Historical mortgage rates: How do they compare to current rates?
Mortgage rates are far lower than the historically high levels in the 1980s. Home buyers have seen better days, though, with current rates significantly higher than their sub-3% lows from 2021. As home prices continue to rise, many are forced to put their homeownership dreams on hold.
But for those still on the fence about buying a home, you're probably wondering — is it the right time to buy a house? Or should you wait until rates are lower? And do historical mortgage rates shed light on what's to come?
The short answer to all of these questions: It depends. However, steep mortgage rates may not be a deal breaker if your finances are solid and you can afford the payments on a new home loan. Furthermore, there's no crystal ball to show how rates will move. Still, understanding trends can help you make a more informed decision on when to buy a home — and maybe lift a weight off your shoulders when you realize that, historically speaking, today's mortgage interest rates aren't as high as you might think.
This embedded content is not available in your region.
In this article:
History of home interest rates
Historical mortgage rate trends
1970s
1980s
1990s
Mortgage rates in the 2000s
2000s
2010s
2020s
Factors that impact mortgage rates
Mortgage rates and the housing market
Mortgage rates and refinancing
The bottom line: How current mortgage rates compare to historical ones
FAQs
Congress established Freddie Mac in 1970 to expand the secondary mortgage market. Freddie Mac began tracking rates in April 1971.
The average annual rate on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage reached its highest point at 16.64% in 1981 and dropped to a historic low of 2.96% in 2021. At the time of publication, the average rate sits in the mid-to-high 6% range.
Here's a closer look at home interest rates over time.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 7.38%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 11.20%
Rates rose steadily from the mid-7% range to roughly 9% in the 1970s. Buyers saw a significant jump to over 11% by the decade's end. The Great Inflation caused the incline, a period marked by record-high inflation. It spanned from the mid-1960s to the early 1980s and was triggered by the Fed's monetary expansionary policies implemented during this period.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 10.19%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 16.64%
The upward trend continued into the 1980s, and average mortgage rates reached an all-time high of 16.64% in 1981. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) issued an oil embargo against the U.S. in the 1970s, and in response, the Fed slashed and increased short-term rates many times throughout the 80s. By the mid-1980s, the average rate started to drop and closed out at 10.32%
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 6.94%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 10.13%
Home buyers got a bit of relief in the 1990s. Mortgage rates cooled to just below 7% in 1998, then rose slightly to an average of 7.44% in 1999. Borrowers could thank the dot-com bubble and the rise of the internet for the dip in rates. More specifically, investors moved away from tech stocks and toward bonds and other fixed-income investments, pushing mortgage rates down.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 5.04%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 8.05%
Mortgage rates peaked at 8.05% in the early 2000s before dropping to 5.04% by 2009. The culprits were the economic crash and subsequent Great Recession. Both stemmed from astronomical growth in the housing market, mainly due to the influx of subprime borrowers.
The mortgage payments became too much for these borrowers to handle. Many found themselves underwater on mortgage loans, and the housing market eventually crashed. A wave of foreclosures followed, prompting the Fed to cut rates and stabilize the market. This is the perfect example of the general rule that mortgage rates decrease when the economy struggles.
Learn more: When will the housing market crash again?
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 3.65%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 4.69%
Mortgage rates remained low this decade. They temporarily reversed course in 2014 and again in 2018, with average rates at 4.17% and 4.54%, respectively — still four times lower than the all-time high. The decade ended with an average slightly below 4%.
Lowest annual average mortgage rate: 2.96%
Highest annual average mortgage rate: 6.81%
The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in record-low rates, largely due to the Federal Reserve cutting the federal funds rate to make borrowing attractive again. Unfortunately, these enticing rates were short-lived, as the Fed followed up its actions with several rate hikes between March 2022 and July 2023.
Rate hikes made home loans more expensive. The average spiked to 5.54% in 2022, followed by another increase to 6.81% in 2023. A rate cut in September 2024 caused the rate to dip to 6.72% that year.
