Sir Keir warned not to cosy up to EU as President Trump now threatens Brussels with 50 per cent tariffs
Sir Keir Starmer was yesterday warned against more Brexit backsliding after Donald Trump threatened to hit the EU with 50 per cent trade tariffs.
The US President made the threat amid trade talks between Washington and Brussels, warning he could impose the tariffs next month.
It comes after Sir Keir unveiled his EU-UK 'reset' deal this week, bringing Britain the closest its been with the bloc since Brexit.
But critics fear it's the start of a slippery slope which could lead to the PM, who tried to reverse Brexit while in Opposition, taking Britain back into the EU's customs union or single market.
Were this to happen, the tariffs would likely apply to the UK too.As part of his deal, dubbed the 'surrender' pact by Brexiteers, Sir Keir agreed to shackle Britain to the EU's rulebook on food standards, also known as the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement (SPS).
He also surrendered Britain's fishing waters to EU trawlers for another 12 years and committed to a youth mobility scheme which could give tens of thousands of Europeans the right to live and work here.
Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith said: 'This week he stupidly went and handed ourselves over to the EU on SPS, where we have now become a rule-taker from the EU.
'So this 50 per cent tariff should be a warning to him that it's a mistake getting directly back involved with the EU.'
Stock markets fell sharply on Mr Trump's threats. The FTSE 100 closed 0.24 per cent, or 21.29 points, down.
European markets fell even further – with Germany's Dax down 1.5 per cent and France's Cac 40 falling 1.7 per cent.
In New York, stocks were also trading lower.
Analysts said Mr Trump's announcements had eradicated optimism that his previous aggressive stance on tariffs had cooled after deals with China and the UK.
'The European Union, which was formed for the primary purpose of taking advantage of the United States on TRADE, has been very difficult to deal with,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site.
'I am recommending a straight 50 per cent Tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025.'
EU exports to the United States last year totalled about €500billion (£420billion), led by Germany with €161billion (£135billion).
Mr Trump also turned his fire on tech firm Apple.
'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,' he said, referring to the Apple chief executive.
'If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25 per cent must be paid by Apple to the US.'
Apple shares fell nearly three per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries
June 5 (Reuters) - Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned from visiting the United States expressed dismay and disbelief on Thursday at President Donald Trump's new sweeping travel ban as his administration intensifies its immigration crackdown. Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the U.S. starting on Monday, asserting that the restrictions were necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists." The order was reminiscent of a similar move Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. That directive faced court challenges and went through several iterations before the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed that ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience." But the new ban is much more expansive and covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Citizens of seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. A senior diplomat with the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, who asked not to be named, said Trump's justification did not stand up to scrutiny. "Sudanese people have never been known to pose a terrorist threat anywhere in the world," the official said. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the U.S. a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the U.S. or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women's rights defender waiting in Pakistan for her U.S. visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after Trump's order. "Unfortunately, the decisions made by President Trump turned all the hopes and beliefs of us into ashes," she told Reuters, asking that only her first name be published for security reasons. Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt was not part of the travel ban. "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. When asked why he chose this moment to unveil the ban, he said: "It can't come soon enough." The visa ban takes effect on June 9 at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said. In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The ban is likely to face legal challenges. But Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, said he expected those lawsuits to face an uphill climb, because the latest ban contains various exemptions and cited specific security concerns with each country. The ban includes exemptions, such as for dual nationals, permanent residents, immigrant visas for immediate family members of U.S. citizens and athletes traveling for major sporting events like the World Cup. "Trump has learned from the mistakes of earlier travel bans," he said. Some foreign officials said they were prepared to work with the U.S. to address Trump's security concerns. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement.
