Two Aussies were on-board aid ship allegedly intercepted by Israel
Two Australians were on board an aid boat in a bid to challenge the blockade of Gaza when it was allegedly intercepted by Israeli troops.
The Freedom Flotilla Coalition said there were 21 people on board the 'Handala' ship, which was stocked with baby formula, diapers, food and medicine, when it was intercepted early on Sunday morning (AEST) about 75km from Gaza.
Two Australians, Robert Martin and Tan Safi, were reportedly on board the ship when it was allegedly intercepted by the Israel Defence Forces.
Pre-recorded videos of both Mr Martin and Ms Safi were shared to Freedom Flotilla's X pages, alleging they had been intercepted at sea.
'I appeal to my comrades, friends and family, to everyone, to put pressure on your country, Australia, of my country, to demand my release, and the release of everybody on board the 'Handala' as soon as possible. Thank you,' Mr Robert said in the video.
An Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson confirmed two Australians were on-board the boat, The Guardian reported.
NewsWire has contacted DFAT for comment.
Two Australians, Robert Martin and Tan Safi, were reportedly on board the ship when it was allegedly intercepted by the Israel Defence Forces. Picutre: Freedom Flotilla/X.
The Israel Foreign Ministry said a vessel had been stopped from 'illegally entering the maritime zone of the coast of Gaza' in a post shared to X.
'The vessel is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. All passengers are safe,' the statement read.
'Unauthorised attempts to breach the blockade are dangerous, unlawful, and undermine ongoing humanitarian efforts.'
It comes after Anthony Albanese said he believed Israel has 'quite clearly' breached international law through its treatment of innocent civilians in Gaza, but will not follow French President Emmanuel Macron and formally recognise a Palestinian State when he heads to the United Nations General Assembly in September.
Anthony Albanese said he was personally heartbroken over the photos coming out of Gaza, with the death toll from starvation and malnourishment increasing. Picture: Omar Al-Qarraa/ AFP
A photo taken from the Shait refugee camp in Gaza, picturing a woman, Naima Abu Ful holding her malnourished two-year-old child, Yazan. Picture: AP Photo/ Jehad Alshrafi
This follows global condemnation of Israel for restricting aid to civilians trapped in Gaza, with health authorities reporting 123 people have died of starvation and malnutrition.
The Israeli military has since said it will begin aid airdrops, and establish humanitarian corridors for United Nations convoys to allow for the delivery of food.
Speaking to ABC on Sunday, the Prime Minister said he was heartbroken by the images of starving children coming out of Gaza.
While he welcomed the resumption of aid as 'a start,' he reiterated the condemnation of civilian deaths as 'completely unacceptable' and 'completely indefensible'.
'This is a start, but we need to make sure that people who are innocent … including the young boy who people will have seen that image of just breaks your heart, a one-year-old boy is not a Hamas fighter,' he said.
When pressed, Mr Albanese also said Israel's actions are 'quite clearly' a breach of international law, given 'international law says that you can't hold innocent people responsible for what is a conflict'.
'I'm a supporter of Israel and Israel's right to defend itself, but that boy isn't challenging Israel's right to existence, and nor are the many who continue to suffer from the unavailability of food and water,' he said.
Mr Albanese said Israel had 'quite clearly' breached international law through its treatment of innocent people. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
However, Australia will not follow France, who has become the first large Western power to confirm it will formally recognise Palestinian statehood at the UN General Assembly, joining about 75 per cent of member states.
Mr Albanese said that, while Australia 'will make a decision at an appropriate time,' there needed to be more detail on how a Palestinian state would function before he was comfortable making that commitment.
'How do you exclude Hamas from any involvement there? How do you ensure that a Palestinian State operates in an appropriate way which does not threaten the existence of Israel?' he said.
'And so we won't do any decision as a gesture. We will do it as a way forward, if the circumstances are met.'
Coalition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash criticised Mr Albanese for not putting more blame on Hamas and its continued refusal to release hostages taken on October 7, 2023.
However, Mr Albanese has made repeated comments calling on Hamas to release the hostages, and has reiterated his condemnation of the terrorist organisation.