Despite these changes in recent years, rates haven't returned to their pre-pandemic levels and are among the highest since 2002.
Mortgage rates can fluctuate daily. Multiple factors affect mortgage interest rates, and here are some of the most common:
Federal funds rate: Mortgage rates typically increase when the Fed rate increases and decrease when the Fed rate decreases.
10-year Treasury yield: Because mortgages are longer-term loans, their rates follow the 10-year Treasury yield's movements even more than shorter-term yields (like the fed funds rate).
Inflation: You'll usually see mortgage rates increase when inflation rises more aggressively than economists expect.
Global events: Investors' perceptions of events like the U.S. presidential election or tariffs imposed on other countries can impact home loan rates either way.
Economic conditions: Mortgage interest rates tend to increase when the economy thrives and decrease when the economy struggles.
Job market: Since the job market is part of the overall economy, rates tend to increase when the job market is doing well.
Home-buyer demand: The more demand in the housing market, the higher the rates.
These are factors you can't control. However, a mortgage lender may give you a better interest rate if your personal finances are strong.
A mortgage lender's advertised rate may not be the one you receive. It depends on several personal factors, including your credit score, down payment, debt-to-income (DTI) ratio, and cash reserves (if applicable). Loan type also plays a role in the mortgage rate you're offered. For example, VA loans often have lower interest rates than conventional loans.
Read more: The best mortgage lenders for first-time home buyers
When rates are low, homeownership becomes more attractive, driving up demand. Home prices also follow suit as more prospective buyers hit the market.
Still, lower borrowing costs mean access to more buyer power and lower monthly mortgage payments. Keep in mind that the lowest mortgage rates are generally reserved for well-qualified borrowers with strong credit scores.
Refinancing a mortgage makes sense when rates drop, but only if you qualify for a better deal. It isn't a hard-and-fast rule, but many say you should consider refinancing if you can secure a rate reduction of at least 1%. If you plan to move soon, though, the costs of refinancing could outweigh the long-term benefits.
Mortgage rates fluctuate with economic conditions, and there's no surefire way to time the market or predict when rates will shift. Ideally, you want to purchase when rates are low to keep borrowing costs in check. However, buying a home is not necessarily a bad idea when rates are higher if your finances are in solid shape.
Current rates haven't returned to the pre-pandemic levels. Still, they remain well below the record highs in the late 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. And if you decide to buy a home before rates drop, refinancing into a lower rate later is always an option — provided your finances are up to par.
Learn more: 6 times when it makes sense to refinance your mortgage
This embedded content is not available in your region.
Inflation and Fed rate hikes in recent years have kept mortgage rates elevated. However, even though mortgage rates may seem very high, they're low compared to the rates from the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s.
As of April 2025, the average mortgage rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan is in the mid-to-high 6% range. Any rate around or below this number could be considered 'good.'
It's impossible to predict future mortgage trends with certainty. But if mortgage rates were to drop below 3% again, it would likely result from a major economic event, like the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to Freddie Mac, the lowest average weekly rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage was 2.65% in 2021 due to a Fed rate cut prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The cut was made to address economic uncertainty and persuade consumers to increase spending and borrowing levels, aiming to stimulate the economy.
