Maxwell offers to testify before Congress but with major conditions, including immunity
House Oversight Chair James Comer subpoenaed Maxwell to testify next month. In a new letter sent to Comer Tuesday, Maxwell's attorneys said they initially decided to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights, but then offered to cooperate with Congress 'if a fair and safe path forward can be established.'
Her attorneys noted Maxwell is currently appealing her conviction to the Supreme Court and argued that 'any testimony she provides now could compromise her constitutional rights, prejudice her legal claims, and potentially taint a future jury pool.'
'Compounding these concerns are public comments from members of Congress that appear to have prejudged Ms. Maxwell's credibility without even listening to what she has to say or evaluating the extensive documentation that corroborates it,' the letter states.
An Oversight Committee spokeswoman on Tuesday rejected the idea of giving Maxwell immunity. 'The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony,' the spokeswoman said.
'I don't think there are many Republicans that want to give immunity to someone that may have been sex trafficking children,' Comer told CNN last week.
Maxwell's conditions as laid out by her attorneys include:
A grant of formal immunity.
The interview can't happen at the correctional facility where she's serving her sentence.
'To prepare adequately for any congressional deposition—and to ensure accuracy and fairness—we would require the Committee's questions in advance….Surprise questioning would be both inappropriate and unproductive.'
The interview would be scheduled 'only after the resolution of her Supreme Court petition and her forthcoming habeas petition.'
It's likely the Supreme Court will not act on Maxwell's petition until October, when the justices are scheduled to return from a summer break.
Her attorneys said if the demands cannot be met, 'Maxwell will have no choice but to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights.'
Notably, the letter ended with a final appeal to President Donald Trump for clemency.
'Of course, in the alternative, if Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing—and eager—to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C. She welcomes the opportunity to share the truth and to dispel the many misconceptions and misstatements that have plagued this case from the beginning,' her attorneys said.
CNN's Annie Grayer and Manu Raju contributed to this story.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's How Much Retirees Would Save If Social Security Taxes Actually Get Eliminated
President Trump has often declared that seniors should not pay taxes on Social Security benefits. While it may just seem like another former campaign promise, the White House moved forward with some big tax policy changes. Getting rid of Social Security taxes sounds great for those who depend on these benefits, but how would this work in the big picture? Good To Know: Up Next: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) added fuel to the speculation. However, even a wage-based blessing for retirees on fixed incomes — one of the country's biggest and most reliable voting groups — can come with implications. So how much would seniors benefit if Trump were to actually succeed in eliminating tax on Social Security benefits? Let's find out. How Trump's Bill Impacts Social Security After the approval by a Republican-led Congress, Trump signed a bill that includes a tax deduction for seniors but NOT the elimination of taxes on Social Security benefits. Instead of eliminating the tax, the bill introduced a temporary $6,000 tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and older. It will only be effective from 2026 through 2028, though, and has income-based eligibility limits. The bill is also an umbrella under which many components of Trump's overall tax plan can be found, such as the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act, as well as requiring retirees who exceed income thresholds to pay federal income tax on up to 85% of their Social Security benefits. However, it turns out that what appears to be a proposal to help the most vulnerable populations with their tax returns would actually benefit wealthy retirees the most. And, the cost in lost revenue could threaten the program's future and lead to reduced benefits for all. Find Out: It's also good to note that eliminating income tax on Social Security benefits could increase the federal deficit by up to $1.6 trillion over 10 years. If Trump's promise to end taxes on Social Security is passed altogether (again, to be clear, the OBBBA does not eliminate Social Security taxes), households earning between $32,000 and $60,000 annually would get an average tax cut of about $90. That means that less than 1% of the lowest-earning households (those making about $33,000 or less annually) would get a tax cut, 28% of middle-income households would get a tax cut, and roughly 20% of households earning more than $5 million a year would get a tax cut. According to the Tax Policy Center, 'The biggest winners would be those in the top 0.1% of income, who make nearly $5 million or more. They'd get an average tax cut of nearly $2,500 in 2025.' How Social Security Benefits Are Taxed About 68 million Americans collect Social Security benefits. As of 2025, the average monthly Social Security retirement benefit was estimated at around $1,999. Most recipients owe nothing to the IRS. According to the Social Security Administration (SSA), 'About 40% of people who get Social Security must pay federal income taxes on their benefits.' Kiplinger pointed out that the IRS taxes not just retirement