logo
China sees opportunity in a world turned upside down by Trump

China sees opportunity in a world turned upside down by Trump

CNN26-02-2025

President Donald Trump's upending of US foreign policy has alarmed allies and nations in need. His administration has frozen foreign aid, threatened to take control of other countries' sovereign territory, exited key international bodies and alienated Europe with an embrace of Russia.
But the head-spinning set of moves, that together signal a retreat from leadership of a liberal order to 'America First,' is playing right into the messaging of the US' biggest rival.
In this time of 'transformation and turbulence,' China has a vision for a 'safer world,' its top diplomat Wang Yi told G20 counterparts last week as he reiterated Beijing's pitch for 'a new path to security' without alliances, 'zero-sum' competition and 'bloc confrontation.'
That vision – coded language for reshaping a world order China sees as unfairly dominated by the West – has been a cornerstone of Chinese leader Xi Jinping's push to step up as an alternative global leader to the US.
And the drive has the potential to take on new relevance, observers say, as Beijing eyes the opportunities to advance its influence in the wake of Trump's US foreign policy upset.
Trump's shake-up was obvious even in the room of foreign ministers from the world's largest economies where Wang, China's most seasoned diplomat, spoke in South Africa last week.
The absence of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio meant no high-ranking US diplomat was there to present an American counterpoint to a gathering of countries that make up 80% of the global population and three-quarters of international trade.
On the surface, this shift has the potential to accelerate China's ascent as a global power, potentially granting the world's second-largest economy space to win more allies, boost its global leadership and shift global norms and rules – such as those on human rights or security – in its favor.
But countries from Europe to Asia are well aware of the wide gap between Beijing's benign rhetoric and its behavior as it flouts a major international ruling to harass Philippine vessels in the South China Sea or intimidates Taiwan – the self-ruling democracy Bejing claims.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration has signaled it wants to shift attention from other global conflicts to focus on its rivalry with China. And Beijing will face that and potential fresh US tariffs on its goods as it tries to revive a weak economy – limiting how much it can pour into expanding global influence.
But even still, there are signs that China may see potential for those headwinds to just be some turbulence in a rise made easier by Trump's policies.
'Trump 2.0 era will undoubtedly weaken the US' leadership in international affairs,' an analysis published this month on the website of Shanghai-based think tank Fudan Development Institute said.
'As other countries, particularly the European Union and China, actively respond, the power vacuum left by the US withdrawal may be filled by them … With the US no longer able to dominate global issues as it once did, a new global governance structure may emerge,' it said.
As Trump dismantles the US foreign aid sector – freezing funding to global education, health and development programs – some English-language arms of Chinese state media released scathing critiques of such assistance.
Foreign aid is 'viewed by the US as a tool to maintain its hegemonic position and engage in geopolitical maneuvering,' nationalist tabloid the Global Times said in an article on USAID, an agency Beijing has long seen as a thorn in its side, accusing of sparking democratic 'color revolutions' and indoctrinating US proxies across the world. USAID, which was founded during the Cold War, has long played a key role in advancing American soft power and democratic ideals.
Beijing, however, wasn't looking at Washington's aid freeze as an opportunity because – unlike the US – China treats 'other nations with sincerity, fairness, and selflessness,' an editorial by the state-run outlet claimed.
There has been some indication China will take targeted steps to ramp up its support in regions it sees as strategically important in the wake of the US freeze – a move that would align with what experts have seen as a soft-power struggle between the two countries in recent decades.
In Cambodia, for example, Beijing released $4.4 million for demining operations, as US-backed landmine removal programs were halted in eight provinces, the Associated Press reported, citing the Cambodian Mine Action Center.
Overall, however, experts say there's little chance that Beijing would be able or willing to step up to fill the US aid void.
China is a huge player in global development, funneling more than a trillion dollars into overseas projects between 2000 and 2021. But unlike the US, data show the vast majority of Beijing's development spending is not direct aid, but loans and other financing.
And economic belt-tightening has seen Beijing move away from big-ticket commitments, like building railroads and power plants under Xi's signature Belt and Road overseas infrastructure drive, paring back to more modest projects in recent years.
