logo
Joshlin Smith case: NPA ready to fight appeals in SCA if necessary after latest verdict

Joshlin Smith case: NPA ready to fight appeals in SCA if necessary after latest verdict

The Citizen3 days ago
The judge also granted key witness Laurentia Lombaard indemnity from prosecution.
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said it will oppose any further appeals by the three convicted people in the Joshlin Smith case should they take their case to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).
On Wednesday afternoon, the Western Cape High Court in Cape Town delivered its judgment on the leave to appeal applications after hearing submissions from both the state and the defence.
Joshlin's mother, Racquel 'Kelly' Smith, together with Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis and Van Rhyn, had sought to appeal their convictions and sentences.
The trio had been sentenced to life imprisonment for human trafficking, along with an additional 10 years for kidnapping, in connection with Joshlin's disappearance.
The young girl went missing from her family's home in Saldanha Bay on 19 February 2024.
It is alleged that the child was sold for R20 000.
Appeal judgment in Joshlin Smith case
Judge Nathan Erasmus dismissed the appeal, finding no reasonable prospect of success.
'There is no compelling reason why the appeal should be granted.
'It is rather pegged on whether there is a reasonable prospect of success,' the judge said.
He explained that the court had made factual findings, drawn inferences from circumstantial evidence, and had the advantage of observing witnesses directly, which informed credibility assessments.
'It is clear that it can never be said that a sentence of life imprisonment, in particular on count one, on the human trafficking of a child, where life imprisonment is imposed, where persons have shown no remorse, would be shockingly inappropriate.
'We for that reason leave on the sentence should be refused,' Erasmus remarked.
ALSO READ: 'Don't twist facts' – Tense proceedings as Joshlin Smith case judge accused of threats, collusion
In addition, the judge granted key witness Laurentia Lombaard indemnity from prosecution.
Lombaard, initially an accused in the case, later became a Section 204 witness, providing crucial testimony that helped secure the convictions against Smith, Appollis and Van Rhyn.
Erasmus emphasised that he could not ignore the witness's personal circumstances such as her drug addiction, as well as the fact that she had no previous convictions.
Therefore, her reluctance to be truthful from the outset should not, the judge said, 'carry that much weight'.
He further stated that although Lombaard was aware arrangements had been made to sell Joshlin and she remained silent, this was not an offence.
'Over and above that, you played no active role in either the trafficking and kidnapping of Joshlin Smith.'
NPA reacts
Speaking to the media outside the court, Western Cape NPA spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said the state was satisfied with the outcome of the proceedings.
Ntabazalila indicated that the state had not yet been told whether the defence intended to appeal the latest judgment.
'We will go to the SCA and still oppose their decision to appeal. We believe there is no other court that can come to a different conclusion than what this court has taken.
'So even if they go to the SCA, we will go there and argue the same,' he said on Wednesday.
He also confirmed that key witness Laurentia Lombaard remained under witness protection.
'We cannot talk about that programme, but there will be a process which will unfold.
'In this case, she is not going to be prosecuted; she is indemnified. She has got immunity from prosecution, so she's free.'
NOW READ: 'Where's Joshlin and what really happened to her?'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One murder, two court cases: chaos at Cape Town court
One murder, two court cases: chaos at Cape Town court

