NSW Premier Chris Minns rejects proposal to redevelop Sydney's Long Bay prison into housing
Former Liberal minister David Elliott suggested closing the Matraville prison and hospital on Monday and instead using the 45ha of land for a new housing development.
It comes after the Australian Turf Club shot down a $5bn proposal by the government to redevelop the historic Rosehill racecourse into 25,000 homes and a Metro stop.
Asked about the Long Bay site, Mr Minns told reporters on Monday that he was 'grateful that different ideas for housing are coming up' but voiced concerns about transport.
'The real challenge with Long Bay jail is the public transport … the closest heavy rail station from Maroubra is Central Station – it's a long way' Mr Minns said.
'If we're going to have a dramatic or massive increase in population, we have to take that into consideration.'
Mr Elliott suggested closing the prison and relocating it to regional NSW in an interview with The Daily Telegraph.
The former minister said he had pushed for the plan almost 10 years ago while serving as prisons minister, but it had faced resistance.
'For the life of me I don't understand why we've still got Long Bay jail,' Mr Elliott said.
'This is not a modern prison. It was designed along Victorian-era prison principles. All the rehabilitation programs and facilities are last century.
'You could sell that and build a new state-of-the-art, fit-for-purpose correctional facility in the outer suburbs or regional NSW where you'd get so much more bang for buck.'
Mr Elliott said the Long Bay site could provide 'a magnificent place to live' for people working in the CBD and floated extended the existing city to southeast light rail.
The state government's long-term plan for housing in Sydney was back under the spotlight last week when the ATC voted down the 'once-in-a-generation' plan.
ATC leadership had supported the buyout, which chairman Peter McGauran said would have provided fiscal security for the club for the next '100 years'.
The project would have involved 25,000 new homes and a Metro West station but faced pushback from stalwarts of the horse racing community.
Mr Minns has, so far, failed to outline his 'Plan B' but revealed on Friday that the state government was discussing 'contingency' plans.
'I'm very disappointed by the Rosehill decision, but I don't regard it as a waste of time,' Mr Minns said.
'I think it's really changed the nature of the discussion about where people will be living in Sydney.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Linking the metro to the new airport line is just so logical
Whatever Premier Chris Minns tells us about the NSW budget being unable to pay for extensions to Sydney's metro (' Future metro rail extensions kicked further down track ', August 13), it remains true that it is far cheaper to fund the rail system than pour money into the road network. Sydneysiders need to move around so let's swap much of the road funding and put it into rail. Greg Baker, Fitzroy Falls The state government is sensibly looking into joining the new Western Sydney Airport metro to St Marys with the existing metro at Tallawong. Pity then that the two metro systems won't be interchangeable because some expert rail boffin decided that the WSA metro trains should be 30cm wider than the existing ones. It might not be too late to change back to the original size metro cars, which have ample room for passengers with luggage. Why do we not take time to plan carefully before committing to spending billions of dollars on major infrastructure projects? Lance Dover, Pretty Beach Leppington railway station is not far from the terminal at the new airport. Google AI suggests a cost of between $160 million and $1 billion to build 10km of heavy rail in Sydney, depending on whether the build requires tunnels, etc. The land is flat, so no tunnels would be required, and we already have the rolling stock, but let's say it's the upper price: $1 billion. The airport cost is quoted at $5.3 billion, and the metro from St Marys is costing $11 billion. The associated roadworks will come in at around $6 billion. Around $22 billion all up. But we don't have a further $1 billion for the logical connection to the existing rail station at Leppington that is just 10km away? Spare us. Brett Jack, Bonnyrigg Heights Focus on the endgame Jeremy Leibler predictably lays the entire blame for the present slaughter of Gazans at the feet of the Palestinians, and correctly on Hamas who are responsible for triggering the latest round of hostilities (' Statehood without reforms will bring more repression ', August 13). However, what caught my attention was the often-made claim blaming Hamas for indoctrination of children with hatred. Just a moment of reflection will make it clear to him that the thousands of children with maimed limbs and the orphans of innocent civilians will find it easier to fuel hatred for an Israel they hold responsible. While the innocent victims killed are an unforgivable crime, the cataclysm facing their surviving children, siblings and kin are fertile grounds for generating hate, the fruits of which will unfortunately further poison our world and make Israel more unsafe. Wounded hearts are not a place that easily allows love to dwell for its perceived enemy. Manbir Singh Kohli, Pemulwuy Jeremy Leibler is right, recognising a Palestinian state before the terrorist