'Trump is giving China some opportunity – but China might not be able to pick up this US gift,' said Shanghai-based foreign affairs analyst Shen Dingli. 'Due to our gloomy economy and the (downsized) version of Belt and Road … we have less money to buy loyalty.'
Even still, China may look to capitalize on countries' uncertainty about the US to expand its trade and security ties, as well as access to critical minerals, observers say. And countries may take uncertainty in US relations – from the aid freeze to Trump's tariff threats – into calculations for dealing with the world's two largest economies.
'Beijing can send the message to the rest of the world … that the US is fundamentally going to be unreliable,' said Manoj Kewalramani, who heads Indo-Pacific studies at the Takshashila Institution research center in the Indian city of Bengaluru. 'Why would you want to pick a fight with Beijing now?'
There are already signs of concern from some parts about Beijing's potential gains from a Trump-era pullback of US assistance.
In an open letter to Trump posted on social platform X, Nepalese lawmaker Rajendra Bajgain last week warned that a 'vacuum created by reduced American involvement will inevitably be filled by other powers that do not share the values of democracy and free enterprise.'
Two major US-funded infrastructure projects as well as other initiatives in Nepal have been put on hold following the US aid freeze, Reuters reported.
In a response to a request for comment from CNN, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the US 'adjustments' were America's internal affairs, and that Beijing has 'consistently' provided assistance 'to the best of its ability.'
China's aid 'aligns with the needs of recipient countries for socio-economic development and the improvement of people's livelihoods,' it said.
But even as some of Trump's moves so far have created potential openings for Beijing, there's also the hanging question of how his administration may ultimately calibrate its aid and foreign policy – and its rivalry with China.
When asked this month if the foreign aid shake-up was giving China and Russia an opportunity to expand their influence, national security adviser Mike Waltz told NBC's 'Meet the Press' that 'all too often these missions and these programs, number one, are not in line with strategic US interests like pushing back on China.'
And speaking to European counterparts earlier this month, US defense chief Pete Hegseth warned that the US could no longer be 'primarily focused on the security of Europe.' Instead, the US is 'prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific,' he said.
There have also been signs of Trump's brash diplomacy working against Beijing's benefit.
Panama, the first country in Latin America to sign onto China's Belt and Road Initiative, announced it would pull out of the scheme after Trump repeatedly threatened to 'take back' the Panama Canal, falsely claiming Panama had ceded its operations to China.
And in Europe, even as Trump officials lambasted European and NATO counterparts earlier this month and warmed to Russia, US allies there appeared galvanized, rather than dissuaded, to bolster NATO with more spending. That pivot will also mean Beijing is watching closely whether Washington is able to peel away its close ally Moscow, as the White House has signaled it may hope to do.
Even still, Beijing will likely see the time as right to put more focus on repairing strained relations with Europe – a potential opening that could widen if Trump slaps tariffs on European goods.
Trump has also so far not shaken US alliances in Asia, as Beijing may have hoped. And it's not clear that 'America First' will leave a security void in Asia or weaken the US alliance system there.
The US president held seemingly successful meetings with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Indian counterpart Narendra Modi this month, and signaled support for the Pacific-focused AUKUS alliance of Canberra, London and Washington.
And uncertainty or future demands from Trump could also strengthen arsenals and partnerships in the region. On Monday, US allies the Philippines and Japan agreed to further deepen their defense collaborations.
Beijing, so far, has been seen as continuing to probe the limits of its own military muscle-flexing in the region, in recent days conducting what New Zealand said were unprecedented live-fire drills in the Tasman Sea.
On Wednesday, Taiwan accused China of setting up a zone for 'live-fire training' without advance notice a day after the island's coast guard detained a Chinese-crewed cargo ship suspected of cutting an undersea cable in the Taiwan Strait.
But Beijing will be carefully watching how Trump's policies and his allies' response to them weigh on its core ambitions to defend its territorial claims in the South China Sea – and take control of the self-ruling democracy of Taiwan.
'As long as the war in Europe would be put to an end, China's freedom of action in our part of the world might be more seriously checked and balanced,' said Shen in Shanghai.
'China must be watching, calculating how it should adjust its new approach to this fast-moving situation,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Diesel and crude spike higher on Israel attack, though no Iranian oil facilities impacted
Diesel and crude spike higher on Israel attack, though no Iranian oil facilities impacted