The Citizen

time9 hours ago

  • The Citizen

One murder, two court cases: chaos at Cape Town court

Five people are facing charges related to the murder of a retired teacher. The brutal kidnapping and murder of a retired teacher has caused confusion at the Cape Town Magistrates' Court. On 27 October 2024, Alison Dewar's body was found, stabbed to death, outside Philadelphia. Five people are facing charges related to the crime. But they are being tried in two separate cases, by different prosecutors, and investigated by different police units. There appears to be no communication between the teams. GroundUp has established that the current prosecutors in each case were unaware of the other case. Four people are charged with kidnapping, murder, theft of the victim's car, and defeating the ends of justice. But a fifth person has been charged with theft in a separate case. In November 2024, the state told the court it wanted to merge the two cases. ALSO READ: 'I was terrified' – Joburg woman recounts chilling driveway hijacking and kidnapping (VIDEO) But nine months later, this has not happened, and both cases have continued in parallel, and the merging of the cases has not been mentioned again. The police investigations have been beset by delays and inefficiencies, including delays in obtaining a postmortem report. The investigating officer in the murder case was reassigned to a less senior sergeant, with no explanation provided. In the car theft case, the accused appeared in court twice before an investigating officer was finally assigned and a docket was produced. Both cases have been postponed several times and will need to proceed to trial soon or risk being struck off. Dewar was a retired teacher who volunteered as a maths tutor at Rainbow of Hope, a non-profit organisation. A teacher at the organisation who worked with her, Shayner-Lee Wiese, told GroundUp she has little confidence in the state. 'This case is being handled as if it's not serious,' said Wiese, who has been attending the court hearings. 'Alison was someone who was committed to helping and caring for children. Does her death mean nothing?' Murdered for R5 000 Four days after her body was found, the police recovered Dewar's vehicle, a red 2024 Hyundai Creta, from the house of second-hand car salesman Obina Ugwuoke, who was arrested. Police then arrested Chukwudi Stanley and Isaac Okeowo, who were allegedly involved in stealing the car and selling it to Ugwuoke. Another person was also arrested, but charges against him were later withdrawn. A couple from Bellville, Marlon and Riani Macalagh, was also arrested. It is alleged that Dewar was murdered by the Macalaghs, who sold her car to a man called CJ for R3 000 in cash plus R2 000 worth of drugs. CJ is alleged to have sold the car to Ugwuoke for R20,000. Stanley apparently acted as a middleman for CJ, and Okeowo negotiated the price on behalf of Ugwuoke. CJ is said to have fled to Johannesburg and is still at large. It is unclear whether any attempts have been made to arrest him. First court appearance On 4 November 2024, the suspects appeared in court for the first time. Five of the accused – Stanley, Okeowo, the Macalaghs and the fifth man against whom charges were later withdrawn – were taken to the Atlantis Magistrates' Court. This was because the murder case was opened at the Philadelphia police station, which falls under Atlantis. They were charged with kidnapping, murder, theft and defeating the ends of justice. The court ruled that the case should be transferred to the Cape Town Magistrates' Court because the investigation was being led by the provincial Serious and Violent Crimes unit based in Cape Town. READ MORE: Three men found guilty for murder of would-be state witness Meanwhile, Ugwuoke was enrolled in a separate case from the other accused, and he was taken to the Cape Town Magistrates' Court, where he was charged with theft of the car. It emerged in court that no investigating officer had been assigned to the case. It was only at his third court appearance that an investigating officer was assigned, and the docket was finally disclosed to the court. Neither the Saps nor the NPA answered questions from GroundUp on why there were two separate cases for the same crime. Chaos in the court Both cases appeared before Magistrate Theart in the Cape Town Magistrates' (District) Court on 11 November. When Ugwuoke appeared in court, prosecutor Oliver Bulana told the court that his case would be added to the main murder case with the other suspects (but nine months later, this has not happened). There was still no docket, and no investigating officer had been assigned. Nonetheless, the court proceeded with bail proceedings, and Ugwuoke was released on bail for R10000. When the five accused in the murder case appeared later in the day, chaos ensued. The prosecutor told the court he was not sure what the next steps were in the case and that he would have to take instructions from a senior prosecutor. Senior prosecutor Johan Swart then came to address the court. READ MORE: DA accuses Saps of 'dismissive attitude, rudeness and lack of empathy' at police stations It emerged that the magistrate in Atlantis had used the wrong forms to transfer the case to the Cape Town Magistrates' Court – the forms said the matter was transferred to the regional court rather than the district court. So Magistrate Theart adjourned the matter, saying that the case could not appear before her in the district court. Late in the afternoon, the matter appeared in the Cape Town Regional Court before Magistrate Amori Graf, and the case was postponed. Two court appearances later, a bail hearing was held on 28 November, by which time charges against the fifth accused had been withdrawn. The Macalaghs decided not to apply for bail, but Stanley and Okeowo did apply, and they were released on R5 000 bail each. After the bail hearing, the senior investigating officer was reassigned and replaced by a junior colleague – a sergeant at the serious and violent crimes unit. Several postponements In the following months, there was a series of postponements in both cases. In the Ugwuoke car theft case, the matter was postponed five times between January and August this year. In March, the state said they were waiting for cellphone records to be analysed, and in June, the state said further evidence had to be obtained because there was a USB drive that had become corrupted. At the most recent court appearance, on 14 July, the trial was set down to begin in the regional court on 28 August. In the murder, kidnapping and theft case where the other four stand accused, the matter was postponed four times between February and August. READ MORE: Police can't say why they let an alleged rapist off the hook In April, the prosecutor told the court that they were still waiting for the postmortem report, about six months after the murder. Marlon Macalagh also applied for a bed at Valkenburg Psychiatric Hospital to be assessed to determine if he is mentally fit to stand trial. On 22 July, he was still on the waiting list. Only after his medical report is received will the trial be able to go ahead. This reporter asked the prosecutors in each case if they were aware of the other case. Both answered no. Neither the NPA nor Saps responded to GroundUp's questions. This article was republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.