benefits, but all payments pulled from the program's trusts, including disability and survivor benefits, although Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments are exempt. Additionally, some states tax Social Security income too, but the president does not have the power to alter that. The federal government taxes or doesn't tax benefits based on the recipient's combined income, which includes their monthly Social Security checks. For single filers: Those earning between $25,000 and $34,000 in combined income can be taxed on up to 50% of their benefits. Those earning more than $34,000 can be taxed on up to 85% of their benefits. For couples filing jointly: Those earning between $32,000 and $44,000 can be taxed on up to 50% of their benefits. Those earning more than $44,000 can be taxed on up to 85% of their benefits. Final Take To GO: This Could Hurt More Than Help The bottom line is that the majority of recipients wouldn't get a tax break, and for most who would, the savings would be negligible. If Social Security taxes are eliminated, it's not likely you would see much of a difference in your tax return or your budget overall if you're a lower to average income earner. In other words, 60% of recipients who the IRS doesn't tax keep their entire payments because they don't have enough income to qualify for taxation. For them, Trump's plan wouldn't leave them with a single extra dollar. The rich, however, would reap the lion's share of the gains (as per usual, some might say). This is because Trump's plan to repeal Social Security taxes would lead to about 20% of the households earning more than $5 million a year getting a tax cut. While every dollar counts, $90 in savings pales in comparison to the projected cost of $1.6 trillion in lost revenue over the next decade, which would drive Social Security and Medicare hospital insurance into insolvency faster, resulting in sharply reduced benefits for tens of millions of recipients. Andrew Lisa contributed to the reporting for this article. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should) Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on Here's How Much Retirees Would Save If Social Security Taxes Actually Get Eliminated
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Indian nurse Nimisha Priya's execution cancelled in Yemen, cleric says
The execution of an Indian nurse convicted of murdering her Yemeni business partner has been cancelled, a leading Muslim cleric involved in negotiations to spare her life has said. The office of the Indian cleric, Kanthapuram AP Aboobakr Musliyar, said on Monday Nimisha Priya's execution had been revoked after a delegation of Yemeni scholars and diplomats mediated with the Houthi administration. Priya, 38, from the southern state of Kerala, was sentenced to death in 2020 for murdering Talal Abdo Mehdi, the co-owner of her clinic in Sanaa. Her execution on 16 July was suspended to allow for negotiations led by Mr Musliyar. 'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was previously suspended, has been overturned," the cleric's office announced in a statement. 'A high-level meeting held in Sanaa decided to completely cancel the death sentence.' But unnamed Indian foreign ministry sources told ANI news agency that "information being shared by certain individuals on the Nimisha Priya case is inaccurate". The Indian government told the Supreme Court earlier this month there was 'nothing much' it could do to prevent Priya's execution given the lack of formal diplomatic ties with Yemen. Priya has been held in a Sanaa prison since her arrest in 2017. The nurse was convicted of injecting Mehdi with sedatives in an attempt to retrieve her passport, which he had allegedly confiscated. The dose proved fatal. Her sentence was upheld by the Supreme Judicial Council in 2023. Yemeni law punishes murder by death, as it does drug trafficking, apostasy, adultery, and same-sex relations. The country, however, allows a murder convict to be pardoned by the victim's kin in exchange for diyat, or 'blood money'. Priya moved to Yemen in 2008 and eventually launched a clinic in partnership with Mehdi, in keeping with Yemeni law requiring foreign entrepreneurs to collaborate with citizens. Her family previously alleged that Priya faced mental, physical and financial abuse at his hands. She had even filed a police complaint against him in 2016, leading to his brief arrest. He allegedly resumed threatening her after getting out. The nurse's mother, Prema Kumari, a domestic worker in Kochi city, has been in Yemen for the past year trying to save her daughter. In December, she moved the Delhi High Court for exemption from an Indian travel advisory barring its citizens visiting the conflict-ridden Yemen. She has visited her daughter several times in prison. In an emotional appeal earlier this year, Ms Kumari said she was 'deeply grateful to the Indian and Kerala governments, as well as the committee formed to save her, for all the support provided so far'. 'But this is my final plea,' she added, 'please help us save her life. Time is running out.'
Wall Street Journal
12 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Sees Emergencies Everywhere. Judges Are Considering Whether to Rein Him In.
WASHINGTON—Across the U.S. landscape, Donald Trump sees one emergency after another, and that is posing a host of challenges for the federal courts. Since beginning his second term, Trump has declared in dozens of presidential documents that the U.S. faces emergencies requiring him to take extraordinary actions that circumvent normal government processes. That gambit offers him a path of unilateral action instead of the uncertain route of enacting legislation through Congress.
