How reliable is U.S. economic data? It's a growing risk for investors awaiting the next Fed rate cut.
Investors have been navigating an increasingly hazy outlook for the U.S. economy, as surveys of consumer sentiment have appeared to clash with so-called hard data regarding the state of the labor market.
Creeping doubts about the quality of U.S. economic reports certainly won't make this task any easier.
I have $1,000 in credit-card debt. Will I be able to hide my inheritance from the bank?
'He failed in his fiduciary duty': My brother liquidated our mother's 401(k) for her nursing home. He claimed the rest.
I bought my mother-in-law a condo — and she took out a $30,000 car loan. Now she refuses to get a roommate.
Third time lucky? Citi changes its S&P target once more after index hits 6,000.
'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell?
Fresh questions about the reliability of official data surfaced this week, after the Bureau of Labor Statistics said that it had to cut back on some regional collection efforts that were part of the tabulation of the consumer-price index in April, and again in June, because 'current resources can no longer support the collection effort.'
The cutbacks, caused by a federal government hiring freeze, won't impact the headline CPI numbers that investors tend to focus on most closely, the agency said in a statement published on its website — although it could increase the volatility of certain details within the report. A representative for the BLS didn't offer any further comment when contacted by MarketWatch.
See: There's a frenzy in Washington over the accuracy of a key measure of U.S. inflation. Here's what's happening.
The next iteration of the CPI report, which would offer investors the first major insight into the level of inflation in May, is due to be released on Wednesday. Another inflation reading focused on producer prices will follow a day later.
For decades, U.S. economic data were widely considered the most comprehensive and most reliable among major developed economies. But recently, some economists and investors have highlighted what they see as flaws or shortcomings that could impact key economic reports, including labor data like the monthly nonfarm-payrolls report released this past Friday.
'This is a problem that we all kind of know about, but we just kind of ignore it and move forward because perception is reality in this market,' said Eric Pachman, chief analytics officer at Bancreek Capital Advisors, during an interview with MarketWatch on Friday.
The Federal Reserve relies on the personal-consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, a separate inflation gauge, as the basis for its policy decision-making. The central bank outsources the collection of these data to federal statistical agencies.
Given the influence that Fed policy decisions have on financial markets, this could become a problem for investors down the road.
It is not just the BLS's stymied collection method for CPI that is contributing to these doubts. Questions about official methodologies used to calculate certain reports have been percolating for more than a year now, and they found their way back into the conversation on Wall Street this past week.
On Thursday, Steven Englander, head of global G-10 FX research and North American macro strategist at Standard Chartered, published a report highlighting what he described as inconsistencies between the Labor Department's monthly jobs report and a quarterly employment reading that is seen as more reliable, but released with a longer lag.
In the report, Englander said that some of the methods used by the BLS when calculating the monthly figures might be causing this.
Whether or not these issues could lead to a Fed 'policy mistake' that leads to negative consequences for markets and the economy is hard to say, Englander told MarketWatch. The central bank uses a panoply of data to inform its assessments regarding the strength of the labor market and inflation, the two sides of the central bank's dual mandate.
However, if the Fed had access to more accurate data earlier, it might have held off on one of the interest-rate hikes it delivered in 2023 while potentially moving more quickly to cut borrowing costs, Englander said. The central bank ultimately lowered its policy rate in September for the first time since the pandemic.
Many recent monthly reports have seen the headline number that investors tend to focus on later revised lower. When the reading for May was released on Friday, it included downward revisions to data from the prior two months.
Last year, officials revealed that the U.S. economy had added 818,000 fewer jobs than previously reported between the spring of 2023 and the spring of 2024.
Steve Dean, chief investment officer at Compound Planning, warned that the issues with the BLS's collection efforts tied to its inflation reports have cropped up at a particularly inopportune time. Investors and policymakers alike are still struggling to untangle how President Trump's tariffs might impact inflation and the labor market.
'Any reduction in the quality and reliability, and therefore the confidence, in that data makes the Fed's job harder,' Dean, who began his career in economic research at the Fed, told MarketWatch in a statement shared via email.
'This is crucial in the current environment when investors are trying to gauge the balance between inflation and employment and how that will lead the Fed to act,' Dean added in comments shared via email.
Michael Brown, a senior research strategist at Pepperstone, told MarketWatch that concerns about the quality of economic data have been gaining traction recently, and not just in the U.S. Problems with the accuracy of economic data have cropped up in the U.K., where Brown is based.
'Frankly, it's a huge issue,' Brown told MarketWatch via email. 'Every market participant and policymaker (both monetary & fiscal) is relying on data being accurate in order to make the most effective decisions that they can. If one has to question the figures that are being received, then it will clearly lead to those decisions being less effective.'
U.S. stocks finished higher on Friday, with the S&P 500 SPX closing above 6,000 for the first time since February, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The Nasdaq Composite COMP also logged its highest close since February, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA saw its highest close since May 19.
'The situation is extreme': I'm 65 and leaving my estate to only one grandchild. Can the others contest my will?