RAF payout murder lands MP man behind bars for 25 years
RAF payout murder lands MP man behind bars for 25 years

The Citizen

time20 hours ago

  • The Citizen

RAF payout murder lands MP man behind bars for 25 years

Sibuyi was found guilty of five charges, including murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances. He might not have imagined a future behind bars, but Present Sibuyi will have to face that reality after he was sentenced to 25 years direct imprisonment for murder. The High Court in Mbombela, Mpumalanga, recently found the 31-year-old guilty of five offences in connection with the brutal killing of Nonewell Nkuna, 33, over allegations relating to a Road Accident Fund (RAF) payout. The charges include murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, kidnapping, possession of a prohibited firearm, and possession of ammunition by the High Court in Mbombela, Mpumalanga. Sibuyi ambushes deceased The conviction follows an incident that occurred on 6 January, when Sibuyi and an unknown accomplice followed Nkuna and other victims from Mbumber Taven in Buyisonto, Bushbuckridge. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Monica Nyuswa said the pair ambushed Nkuna and company at gunpoint when they stopped their vehicle on the side of the road. Sibuyi and his accomplice forced them into the car; they followed them in and drove to a secluded location. Nkuna declared dead at scene 'During the ordeal, Sibuyi accused one of the victims of having received an RAF payout, robbed them of a cellphone and R1 800 in cash, and fired multiple shots at them,' Nyuswa said in a statement on Friday. ALSO READ: Three men found guilty for murder of would-be state witness Nkuna died at the scene from gunshot wounds to the head and hands, as confirmed by the post-mortem report. Guilty plea In court, Sibuyi admitted his actions were unlawful and entered into a Section 105A plea and sentence agreement with the state. The agreement allows the accused to negotiate a resolution with the state without having to go to trial. State Advocate Fedile Tsotetsi argued that the murder was premeditated and committed violently without any provocation. 'The court accepted the plea and imposed the sentence,' Nyuswa said. 'The NPA remains committed to ensuring that perpetrators of violent crimes face the full might of the law and that justice is served for victims and their families,' she added. In addition to the 25-year term, the court declared Sibuyi unfit to possess a firearm in terms of Section 103 of the Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000. NOW READ: Mozambican traditional healers arrested in for kidnapping, muthi murder

Safa boss Danny Jordaan's fight to ditch fraud charges stalled by NPA changes
Safa boss Danny Jordaan's fight to ditch fraud charges stalled by NPA changes

The Citizen

timea day ago

  • The Citizen

Safa boss Danny Jordaan's fight to ditch fraud charges stalled by NPA changes

Jordaan is accused of misusing R1.3 million from Safa for his personal benefit. A decision on South African Football Association (Safa) president Danny Jordaan's bid to have his fraud charges dropped has not yet been made, with the case postponed for further proceedings. On Friday, Jordaan, Safa chief financial officer (CFO) Gronie Hluyo, and businessman Trevor Neethling made a brief appearance before the Specialised Commercial Crimes Court in Palm Ridge, Gauteng. The trio face charges of conspiracy to commit fraud, theft, and fraud, and are each out on R20 000 bail. Danny Jordaan seeks withdrawal of fraud charges State prosecutor Moagi Malebati told the court that no decision had been reached on all the accused's representations to have their charges withdrawn. He explained that a leadership change within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) had caused delays. 'The unfortunate part is that he left office before he could make a decision and sign off on his decision. 'We could not have the decision made as there was no DPP appointed,' Malebati said, referring to Johannesburg Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Andrew Chauke, who was recently suspended by President Cyril Ramaphosa. ALSO READ: Safa boss Danny Jordaan's lawyer stays after state's application fails Chauke has temporarily been replaced by former Northern Cape DPP Livingston Mzukisi Sakata. Sakata will assumed office on 1 September, according to NPA regional spokesperson Phindi Mjonodwane. Jordaan and Hluyo have also lodged a review application challenging a previous ruling that dismissed their section 342A applications to have the case struck off the roll. Additionally, they are contesting the Hawks' 8 March 2024 search and seizure at Safa's offices, seeking a court order declaring the search unlawful. Gronie Hluyo (L), Trevor Neethling (C) and Danny Jordaan appear at Palm Ridge Magistrate's Court n 15 August 2025. Picture: Gallo Images / OJ Koloti Jordaan and Hluyo are also challenging arrest warrants issued on 4 April 2024, alleging that the investigating officer withheld crucial information when applying for them. They further want authorities held in contempt of court for taking them into custody a day before the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria was set to hear their interdict application to prevent their arrest. Malebati confirmed that the outcome of the review application remains pending as the high court has yet to set a hearing date. 'Thieves and fraudsters' Defence lawyer Victor Nkwashu, representing Jordaan and Hluyo, argued that his clients' arrests had caused serious reputational harm to his clients and to Safa. 'The executives of Safa are rendered as thieves and fraudsters internationally. 'The question is what is the prejudice that the state will suffer if this matter is removed from the roll whilst they vindicate their names in the high court? 'Because if not, they will come and vindicate their names before this court. If the state succeeds, we'll be back here. It was not difficult to find them,' he said. The case has been postponed to 12 September. Jordaan was arrested on 15 November 2024 for allegedly misusing R1.3 million from Safa for his personal benefit. Meanwhile, Hluyo and Neethling are alleged to have enabled the misappropriation. NOW READ: Embarrassment for Safa as they can't pay salaries on time

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store