This article was edited by Laura Grace Tarpley.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democratic congressman steps up his work to pull Musk toward his party
Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., talked with one of Elon Musk's 'senior confidants' on Thursday about whether the ex-DOGE leader, now feuding with Donald Trump, might want to help the Democratic Party in the midterms. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna told Semafor on Friday. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026.' Khanna, who has known Musk for more than a decade, has long argued that Democrats unwisely pushed him away from their party. Now the world's wealthiest man, Musk benefited from the Obama administration's clean energy investments, defending them against Republican attacks in the 2012 election. He supported Democratic nominees for president until 2024, when he endorsed Trump for president — and spent more to help elect him than he had for any Democrat. Since Musk began attacking the Trump-backed GOP tax bill as an 'abomination' this week, Democrats in Congress have amplified his criticism and even adopted some of his language. But few besides Khanna have gone as far as talking about bringing Musk back into the Democratic tent; most Democrats are furious at Musk's DOGE work to dismantle parts of the federal government and are confident that he is a political liability for Trump. 'How great is it that that dipshit Elon Musk is out?' Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota said at last Friday's Democratic fish fry in South Carolina, after Musk left the administration. 'The decisions he was making were literally killing people, so he could dance around and act like he was doing something.' Musk was a 'historic villain' whose unpopularity had helped Wisconsin Democrats win the state's April 1 supreme court race by 10 points, said state Democratic Party chairman Ben Wikler. At their 'Fighting Oligarchy' rallies, the largest political events since Trump was sworn in, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., torched Musk as the embodiment of what Democrats and fair-minded Americans should be against. Some Democrats believe that Musk could have stayed in their coalition, had they paid him a little more respect — specifically, had Joe Biden invited Musk to the White House electric vehicle summit early in his presidency. Khanna is in that camp. Others counter that the party's overall shift leftward after 2016 alienated Musk, who was never coming back. He clashed with Elizabeth Warren ('Senator Karen') over the idea of a wealth tax, and with progressives over the 'woke mind virus' that he blamed for the gender transition of his third child. That's the camp where most Democrats are, although some — like Walz — see this as a political opportunity. Still, the idea of an irate multibillionaire making problems for Republicans is enticing to plenty of Democrats, who have not been above meddling in GOP primaries to help weaker candidates win nominations. What if Musk made Republicans burn money to defend their incumbents, as he slammed them with TV ads? That's all theoretical, as Musk said last month that he would do 'a lot less' political spending now that he'd achieved his goal of electing Trump. If Musk is sincere about the political views he posts about on X, he is completely at odds with the Democratic Party, and the best they could hope for is him making trouble for Republicans out of spite. In Politico, Holly Otterbein and Lisa Kashinsky about the Democrats who hoped that Musk would have a 'villain-to-hero' arc, and help them beat Trump. But Khanna was the only voice in the party who fully believed it could happen.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Clean energy tax cuts in reconciliation budget would stall renewable energy projects in Iowa
Wind turbines along west-bound Interstate 80 on March 29, 2025. (Photo by Cami Koons/Iowa Capital Dispatch) Clean energy advocates said Iowa stands to lose jobs, manufacturing facilities, renewable energy project expansions and face more expensive utility bills if Congress passes the budget reconciliation bill as is. Many of these credits were extended via the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, which put them under attack from Republican lawmakers opposed to the green policies. Renewable energy advocates say continued investment into wind, solar and other clean energy sources, regardless of environmental impact, is vital to meeting growing energy demands. Nearly three-fifths of Iowa's total electricity generation comes from renewable sources, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which also reports Iowa is one of the top states for solar and wind energy generation. Since 2019, Iowa has generated more electricity via wind than from coal and continues to grow its solar production. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Kristina Costa, who formerly worked at the White House implementing the Inflation Reduction Act's energy and climate policies, said the IRA established at least 10 years of tax credits to support clean energy industries, which launched new projects and expanded the industry. 'The House bill that the Republicans passed explodes that entire paradigm,' Costa said. 'It functions as a full repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act.' Costa, during a Thursday press conference with Climate Power, said the bill 'really radically' changes how clean electricity developers can plan and develop their projects, by eliminating the ability to 'lock in' a tax treatment at the start of construction. 