My new husband gave me a contract and told me to 'sign here' — but I refused. It was the best decision of my life.
'I'm not wildly wealthy, but I've done well': I'm 79 and have $3 million in assets. Should I set up 529 plans for my grandkids?
My local restaurant charges a 5% container fee and 3% kitchen-service charge. Should I refuse to pay?
My daughter's boyfriend, a guest in my home, offered to powerwash part of my house — then demanded money

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
19 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Morgan Stanley shares a chart that fuels the argument for new stock-market highs
Morgan Stanley is growing more optimistic about the stock market as earnings revisions breadth improves. Improving breadth is being driven by more upward revisions, the bank said. The market is likely to overlook softer hard data in favor of forward-looking views of strong earnings. The vibes in the stock market are improving, and it's boosting the case for prices to rise from here. That's according to a note from Morgan Stanley's Mike Wilson. The bank's CIO and chief stock strategist pointed to a key signal that's sending a bullish signal: a sharp rebound in earnings revisions breadth, or the proportion of analysts who have raised their estimates minus the proportion who have lowered them. The indicator is now at -10%, a noticeable improvement from -25% during the height of tariff uncertainty in April, an indication that sentiment is recovering. The bank believes the indicator will continue to trend upward. A weak dollar could further bolster this earnings gauge, as US companies that do a lot of business overseas receive a boost in sales when the dollar is weaker. Once earnings revisions breadth turns positive, investors should expect forward EPS predictions to trend higher. Earnings revision breadth can be driven by either fewer downward revisions or more upward revisions. According to Morgan Stanley, the latter is the case today, which is good news for investors. More upward revisions tend to result in stronger overall stock market performance, historically leading to a 13% increase in the S&P 500 over a 12-month span. When fewer downward revisions are the driving factor, the S&P 500 has historically returned 8% over the next 12 months. Morgan Stanley's 12-month price target for the S&P 500 is 6,500, a potential gain of 8% from current levels. Investors should pay more attention to the improvement in forward-looking earnings revision breadth rather than lagging hard data, according to Morgan Stanley. The bank sees April stock market lows as the end of a year-long trend of downward earnings revisions, and expects the rate of change on earnings revision breadth to be the primary driver of equity prices going forward. "In our experience, when revisions breadth is accelerating in a V-shaped manner from an extreme low, equity markets typically remain supported and pullbacks remain shallow and unsatisfying (like the past 6 weeks)," Wilson wrote. The recent outperformance of cyclical stocks also points to a market more focused on forward-looking earnings revisions than backward-looking hard data. These areas of the market are especially sensitive to economic growth and earnings, and they're picking up momentum and providing a tailwind to the overall stock market. While it's possible that inflation could creep up over the summer as the pull-forward effect of tariffs fades, Morgan Stanley believes the bulk of the tariff pain appears to be already priced in following the April 2 tariff announcements. Policy headwinds should ease soon, as Trump's term began by front-loading disruptive tariff policies and will transition to more pro-growth initiatives like deregulation and tax cuts. Over the last month, the market has has rallied over 20% from April lows despite a first quarter GDP contraction weakening manufacturing data. As long as earnings revisions breadth continues trending upwards, Morgan Stanley believes the stock market will continue to overlook short term weakness in hard data.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The bull case for stocks is growing among Wall Street strategists
Wall Street strategists aren't scared of a summer slowdown for stocks despite some indications of a cooling labor market and slowing economic activity. In the past month, several strategists have defended their S&P 500 year-end targets in the range of 6,300 to 6,500, noting that the most dire outcomes from tariffs may no longer be on the table. On Monday, the benchmark index was trading around 6,010, about 2% from the record closing high. In a note titled "Don't fight it," Morgan Stanley chief investment officer Mike Wilson pointed out that a "moderate slowdown in growth" was likely already priced in earlier this year when the average S&P 500 stock fell nearly 30%. "In our experience, stocks and equity market internals move well ahead of lagging economic data and earnings results," Wilson said. To be clear, there are certainly signs of softening in economic data. Last week, ADP data showed that the private sector added 37,000 jobs in May, the lowest monthly total in more than two years. Weekly filings for unemployment claims hit their highest level since October 2024. And monthly nonfarm payroll revisions revealed 95,000 fewer jobs were added in March and April than initially thought. But the slowdown in this data has been widely expected. The equity research team at Goldman Sachs analyzed prior "event driven recessions" such as the bursting of the dot-com bubble and the 1970s interest rate shock. Goldman's team, led by chief US equity strategist David Kostin, found that so-called soft economic data, which encapsulates data points like consumer surveys, usually hits its cycle bottom before hard economic data, like monthly readings on inflation or job additions, does. That's been playing out over the past month. In May, the Conference Board's future expectations index saw its largest monthly increase since May 2009. But data on Monday showed inflation expectations in the New York Federal Reserve's monthly survey moved lower in May for the first time this year, perhaps marking that the worst tariff-driven inflation fears might be behind markets too. Read more: How to protect your savings against inflation Kostin's work shows the S&P 500 typically will follow the soft data's return higher, even if hard economic data, like monthly jobs reports, continues to move lower. "S&P 500 returns are currently more correlated with soft data than hard data," wrote Kostin, who projects the S&P 500 will hit 6,500 in the next 12 months. "If the recovery in soft data is sustained, it should support equity returns even as hard data weaken." Citi equity strategist Scott Chronert boosted his S&P 500 target to 6,300 on Monday from a prior forecast of 5,800. Chronert, like other strategists, pointed out that peak tariff uncertainty has likely passed following the pause on duties between the US and China. With that headwind easing, Chronert pointed out that economic growth forecasts are no longer falling either. After tumbling to a recent bottom of 1.35% in early May, consensus is now projecting the US economy to grow at an annualized pace of 1.4% in 2025. Chronert and other strategists agree that the key risk moving forward would be that economic growth data slows more than consensus is now expecting. But barring that outcome, Chronert likes growth stocks such as Big Tech names amid a market environment that features elevated interest rates and high stock valuations. "Our growth preference continues for now as the AI theme regains momentum," Chronert wrote. Josh Schafer is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on X @_joshschafer. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Do Billionaires Ken Griffin and Izzy Englander Know Something About Palantir That Wall Street Doesn't?