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Diesel and crude spike higher on Israel attack, though no Iranian oil facilities impacted

Oil futures prices soared Friday on the back of Israel's attack on Iran, but there were no indications any oil-related facilities had been impacted by the multi-pronged offensive by the Israeli military. 'Non-nuclear energy infrastructure has not been expressly threatened by any party thus far,' S&P Global Commodity Insights (SPGCI) (NYSE: SPGI) said in a 'factbox' summary of key energy-related developments stemming from the Israeli attack. Ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) on the CME commodity exchange settled at $2.3587/gallon, an increase of exactly 17 cts/g or 7.77%.Friday's ULSD settlement is the highest since February 27. The one-day increase of 17 cts/g is the highest since Jan. 10. The last time ULSD increased as much as December 2022, when it rose more than 18 cts/g. But the gain that day was 5.97%; today's was 7.77%. The higher ULSD levels followed increases in global crude markets, which at first tend to rise or fall more in percentage terms than products like gasoline or diesel in reaction to real or potential disruptions in oil supply or demand. But that did not occur Friday, with ULSD rising more than the two key crude benchmarks in percentage terms. Brent, the global crude benchmark, rose $4.87/barrel on the CME, an increase of 7.02% to settle at $74.23/b. West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. crude benchmark, climbed $4.94/b to $72.98/b. That marked a percentage gain of 7.26%.What's at stake through any widening of the war to include Iranian capacity to produce crude was spelled out by SPGCI in its factbox. The SPGCI segment, which houses the legacy Platts business, said Iran produced about 3.25 million b/d of crude in May. Of the countries in the OPEC+ group of oil exporters, only Saudi Arabia, Russia and Iraq produced more. The U.S. is the world's largest crude producer with output of about 13.24 million b/d, according to the latest report by the Energy Information Administration. But since the Iranian Revolution in 1979 and the takeover by its Islamic leaders–and its breach with most other Arab oil producers–the nightmare scenario for oil consumers has always been that Iran would take steps to close the Strait of Hormuz, which is the entrance to the Persian Gulf. Some portion of oil exports from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Iran all pass through the Strait of Hormuz. But despite those fears that have now been in place for more than 45 years, a closure has never happened. Several analysts Friday said it was not likely to happen this time either. The Strait of Hormuz is 'obviously the major concern,' Paul Sankey of independent research firm Sankey Research said in an interview with CNBC. But he added that if Iran took steps to close the passage, 'all hell will break loose. I'm sure Donald Trump is going to be at the forefront of that unleashing of hell.' But Sankey was not fully downplaying the impact from the Israeli attacks. He said the 'speed of the move we've seen is actually as fast as we saw during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. ' 'Recently the oil market hasn't been characterized by reacting to geopolitical risk as much as you would think,' he said. 'On this occasion, we're doing a Russia-Ukraine reaction. So you have to ask yourself, why is that?' Sankey said if there is a loss of output from Iran, it will be difficult to turn to the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve to fill the gap. Reserves were drawn down by the Biden administration to compensate for the loss–real and anticipated–of Russian oil following its invasion of Ukraine in other option to fill any gap, Sankey said, is spare capacity in several Middle East countries; Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Iraq. But the problem with that spare capacity is that much of it is behind the Strait of Hormuz. 'I think the market is pricing real fear about spare capacity,' Sankey said. 'That's why the move has been so aggressive.' Richard Joswick, the head of near-term oil analysts at SPGCI, said 'the key is whether oil exports will be affected.' He noted that when Iran and Israel went back and forth with attacks last year, oil prices did move higher at first. The higher levels didn't stick for long once it became clear that the attacks had no impact on supply. But the SPGCI report also quoted J.P. Morgan analysts who said the 'worst case-scenario' of lost output would be a decline of Iranian supplies of 2.1 million b/d. That could spike the price of dated Brent–the physical benchmark that is drawn from the market for several different crudes–to $120 to $130/b. Retail prices take time to react to moves big and small in futures prices, though wholesale prices will be expected to move on the same day to reflect higher futures prices. Pilot Flying J makes its retail pump prices available through a downloadable spreadsheet. As of 2 p.m. Friday, there was no indication of a surge in retail diesel prices as a result of the Israeli attack; any increases were small and of an amount that would be considered part of the normal day-to-day fluctuation. That lack of movement is not surprising given that the attack just happened. When disruptions to physical supplies occur, like with a hurricane or pipeline outage, price spikes can be more rapid. That has not happened yet. Patrick DeHaan, the head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, which tracks retail prices, said in a post on X that diesel could rise between 10-30 cts/g over the next two weeks. More articles by John Kingston Onstage in Chicago, CHRW talks tech and staffing; RXO sees language order hitting capacity Logistics GDP share rose in '24, not likely to drop: CSCMP report Trump signs bill killing California ZEV-related waivers, state immediately files lawsuit The post Diesel and crude spike higher on Israel attack, though no Iranian oil facilities impacted appeared first on FreightWaves.