'This is going to create a lot of uncertainty for project developers,' Costa said. 'It's going to raise financing costs for project developers pretty considerably … but it also just means that fewer projects will end up qualifying for the credits.' Clean energy tax credits impact transportation, power generation, industry and construction and create incentives for projects like renewable vehicle fuels, solar, wind, nuclear power generation and more. Per the reconciliation bill text as it passed the House May 22, the bill would terminate clean vehicle credits, residential energy efficiency credits, hydrogen fuel credits and place restrictions on credits for clean electricity production, zero-emission nuclear energy production and other sectors. Some of the restrictions include strict construction timeline requirements, like beginning construction within 60 days of enactment, and bringing the projects online by 2028. Costa said these timelines create an 'incredibly sharp cliff' for developers to work within for projects that often take years and can face lengthy setbacks from supply chain disruptions. The budget bill also has extensive language pertaining to and restricting projects that have any ties to foreign entities. Costa said these restrictions are 'very complicated, unworkable, Byzantine requirements' that impose 'a lot of red tape' for developers and would have the 'immediate effect of freezing the market.' She said it would require companies to understand where 'literally every nut, bolt, screw and wire in a project they are building comes from' and certify that it does not have any ties to China or to Russia. Costa said gutting these policies will lead to increased energy costs for American customers. A study from Clean Energy Buyers Association analyzed the impact of removing just two clean energy tax credit programs, and found it would cause an average increase of 7% for residential electricity costs. Part of the problem is an anticipated 2% energy demand increase nationwide, in 2025 and again in 2026, according to the EIA. Much of that energy demand is a result of battery manufacturing and data centers. Iowa alone has roughly 100 data centers, which is one of the largest concentrations in the midwest. 'The near term additions to the grid are going to come from renewables, or they're supposed to come from renewables under the current tax regime,' Costa said. 'That is why you would see these consumer electricity price increases.' A spokesperson for Alliant Energy, one of Iowa's utility companies with significant investments in solar and wind energy, said the company is monitoring the bill. A spokesperson for MidAmerican Energy declined to comment on the pending legislation. Earlier this year, NextEra Energy proposed restarting its Duane Arnold Energy Center, a nuclear plant near Palo. A representative from the company did not answer questions about the impact the Republican-sponsored bill would have on the Iowa project. A study from The Nature Conservancy found that clean energy tax credits in Iowa alone would add more than $238 million in annual economic value to Iowa, if left intact through 2032. Repeal of the credits would also affect associated manufacturing companies, like those that make solar panel parts, or wind turbine blades. Analysis from Climate Power found 400,000 jobs nationwide would be in jeopardy without the tax credits supporting the expanding industry. Joe Zimsen, an Iowa resident with 10 years of construction experience in the wind industry, said the IRA created a 'tremendous amount of hope' among his colleagues in the industry that has now 'disintegrated' because of budget bill. Zimsen formerly worked on wind projects near Grinnell, but now works for Renew Energy as a construction manager for off-shore wind projects. He and his family still live in Iowa, and he urged Iowa senators to oppose the bill as it is currently written. 'This policy of killing offshore and onshore wind and solar energy is going to have tremendous detrimental effects and set us back another 10 to 15 years behind our competitors, like China and Europe,' Zimsen said. 'We can't afford to do that.' U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley said Tuesday that wind energy incentives have been at risk since 2015 when he worked to extend them, and he said he senators would try to find a 'compromise' on them again, Radio Iowa reported. But, the so-called, 'big beautiful bill' comprises much more than just clean energy concerns, which Grassley said means one issue can't 'stand in the way' of the rest of the bill. U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst's office did not respond to requests for comment. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE


The Hill
32 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump works to turn page amid Musk fallout
