
Bitcoin Fell Below $100,000 This Weekend Amid ‘Escalating Geopolitical Uncertainty'
Bitcoin prices declined below the $100,000 this weekend.
Bitcoin prices dropped below $100,000 this weekend, briefly trading below that crucial level as global markets responded to the latest developments in the conflict between Iran and Israel.
The world's most valuable digital currency by total market value approached $98,400 on Sunday, June 22, according to Coinbase data from TradingView. As recently as Friday, June 20, the cryptocurrency had been trading above $105,000.
Jacob Joseph, Senior Research Analyst at CoinDesk Data, commented on this decline, stating via email that 'This movement has coincided with escalating geopolitical tensions involving the U.S., Israel, and Iran.'
'Investor sentiment appears to have become more cautious amid uncertainty over potential U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict, which has likely contributed to the broader retreat seen in risk assets,' he continued.
Marc P. Bernegger, cofounder of crypto fund of funds AltAlpha Digital, offered a similar take, indicating that 'Escalating geopolitical issues, particularly in the Middle East, were cited as a trigger for market uncertainty.'
'Tensions between Israel and Iran may have prompted capital flight from risk assets like Bitcoin, pushing prices below the $100,000 psychological support level,' he clarified through emailed commentary.
James Maxfield, head of trading for Gemini EU, also chimed in, emphasizing the losses bitcoin (and ether) suffered over the weekend.
'This followed U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, which triggered a sharp selloff across crypto markets,' he said through email.
'The downturn came after President Trump confirmed the strikes and warned that further military action was possible, fueling fears of broader conflict.'
Potential Impact On Energy Markets
Some analysts have voiced concerns about how the ongoing conflict in the Middle East could affect global energy markets.
Dom Kwok, cofounder and COO of educational platform EasyA, spoke to this matter, specifying via email that 'Fears around Iran potentially closing the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of global oil flows, have sparked concern.'
Last year, 20 million bpd moved through this straight on average, which amounted to approximately 20% of petroleum liquids consumed by the global market, according to an analysis conducted by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Should this straight close, industry participants will have some very limited options for moving oil out of this area.
As a result of these factors, the EIA has described the Strait of Hormuz as 'one of the world's most important oil chokepoints.'
'If disrupted, oil prices could spike, driving inflation higher,' Kwok noted. 'Historically, inflationary pressure prompts investors to exit perceived high-risk assets and shift towards cash and gold."
The analyst shed further light on the subject, offering greater detail on the market's response to the latest geopolitical developments.
'Importantly, this isn't a crypto-specific reaction. It's a classic flight-to-safety move,' he stated.
'In times of conflict, forecasting future risk becomes nearly impossible, so capital flows to traditionally safer assets. While many believe Bitcoin should serve as a hedge, institutions still classify it as a high-risk asset.'
'Fortunately, these shocks are often short-lived,' he added. 'Temporary supply disruptions rarely result in lasting inflation unless prolonged.'
'Past events, like COVID's initial crash, show that such dips can offer compelling long-term buying opportunities. The fact BTC has bounced back above $100,000 shows this.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Charlamagne says Dems 'sound like hypocrites' for demanding congressional approval for strikes
Radio host Charlamagne tha God called out Democrats on Monday for their outrage about President Donald Trump launching strikes on Iran without congressional authority, saying they turned a blind eye when Democrats recently did the same. The U.S. launched a surprise strike using B-2 stealth bombers on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities on Saturday. "All three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Joint Chiefs Chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine said during a briefing at the Pentagon on Sunday morning. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., called out Trump for the strikes during a Sunday appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," arguing the head of state should have begun the process by first "coming to Congress and asking for authorization to do this." He continued, "That's the constitutional approach to this. He could have talked to us about what the goal is and what the plan is ahead of time. And we could have had a discussion about it." Charlamagne agreed, but argued Democrats like Kelly should look in the mirror. "Morgyn, this is one of those times when politicians sound like hypocrites, because Mark Kelly is right, the president should get congressional approval," he said about the national war powers debate. "But there have been a bunch of presidents who have ordered strikes without congressional approval." "Barack Obama did it against Libya. Joe Biden ordered strikes in Iraq and Syria without congressional approval. Bill Clinton did it with - 'Kosovo' I think you pronounce it?" he recalled. "So presidents ordering military action without congressional approval has become pretty routine." Co-host Morgyn V. Wood noted that this issue is now being cited for possible impeachment. "So why didn't it lead to an impeachment for everybody else? Like, when Barack Obama did it, when Biden did it, when Clinton did it?" Charlamagne asked. Wood said that there have been calls for impeachment over presidents' military actions without congressional approval before, but Charlamagne was not persuaded. "I don't even remember hearing about it during the Joe Biden administration," Charlamagne said. "I guess that's just because of the way Trump has been moving," co-host DJ Envy said. "But we didn't hear about it when Obama did it. We didn't hear about it when Biden did it." "I do remember when Obama did it," Charlamagne said. "When Obama did it, I do remember, you know, people in Congress saying he needed congressional approval, and they were making it a thing. I don't remember the Biden thing at all. I don't remember that even making a headline." After Wood recalled the widespread outrage over Biden's botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, Charlamagne said he recalled Biden's lack of accountability for military missteps after an NBC News piece headlined, "Presidents' ordering military action without Congress' approval has become routine."


Bloomberg
29 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Iran Capabilities Are Damaged, Not Gone: Jeffrey Lewis
Jeffrey Lewis, Professor at Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, discusses roughly 900 pounds of highly enriched uranium being stashed somewhere in Iran at a location unknown to both the United States & Israel and talks about what Iran could possibly do with that amount of uranium. He speaks with Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu on the late edition of Bloomberg's "Balance of Power." (Source: Bloomberg)


Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Balance of Power: Early Edition 6/23/2025
On the early edition of Balance of Power, Bloomberg Washington Correspondents Joe Mathieu and Kailey Leinz discuss Irans' retaliatory strike against the US. On today's show, Former Israel Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, Stonecourt Capital Partner Rick Davis, Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress Senior Democracy Fellow Jeanne Sheehan Zaino, Beacon Global Strategies Managing Director Michael Allen, Center for Strategic and International Studies Fellow Joseph Rodgers, Middle East Institute Distinguished Diplomatic Fellow Alan Eyre and Dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Power Studies Ret. Gen. David Deptula. (Source: Bloomberg)