Tariff Shockwave 2025: US Stocks Crater While Canada Rides the Wave
Tariff Shockwave 2025: US Stocks Crater While Canada Rides the Wave

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Tariff Shockwave 2025: US Stocks Crater While Canada Rides the Wave

Written by Christopher Liew, CFA at The Motley Fool Canada Trump's tariffs and ensuing turmoil hurt Wall Street more than other global markets. Instead of booming, U.S. stocks cratered, with the S&P 500 losing around US$2 trillion in value to start April 2025. However, Canada's stock market showed remarkable resilience despite the escalating trade tension. As of this writing, the TSX is up 7.3%-plus year-to-date compared to the S&P 500 Index's 2.4-plus. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (+0.8%) and Nasdaq Composite (+2%) also underperformed, falling behind due to concerns about tariffs. TSX stocks from various sectors continue to surge, notwithstanding the tariff-induced headwinds. Orla Mining (TSX:OLA) and Kits Eyecare (TSX:KITS) are among the high-flyers with unstoppable momentum. Orla Mining is hard not to notice because of its stellar performance this year. At $14.84 per share, the year-to-date gain and trailing one-year price return are 86.4%-plus and 169.3%-plus, respectively. Had you invested $7,000 a year ago, your money would have grown to $18,851.49 today. This $3.5 billion mining company has two operating gold mines and a development project. The Musselwhite mine in Ontario has been in operation for 28 years and is expected to continue producing for many years to come. Its strong cash flow generator is the Camino Rojo Mine in Mexico. In Q1 2025, total gold production increased 43.8% year-over-year to 47,759 troy ounces (oz), a new quarterly production record. Revenue rose 109.1% to $140.7 million versus Q1 2024, although net loss reached $69.8 million compared to the $17.5 million net income a year ago. Orla President and CEO Jason Simpson said, 'Over the next two quarters, our focus will be on integrating Musselwhite, laying the foundation for long-term success.' The plan for the next 24 months is to invest significantly in exploration to reshape Musselwhite beyond 2030. Making eye care easy and revolutionizing the eyewear industry is the mission of Kits Eyecare, a vertically integrated digital eyewear brand. The $444.3 million company offers a wide range of eyeglasses, sunglasses, contact lenses, and vision care products. Performance-wise, the consumer discretionary stock has a market-beating return of 63.1%-plus thus far in 2025. If you invest today, the share price is $13.75. Market analysts recommend a buy rating for KITS. Their 12-month average price target is $17.79, a 29.4%-plus potential upside. In Q1 2025, total revenue and glasses revenue increased by 34% and 46.4% respectively to $46.6 million and $6.6 million compared to Q1 2024, both new records. Net income jumped 2,566.7% year-over-year to $1.6 million. Also, during the quarter, the number of delivered glasses reached a record-breaking 104,000 pairs. Roger Hardy, co-founder and CEO of KITS, said, 'These results reflect the strength of our vertically integrated model and our team's continued focus on operational efficiency. We remain confident in our ability to drive sustained profitable growth while advancing our mission to make eyecare easy.' Management expects consistent and stable recurring customer orders to deliver recurring long-term earnings and profitability. The revenue forecast for Q2 2025 is between $48 million and $50 million. Gold stocks, such as Orla Mining, are safe havens during times of economic uncertainty. Meanwhile, Kits Eyecare stands out and continues to garner a commanding share in a rapidly evolving market. U.S. tariffs have minimal or zero effect on these high-flying TSX stocks. The post Tariff Shockwave 2025: US Stocks Crater While Canada Rides the Wave appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Christopher Liew has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kits Eyecare. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

How Israel's campaign to wipe out Iran's nuclear program unfolded
How Israel's campaign to wipe out Iran's nuclear program unfolded