groups are disarmed, and before proper democratic safeguards are in place, could be a grave mistake. His message is reinforced by the lessons of 1948, when the UN recognised Israel before the Jewish paramilitary organisations (Irgun and Lehi) were disbanded. In fact, they were never disbanded, but were integrated, along with the more moderate Haganah, to form the IDF. Even today, 77 years later, Israel does not have effective safeguards for human rights and is unwilling to stop its own citizens from establishing illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank. Worse, the Israeli government has approved these illegal settlements. The Israeli prime minister stands accused of corruption in Israel, and is wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. Recognising a Palestinian state now would be no worse a mistake than recognising Israel in 1948. However, we can learn the lessons of history and provide Palestine with guidance on the establishment of a robust democracy, with safeguards for human rights and respect for the law. We should also pressure Israel to work towards the same ideals. George Rosier, Carlingford Surprisingly, Jeremy Leibler makes a point I agree with. We should learn from the past. His comment about 2005, 'autonomy was granted before the foundations of self-governance were in place', is something we should not repeat. If all the money poured into the war was redirected to establishing a temporary UN-administered government, with a plan to transition to an independent Palestinian authority over time, there might be a chance of success. The key question for Netanyahu has always been, 'What is the endgame?' All indications are that he wants Gaza to become part of Israel, so we should talk about an alternative endgame while we still have time. Neville Turbit, Russell Lea Policy and perception The analysis of Anthony Albanese's decision to recognise a Palestinian state (' PM must follow through after his shift on Palestine ', August 13) refers to the apocalyptic spectre of famine in Gaza and the seismic shift in sentiment by other governments. The PM and Penny Wong have taken up the recognition decision with conviction, possibly for these and other reasons. As with the Voice referendum, it is clear that the PM's heart is fully engaged. The contrast with Opposition leader Sussan Ley is stark. In the interview where she said a future Coalition government would revoke the recognition, her body language gave away the lack of conviction – it seemed that the policy had been forced on her. Say what you like about Peter Dutton, but you always got the sense that he believed what he was saying. Ley has yet to master the look and sound of conviction, either in criticisms of the government or in presenting Coalition policies. Until she does, she will struggle to have an impact on the electorate.m Alan Russell, Unley (SA) While it is true that Henry Kissinger's 1976 dictum, 'Israel has no foreign policy, only domestic politics' might still ring true, it should be pointed out that more recent observations, including for example that of international relations scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, in their book The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, argue that the US has one and only one foreign policy – that of Israel. Jack Dikian, Mosman Praise for Palestine move I cannot understand the mealy-mouthed comments coming from both sides in this debate. On the one hand, Albanese is not doing enough, though what else he can do other than stating publicly our Australian view that what Israel is doing to innocent civilians in Gaza is unacceptable, no-one seems to have any practical ideas. The other mob, including Trump toadies the Opposition, believe we should stand back, presumably hold our noses and keep quiet while children starve. This is not our fight; we have little trade with Israel; we are just a decent country with some standards expressing our horror nationally at a sovereign, supposedly civilised democratic nation behaving like cruel barbarians to their largely defenceless enemy. Well done, Albo. Andrew Caro, Greenwich 'Humanitarianism is above politics and doesn't take sides' as stated by your correspondent (Letters, August 13). How utterly true. Where is the humanity that allows 400 people per 1 square kilometre compared with 5000 people existing in 1 sq kilometre? Elizabeth Maher, Gordon Words and actions To quote (possibly) Benjamin Franklin: 'Well done is better than well said' (' Albanese chose words over action ', August 13) Edward Loong, Milsons Point A HEX on untaxed gas riches Good on Ross Gittins (' PM cries poor as gas riches go untaxed ', August 13) for reporting and amplifying the truth to Dr Richard Denniss' claim that our government takes more money from uni students through HECS than it collects via the petroleum resource tax. That an estimated $150 billion over the past four years garnered our nation zero in royalties is a scandal. One might well wonder who wrote the rules to the petroleum resource rent tax? Perhaps the authors were the gas lobbyists working in Canberra for foreign companies – not for the Australian people. Michael Davis, Balmain East Ross Gittins always manages to put the human condition in the forefront of economic rationalisation. His comparison of offshore gas taxes to student uni fees highlights the federal government's