EU countries reach deal on new defence funding programme
BRUSSELS, June 18 (Reuters) - European Union governments have reached an agreement on a 1.5 billion-euro ($1.73 billion) EU scheme to fund defence investments, although some complained that its 'buy European' provisions are too restrictive, diplomats said on Wednesday.
Governments have wrangled for more than a year over the European Commission's proposal for a European Defence Industrial Programme (EDIP), part of a broader drive to re-arm sparked by fears of Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Much of the debate focused on eligibility. France pushed for strict 'buy European' rules to boost European industry while countries such as the Netherlands argued for more flexibility to buy arms from the United States, Britain and other nations.
Under the final compromise, at least 65% of the costs of the components of an item funded under the scheme must originate in the EU or certain associated countries, with some exceptions.
Ambassadors from the EU's 27 countries are expected to approve the deal on Monday, diplomats said on condition of anonymity. It will then be the subject of negotiations with the European Parliament before it can enter into force.
A group of 10 countries - the Netherlands, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Slovakia and Finland - argued that the rules should have taken more account of an urgent need to boost Europe's defences.
"We fully support the goal of enhancing European security and resilience through increased defence cooperation and investment," they said in a joint statement. "However, we face an urgent threat to European territory and interests."
They said the EU defence industry "still depends - especially in the short to medium term - on critical components, technologies and know-how from like-minded third countries, in particular transatlantic allies".
Despite their objections, the countries said they did not want to stand in the way of starting negotiations with the European Parliament.
EU officials said the 1.5 billion euro budget for the programme is modest for the defence sector but the criteria were fiercely fought over as it may receive larger funding in future.
($1 = 0.8678 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Separatist Moldovan region facing crisis without Russian gas, minister says
CHISINAU, June 18 (Reuters) - Moldova's pro-Russian separatist Transdniestria region faces a dire economic crisis triggered by this year's halting of gas supplies from Russia and a collapse in industrial and farm production, a senior minister in the enclave said on Wednesday. Moldova's pro-European President Maia Sandu has warned that Russia could use instability in Transdniestria to sow chaos and influence a September election to secure a parliament and government more favourable to Moscow. Sandu is seeking European Union membership by 2030. "Forecasts for Transdniestria's economy are not encouraging, based on uncertainty over gas supplies, a lack of a contract on power exports from the thermal plant and the fact that major industrial plants are idle," Economic Development Minister Sergei Obolonik told a government session on Wednesday. "There remains a risk that Moldova could introduce new sanctions and restrictive regulations," he said, according to local media. Transdniestria broke from Soviet Moldova in 1990. Other than a brief 1992 conflict, it has lived alongside the rest of the now-independent state with little upheaval for more than 30 years thanks largely to assistance provided by Moscow. But Russia halted supplies of virtually free gas in January after Ukraine shut a transit pipeline. Separatist authorities secured alternative gas through a Hungarian supplier with Russian funding, but that supply has proved insufficient to keep the economy afloat. Obolonik forecast a 12% drop in gross domestic product in the second half of the year from a year ago, a 30% plunge in industrial output, a 6% slide in agricultural production, a 20% slide in foreign trade and inflation of 16%. Improvement next year, he said, depended on finding reliable gas sources and on Moldova introducing no punitive measures. "We can expect no real growth in the economy," Obolonik said. "The best scenario is for indicators to remain at this year's levels."
Reuters
38 minutes ago
- Reuters
Hungarian official unsure if contested transparency bill will ever re-emerge
LONDON, June 18 (Reuters) - Hungarian Foreign Ministry state secretary Levente Magyar said on Wednesday he was unsure if a postponed parliamentary debate and vote on transparency legislation governing foreign-funded groups would "ever re-emerge." Prime Minister Viktor Orban's Fidesz Party submitted a bill to parliament on May 14 that would draft a list of organisations that collect foreign funding and restrict or shut them down if they are deemed to threaten Hungary's sovereignty and culture. The bill has been widely criticised by Hungarian news outlets, think tanks and civic rights groups. Street protests have occurred and scores of editors from leading European news outlets signed a petition last month calling for Orban's nationalist government to scrap the legislation. The vote was originally scheduled to happen in mid-June and approval was expected as Fidesz holds a majority. "There was a lot of controversy around the bill, and there was a lot of internal debate and discussion and dispute around the bill, so the initiators of the bill saw it appropriate to revoke it for now," Magyar told Reuters on the sidelines of an event at the Hungarian embassy in London. "I'm not sure if it will ever ... re-emerge again," he said, adding that the earliest the bill could return to parliament for debate is autumn. "I don't know about any determined decision... to bring this back." Orban, in power since 2010, pledged in March to crack down on foreign funding of independent media, opposition politicians and nongovernmental organisations in what critics said was a move to strengthen his position ahead of elections due in 2026, when he faces a challenge from a new opposition party.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Britain's £100billion benefits timebomb that no one is brave enough to defuse