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

How Israel's campaign to wipe out Iran's nuclear program unfolded

Israel launched a wave of unprecedented strikes on Iran shortly before sunrise Friday morning, hitting key sites in the nation's nuclear program as well as residential areas in upscale neighborhoods of Tehran and killing some of the country's highest-ranking military leaders. A CNN analysis of satellite imagery and dozens of videos shared on social media offers insight into how the wide-ranging operation unfolded across the country. The attacks landed hundreds of miles from Tel Aviv, with strikes continuing through the afternoon as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned the bombardment could go on for days. Israel's military said it used 200 fighter jets in the operation, called 'Rising Lion.' Based on a review of strike targets, the attack had several prongs: Heavy strikes against at least one of Iran's uranium enrichment sites as well as its stockpiles of ballistic missiles, and more targeted strikes in Tehran to decapitate the regime's military leadership. It aimed to halt what Israel said was Tehran's rapid progress in developing nuclear weapons. Videos geolocated and verified by CNN reveal multiple residential neighborhoods were hit across Tehran, including in the north, west and east. Aftermath footage showed crowds and emergency workers surrounding collapsed buildings in densely populated areas. The Israeli operation came after years of threats and days of heightened speculation. Earlier in the week, the US had made efforts to withdraw non-essential personnel from locations around the Middle East, with one official citing 'developing tension' in the region. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump told reporters in the White House that he did not want Israel to target Iran while talks to reach a new agreement to limit Iranian nuclear enrichment were ongoing. In retaliation, Iran launched over 100 drones toward Israeli territory, Israel's military said, and then a barrage of ballistic missiles. Here's what we know about how Israel's attack unfolded, minute by minute. All times are local to Iran. The first reports of explosions in Tehran came at around 3:30 a.m. local time Friday. Video geolocated by CNN showed a fire burning across several floors of an apartment block in northern Tehran, as emergency services arrived at the scene. Seven miles west of those buildings – still in the north of the city – another video showed damage from a strike on the upscale Chamran Town neighborhood. An entire wall had been stripped off one of the buildings, with people seen climbing through the rubble inside. One strike hit centrally near Laleh Park, the site of protests over the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old woman who died after Iran's morality police detained her for allegedly not wearing her headscarf properly. Beyond the capital, a video showed a strike on the Piranshahr military base in western Iran, some 350 miles (about 560 kilometers) away from Tehran. The video showed the dark night sky being lit up by a series of rapid explosions, with smoke rising in the distance. Trevor Ball, a munitions researcher and former US Army senior explosive ordnance technician, told CNN the video indicated 'rocket motor burning,' which would be consistent with a strike on a ballistic missile storage facility. Strikes also hit the Natanz nuclear facility, about 150 miles (240 kilometers) south of Tehran. Social media footage showed a huge fireball rising from the site. CNN obtained radar imagery from a space imaging company, Umbra, which captured damage to several areas of the facility. Other satellite imagery reviewed by CNN showed the same damage in more clarity; black plumes of smoke rising from multiple locations across the site. The Natanz nuclear facility includes two large underground halls believed to hold centrifuges for enriching uranium, according to a 2003 report from the Institute for Science and International Security, which includes satellite imagery of the site under construction in 2002. Based on that imagery, the latest attacks do not appear to have hit the underground buildings, but the full extent of the damage is not yet known. Iran's atomic energy agency said its primary nuclear enrichment facility 'did not encounter serious damage' and there were 'no radiation leaks that would cause concern to the people' after Israel attacked it. The spokesperson of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Behrouz Kamalvandi, said on Iranian state media that the damage was on the ground level away from the underground facility at the plant. Rafael Grossi, the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said in a statement that 'radiation levels outside the Natanz facility remained unchanged' but added that there was 'radioactive contamination present inside the facility,' which 'can be managed with appropriate protective measures.' Soon after the first explosions rocked Tehran, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced it had launched preemptive strikes against Iran's nuclear program. It said it used jets to strike 'dozens of military targets, including nuclear targets in different areas of Iran.' The statement came at 3:44 a.m. in Israel, which is 30 minutes behind Iran's time zone. Within minutes, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressed that the US was 'not involved' in Israel's strikes and that Israel's actions were 'unilateral.' 