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Ukraine's spectacular attack: 21st-century tactics still require support from allies
Since Donald Trump scolded Volodymyr Zelenskyy with the words 'You don't have the cards right now,' Ukraine has been keener than ever to demonstrate that it has a few up its sleeve. On Sunday it showed its hand with an extraordinary, audacious drone attack on multiple bases deep inside Russia, which it says damaged 41 aircraft. Operation Spiderweb, which saw the smuggled drones released from their hiding places in wooden sheds and remotely piloted to their targets, was swiftly followed by another attack on Crimea's Kerch bridge using underwater explosives. Kyiv – often coy in such cases – was unusually swift to claim both incidents, but has not taken responsibility for two railway bridge attacks which Russia says led to the deaths of seven passengers at the weekend. There is obvious satisfaction in hitting Russian bombers and surveillance planes used against Ukrainian civilians, and Spiderweb's unexpected method will surely force Russia to think harder about defence. But the greater significance lies in its potential impact on domestic morale and international support. Ukraine has repeatedly surprised both its enemy and its allies throughout this war. Unexpected successes such as the Kursk incursion have changed the narrative at critical moments. Meticulously planned, and reportedly 18 months in the making, the latest operation must make Russia wonder what else may be on the way. It was also spectacular enough to make Mr Trump pay attention. The US president reportedly judged the attack to be 'badass'. But his cosy phone chats with Vladimir Putin appear to be locking in his tilt towards Moscow. On Wednesday he said that, in a 'good' conversation, Mr Putin had said he would have to respond. It did not appear to have occurred to the US president that discouraging retaliation might be desirable. He should be challenging Kremlin talking points instead of amplifying them. If Ukraine hoped to dispel the nuclear spectre which Russia has repeatedly summoned up, Mr Trump seems to be still in its thrall – with some of those around him talking up the threat again. The Center for Strategic and International Studies argued in a report this week that Russia's military performance has been notably poor in this war, with gains coming at a strikingly high cost in terms of both equipment and personnel – hitting an estimated million casualties this summer. But Russia still has many more cards. It continues to grind out its advance, and in late May it launched its largest drone and missile assault on Ukraine to date. Its war of attrition may look old-fashioned compared with Kyiv's innovations, but it still hurts. Meanwhile, talks in Istanbul have produced agreement on a prisoner exchange but no movement towards peace. There appears to be growing support in the US Senate for further sanctions on Russia, but Lindsey Graham is unlikely to move without Mr Trump's acquiescence, and there is little sign of progress in the House. Pete Hegseth did not attend the session on Ukraine at Thursday's gathering of defence ministers ahead of this month's Nato summit – a telling absence, though the Pentagon blamed scheduling issues. Kyiv needs and deserves increased support from Washington, but damage limitation looks like a more realistic aspiration. Ukraine continues to surprise, and to shift its approach as circumstances demand. Unfortunately, there is little sign of the US president, capricious as he is, changing course on this conflict.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Transgender American woman files for asylum in Canada over Trump
An Arizona transgender woman claims the United States is no longer safe for trans people because of President Donald Trump and has applied for asylum in Canada. Hannah Kreager, 22, has now 'fled' her home in the Grand Canyon State for the Canadian city of Calgary. 'I have fled in hopes of finding safety, security, and the freedom to continue to live my life, and access/take my medications as prescribed,' Kreager wrote on her GoFundMe page Her legal filing cites two executive orders by the Republican president, including where the federal government only recognizes the male and female genders, according to The Globe and Mail. As a result, US passports and identity cards with an X gender marker are no longer being issued. Her own passport displays an X, she told the Canadian news organization, claiming she is concerned what might happen to hers after hearing the passports of other transgender people have been seized or damaged. 'Attitudes in the United States have grown increasingly intolerant toward trans people by those who have been influenced and emboldened by a president and administration that takes basic rights away from trans people on the basis of nothing more than their identity,' the US migrant stated. 'The danger to trans individuals in the United States is very high, while the threat my community poses is exceedingly low.' Her pending claim for protection in the Great White North could be a landmark case, the American believes. 'I'm here in Canada with a terrific lawyer taking up my unprecedented case: seeking asylum from the United States of America on the grounds of violation of human rights,' she posted online. 'My case is a precedent-setting one, and if successful, could make asylum for trans people in the U.S. possible.' Kreager's attorney Yameena Ansari claims she and other Canadian immigration lawyers have been flooded with inquiries from transgender Americans since Trump took power about how they can move to their country. 'This case is about safety,' her attorney Yameena Ansari told the Canadian news site. 'It's about whether Canada will recognize the threat Hannah faces in the U.S.' Other Americans have also applied for refugee status north of the US border. An Illinois family with transgender children has made a similar request of the Canadian government, reported the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Kaitlyn and Ted Berg, parents to older children who is transgender, and a younger singling who identifies as gender fluid, pulled their kids from school one day after Trump's inauguration. 'When I saw what happened, Donald Trump being elected, my gut started turning,' Kaitlyn told the CBC. 'And that is when I started looking at how to get my family out safely.' The military veteran parents drove to the US-Canada border without passports to a border crossing where they made an asylum claim. However, Canadian immigration officials have stressed that claims from Americans face an uphill battle, as they must prove that they have a 'real fear of persecution or face serious harm, such as torture or cruel treatment, in their home country or where they usually live.'