priorities, and he does not paint a pretty picture. For readers, it is essential we understand and all push to right the current wrongs against our young adults, and it is important to remember that they vote, too. Janice Creenaune, Austinmer Ross Gittins points out the claims made by Dr Richard Denniss are indeed true. The government takes more from poor students via HECS than from large multinationals in petroleum resource rent tax. This does not consider all the tax avoidance schemes by large conglomerates, small companies and private education. With their overwhelming government representation, this is a chance for Anthony Albanese's Labor Party to make real changes and introduce major tax reform to this country. Gittins mentions Norway's tax scheme on resources; this would be a good beginning for Albanese to apply to our mining resources, which Gittins reminds us are non-renewable. Mark Nugent, Lugarno Please explain productivity Productivity is flavour of the month and, as Shane Wright points out (' Rapid relief but there's a sting in the tail of RBA's statement ', August 13), that brings a focus on regulation. He notes that the RBA has received feedback from businesses that regulation is a key barrier to productivity growth. The Treasurer will be hosting a roundtable with a key focus on productivity. And yet, we know that all rules and regulations have a reason for existence; they address undesirable behaviours that we want stamped out. Professor Peter Shergold, former senior leader in the Australian Public Service (APS), once told a staff gathering that, for every rule or regulation that industry questioned, he could show you a minister who thought it was a good idea. Despite all the rules and regulations, how is it that we have egregious actions by banks (as identified by the royal commission), builders of apartment towers, aged care providers, childcare providers, super funds etc? The answer is simple, governments prefer writing new rules to resourcing regulators to take action. Regulators have too few staff to implement proper regulatory frameworks of informing, educating, monitoring and eventually taking action against non-compliant businesses. Ministers are strongly averse to taking actions that may threaten closure of businesses – they don't want to be seen as the bad guys, and closing an aged care provider or childcare centre means those in care must be relocated. And it is individual businesses and business groups who fund political parties and lobby those same ministers. But, governments could stop writing new regulations that strangle good businesses, and maybe roll back some rules. Enforce the rules instead of adding to them. And stop ministers interfering in decisions about what action is taken and who is pursued. Steven Lee, Faulconbridge With the economic summit gabfest due shortly, we're going to hear a lot about productivity. But could someone please explain what it is? To me, productivity means me working fewer hours for more money, but for industry – and judging by their actions over time – productivity means working more for less money to provide more profits that are kept by the owners. Dan O'Regan, Blacktown Tied up in knots I suggest those planning to spend more than they can comfortably afford on a wedding dress and reception are too immature to tie the knot ('For the modern wedding, one has become two (at least)' August 13). Marriage is meant to be a lifetime commitment. Focus on that, and don't get carried away by the dress and the cake if you want your marriage to last. Graham Lum, North Rocks I ask myself why would the young forego individual freedom of choice for the formulaic, forfeit any semblance of fun and spend a fortune to boot? The word vanity springs to mind. Helen Lewin, Tumbi Umbi Restoring our river Our family often drove across the Ryde bridge (' Once foul-smelling river is now at heart of second CBD ', August 13). If we were unfortunate enough to be travelling at low tide, the smell from the river around where the old Philips factory at Rhodes was, was nauseating. We even joked that the fish in the river there glowed in the dark. It's been a long and slow process, but it's great to see the river returning to its pre-industrial condition. Peter Miniutti, Ashbury Aussie talent, anyone? Why has the AFL hired an American rapper to perform at the biggest event of the year for a unique and quintessentially Australian football game (' CBD ', August 13)? So Kylie Minogue wasn't willing, but surely there is another high-profile Australian performer available and happy to do this gig. Irrespective of one's opinion of the talent of Snoop Dogg, why do we use such an important occasion to further kowtow to the Americanisation of our music industry? Rob Phillips, North Epping State the reserve
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Grants for social enterprises look to break cycles of disadvantage