TO the hand-wringing Labour MPs plotting to torpedo the government's £5billion in welfare cuts, some facts. Even with that squeeze, we are still hurtling towards a £100billion sickness benefits bill EVERY YEAR by the end of the decade. 4 4 That is roughly equivalent to the entire size of Slovakia's economy — or the annual output of the City of London. It is more than the combined yearly budgets of the police, prisons and courts — and twice that of what we spend on defence. You could buy every Premier League club several times over and then some. And that is before you even scratch the surface on public money for jobseekers and the elderly. Britain is a nation that looks after people — at ease with the language of safety nets, support and compassion. But we have to be honest about what we have become: a nation hooked on handouts that is driving our economy on to the rocks. Painfully clear A creaking welfare state — with a price tag no government can control and no taxpayer can sustain — is ready to burst. The parliamentary bill to reform it — introduced yesterday by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall — was meant to be the moment Labour got serious. It tightens eligibility for Personal Independence Payments (PIP), slashes Universal Credit for new claimants and freezes it for existing ones. On paper it is a package designed to 'make the system sustainable' and save the Treasury £5billion a year by 2030. Five key changes to PIP & Universal Credit as Labour's benefits crackdown unveiled But when you actually read the figures, it becomes painfully clear just how little difference it will make. Britain is still projected to spend £100.7billion a year on health and disability benefits by 2029–30 — up from £64.7billion just last year. That is a 55 per cent rise in just six years, driven largely by soaring costs in working-age sickness and disability payments, with PIP fuelling the surge. Once meant to help those with serious long-term physical and mental conditions live independently, PIP is now claimed by more than 3.7million people — and demand is only accelerating. The number of new applications has shot up by 70 per cent since 2018, with more than 1,000 new claims A DAY thudding on to DWP desks. The bill for PIP alone has already ballooned from £12billion in 2019 to more than £21billion today, and it is predicted to hit an eye-watering £42.3billion by 2028–29. Driving this explosion is a marked rise in claims linked to mental disorders — now the main condition for nearly 70 per cent of new applicants under-35. Combined with long Covid, chronic fatigue, and musculoskeletal complaints such as back pain, we have arrived at a staggering projection: that by 2030 nearly one in 12 working-age Brits will be economically inactive due to long-term sickness. International comparisons lay bare just how much of an outlier the UK has become. We now spend more on working-age disability benefits as a share of GDP than almost any other advanced economy. Most European countries — including France, Germany and the Netherlands — have seen their incapacity benefit caseloads remain steady while ours is still climbing. Is it any wonder why critics start to mutter about the UK becoming the ' Sicknote Man of Europe '. But far from marking a moment of unity for Labour, the new bill has lit the fuse on a major rebellion and split the party in two. More than 100 Labour MPs are squeamish about the proposals, and many have already threatened to vote it down when it comes to a vote in the next few weeks. Supporters of the reforms say the real betrayal would be pearl-clutching backbenchers pretending the current system can continue. One Labour insider told me: 'You can't call yourself progressive if you ignore a system that's spiralling out of control. This isn't about cruelty. It's about honesty.' The internal row gripping the party was not unexpected — but the scale of it was. A far tougher package was meant to be unveiled at March's Spring Statement to lance the boil in one fell swoop. But after internal leaks and pushback from Labour left-wingers, No10 blinked. 4 The result? A lightweight version, rushed out early and designed to placate mutinous MPs. One senior Government figure admitted to me a few months ago: 'We had one shot to fix this, and we bottled it. These are half-measures. They won't be enough.' The deeper danger now is not just the cost but the fact political will to act is slipping away. We are an old population, with flatlining productivity, who have very few babies. We cannot have a generous welfare state and a national social care service, and a massive in-work support system Backbencher Some inside the party get it. They know the writing is on the wall: an ageing population, low birth rates, flatlining productivity and soaring demand on every part of the state. Commons humiliation As one influential backbencher put it: 'We have to get serious about reforming the state. "We are an old population, with flatlining productivity, who have very few babies. We cannot have a generous welfare state and a national social care service, and a massive in-work support system. 'We need to change expectations about what Government does in a radical and sustained way. I do not see us being serious about that right now.' Behind the scenes, the whips are in damage control mode, trying to keep a lid on the rebellion. Abstentions might help Labour avoid a Commons humiliation but they will not solve the underlying dilemma. This is not just about one benefit, or one Budget line. It is about what kind of state Britain can be in the 2020s and beyond — and how much we can afford. For too long politicians have ducked the debate, layering new promises on top of old ones without ever confronting the trade-offs. Now, the bill is landing and it's not just a financial one, it's political, too. Labour may win the vote but its bigger test is yet to come: can it finally level with the public, not just about what needs cutting, but what kind of country we want to be? 4