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel,' Rubio said in a statement on X, anticipating a potential Iranian response. Just one mile west of the strikes on Chamran Town, daylight video showed the aftermath of a strike on Tehran's Chizar neighborhood. A huge hole had been blown in the top two floors of a building, with twisted iron bars hanging from the concrete structure. Residents of Tehran later told CNN how they had been woken up by their homes 'shaking' from Israel's attack. A 17-year-old Iranian, who asked to remain anonymous, said people were 'screaming' in the streets. 'I didn't know what was happening. It was really scary,' the teenager said. As evidence of Israel's strikes began to pour in, Netanyahu gave a televised address, saying that Israel had acted to 'roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival.' He said the operation would continue for as long as it takes 'to remove these threats.' Netanyahu claimed Iran had produced enough highly enriched uranium for nine nuclear weapons. In a report sent to member states May 31, the IAEA also judged that Iran had enough uranium enriched to 60% purity, near weapons-grade, potentially to make nine nuclear weapons. 'Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time. It could be a year. It could be within a few months,' Netanyahu said. 'This is a clear and present danger to Israel's survival.' The prime minister claimed Israel had struck Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz, which was corroborated by video of the site. As the sun rose, the full scope of Israel's attack became clearer. Videos published after 6 a.m. showed the aftermath of a strike on a military base and a cargo terminal in the western Kermanshah region, which borders Iraq, over 250 miles from Tehran and 167 miles from Baghdad. After Netanyahu claimed Israel had targeted the nuclear facility at Natanz, the UN nuclear watchdog confirmed that Natanz had been hit. 'The IAEA is closely monitoring the deeply concerning situation in Iran,' it said. The agency said it was in contact with Iranian authorities regarding radiation levels in the area. In a later statement, it said it had not observed an increase in radiation. The Israeli military said it had killed three of the most senior men in Iran's military and its nuclear program. Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami, head of the secretive Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), was the highest-profile of those killed. In its initial statement, Israel also said it killed Maj. Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of Iran's armed forces, and Gen. Gholam Ali Rashid, leader of Iran's emergency command. Later, the IDF said it had killed Ali Shamkhani, a close aide to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Amir Ali Hajizadeh, commander of the IRGC's air force. Many of the strikes on Tehran appear to have been targeting these senior officials. Last year, Israel demonstrated its ability to assassinate its adversaries in highly targeted attacks on Iranian soil. In July 2024, it killed Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas – the Iran-backed militia in Gaza – by remotely detonating a bomb that had been hidden in his room in Tehran. While Friday's strikes appeared extremely targeted, there have been reports of civilian casualties. The IDF said that Iran had launched more than 100 drones towards Israeli territory, and that Israel's air defenses were preparing to intercept them. 'We're expecting difficult hours,' it said. Following previous Israeli attacks against Iran and its proxies in the region, Tehran fired back with huge salvos of ballistic missiles. The Institute for the Study of War, a think tank in Washington, DC, said it was 'possible that Israel somehow disrupted Iran's response by targeting Iran's ballistic missile launch sites and stockpiles.' Early afternoon, Iranian media reported that Israel had launched a fresh strike on the northwestern city of Tabriz. Tamsin news agency said the Tabriz Airport had come under 'heavy Israeli attack.' After learning the extent of Israel's attack, Trump urged Iran's leaders to agree to a new nuclear deal 'before there is nothing left' of their country. Trump said he had given Iran 'chance after chance' to make a deal. 'JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE,' he wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform. Under a 2015 nuclear deal struck by President Barack Obama, Iran agreed to drastically limit its number of centrifuges and cap uranium enrichment at levels far below those required to make weapons, in exchange for sanctions relief. But during his first term as president in 2018, Trump withdrew from the deal, saying the 'rotten structure' of the agreement was not enough to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear bomb. He ramped up sanctions on Iran and threatened to sanction any country that helped the regime obtain nuclear weapons. In his second term, Trump has revived efforts to strike a new nuclear deal with Iran. Just hours before Israel's attack, the president on Thursday cautioned Israel against launching a strike while talks are ongoing. US officials have held several rounds of high-stakes nuclear talks with Iran in recent weeks, demanding that Tehran stop all uranium enrichment activity. Iran has long claimed that its nuclear program is peaceful. It has said it wants to keep enriching uranium for civilian purposes, like building a nuclear reactor, and not for weapons. 'Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal,' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in an X post last month, setting out Tehran's red lines in the talks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store