logo
How old are you, really? AI uses headshots to predict biological age and health risks

How old are you, really? AI uses headshots to predict biological age and health risks

Malay Mail10-05-2025

WASHINGTON, May 10 — Doctors often start exams with the so-called 'eyeball test' – a snap judgment about whether the patient appears older or younger than their age, which can influence key medical decisions.
That intuitive assessment may soon get an AI upgrade.
FaceAge, a deep learning algorithm described Thursday in The Lancet Digital Health, converts a simple headshot into a number that more accurately reflects a person's biological age rather than the birthday on their chart.
Trained on tens of thousands of photographs, it pegged cancer patients on average as biologically five years older than healthy peers. The study's authors say it could help doctors decide who can safely tolerate punishing treatments, and who might fare better with a gentler approach.
'We hypothesize that FaceAge could be used as a biomarker in cancer care to quantify a patient's biological age and help a doctor make these tough decisions,' said co-senior author Raymond Mak, an oncologist at Mass Brigham Health, a Harvard-affiliated health system in Boston.
Consider two hypothetical patients: a spry 75-year-old whose biological age clocks in at 65, and a frail 60-year-old whose biology reads 70. Aggressive radiation might be appropriate for the former but risky for the latter.
The same logic could help guide decisions about heart surgery, hip replacements or end-of-life care.
Sharper lens on frailty
Growing evidence shows humans age at different rates, shaped by genes, stress, exercise, and habits like smoking or drinking. While pricey genetic tests can reveal how DNA wears over time, FaceAge promises insight using only a selfie.
The model was trained on 58,851 portraits of presumed-healthy adults over 60, culled from public datasets.
It was then tested on 6,196 cancer patients treated in the United States and the Netherlands, using photos snapped just before radiotherapy. Patients with malignancies looked on average 4.79 years older biologically than their chronological age.
Among cancer patients, a higher FaceAge score strongly predicted worse survival – even after accounting for actual age, sex, and tumor type – and the hazard rose steeply for anyone whose biological reading tipped past 85.
Intriguingly, FaceAge appears to weigh the signs of aging differently than humans do. For example, being gray-haired or balding matters less than subtle changes in facial muscle tone.
FaceAge boosted doctors' accuracy, too. Eight physicians were asked to examine headshots of terminal cancer patients and guess who would die within six months. Their success rate barely beat chance; with FaceAge data in hand, predictions improved sharply.
The model even affirmed a favorite internet meme, estimating actor Paul Rudd's biological age as 43 in a photo taken when he was 50.
Bias and ethics guardrails
AI tools have faced scrutiny for under-serving non-white people. Mak said preliminary checks revealed no significant racial bias in FaceAge's predictions, but the group is training a second-generation model on 20,000 patients.
They're also probing how factors like makeup, cosmetic surgery or room lighting variations could fool the system.
Ethics debates loom large. An AI that can read biological age from a selfie could prove a boon for clinicians, but also tempting for life insurers or employers seeking to gauge risk.
'It is for sure something that needs attention, to assure that these technologies are used only in the benefit for the patient,' said Hugo Aerts, the study's co-lead who directs MGB's AI in medicine program.
Another dilemma: What happens when the mirror talks back? Learning that your body is biologically older than you thought may spur healthy changes – or sow anxiety.
The researchers are planning to open a public-facing FaceAge portal where people can upload their own pictures to enrol in a research study to further validate the algorithm. Commercial versions aimed at clinicians may follow, but only after more validation. — AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside the intricate science, engineering, and policy hurdles shaping Nasa, SpaceX's bid to send humans to Mars
Inside the intricate science, engineering, and policy hurdles shaping Nasa, SpaceX's bid to send humans to Mars

Malay Mail

time7 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Inside the intricate science, engineering, and policy hurdles shaping Nasa, SpaceX's bid to send humans to Mars

