Pierre Poilievre: Journey From Being A Paper Boy To Canada's PM-Candidate
Ottawa, Canada:
Pierre Poilievre, the combative Conservative leader known for his fiery speeches, is now closer than ever to the Prime Minister's Office. As Canada prepares for a federal election on April 28, Mr Poilievre finds himself in a two-way showdown with newly appointed Liberal leader Mark Carney. The 45-year-old has spent nearly two decades in Parliament.
Who Is Pierre Poilievre?
At 20 years of age, Pierre Poilievre had already written his political playbook. In an essay outlining what he would do as prime minister, he argued for smaller government, lower taxes, and more economic freedom - ideas he still champions today.
Now over two decades later, Mr Poilievre leads Canada's Conservative Party and is inching closer to the job he imagined decades ago. With Justin Trudeau stepping down and Mark Carney taking over as Liberal leader, the next election is shaping up to be a fierce contest between two sharply different visions for Canada.
While Mr Poilievre's Conservative Party has long led in national polls, the race has tightened since Trudeau's resignation, with Prime Minister Mark Carney emerging as a strong contender.
Early Life And Education
Pierre Poilievre was born in Calgary, Alberta, on June 3, 1979, to a teenage mother who gave him away. He was adopted shortly after birth by two school teachers. He grew up in a middle-class home in suburban Calgary.
Growing up in Calgary, Pierre Poilievre delivered newspapers for the 'Calgary Sun' and attended Henry Wise Wood High School. An early shoulder injury ended his stint on the wrestling team, prompting him to explore politics as a hobby.
At 14, he began attending local Tory meetings. By 16, Mr Poilievre was selling Reform Party memberships for former Conservative leader Jason Kenney, canvassing for campaigns, and attending party conventions. He graduated high school in 1997.
He went on to study international relations at the University of Calgary.
It was at university that he met Stockwell Day, a cabinet minister under former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Day was then running for leadership of the Canadian Alliance, a right-leaning party that would eventually merge into today's Conservative Party. Impressed by Mr Poilievre's energy and focus, Day brought him on board to help with outreach on campus.
Business
Pierre Poilievre co-founded a political communications company called 3D Contact with his friend Jonathan Denis, who later served in various high-ranking roles in Alberta's provincial government, including Minister of Justice and Attorney General. The company specialised in outreach and voter contact services, helping Mr Poilievre earn money before and during the early stages of his political career.
Political Career
After Stockwell Day's successful leadership bid, Pierre Poilievre moved to Ottawa as his assistant. One winter evening, Mr Poilievre told Stockwell Day he wanted to run for office himself.
He won his first seat (Nepean-Carleton) in 2004 at the age of 25, becoming one of the youngest Conservative MPs in the House. He defeated Liberal leader David Pratt and has held that seat ever since.
In Ottawa, Pierre Poilievre earned the nickname "Skippy" from colleagues and opponents alike due to his youthful energy and quick, often sharp, retorts in Parliament.
He served as Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board and later to the Prime Minister. In 2013, he was appointed Minister of State for Democratic Reform, followed by a brief tenure as Minister of Employment and Social Development in 2015.
In September 2022, Poilievre won the Conservative Party leadership with a significant majority.
Rift With Donald Trump
Pierre Poilievre has frequently been compared to US President Donald Trump due to his populist rhetoric, confrontational style and use of social media to connect directly with supporters. Both politicians have positioned themselves as champions of the "common people" against perceived elites and have criticised mainstream media outlets.
While the style may seem familiar, Mr Poilievre's approach has taken a different turn, especially in foreign policy. For most of his career, he avoided international affairs. That changed when Trump reignited tensions between the US and Canada - first by casually suggesting that Canada should become America's "51st state", then through a trade war.
This forced Mr Poilievre to speak up. He responded with sharp words, rejecting Trump's remarks and declaring that he would always "put Canada first."
"While Canadians are slow to anger and quick to forgive, once provoked, we fight back. And we will fight back," Mr Poilievre said in a pointed address aimed at Trump in response to his latest tariffs. He also said Trump "stabbed America's best friend in the back."