Senator Cash added that while the statement said that Australia wants to 'to see the end of the war in Gaza,' the 'next sentence should have been: 'And we call on the terrorists Hamas, who commenced this war and who are ensuring the suffering of the civilians in Gaza to end this war tomorrow''.
'Does Israel have a moral responsibility? Yes. Should Israel be getting more aid in to civilians in Gaza? Absolutely,' she said.
'And I call on the Israeli government to work with the international agencies to get that aid to the civilians but let us not be blind … to the reality.'
Foreign Minister Penny Wong was asked on Sunday afternoon whether Australia was obligated to act given Mr Albanese had said Israel was breaching international law.
'The Prime Minister made out position clear this morning, it is forbidden to withhold aid from civilians, that is not consistent with international law,' Ms Wong said.
'But actually, as importantly, it's morally the wrong thing to do, it's ethically the wrong thing to do.'
Originally published as Two Aussies were on-board aid ship allegedly intercepted by Israel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
2 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘They're gutless': Pauline's net zero play
One Nation senator Pauline Hanson is seizing on division in the Coalition to push through an urgency motion calling for Australia to abandon its net zero target. Senator Hanson, a long-time climate change denier, will introduce the motion on Monday following Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce's private members bill calling for the same thing. Aware of the divide in the Coalition, Senator Hanson said her motion would out opposition 'cowards'. 'They're gutless, you know, they're cowards,' she told Sky News when asked about the prospect of Coalition senators not backing her motion. 'Because a lot of these people on the floor of parliament have no understanding, cannot debate you about climate change. 'They don't even know anything about it. 'They're making decisions and voting on it.' One Nation senator Pauline Hanson says her net zero urgency motion will expose 'cowards' in the Coalition. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'Scam' She went on to say Australians have 'been hoodwinked'. 'It's a scam going on and if we head down this path, what will happen to Australians?' Senator Hanson said. 'You will be restricted where you travel, where you go, what you eat, and it will be based on your carbon emissions.' Australia's renewables targets do not impose restrictions on freedom of movement or diets. Earlier, Mr Joyce asked Australia's big-city residents if they are 'prepared to hurt the poor' by pursuing a carbon neutral future. Mr Joyce, who was banished to the backbench after the Coalition's brief post-election break-up, kicked off the second sitting week of the new parliament by introducing his Repeal Net Zero Bill. Unless Sussan Ley drastically changes course in rebuilding the Coalition as a moderate opposition, the private member's bill will not get far. But as a former Nationals leader, Mr Joyce holds clout within the party and his split from more green-minded Liberal Party colleagues has grown into somewhat of a backbench rebellion. Nationals heavyweight Barnaby Joyce has asked Australia's big-city residents if they are 'prepared to hurt the poor'. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Joyce said on Monday there needed to be more give and take between city-living Australians and their rural and regional counterparts, saying there 'are certain things' the regions could do but do not 'because we're trying to be reasonable'. 'There's absolutely no reason that Mascot Airport can't work 24/7,' he told reporters, flanked by fellow Coalition rebels and disgruntled community members. 'But we understand that people don't want planes flying over themselves in the middle of the night … but we don't want transmission lines over our head either. 'We don't want wind towers either, so there's got to be a form of good pro quo.' Mr Joyce said the question 'affluent suburbs' needed to be asked was: 'Are you prepared to hurt the poor?' 'Are you prepared to hurt them and I don't think if you really explain the issue that people do want to hurt them,' he said. 'You don't feel virtuous if you're hurting people.' Former Nationals leaders Barnaby Joyce and Michael McCormack are calling for Australia's net-zero target to be abandoned. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Joyce's Bill proposes to abandon Australia's carbon-neutral target by 2050. The target is in line with goals set by other developed economies, but the task has been complicated by rapid energy demands from emerging economies and global disruptions driven by increased conflicts, such as Russia's war in Ukraine. Among Mr Joyce's supporters gathered outside Parliament House was fellow former Nationals leader Michael McCormack, another hefty voice in the party. Liberal MP Garth Hamilton also joined him, making him the only member of the senior Coalition partner to do so.
