EU diplomat warns that Russia has a plan for long-term aggression against Europe
'Russia is already a direct threat to the European Union,' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said.
She listed a series of Russian airspace violations, provocative military exercises, and attacks on energy grids, pipelines and undersea cables.
Ms Kallas noted that Russia is already spending more on defence than the EU's 27 nations combined, and this year will invest more 'on defence than its own healthcare, education and social policy combined'.
'This is a long-term plan for a long-term aggression. You don't spend that much on (the) military, if you do not plan to use it,' Ms Kallas told EU politicians in Strasbourg, France.
'Europe is under attack and our continent sits in a world becoming more dangerous,' she added.
Russian President Vladimir Putin (Sergei Bulkin, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)
Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte has said that Russia is producing as much weapons and ammunition in three months as the 32 allies together make in a year.
He believes that Russia could be in a position to launch an attack on a Nato ally by the end of the decade.
The acts of sabotage and cyber attacks are mostly aimed at undermining European support for Ukraine, military officers and experts have said.
But concern is mounting in Europe that Russia could try to test Nato's Article 5 security guarantee — the pledge that an attack on any one of the allies would be met with a collective response from all 32.
In 2021, Nato allies acknowledged that significant and cumulative cyber attacks might, in certain circumstances, also be considered an armed attack that could lead them to invoke Article 5, but so far no action has been taken.
With the Trump administration now turning its sights on security challenges in the Middle East and China, Europe has been left to fend for itself, and for Ukraine, and finds itself in a more precarious position.
Last week, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence service (BND), Bruno Kahl, warned against underestimating Russian intentions toward the West and Nato.
'We are very certain, and we have intelligence evidence for this, that Ukraine is just a step on the path to the West,' Mr Kahl told the Table Today podcast on June 9, according to German news agency dpa.
Russia's goal is to expand its sphere of influence westward, the BND chief said.
'They want to catapult Nato back to the state it was in at the end of the 1990s. They want to kick America out of Europe, and they'll use any means to achieve that,' Mr Kahl said.
He warned that 'this must be nipped in the bud,' and that deterrence is the 'most bloodless way' to prevent war.
Nato countries are set to agree a new defence investment pledge at a summit in the Netherlands next week, pouring billions of dollars more into security-related spending.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU countries reach deal on new defence funding programme
BRUSSELS, June 18 (Reuters) - European Union governments have reached an agreement on a 1.5 billion-euro ($1.73 billion) EU scheme to fund defence investments, although some complained that its 'buy European' provisions are too restrictive, diplomats said on Wednesday. Governments have wrangled for more than a year over the European Commission's proposal for a European Defence Industrial Programme (EDIP), part of a broader drive to re-arm sparked by fears of Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Much of the debate focused on eligibility. France pushed for strict 'buy European' rules to boost European industry while countries such as the Netherlands argued for more flexibility to buy arms from the United States, Britain and other nations. Under the final compromise, at least 65% of the costs of the components of an item funded under the scheme must originate in the EU or certain associated countries, with some exceptions. Ambassadors from the EU's 27 countries are expected to approve the deal on Monday, diplomats said on condition of anonymity. It will then be the subject of negotiations with the European Parliament before it can enter into force. A group of 10 countries - the Netherlands, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Slovakia and Finland - argued that the rules should have taken more account of an urgent need to boost Europe's defences. "We fully support the goal of enhancing European security and resilience through increased defence cooperation and investment," they said in a joint statement. "However, we face an urgent threat to European territory and interests." They said the EU defence industry "still depends - especially in the short to medium term - on critical components, technologies and know-how from like-minded third countries, in particular transatlantic allies". Despite their objections, the countries said they did not want to stand in the way of starting negotiations with the European Parliament. EU officials said the 1.5 billion euro budget for the programme is modest for the defence sector but the criteria were fiercely fought over as it may receive larger funding in future. ($1 = 0.8678 euros)
Western Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Trump will not say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran
'I may do it, I may not do it,' Mr Trump said in an exchange with reporters at the White House. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Mr Trump added that it is not 'too late' for Iran to give up its nuclear programme as he continues to weigh direct US involvement in Israel's military operations aimed at crushing Tehran's options. 'Nothing's too late,' Mr Trump said. 'I can tell you this. Iran's got a lot of trouble.' 'Nothing is finished until it is finished,' Mr Trump added. But 'the next week is going to be very big — maybe less than a week'. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader via AP) Mr Trump also offered a terse response to Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's refusal to heed to his call for Iran to submit to an unconditional surrender. 'I say good luck,' Mr Trump said. Mr Khamenei earlier warned that any United States strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will 'result in irreparable damage for them' and that his country would not bow to Mr Trump's call for surrender. Mr Trump said on Tuesday the US knows where Iran's Mr Khamenei is hiding as the the Israel-Iran conflict escalates but does not want him killed — 'for now'. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' Mr Trump said. Mr Trump's increasingly muscular comments toward the Iranian government come after he urged Tehran's 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives as he cut short his participation in an international summit earlier this week to return to Washington for urgent talks with his national security team. Mr Trump said that the Iranian officials continue to reach out to the White House as they are 'getting the hell beaten out of them' by Israel. But he added there is a 'big difference between now and a week ago' in Tehran's negotiating position. 'They've suggested that they come to the White House — that's, you know, courageous,' Mr Trump said. Iran's mission to the United Nations refuted Mr Trump's claim in a statement on social media. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader.' The US president said earlier this week Russian president Vladimir Putin offered to serve a mediator with. But Mr Trump said he told Mr Putin to keep focused on finding an endgame to his own conflict with Ukraine. 'I said, 'Do me a favour, mediate your own',' Mr Trump said he told Mr Putin. 'I said, 'Vladimir, let's mediate Russia first. You can worry about this later'.' The Russia-Iran relationship has deepened since Mr Putin launched a war on Ukraine in February 2022, with Tehran providing Moscow with drones, ballistic missiles, and other support, according to US intelligence findings.