Trump didn't take kindly to the pushback. In interviews with The Spectator and Fox News, he dismissed Mr Poilievre as "not MAGA enough" and "stupidly no friend of mine."
Controversies
Pierre Poilievre has promised the "biggest crackdown on crime in Canadian history," aiming to keep repeat offenders in jail and toughen sentences.
The Conservative leader once voted against legalising gay marriage in the early 2000s. Today, he says marriage equality is settled law.
Mr Poilievre has been vocal about vaccine mandates, opposing them during the pandemic. He also supported the 2021 Freedom Convoy, framing it as a stand for individual rights.
The 2021 Freedom Convoy was a protest led by Canadian truckers against COVID-19 vaccine mandates and pandemic restrictions.
He became a vocal critic of then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's handling of COVID-19 restrictions, calling for the removal of mandates and standing with those protesting the restrictions.
Perhaps one of his most controversial promises is his vow to scrap the federal carbon pricing system for industries, claiming it places an unnecessary burden on Canadian families. Critics argue this leaves unanswered questions about how his government would address the climate crisis.
Mr Poilievre has pledged to scrap the Liberal government's carbon tax, calling it "inflationary." He also plans to repeal the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act and the Impact Assessment Act - two laws he labels as "anti-energy" - and supports reviving the Energy East pipeline project.
Personal Life
In December 2017, Pierre Poilievre married Anaida Poilievre, a former Senate aide, in Portugal. They have two children - a daughter born in 2018 and a son in 2021. Anaida came to Canada as a child refugee from Caracas, Venezuela.
Pierre Poilievre has supported immigrant integration, saying that Canada doesn't need to be a "hyphenated society."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Albanese to skip NATO summit as push for Trump meeting and AUKUS talks intensify
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will not attend next week's NATO summit in The Hague on 24-25 June, as he plans for a rescheduled meeting with US President Donald Trump . The two leaders were at the recently concluded G7 summit in Canada but the official meeting failed to materialize as Trump suddenly left for Washington. Albanese had left the door open to joining the key gathering of Trans Atlantic leaders, which will cover critical topics including Australia's role in AUKUS, rising global security tensions, and US trade tariffs. There is additional pressure on the Albanese government to reassert Australia's strategic position with the US as Trump's influence over global security and trade policy intensifies. 'Whatever happens, we'll be represented at a very high level at NATO,' Health Minister Mark Butler told Seven News on Friday, referring to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, who will lead the Australian delegation . Also read: Albanese gifts Gallipoli poster to Canada's Carney as they meet on the sidelines of G7 summit; here is a list of gifts exchanged Live Events Australia can be sidelined? Critics say skipping the NATO summit risks sidelining Australia during crucial conversations on Ukraine, Iran, and global defence coordination. 'The PM should still go,' Liberal frontbencher James Paterson told Sunrise. 'Meeting Trump would be a bonus, but there are strong shared interests with our allies, from Ukraine to Iran to defence spending.' Albanese had been seeking another opportunity to speak with Trump before the US completes its 30-day review of the AUKUS pact that will help determine how and whether Australia receives American-built nuclear submarines as promised. The crisis in the Middle East Adding urgency to the situation is the Middle East crisis with a new conflict between Israel and Iran, which continues to escalate. Australia has evacuated diplomats from Tehran, deployed aircraft and personnel to assist citizens leaving Israel via Jordan. It has now stationed officials at Azerbaijan's border to support over 2,000 Australians seeking to leave Iran.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Trump's research team in shambles; fact-check disasters and unscripted moments of bias by US President
President Donald Trump 's recent international appearances have provided a cascade of unscripted moments, historical mix-ups, and eyebrow-raising claims, leaving his speechwriters and America's allies scrambling to correct the record in real time. A summit of stumbles At the G7 summit in Canada, Trump revived a favorite but false anecdote: blaming former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for Russia's expulsion from the G8 in 2014. In reality, Trudeau didn't take office until late 2015; it was Conservative PM Stephen Harper who led the charge to eject Russia after its annexation of Crimea. Trump's public misattribution, delivered while standing next to current Canadian leader Mark Carney, was more than just a slip. It was a diplomatic head-scratcher that left Canadian officials correcting the record yet again. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bangladesh: Unsold Sofas at Bargain Prices (View Current Prices) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo But the G7 was just the latest stage for Trump's improvisational approach to world affairs. He floated the idea that the war in Ukraine might have been avoided if Russia hadn't been expelled from the G8, a claim that not only overlooks Moscow's aggression but also undercuts the unified Western stance against Vladimir Putin's actions. European diplomats privately expressed alarm, noting that Trump's comments seemed to offer 'bouquets' to the Kremlin at a time when the West is trying to pressure Russia with new sanctions. Live Events UK-EU mix-up Trump's off-script moments extended to his dealings with the UK. While speaking alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump erroneously described his trade agreement with the UK as a deal with the European Union, a body the UK no longer belongs to after Brexit. The mischaracterization was not just a minor slip but a significant diplomatic faux pas, given the sensitive nature of UK-EU relations post-Brexit. The $350 billion Ukraine aid myth Trump also twice repeated his long-debunked assertion that former President Joe Biden had given '$350 billion' in aid to Ukraine. The real numbers tell a very different story. According to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy , a German think tank that closely tracks international aid to Ukraine, the US had committed about $138 billion in military, financial, and humanitarian aid from January 2022 through April 2025, a period that includes more than three months of Trump's current presidency. Even using different counting methodologies, there is no basis for Trump's '$350 billion' claim. The US government inspector general overseeing the Ukraine response reports that the US had appropriated about $185 billion for Ukraine through March 2025, with about $90 billion actually disbursed - figures that also include funds spent in the US or allocated to other countries. For Trump's speechwriters, these moments are more than gaffes; they're a recurring challenge. Carefully crafted talking points are often abandoned in favor of improvisation, leaving aides and diplomats scrambling to clarify facts and mend fences.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Will Canada's new tax cut change your life, or just cover your coffee? Here's what you'll save
According to a new report released Wednesday(June 18) by the Parliamentary Budget Officer(PBO), the Liberal government's promised income tax cut is expected to save the average Canadian family $280 next year. However, while the savings may offer some relief, critics, especially those from the Conservative Party, argue that the benefit is too small to make a real difference. The tax cut was first proposed during Prime Minister Mark Carney 's election campaign this spring, lowering the rate on the first $57,375 of taxable income from 15 percent to 14.5 percent, starting July 1, and then to 14 percent next year. For some families, the tax break could help ease everyday costs. But for many Canadians already facing soaring rents, food prices, and interest rates, a few hundred dollars a year may not feel like enough. As one Winnipeg senior told CBC, 'It's something, but it won't change my life.' Relief for the middle class Carney pitched the plan as a middle-class relief measure, estimating potential savings of up to $825 per year for dual-income families. Finance Canada later pegged the maximum savings at $840 per couple. Live Events However, PBO Yves Giroux offered a more sobering view. Because the tax cut takes effect midway through 2025, the average filer will save only $90 this year, rising to $190 in 2026. A closer look at the numbers reveals how unevenly the benefits are distributed A two-income couple with a child in the second income bracket will likely save about $750. A high-earning single Canadian might see $350 back. A single parent in the lowest tax bracket is estimated to save $140. A single senior in the same bracket? Just $50. Minimal impact for low-income Canadians For many low-income Canadians, the impact will be minimal as their taxable income is already offset by credits, and the tax cut brings little change. The PBO noted: " The lower an individual's income, the less they can expect to save." That prompted a sharp rebuke from Pierre Poilievre 's Conservatives, who issued a statement saying, 'This tax cut won't even buy a breakfast sandwich a month for a low-income senior.' They slammed Carney for offering Canadians 'mere cents a day,' calling the move marginal and insufficient. Conservatives still in favour of the tax cut Despite the criticism, the Conservatives said they will vote in favour of the tax cut, but are pushing for more. Their campaign had promised a deeper 2.25-point tax cut, to be phased in over four years. Meanwhile, the fiscal cost of the Liberal plan is significant. The PBO estimates the gross cost at $64 billion over five years, with a net cost of $28 billion once reduced credits are factored in. Finance Canada places that closer to $27 billion. The legislation was introduced via a 'ways and means' motion last month and is set to take effect July 1, though it still awaits final passage in Parliament.