PRESIDENT TRUMP says he's moving on from his nasty feud with Elon Musk, a day after the U.S. president and world's richest man gripped Washington and the world with their lacerating insults and threats. In a series of interviews, Trump sought to change the story, focusing on his agenda bill in Congress, talking up Friday's solid jobs report and pointing to the stock market rally. The rally was driven in part by a surge in Tesla shares, which had plunged at the onset of the Trump-Musk feud. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon,' Trump told CNN's Dana Bash in a phone interview. 'I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well,' he added. However, even Trump's dismissals came with some pointed barbs. Trump told ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind.' 'He's got a problem,' Trump told CNN. 'The poor guys' got a problem.' Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here There were early media reports about White House aides scrambling to set up a call between Trump and Musk, but it does not appear the two men will speak directly to clear the air. On Thursday, their social media beef reached a fever pitch when Musk alleged Trump had ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Trump threatened to kill government contracts for Musk's businesses. Musk also mused about a third-party to challenge Trump, and said the president never would have been elected if not for him. Musk on Friday extended a bit of an olive branch, replying 'true' to a post on X saying they needed to 'make peace for the benefit of our country.' Still, the bad blood lingers. The White House said Trump plans to either give away or sell his Tesla. And Musk posted on X, saying he'll 'be around for 40+ years' after Trump leaves office. Congressional Republicans lamented the nasty break up. 'I hope they reconcile,' said Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). 'I believe in redemption.' Still, Johnson and most Republicans put the blame squarely on Musk. 'Do not doubt and do not second guess and don't ever challenge the president United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. 'He is the leader of the party, he's the most consequential political figure of this generation, in probably the modern era, and he's doing an excellent job for the people.' Even if Trump and Musk bury the hatchet, the rupture is likely to resonate for some time on the right, which is torn between a deep skepticism of Silicon Valley and enthusiasm for the new breed of Libertarian-styled tech leaders. Trump's former adviser Steve Bannon, who warned Trump against partnering with Musk from the start, declared 'war' on Musk, while calling on Trump to retaliate by nationalizing Musk's Space X and Starlink companies. The personal nature of the insults obscured the fact that it was a disagreement over spending and debt in the Trump agenda bill that first sparked the fight, with Musk railing against the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' over forecasts it will add trillions to the national deficit. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Trump and his administration have cast Musk's criticism as sour grapes stemming from the bill's elimination of electric vehicle subsidies, which are utilized by Tesla. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News's Sean Hannity that Musk leaving the White House to return to running Tesla was behind his criticism of the bill. 'The only difference…is Elon went back to his companies,' Leavitt said. 'And, as a businessman, he has a right to speak for his companies. But as president, President Trump has a responsibility to fight for this country.' Musk denies this, posting on X that he'd gladly give up the subsidies if the GOP would abandon its 'pork barrel spending.' Regardless, Musk's opposition mirrors criticism from GOP fiscal hawks in Congress at a fraught time for Trump's agenda bill. The Hill's Alexander Bolton writes: 'Problems are multiplying for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and other Senate negotiators in their bid to pass legislation to enact President Trump's agenda by July 4.' In addition to debt concerns, debate is raging among Republicans over spending cuts to Medicaid, Medicare and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. A compromise to lift the the cap on state and local tax deductions appears to be in peril. Senate Republicans can only afford three defections, and there are at least two hard no votes at this point, with Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) saying they won't vote for the bill at current spending and debt levels. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), who voted for the bill last month, has flipped to a no vote, narrowing the margin in the House if the reconciled package is sent back to the lower chamber. 💡Perspectives: • The Guardian: The inevitable Trump-Musk feud is pathetic. • Sasha Stone: Hell hath no fury like an Elon scorned. • MSNBC: John Thune has one month to save Trump's agenda. • BIG: On Steve Bannon's nationalize SpaceX. • The Hill: Trump just doesn't get principled people like Musk. Read more: • Musk-Trump, from fast friends to breaking up: A timeline. • Democrats ask Bondi for Epstein files after Musk's Trump allegation. • Elon Musk's stock plummets among Republicans. • 5 takeaways from the explosive Trump-Musk divorce. • Democrats call for halt of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac privatization. U.S. officials will meet with their Chinese counterparts in London on Monday for the next round of trade talks, President Trump said Friday. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will represent the Trump administration amid a fragile truce in which the U.S. and China have temporarily agreed to lower tariffs. Trump spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday, saying the two leaders 'straightened out' a lingering disagreement over whether China had violated the truce. In a Treasury Department report released Thursday, the U.S. declined to officially label China as a currency manipulator, but accused Beijing of hiding information related to its exchange rate policies. 