Group claims responsibility for Syrian church bombing
In a statement released on its social media platforms, the group claimed the assault was retaliation for what it described as 'provocations by Christians in Damascus.' It threatened further attacks, including suicide operations.
Previously, the group had issued sectarian threats targeting Christians, Alawites, Druze and Shiite Muslims.
It has claimed responsibility for a February attack on the village of Arzeh in Hama province and has threatened individuals linked to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. (DPA)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Member of Irish rap band Kneecap faces court on ‘terrorism' charge
A member of the Irish rap group Kneecap is due to appear in court, charged with a 'terror' offence for allegedly supporting Hezbollah. Liam O'Hanna, 27, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, will appear at the Westminster Magistrates' Court in central London on Wednesday after he was charged in May for displaying a Hezbollah flag during a London concert in November. Kneecap has taken a stance against Israel's assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 60,000 people and reduced much of the enclave to rubble since it began in October 2023. The Lebanese armed group Hezbollah began cross-border attacks into Israel shortly after Israel launched the assault, saying at the time that it was acting in support of Palestinians in Gaza. Since Hezbollah was banned in the United Kingdom in 2019, it has been an offence to show support for the Iran-aligned group. Protest restrictions The hearing in central London is expected to hear legal arguments on whether the charge falls outside a six-month time limit, a court official told the AFP news agency. Police have imposed conditions limiting where demonstrations in support of O'Hanna can take place, saying they were needed to 'prevent serious disruption'. In response, the rap group described this move as a 'calculated political decision' which is a 'distraction from war crimes that the British state supports'. Still, they asked supporters to go out of their way to be compliant with the rules, 'irrespective of how pitiful'. Hundreds of fans had cheered outside the central London court in June when O'Hanna, or Liam Og O hAnnaidh in Gaelic, made his first appearance, with dozens waving flags and playing drums. Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove told the previous hearing the case was 'not about Mr O'Hanna's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel'. 'He is well within his rights to voice his opinions and his solidarity,' Bisgrove said. Instead, the prosecutor said, the case was about O'Hanna wearing and displaying 'the flag of Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist organisation, while allegedly saying 'Up Hamas, up Hezbollah''. The punk-rap group has said the video that led to the charge was taken out of context. Formed in 2017, the group is no stranger to controversy, clashing with the UK's previous Conservative government and voicing opposition to British rule in Northern Ireland. Banned organisations The hearing comes amid a growing controversy surrounding support for banned organisations in the UK. More than 700 people have been arrested, mostly at demonstrations, since the Palestine Action group was outlawed in early July. The ban came into force days after Palestine Action took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated 7 million pounds ($9.5 million) of damage to two aircraft. The group said its activists were responding to the UK's indirect military support for Israel during the war in Gaza.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
UK agrees to drop mandate for Apple ‘back door', US spy chief says
Apple will no longer be forced to provide the United Kingdom's government with access to American citizens' encrypted data, Washington's spy chief has said, signalling the end of a months-long transatlantic privacy row. Tulsi Gabbard, the United States' director of national intelligence, said on Monday that London agreed to drop its requirement for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have allowed access to the protected data of US users and 'encroached on our civil liberties'. Gabbard said the reversal was the result of months of engagement with the UK to 'ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected'. The UK government said it would not comment on operational matters, but that London and Washington have longstanding joint security and intelligence arrangements that include safeguards to protect privacy. 'We will continue to build on those arrangements, and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK,' a government spokesperson said. 'We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The UK's climbdown on encryption comes after Apple in February announced it could no longer offer advanced data protection, its highest-level security feature, in the country. While Apple did not provide a reason for the change at the time, the announcement came after The Washington Post reported that UK security officials had secretly ordered the California-based tech giant to provide blanket access to cloud data belonging to users around the world. Under the UK's Investigatory Powers Act, authorities may compel companies to remove encryption under what is known as a 'technical capability notice'. Firms that receive a notice are legally bound to secrecy about the order unless otherwise granted permission by the government. It was not immediately clear if Apple would start offering advanced data protection again in the UK. Like other tech giants, Apple has marketed its use of end-to-end encryption as proof of its steadfast commitment to the privacy of its users. End-to-end encryption scrambles data so it cannot be read by third parties, including law enforcement and tech companies themselves. Governments around the world have made numerous attempts to undermine or bypass encryption, saying that it shields serious criminals from scrutiny. Privacy experts and civil liberties advocates have condemned efforts to weaken the technology, arguing that they treat innocent people as potential criminals and put the privacy and security of all users at risk. John Pane, chair of the advocacy group Electronic Frontiers Australia, welcomed the UK's reported reversal as a win for digital rights and safety. 'Were Apple to create a backdoor to its encrypted user data it would create a significant risk which could be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian governments,' Pane told Al Jazeera. 'EFA believes access to encryption technologies is vital for individuals and groups to be able to safeguard the security and privacy of their information and it is also fundamental to the existence of the digital economy. The right to use encrypted communications must be enshrined in law.'
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
A Tiny Island's Big Secret
In a place so isolated, can justice ever truly reach the people who need it most? Far out in the Pacific, Pitcairn Island was once seen as an untouched paradise. But beneath the tranquil surface, police uncovered years of devastating abuse—crimes against women and girls that everyone knew about, but no one stopped. When the truth finally emerged, it exploded into a global scandal that shattered lives and exposed a legacy of silence and betrayal. In a place so isolated, can justice ever truly reach the people who need it most? In this episode: -Dennis McGookin, Former Detective Superintendent -Sue Farran, Law Professor at Newcastle University