New Statesman
26 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Will Iran inflict oil inflation on the West?
Fire and smoke rise into the sky after an Israeli attack on the Shahran oil depot in Tehran. PhotoMeetings are best avoided, as a rule. They take up valuable time, they achieve little, and they're often just a pretext for one person's terrible idea to be foisted on everyone else. And every now and then, a meeting takes place that sets world history on a dramatic and frightening new course. On 16 October 1973, the oil-producing nations of the Opec cartel met at the Sheraton Hotel in Kuwait City and agreed to almost double the price of crude oil. In doing so they divided the world along new lines. Economic growth in the West was effectively halved, while the autocracies from which the oil came – Saudi Arabia, Russia – received huge, long-term increases in their current accounts. The US, UK and Europe have spent decades trying to recapture the glory days before that fateful meeting, to rebuild the Western consumer dream that cheap energy had bought – using cheap labour (offshoring, globalisation, historic levels of immigration) and cheap money (privatisation, financialisation, historic levels of borrowing). From a single meeting, the modern dichotomy between oil-rich dictators and debt-laden democracies was agreed. Of course, the 1973 meeting was really just when the petrostates chose to exercise the power that Western dependence on oil gave them. It was retribution for America's support for Israel in the Yom Kippur War that October; unable to triumph in battle, Opec turned instead to the oil weapon. Now, as then, Iran may decide that Israel's military success will be paid for with inflation and recession in the West. This is made possible by geography. On Iran's southern coast the Persian Gulf narrows to a channel, 21 nautical miles across at its thinnest, through which 20 million barrels of oil and more than ten billion cubic feet of liquefied natural gas (LNG) are shipped each day. If Iran begins attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz, it could threaten a fifth of the world's supply of oil and LNG. Ukraine's recent drone attack on Russian bombers demonstrated the power of relatively cheap, easily hidden hardware to wreak havoc on larger targets. Mines, drones and missiles in the strait could effectively close energy exports from Qatar and Kuwait, while exports from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Oman would be restricted. Buyers around the world – especially in China, which buys Iranian oil and Qatari gas – would rush to secure new supply, pushing prices up. Matt Gertken, chief strategist at BCA Research, and Ben May, director of global macro research at Oxford Economics, both predict a major spike in the oil price, which could almost double to around $130 per barrel if Iran decided to block the strait. The result for Britain, the US and the eurozone would be higher inflation – and therefore higher interest rates to tame it – coupled with lower growth. The effects would be felt first at the petrol station, then in costlier shopping. Oil and gas are not just oil and gas – they are the plastic that most of the things we buy are made from or packaged in (or both); they are also fertiliser and heat and refrigeration and delivery. The price of energy is the price of pretty much everything, from goods made in Chinese factories to produce grown on British farms. In the UK, people, businesses and the government itself are still feeling the effects of the energy price shock of 2022. Our economy has been nudged even closer to recession by Trump's tariffs. The consequence of a doubling of the oil price would, says Gertken, 'very likely be a global recession'. At time of writing, the markets didn't seem particularly fussed about this suggestion; after a brief spike following Israel's initial attack on Iran on 13 June, the oil price had begun to decline again. Optimists point to the 'tanker war' of the 1980s, in which 55 ships were sunk or significantly damaged by Iran and Iraq, but which did not cause an oil shock. But Gertken says this is a 'mispricing' of the risk, because Israel is not just targeting Iran's nuclear programme but its domestic energy infrastructure. It is, he says, aiming not only to defang Iran's military but to cause unrest and regime change, to depose its 86-year-old Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. The current Iranian regime therefore has little to lose by escalating a situation in which Israel is already an unrestrained aggressor, and Iran has shown an appetite for targeting international shipping through proxy groups such as the Houthis in Yemen. Gertken puts the likelihood of a major oil shock at 50 per cent. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Who wins from this? While drivers in the US would be dismayed by prices at the petrol pump, Americans would be relatively well insulated from the shock because the US is the world's biggest producer of fossil fuels and a net exporter of energy. Russia, too, would benefit from a higher oil price, because fossil fuel exports are a major component of the Kremlin's revenues. China and Europe, which rely more on manufacturing, are far more exposed to a slump in global demand. Faced with another wave of inflation, European countries might find it harder to impose sanctions on Russian energy, and a ceasefire on Vladimir Putin's terms might become more likely. Global politics will continue to be redrawn – crudely, messily, and in black – until we can give up our fatal addiction to oil. [See also: Labour needs to be honest about tax rises] Related