'Moving forward, Treasury will use all available tools at its disposal to implement strong countermeasures against unfair currency practices,' Bessent warned. Trump's former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin labeled China a currency manipulator in 2019 for the first time since 1994. The U.S. added 139,000 jobs in May, slightly outperforming expectations of 125,000. The jobless rate held steady at 4.2 percent, showing the economy is holding steady despite uncertainty over tariffs. Trump on Friday re-upped his attacks on Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who has steadfastly refused to lower borrowing costs over fears of tariff-driven turmoil. 'If 'Too Late' at the Fed would CUT, we would greatly reduce interest rates, long and short, on debt that is coming due,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'Biden went mostly short term. There is virtually no inflation (anymore), but if it should come back, RAISE 'RATE' TO COUNTER. Very Simple!!! He is costing our Country a fortune. Borrowing costs should be MUCH LOWER!!!' 💡Perspectives: • The Liberal Patriot: Which party is more undemocratic? • Very Serious: In blue cities, abundance will require fighting labor unions. • The Nation: The Democrats' class trip to nowhere. • The New Republic: The quest to bring young men back to Democrats. • Foreign Affairs: America's allies must save themselves. Read more: • Labor market may spike a 'white-collar recession', says new report. • US gained 562K millionaires in 2024, far outpacing other countries. Here's who's talking Sunday… NewsNation's 'The Hill Sunday': Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Rep. Sarah Elfreth (D-Md.); U.S. Chamber of Commerce official Neil Bradley. CNN's 'State of the Union': Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). CBS's 'Face the Nation': National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett; Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas). Fox's 'Fox News Sunday': Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). NBC 'Meet the Press': Sens. James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.). U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has made more than 100,000 arrests so far during President Trump's second term, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News. That includes more than 4,000 arrests on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week, up from an average of 660 during Trump's first 100 days in office. ICE is holding about 54,000 people in detention facilities across the U.S., as the Trump administration seeks additional funds from Congress to enact mass deportations. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the Egyptian national accused of an antisemitic attack on the Jewish community in Boulder, Colo., faces 118 criminal charges, including attempted murder. Soliman, who used a flamethrower and Molotov cocktails against people marching in support of hostages held by Hamas, came to the U.S. on a visa that expired in 2023. Efforts by law enforcement officials to deport Soliman's family have been halted by a judge and are pending a hearing. A federal judge temporarily paused Trump's proclamation to block visas for foreign students planning to attend Harvard University until a hearing can be held later in June. Harvard is suing over Trump's action. • House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) subpoenaed former President Biden's White House physician to appear for a deposition later this month, as Republicans ramp up their investigation into Biden's mental and physical health from his time in office. Comer accused Dr. Kevin O'Connor of failing to comply with his initial request for a transcribed interview, according to CNN. O'Connor claimed 'physician-patient privilege' in declining the request, according to Comer. • Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem is ending the Transportation Safety Administration's (TSA) 'Quiet Skies Program,' saying it's costly, ineffective and leveraged against political opponents. The Hill's Sarah Fortinsky and Rebecca Beitsch write: 'The once-secret program launched with the goal of monitoring potential security threats by 'unknown or partially known terrorists.' Through the program, undercover federal air marshals would observe passengers' behavior. This can include watching how close they stand to the boarding area, how often they use the bathroom and any behavioral tics such as sweating or twitching. The program has faced scrutiny from Democrats and Republicans alike in recent years, with many expressing concerns about potential civil liberty violations.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was briefly placed on the watch list last year. • Russia launched a new round of drone and ballistic missile strikes against Ukraine on Friday after promising to retaliate against Kyiv for its recent offensive. 💡Perspectives: • The Hill: Progressives shouldn't be surprised by antisemitic violence. • The Hill: Trump is right, a smaller NSC is actually a good thing. • The Hill: Qatar's US influence strategy goes deep. • Freddie deBoer: AI hype and the tech slowdown are symmetrical. Read more: • Race heats up to replace Connolly on powerful Oversight panel. • Trouble signs grow for Cornyn in Texas. • DC's National Airport will close during Army's June 14 party. • Air Force chief: Qatari jet will cost less than $400 million to retrofit. • US sanctions four International Criminal Court judges. Someone forward this newsletter to you? Sign up to get your own copy: See you next time!