Griffin's and Englander's hedge funds bought Palantir shares hand over fist in Q1. However, many Wall Street analysts aren't so bullish about the stock -- mainly because of valuation concerns. The two billionaires' options strategies might align them more closely with the consensus Wall Street take on Palantir than meets the eye. 10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies › Only one S&P 500 stock has outperformed Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) so far this year. But it's a pretty close contest. NRG Energy's shares have soared around 76% year to date, while Palantir's gain lags by only a few percentage points. Despite Palantir's tremendous momentum, many analysts aren't upbeat about the stock's near-term prospects. But do billionaires Ken Griffin and Izzy Englander know something about Palantir that Wall Street doesn't? At the end of 2024, Griffin's Citadel Advisors owned 441,755 shares of Palantir. In the first quarter of 2025, the hedge fund more than tripled its position in the artificial intelligence (AI) software provider. Englander is arguably even more enthusiastic about Palantir. In the first quarter, his Millennium Management hedge fund more than quadrupled its stake to 1,312,758 shares. Both successful investors also employed options strategies with the stock. Griffin's and Englander's hedge funds held both call and put options for Palantir at the end of the first quarter. While these two billionaires are indisputably buying Palantir Technologies shares hand over fist, the stock doesn't make up a large percentage of their portfolios. That's not surprising, though, considering that Griffin's Citadel Advisors has more than 5,800 holdings, while Englander's Millennium Management has more than 3,900 holdings. Wall Street doesn't seem to share Griffin's and Englander's optimism about Palantir. The consensus 12-month price target for the stock among analysts surveyed by LSEG is roughly 22% below the current share price. Only one of the 25 analysts polled by LSEG in June rated Palantir as a "strong buy." Another three analysts recommended buying the stock. However, seven analysts viewed Palantir as an "underperform" or advised investors to sell. Fifteen analysts recommended holding the stock. Why isn't Wall Street as enthusiastic about Palantir as the two billionaire hedge fund managers seem to be? Probably the biggest objection for analysts is valuation. Palantir's shares trade at nearly 244 times forward earnings. I'd say that was a nosebleed forward multiple, but that might not be a strong enough description. Most analysts don't seem to think Palantir's growth prospects justify this sky-high valuation, either. The software company's price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio based on analysts' five-year earnings growth projections is 4.22. PEG ratios generally need to be below 1.0 for a stock to be considered attractively valued. Maybe Griffin and Englander do know something about Palantir that most analysts on Wall Street don't. Perhaps the billionaire investors expect much stronger growth from the company than analysts forecast. Maybe they agree with Wedbush's Dan Ives, who predicts that Palantir's market cap will more than triple to $1 trillion over the next two to three years. I suspect, though, that the more bearish opinion held by Jefferies analyst Brent Thill is a better take. Thill noted on CNBC's Closing Bell Overtime show a few weeks ago that no tech stock has ever been able to sustain a super-high multiple like Palantir's. Like Thill, I don't question the strength of Palantir's underlying business. The company makes great software. It should have strong growth prospects. Palantir might even enjoy a bonanza if President Donald Trump's Golden Dome missile defense system is funded by Congress and the company wins a lucrative contract to help build it. But this growth still doesn't seem to be enough to justify Palantir's valuation, in my view. I also wonder whether Griffin and Englander are really as bullish about Palantir as their recent buying indicates. We don't know the detailed information about the option trades they've made. It's possible that those options significantly hedge their positions in Palantir. After all, hedging is what hedge funds do. Maybe, just maybe, Griffin and Englander are more closely aligned with the consensus Wall Street view of Palantir than meets the eye. Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Keith Speights has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Do Billionaires Ken Griffin and Izzy Englander Know Something About Palantir That Wall Street Doesn't? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data