Delhi high court sets aside appointment of NCISM chairperson
NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Friday scrapped the appointment of Jayant Yeshwant Deopujari as chairperson of the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM), holding that he did not have a postgraduate degree mandated under the law.
A bench of chief justice DK Upadhyaya and justice Tushar Rao Gedela held that Deopujari's academic credentials -- a bachelor's degree in Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) and a PhD in Kayachikitsa -- do not satisfy the eligibility criteria prescribed under the NCISM Act, 2020.
The Act requires a candidate to have a postgraduate degree in any discipline of the Indian System of Medicine, along with at least 20 years of experience, including 10 years in leadership roles in the sector.
'We are of the considered opinion that every degree awarded by a university after graduation cannot be termed a 'postgraduate qualification',' the court said in its ruling. It noted that in the Indian higher education framework, a postgraduate degree refers specifically to a master's degree such as M.A., M.Sc., M.D., LL.M., or M.Ed., and that a PhD does not substitute the requirement for a master's level qualification.
The court drew a comparison with the LL.B. degree, which is awarded only after graduation but is still not considered a postgraduate degree. 'Similarly, the PhD in question here cannot be seen as satisfying the requirement of a postgraduate degree in the Indian System of Medicine,' it noted.
The judgment came on a petition filed by Ved Prakash Tyagi, former president of the erstwhile Central Council for Indian Medicine, and Dr Raghunandan Sharma, who challenged Deopujari's appointment on the ground that he was ineligible.
Appearing for the Union government, additional solicitor general Chetan Sharma argued that Deopujari's PhD in the same stream constituted a higher qualification than a postgraduate degree. However, the court rejected this reasoning, clarifying that statutory qualifications must be met in the specific terms laid down by the Act.
Finding the appointment to be contrary to the pertinent provision of the NCISM Act, the court directed the Centre to 'expeditiously' initiate the process for selecting a new chairperson who meets all statutory qualifications.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
8 hours ago
- Hans India
Care centres for mentally challenged to come up in four dists
Bengaluru: The Karnataka government has approved establishment of care centres for mentally challenged in Chitradurga, Yadgir, Kolar, and Bidar districts, with a grant limit of Rs 6 crore. The centres will be established in collaboration with NGO Aaladamara Foundation, said an order issued by the health department on Friday. It was declared in the Budget 2025, care centres for mentally ill persons will be established at district-level hospitals in the state in collaboration with NGOs. The order issued on Friday stated that in the remaining 27 districts, too, care centres will be established at district-level hospitals in collabora-tion with NGOs. According to the Mental Health Care Act 2017, it is the duty of a police of-ficer to protect persons found wandering aimlessly on the streets, as these individuals are at risk of causing harm to themselves or others or creating public nuisance due to their mental state. The Act also prescribes that it is essential to initiate community-based, human rights-friendly care, support, assessment, and treatment for these individuals. 'Due to challenges in accessing nearby mental health services, thousands of mentally ill persons leave their homes and become homeless every year. Identifying mentally ill persons among the homeless and bringing them to a safe place is a key function of the system,' added the preamble to the order.
Hans India
10 hours ago
- Hans India
Officials ordered to keep a tab on overcharging hospitals
Nirmal: District Collector Abhilasha Abhinav has ordered the officials that private and government hospitals in the district must strictly follow the provisions of the Clinical Establishment Act - 2010. On Friday, the Collector held a review meeting with the relevant officials at the Collectorate on the implementation and monitoring of the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act - 2010 and the Women and Child Protection Acts. Speaking on the occasion, she ordered that quality medical services should be provided to the people in government and private hospitals in the district. She said that there should be no negligence in the implementation of the Women and Child Protection Acts. Hospitals should not charge high charges from patients, and the rate chart should be clearly displayed at the reception in every hospital. Every hospital should follow minimum standards and properly manage bio-medical waste. It was clarified that all private medical institutions, scanning centers, and diagnostic labs in the district should be registered under the Clinical Establishments Act. The officials were instructed to take strict action against those working illegally. People should contact the toll-free number 7337448722 to complain against those involved in relevant actions.
Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi HC sets aside appointment of NCISMC chairperson
New Delhi, The Delhi High Court on Friday set aside the appointment of the chairperson of National Commission for Indian System of Medicine holding him ineligible for office. A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela allowed two petitions challenging the appointment of Vaidya Jayant Yeshwant Deopujari as the chairperson of the commission (NCISMC). "The writ petitions are allowed, and a writ of quo warranto quashing and setting aside the appointment of respondent 5 (Deopujari) as Chairperson of the Commission is issued," the bench held. The court was informed by the counsel for the commission that the process of selection and appointment of the chairperson had commenced. The court directed the expeditious completion of the process and said at the time of conducting the selection process, its observations ought to be taken into account. The court passed the order on two petitions filed by Ved Prakash Tyagi, former president of the erstwhile Central Council for Indian Medicine, and Dr Raghunandan Sharma. The Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions had issued a circular on June 9, 2021 appointing Deopujari as the commission's chairperson. The petitioners have alleged that Deopujari could not be appointed as the chairperson of the commission as he does not hold a postgraduate degree, mandated under the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine Act, 2020 (NCISM Act). The high court held that Deopujari possessed a PhD degree whereas the requisite degree was MD or any other equivalent master's degree in any discipline of Indian System of Medicine. The PhD degree which was awarded to him by Pune University did not presuppose acquisition of lower qualification (Master's Degree in Ayurveda), it said. "We have no hesitation to hold that the expression 'Post-Graduate Degree' occurring in Section 4(2) of the NCISM Act, 2020 in the context it has been used would mean a Master's Degree (MD) in any discipline of Indian System of Medicine which the respondent does not possess and, therefore, he lacks the requisite qualification for being appointed to the office in question," the bench said. It said Deopujari was admitted to PhD course without undergoing the master's degree course immediately after obtaining his graduation degree in Ayurveda (BAMS). The court opined that every degree awarded by a university after graduation cannot be termed to be a "post-graduation qualification" for the reason that in the domain of higher education in our country "post graduate degree" has acquired a special meaning and significance and post-graduate degree means a master's degree like MA, MSc, MD, LLM or MEd. The court said the emphasis of the provisions of the NCISM Act on the functions of the commission are in relation to maintaining high quality and high standards of education in Indian System of Medicine and, accordingly, the phrases "head of a department" and "head of an organisation" were to be understood and construed in the context in which Parliament passed the Act. "Analysing the alleged experience of respondent 5 working in a company producing ayurvedic medicine and products, we are unable to agree with the submission made on behalf of the respondents that such an experience can be said to be an experience of working as a 'Leader' in the capacity of 'Head of a Department' or 'Head of an Organisation'," it said. The respondents said since the appointment of Deopujari was made on the recommendation of a high-powered search committee headed by the cabinet secretary of the Central government and comprised experts, any interference in this petition would amount to sitting in appeal over a decision of a body of experts, impermissible in law. The court, however, said the submission does not hold good as it is a case where the person concerned clearly lacked the essential eligibility qualification statutorily prescribed under the Act. Tyagi's plea said the commission was a governing body for all matters relating to education and regulation of Indian medicine in the country. "Thus, the interests of a large number of people/students/Indian medicine practitioners shall be adversely and severely affected if an ineligible person is allowed to continue as the chairperson of such a critical statutory body," he added. PTI