Sky News AU
14 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Communications Minister once hailed YouTube as a place for kids — now she appears ready to ban it
Communications Minister Anika Wells once fawned over YouTube as a way to entertain her young children — now she appears ready to ban it as a legal furore erupts in the tech world. Minister wells is considering banning children under 16 from YouTube, but just a few years ago she praised the video sharing platform as a means for a young parent to navigate the "parliament hustle". "How do I handle the parliament hustle? Sturdy baby gates and The Wiggles on YouTube," she wrote in December, 2022, at a time she was sports minister. Minister Wells appeared to confirm for the first time publicly that she would formally adopt a push from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant to prohibit children from creating accounts on YouTube. 'The eSafety Commissioner made it clear in her advice to the Minister that the law relates to children under the age of 16 having their own social media accounts,' Minister Wells told 'eSafety's recommendation does not prevent children from watching videos like The Wiggles on YouTube Kids or on their parent's account.' Under this scenario, kids would still be able to access YouTube logged out, which means they would not be protected by Google's sophisticated parental controls. YouTube has argued this move would make the internet less safe, a clear contradiction with the original intent of the Act. A formal decision is expected as early as Thursday this week but the government has been criticised for confusion around the rollout of these new laws. And it isn't just parents confused by Labor's flip-flopping on the social media ban. The rushed implementation of the laws and the lack of industry clarity has infuriated multiple platforms involved in negotiations, leading to tense and highly complex legal discussions behind closed doors. TikTok is understood to have made a legal threat on constitutional grounds over the ban. TikTok denies this but in a submission to the government, the Chinese owned platform alleged the laws would be fundamentally unworkable and anti-competitive in nature, if YouTube was exempt. Labor appears to have listened to these warnings and could announce a major change to the child ban policy as early as next week. After learning Labor was preparing to U-turn on a pledge to exempt YouTube, Google also called in the lawyers. The video sharing platform argued the child ban breaches the implied constitutional protections Australians have to engage in political speech. In March, TikTok wrote a scathing submission to the government which focused almost entirely on lobbying for YouTube to also be banned. TikTok's submission alleged the laws were "unsupportable" and "anti-competitive" in nature, and accused Labor of reverse engineering legislation. "Excluding any major platform by name from the minimum age obligation on educative grounds is unsupportable without evidence," the submission said. "What is clear is that the Government has begun its analysis from the starting position that YouTube must be exempt and then attempted, half-heartedly, to reverse-engineer defensible supporting evidence. "Handing one major social media platform a sweetheart deal of this nature - while subjecting every other platform in Australia to stringent compliance obligations - would be illogical, anti-competitive, and short-sighted." TikTok also warned that an exemption for YouTube raised anti-competition legal issues which, it argued, had already been highlighted by the ACCC. 'That Google or any rational economic actor in its position would seek to lobby Government for favourable treatment is comprehensible. That the Government would accede to it, against the warnings of its own competition watchdog, is not,' the submission said. In a forward to the submission TikTok warned the government the laws "would not work" if YouTube was exempt. "For the reasons set out in this submission, we have grave concerns that the Rules, if implemented in their current form, would not work," TikTok said. "We are particularly concerned that carving out any major platform by name - in this case, YouTube - from the minimum age obligation would result in a law that is illogical, anti-competitive, and short-sighted." eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant was accused earlier this month of misleading Australians after her push to have children banned from the platform was not supported in her own research. It was revealed that even Ms Inman Grant's office used YouTube to educate children as part of her own publishing strategy, specifically targeting the demographic. In late 2022, while Ms Inman Grant was in charge of the body, a series of videos called 'eSafety Mighty Heroes' including characters such as Dusty the frilled neck lizard, River the sugar glider, Billie the bilby, and Wanda the echidna was released on the same day - content clearly published with the intent to educate children.
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Trump dismisses Macron's push for peace in Gaza
Sky News host James Morrow reacts to US President Donald Trump dismissing French President Emmanuel Macron's push for peace in Gaza. 'This interference by countries like France actually makes it harder to achieve peace, achieve victory, get the hostages back,' Mr Morrow said. 'All you are doing until you have some sort of viable government to run that state is rewarding Hamas, you are rewarding aggression.'