WASHINGTON, June 6 — A crewed mission to Mars would rank among the most complex and costly undertakings in human history—and US President Donald Trump has vowed to make it a national priority. That political momentum, coupled with SpaceX chief Elon Musk's zeal, has breathed new life into a cause long championed by Red Planet advocates—even as major obstacles remain, including Trump and Musk's latest feud. Why go? As Nasa writes in its Moon to Mars blueprint, 'exploration of the cosmos remains a great calling for humanity.' A mission to Mars would pursue scientific objectives like determining whether Mars ever hosted life and charting the evolution of its surface, as well as answering broader space physics questions—such as the history of the Sun through studying Martian soil. Geopolitics also looms large, as Trump has pledged to 'plant the American flag on the planet Mars and even far beyond,' invoking the 'unlimited promise of the American dream.' Critics, however, say cuts to Nasa's science budget and the cancellation of key projects—including the return of rock samples collected by the Perseverance rover—are undermining the research mission. 'The purpose of exploration is not just to go somewhere,' Nobel-winning astrophysicist John Mather told AFP. 'This is not a tourist thing. This is a fundamental knowledge thing.' Getting there Musk is betting SpaceX's future on Starship, the largest rocket ever built, despite fiery failures in its nine test flights. He's aiming for an uncrewed launch by late 2026, timed with the next favorable Earth-Mars alignment. But the timeline is widely seen as optimistic: Starship has yet to land its upper stage or demonstrate in-orbit refueling—both essential for deep space travel. Some experts believe the system is fundamentally sound, while others say it's too soon to judge. 'A lot of the pertinent and relevant technical information... is not known to us,' Kurt Polzin, chief engineer for Nasa's space nuclear propulsion project, told AFP. He backs Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP), which uses fission to heat hydrogen and generate thrust. NTP delivers 'a lot of power in a very small package,' Polzin said, eliminating the need for orbital refueling or fuel production on Mars. Astronauts would spend seven to nine months in a cramped spacecraft, exposed to intense space radiation beyond Earth's magnetosphere. Ideas to improve radiation shielding range from passive methods, like using dense materials, to active concepts such as plasma fields that deflect radiation, while drugs are being developed to reduce cell damage. Without a system to simulate gravity—such as rotational spin—crews would also need grueling exercise routines to counteract muscle and bone loss. Mental health is another concern. Growing plants aboard—more for morale than sustenance—has proved beneficial on the ISS. Communication delays further complicate matters. On the station, real-time data has helped prevent an average of 1.7 potentially fatal incidents per year, said Erik Antonsen, chair of NASA's human systems risk board—but such communication will not be possible en route to Mars. Life on Mars Once on the surface, the uncertainties grow. Probes and rovers have found hints—organic molecules, seasonal methane—but no definitive signs of life. If it ever existed, it likely died out long ago. Still, Earth's own 'extremophiles' offer intriguing clues—from fungi that harness Chernobyl's radiation for energy, to microbes that survived 500,000 years in frozen stasis. 'If they can survive here in extreme environments, we have every reason to suspect they can be on Mars,' said NASA astrobiologist Jennifer Eigenbrode at the recent Humans to the Moon and Mars Summit. And while NASA has decided nuclear fission will power surface operations, other choices—from crop selection to habitat design—remain open. 'Mars has a 24-hour, 39-minute day—that small difference creates strain, increases stress, and reduces sleep quality,' said Phnam Bagley, a space architect who designs for comfort and crew well-being—critical factors in preventing conflict. The first trip would be around 500 days on the surface, but long-term colonization raises deeper questions. For instance, scientists don't yet know whether mammalian embryos can develop in low gravity—or what childbirth on Mars would entail. 'I think it's really important to take that seriously,' said NASA's Antonsen. 'Even if you don't plan on it happening, people are still going to have sex, and somebody might get pregnant. Then it becomes a medical issue.' — AFP

Saudi Arabia Launches Smart Health Bracelet For Security Forces During Hajj
Saudi Arabia Launches Smart Health Bracelet For Security Forces During Hajj

Barnama

time15 hours ago

  • Barnama

Saudi Arabia Launches Smart Health Bracelet For Security Forces During Hajj

ARAFAT (Saudi Arabia), June 6 (Bernama-SPA) -- This Hajj season, Saudi Arabia's General Department of Medical Services at the Interior Ministry has launched the Smart Health Bracelet for the first time, aiming to enhance medical safety and support for security personnel on duty. According to the Saudi Press Agency (SPA), this innovative device leverages Internet of Things (IoT) technology, enhanced with Artificial Intelligence (AI), to provide essential medical support to security personnel in the field, significantly boosting their safety as they serve pilgrims. The Smart Health Bracelet monitors the vital signs of security personnel on duty, sending immediate alerts to the command and control centre at the Security Forces Hospital in Makkah. This ensures prompt support and intervention for advanced medical cases.