Roya Moeen never saw herself being a head chef of a popular restaurant. Fleeing the Taliban from her home in Afghanistan, she came to Australia in 2014. Her experience working was mainly as a housewife for her family. But then, three years ago, she found an opportunity to work at Kabul Social. "I can, because I'm [a] good chef at home and [then I] come here, after that, I started work. First time I'm very scared. You know, after that, slowly, slowly, I'm better." Now the head chef, she says it's been an empowering experience. She leads a kitchen which donates meals to those in need, one in Sydney and one in Afghanistan for every meal sold. "I can look after my family and I work outside and independent. You know, I feel independent. It's so good for everyone." This kind of initiative has been backed by the federal government and is now receiving a $120,000 grant. Minister for Social Services Tanya Plibersek even had her own go at Afghan cuisine. Plate it Forward, which runs Kabul Social, is just one of the organisations receiving funding aimed at helping marginalised communities. Ms Plibersek says it's hoped social enterprises like this will have a long-lasting impact. "We want to invest a small amount of money so these terrific organisations can help more people help themselves. We know the impact of intergenerational disadvantage, and we want to stop it by investing with refugee women, with First Nations communities, people with a disability. By investing early, helping them become financially self-sustaining, we know that we'll change their lives and we'll change the trajectory of their families' lives." David Hetherington is the CEO of Impact Investing Australia. He says better employment outcomes help address the disadvantages experienced by marginalised communities. "We want to see the funders and the kind of supporting ecosystem, who makes it possible, get stronger and deeper and ultimately, the goal is to address that disadvantage, that marginalisation that exists in the Australian community, and bring more and more and more people into mainstream employment and the mainstream economy." Shaun Christie-David is the CEO of Plate it Forward Hospitality. With four other restaurants as well, he says this is an opportunity for Plate it Forward to grow even further. "This represents so much to us. I think where we're seeing is the incredible strength and talent of our team, accelerating in ways that are beyond what we would have dreamt of. So this allows us to move into more venues, more impact, more employment and great opportunities and outcomes for our incredible people from the under-represented communities that we serve." For Roya, cooking is deeply meaningful to her. And it's a career she hopes to pursue further. "I feel so good and I want a big restaurant!"
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Some people with disability feel 'silenced' by this law. Now there's a fresh push for change
Members of Victoria's parliament are being urged to support proposed changes to a law that prevents some people with disability from speaking freely and publicly about their experiences. The Greens are set to introduce a bill to parliament today, alongside disability advocate Uli Cartwright, seeking to amend the 'gag law' — known as clause 37 — affecting those under guardianship or administration orders. Cartwright has long advocated for reform of this law based on his lived experience of such orders. "It's just outdated. It needs to be changed," he told SBS News. In Australia, guardianship laws vary state to state but gag laws, which restrict public comment on such arrangements, are enforced across most jurisdictions. For many Australians currently or formerly subject to guardianship, including Cartwright, this limits their ability to speak openly about their experiences. The move by the Greens seeks to change that in Victoria. The proposed amendment adds to calls of support from disability sector organisations, along with the Victorian Office of the Public Advocate — the state body responsible for advocating for the rights of people living with disability — which backed amending the legislation in 2023. "Not only are we listening to advocates in the sector, but the Office of Public Advocate has also made their position pretty clear on this exact reform," Greens MP Anasina Gray-Barberio said. "We need to be ensuring that legislation as it stands does not constrain the rights of people with a disability." What is clause 37? In Australia, a person may be placed under guardianship or administration orders if they require help with decision-making. An appointed guardian then has legal authority to make decisions or support decision-making on behalf of an individual about personal and lifestyle matters specified in an order. An administrator is someone granted authority over financial and property matters. In Victoria, the so-called gag law refers to clause 37 in schedule 1 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) Act 1998, which states that, "unless the Tribunal orders otherwise", a person must not publish or broadcast information that could identify parties involved in guardianship and administration proceedings. The tribunal may make an order, "only if it considers it would be in the public interest to do so". The Greens' proposed amendment is set to be introduced to parliament in Victoria on Wednesday. Source: AAP / Con Chronis This provision can effectively stop people from talking publicly about any of their experiences of guardianship or administration orders. This can also extend to VCAT proceedings, according to a spotlight paper published by the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) in February. In a letter to Victorian MPs, the state's peak advocacy organisation for adults with intellectual disability, VALID, said the "unnecessary restriction" is applied automatically and "assumes the need to protect people with disabilities". "Their will and preference is not taken into account," the letter reads. "It contradicts human rights principles, undermines transparency and public trust and curtails free speech." Gray-Barberio said the current legislation has a "silencing impact" on those under guardianship or administration orders. "It is so important for them to be able to have choice and control when it comes to their decision-making, to publicly share their lived experience and stories related to their guardianship. I think that is within public interest," she said. "People living with disability or with chronic health [conditions] shouldn't have to ask for permission to tell their own story and lived experience." Telling Uli Cartwright's story Cartwright, 30, is an advocate who lives with disability. He came up against the gag law several years ago when a documentary about his life became subject to it. Life is a Battlefield was acquired by SBS and broadcast in December 2021 as part of the International Day of People with Disability, after which it was available online via SBS' streaming service On Demand. Two weeks after it screened, VCAT raised concerns relating to Cartwright having identified himself as someone previously under the control of the State Trustees. SBS decided to take the program down to allow legal concerns to be addressed. Uli Cartwright has been a long-standing advocate for reform. Credit: Otis Filley Cartwright applied to VCAT for a declaration that clause 37 did not apply in his case, with a tribunal deputy president making an order allowing the material to be published. This meant the documentary could go back online, and Cartwright could be legally identified. Cartwright has been advocating for reform in Victoria ever since. Most states and territories in Australia, except the ACT, ban the publication of information about guardianship proceedings in some way, according to the VLRC paper. This varies state by state, with Tasmania introducing changes last September. The Victorian private member's bill, backed by Cartwright, proposes an amendment to clause 37 of the Act, which allows a represented person, or someone authorised by them, to disclose information about their proceedings without requiring tribunal approval. "I think there is a place for it [the gag provision]," Cartwright said. "I do believe that there needs to be some protections in place to stop abuse and weaponisation of people's stories, whether that's with the media or with family members. "But the bill says the silence mechanism is not the default. It's an extra step." The Greens' Gray-Barberio said the change would ensure a "human rights approach" to legislation in the state. 'Simply the right thing to do' In a letter to Victoria's parliament on 6 August, VALID's chief executive Fionn Skiotis called on all members to support the upcoming bill. "Provisions to protect privacy and limit the disclosure of sensitive and personal information, for example by parties other than the person subject to an order, will continue to exist," Skiotis said. "In our view, supporting this change is simply the right thing to do, for any elected representative in Victoria, so that all citizens in the state can enjoy the same freedoms and rights, whether they are a person with disability or not." LISTEN TO It follows disability service providers Yooralla and Life Without Barriers supporting gag law reform in Victoria in late 2023. "Freedom for people with disability to speak with the media and share their experiences under guardianship is an important step in transparency and accountability and can contribute to safeguarding by individuals and organisations responsible for providing safe and quality support," Life Without Barriers said in a statement. Yooralla said current legislation is at odds with decision principles in the Guardianship and Administration Act 2019, which state that a person's will and preference should only be overridden to prevent serious harm. "While safety and privacy are a factor, the Act conflicts with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disability, which provides the rights of people with disability to freedom of expression and opinion and the participation in political and public life," its statement said. In April 2023, the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA) also voiced support for reform. The OPA recognised there are "valid reasons" to limit the disclosure of sensitive and personal information discussed in guardianship and administration proceedings to protect the privacy of those under orders. But it said these should ensure the person's right to tell their own story is not inadvertently limited. It called on the government to amend the legislation, saying: "Ensuring people can freely tell their own stories will increase transparency and promote public trust in this essential safeguarding system." Gray-Barberio said there has been "no progress" in reform since 2023. This is one small section which we feel is really important, that we feel the government should recognise. "The evidence is there, the calls are there from the community, from advocates, campaigners, as well as the Office of the Public Advocate. So really, it makes sense for them [the government] to come on board and support this reform," she said. The Victorian government has been contacted for comment.
