea, specifically within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone (EEZ). There are three clear drivers behind the accelerated pace that bilateral ties have assumed. The most obvious one is, of course, shared security concerns over China's maritime assertions. A second factor is a convergence in timing. The strategic diversification by the Philippines coincides with India's diplomatic and defence outreach in line with its Act East Policy and Indo-Pacific vision. India's position on the South China Sea has evolved over the past decade. In a notable shift, India first referenced the importance of freedom of navigation in the South China Sea in a 2014 joint statement with the US. This stance hardened after the 2020 Galwan clash. Since 2021, every India-Asean summit statement has consistently reaffirmed the need to uphold freedom of navigation and the UNCLOS framework in the region. This strategic recalibration has brought India and the Philippines closer. While India remained neutral following the 2016 arbitral ruling in favour of the Philippines, it changed course in 2023, publicly urging China to respect the verdict. In March 2024, external affairs minister S Jaishankar reaffirmed support for the Philippines' sovereignty. This move drew sharp criticism from Beijing and underscored India's growing alignment with Manila in the face of regional tensions. A third driver is a growing understanding of the need for structured, long-term collaboration. A defining development in bilateral ties is the first formal Maritime Cooperative Activity (MCA) conducted by the Philippine and Indian navies in the West Philippine Sea, from August 3 to August 4, 2025, which coincided with Marcos's India visit. The two-day deployment, featuring Indian vessels alongside Philippine frigates demonstrated interoperability within Manila's EEZ. Though the exercise proceeded without incident, it was closely shadowed by Chinese naval vessels, underscoring ongoing regional tensions. The declaration on the commencement of the strategic partnership reflects a move toward deeper maritime collaboration and capability sharing. The 2023 acquisition of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile made Manila the first foreign recipient of India's most advanced and operationally deployed missile system. During Marcos' visit, there was an expression of interest in acquiring Indian defence hardware, reinforcing defence cooperation as a growing pillar of bilateral interaction. Parallel to security developments, the two nations also committed to strengthening trade through the conclusion of the negotiations of the preferential trade agreement alongside joint ventures in critical minerals, clean tech, agriculture, health, and digital technologies, and improved customs cooperation. Manila and New Delhi agreed to work together through Asean-led platforms, the Voice of the Global South Summit, and climate initiatives like the International Solar Alliance. The plan of action (2025–2029) adopted during Marcos's visit will guide implementation. Both countries pledged expanded cooperation in space, tourism, cultural exchange, and digital technologies, broadening the scope of their strategic outlook. It was also agreed to introduce visa-free travel for Indians to the Philippines, and free e-visas for Filipinos to India, alongside plans to launch direct flights between Delhi and Manila. The convergence of strategic priorities, countering Chinese assertiveness, diversifying partnerships, and building maritime resilience has positioned India-Philippines ties as a pragmatic and purposeful partnership. If sustained, this relationship could become a bedrock of India's Indo-Pacific strategy and a model for strategic South-South cooperation. Harsh V Pant is vice president, studies and foreign policy, Observer Research Foundation (ORF), New Delhi. Pratnashree Basu is an associate fellow, Indo-Pacific, at ORF Kolkata. The views expressed are personal
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian-ASEAN officials to meet beginning August 11 for ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement review
As India braces for the impact of U.S. tariffs of 25% that went into effect from August 7, the government is seeking to shore up other trade negotiations, including with ASEAN countries beginning Monday (August 11, 2025) in New Delhi. A delegation of the 10-nation ASEAN, or the Association of South East Asian Nations, will hold talks with Commerce Ministry officials from August 11-14, sources confirmed, for the next round of talks on a review of the ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA). The talks come two months after Commerce and Industries Minister Piyush Goyal called the 2009 agreement 'silly' as it gave India's Asian competitors easy access to its markets, a comment that led to speculation that India was planning to pull out of the agreement. The comment also caused some outrage amongst ASEAN members, as he referred to them as the 'B-team of China', referring to India's concerns over Chinese goods flooding the market via these countries. However, in July, after a meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Malaysian PM Anwar Ibrahim, who is chairing the ASEAN Summit this year, as well as a meeting between Mr. Goyal and Malaysian Minister of Investment, Trade & Industry Tzafrul Aziz, the two sides agreed to 'fast-track' the AITIGA review to be completed by the end of this year. In addition, officials are preparing for a possible visit by Mr. Modi to Kuala Lumpur for the ASEAN-India Summit and East Asia Summit, at the end of October. On Friday, Mr. Ibrahim announced that he 'looks forward to welcoming' ASEAN leaders and dialogue partners, including United States President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, although China normally attends ASEAN Summits at the level of Premier. The push for a quick end to AITIGA review talks, amongst a number of other trade agreement negotiations the government is pursuing with the European Union, Australia and New Zealand, has been given further impetus by the slapping of 25% additional penalties on India by the U.S. last week. Although the government still hopes to continue negotiations with the U.S. for a free trade agreement, it is studying the impact of the tariffs, particularly as its export rivals in Asia, especially ASEAN countries, have received lower rates from the U.S., of around 19%. Government sources and ASEAN diplomats said that although nine rounds of talks in the past year with ASEAN officials have not produced a breakthrough yet, they are hopeful of some movement this week. 'There has been very little headway so far in reviewing the agreement with ASEAN. We are trying to address the fact that, under the existing deal, our imports have grown far in excess of our exports to these countries. A good deal needs to have balance,' a source told The Hindu. Data with the Ministry of Commerce and Industry show the trade balance between India and the ASEAN grouping has been turning increasingly unfavourable for India over the years. In 2017-18, the earliest year for which the Ministry has made data available, India's exports to the ASEAN countries stood at $34.2 billion while imports from the ASEAN countries were $47.1 billion, leading to a trade deficit of $12.9 billion. As of 2024-25, India's exports to the ASEAN countries grew at an average annual rate of 1.7%, to $39 billion. Imports, on the other hand, grew at 7.5% on average every year, to $84.2 billion by 2024-25. The trade deficit swelled to $45.2 billion last year. Apart from the 'rules of origin' issue vis-à-vis Chinese goods, India has also raised the inequality in tariff lines opened, where India opened up about 71% of its lines, while ASEAN countries offered considerably less, including Indonesia at just 41%. ASEAN countries comprising Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam also led the effort for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a 15-nation FTA, from which India walked out in 2019.