Elon Musk's controversial Starbase city rises in Texas, but critics raise alarm on pollution, zoning and ‘colonisation' of sacred land
Elon Musk's controversial Starbase city rises in Texas, but critics raise alarm on pollution, zoning and ‘colonisation' of sacred land

Malay Mail

time21 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Elon Musk's controversial Starbase city rises in Texas, but critics raise alarm on pollution, zoning and ‘colonisation' of sacred land

STARBASE (Texas), June 6 — Elon Musk has a long way to go before colonising Mars, but the controversial billionaire already has his own city on a flat patch of Texas, where giant, experimental Starship rockets roar over the incongruous sight of dolphins — and some sceptical human neighbours. Starbase on the south Texas coast is HQ for the Starship project and something of a shrine to its South African-born founder, the world's richest man and until recently one of President Donald Trump's closest advisors. Musk's short Washington tenure spearheading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, ended last week, with a vow to get back to his day job of running his business empire, including SpaceX, Tesla and Starlink. The departure came as investors grew increasingly nervous about the spillover from Musk's reputational damage after publicly allying himself to Trump and tearing through the US government in search of spending cuts. Now he hopes to hunker down in Starbase near the Mexican border and get back to the matter of reaching Mars. The scene is a curious mix of futuristic high-tech and down-to-earth attractions for a city that was officially incorporated in May but remains very much a work-in-progress. Cars speed down the narrow Boca Chica Boulevard leading to Starbase, where an AFP film crew was not allowed to enter. A huge bust of Musk on the outskirts of the settlement was vandalised in April and now stands with the right cheek peeled off, covered by a giant plaster. A cluster of buildings rises near the launch site, including an imposing corporate tower that bears Musk's X logo and prefabricated houses painted black, white, and gray. For now, the city has only about 500 residents, some still living in trailers and some in the prefab homes, which have patios and outdoor grills. Looming over the landscape are two models of super heavy launchers and one Starship rocket. 'I think it's pretty cool, making a whole entire city based around a launch site,' said 21-year-old computer engineer Dominick Cardenas who was visiting the area for the unsuccessful test launch last week. 'Maybe I'll move down here one day. Who knows? I'd love to go to Mars, who wouldn't?' This photo taken on May 28, 2025 shows a damaged bust of Elon Musk with a plaque reading "Elon aka MemeLord by ElonRWA on BASE" outside Brownsville, Texas. — AFP pic Environmental impact But the space city is surrounded by nature and wildlife, especially birds. Activist Christopher Basaldu, who is a member of the Carrizo/Comecrudo Native American tribe and holds a PhD in sociocultural anthropology, called Musk a 'coloniser.' 'The land here is sacred to the original inhabitants of the area. And SpaceX is polluting and desecrating this land,' he told AFP. There are two federal wildlife refuges in the area where SpaceX operates: the Lower Rio Grande Valley and the Laguna Atascosa. There is also the Boca Chica Beach, where residents have been spending their summers for decades and which is now closed during test flights. 'There isn't supposed to be exploding rockets next to pristine wetlands and habitat,' Hinojosa said. In 2024, the Environmental Protection Agency fined SpaceX for unauthorised discharges of water from its deluge system into wetlands near its Starbase launch pad connected to the Rio Grande. Despite protests by Hinjosa and other groups, SpaceX received approval from the Federal Aviation Administration to increase the number of launches per year from five to 25. Hinojosa calls it 'very much a David versus Goliath situation.' 'We are one of the poorest communities in the country... and we're dealing with the biggest bully on the planet, Elon Musk,' she said. 'Elon Musk has so much power that he's found a way around most of our lawsuits,' she added. View of the SpaceX's building outside Brownsville, Texas on May 28, 2025. — AFP pic Mall, restaurants, power plant According to a document obtained by CNBC, Starbase City officials have notified the residents that they might 'lose the right to continue using' their property as they currently do. A hearing is scheduled for the end of June to discuss the new zoning plan. SpaceX is also building the Rio West giant shopping mall and restaurant complex near Starbase, valued at $15 million, according to official filings. And environmental activists worry that the Rio Grande liquified natural gas plant being built in the neighbouring city of Brownsville, which has the capacity to process methane, a gas that powers Starship, could become Musk's fuelling station. SpaceX representatives, Starbase City Mayor Bobby Peden as well as Cameron County officials did not respond to AFP requests for comment for this story. — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store