Kilmar Abrego Garcia's wife shares message ahead of hearing: ‘Continue fighting … God is with us'
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia — a Salvadoran native who was wrongfully deported to an El Salvador prison as part of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown — shared a message from him with a crowd gathered at a downtown Nashville church ahead of his arraignment Friday morning:
'Continue fighting, and I will be victorious because God is with us.'
About two blocks down the street, Abrego Garcia awaited his arraignment in federal court on criminal 'alien smuggling' charges and a hearing to determine whether he will continue to be detained until trial.
Speaking to a crowd of immigrant rights advocates, union leaders and clergy, Jennifer Vasquez Sura said Thursday marked exactly three months since 'the administration abducted and disappeared my husband and separated him from our family.'
It also marked the first time she was able to see him — albeit through a video screen.
Hundreds of miles away, their son, Kilmar Jr., was in Maryland at his kindergarten graduation, she said.
'Our family should have never been in this situation,' she said, her voice choking with emotion. 'We should be with our children. Me and Kilmar's mind is here in Tennessee, but my heart is in Maryland with my kids … My son is alone on his big day, and I'm here fighting for my husband, for his dad, to come back home.'
Abrego Garcia — a 29-year-old Salvadoran native living in Maryland, union sheet metal worker and father of three — was driving home with his five-year-old son when he was pulled over in March. He was detained and mistakenly deported to a notorious Salvadoran prison under allegations of membership in the MS-13 criminal gang. His family says they are false. A court order from 2019 expressly prohibited his deportation to El Salvador, where he fears persecution.
The El Salvador government returned Abrego Garcia to the United States in June to face a grand jury indictment in Tennessee for one count of 'conspiracy to unlawfully transport illegal aliens for financial gain' and one count of 'unlawful transportation of illegal aliens for financial gain' between 2016 and 2025.
The indictment was issued May 21 but remained sealed until June 6.
The charges are tied to a traffic stop by the Tennessee Highway Patrol in November 2022, when Abrego Garcia was pulled over for speeding about 80 miles east of Nashville while driving an SUV with nine Hispanic men. No charges were filed at the time, but prosecutors now allege that the stop involved smuggling migrants within the United States.
Vasquez Sura said Abrego Garcia spoke of faith and gratitude.
'To everyone who continues to support Kilmar and the fight for justice, Kilmar says, 'Thank you from the bottom of my heart. God has put us in this path together for a reason. He knows why He does it and what He does, and there's always a reason we have all come together at this moment,' Vasquez Sura said.
'Kilmar shares that he feels God's presence with him, as only God knows the darkness he has faced in these past three months,' she said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Gunman who killed 10 Black people in N.Y. supermarket wants charges dropped, says grand jury was too white
BUFFALO, N.Y. — Attorneys for the white supremacist gunman who killed 10 Black people at a Buffalo supermarket told a judge Thursday that the federal charges against him should be dropped because there weren't enough Black people and other minority groups on the grand jury that indicted him. Payton Gendron did not attend the hearing, during which his lawyers argued that his constitutional rights to a grand jury drawn from a cross section of the community were violated. At the hearing's start, U.S. District Judge Lawrence Vilardo noted Gendron's objection to the prevalence of white people on the panel seemed 'a little incongruous' in the hate crimes case. He did not immediately rule on the motion. Gendron could face the death penalty if convicted in the 2022 mass shooting at a Tops supermarket, which he targeted because of its location in a primarily Black neighborhood. Those killed ranged in age from 32 to 86. Three others were wounded. Gendron already is serving a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole after pleading guilty in November 2022 to multiple state charges, including murder. A trial on the pending federal hate crime and weapons counts is expected to begin next year. The Justice Department said it would seek the death penalty if Gendron is found guilty. Attorney John Elmore, who represents some of the victims' relatives in lawsuits, said Gendron's lawyers are doing what they can to keep him alive. He said challenges to the makeup of juries rarely succeed, even though he regularly sees juries lacking minorities. 'It is very ironic that attention to this problem is being brought out in this case, where Payton Gendron committed a racially motivated homicide,' he said by phone after the hearing. 'But this has been a persistent problem in our courts that needs to be addressed.' Gendron's lawyers argued in a court filing that Black and Hispanic people and men are 'systemically and significantly underrepresented' in the lists from which jurors are selected in the Buffalo area. 'To illustrate this point, the grand jury that indicted Payton Gendron was drawn from a pool from which approximately one third of the Black persons expected and one third of the Hispanic/Latino persons expected,' Gendron's lawyers wrote. Exacerbating the problem, they said, was that the data sources used by a vendor to pull the lists together weren't preserved. 'We don't know what the vendor did,' Assistant Public Defender Sonya Zoghlin said. 'More importantly, the vendor doesn't know what he did.' Statistically, the addition of two more Black people on the 60-person grand jury panel would have balanced the panel, Vilardo said. 'Can't that be the result of an accident,' the judge asked, rather than systemic exclusion? In opposing the motion, Assistant U.S. Attorney Caitlin Higgins said that at worst, the issue constitutes a 'technical violation,' not grounds to dismiss the indictment. The federal law governing jury selection 'doesn't entitle the defendant to a perfect representation,' she said. Zoghlin said the issue was larger than the panel that ultimately heard Gendron's case and included the exclusion of certain groups from the selection process, including inactive voters. In a written filing, the U.S. Attorney's office said Gendron didn't prove a systematic underrepresentation that was caused by the district's jury plan. Any disparities in the racial makeup were within accepted guidance, they wrote, and not caused by the selection process, which draws from voter, driver, tax, disability and unemployment rolls. Higgins said courts have routinely rejected similar challenges: Vilardo said he was unaware that any such motions had been granted in cases with similar disparities in New York state's federal courts. Gendron's attorneys, in an earlier filing, argued that Gendron should be exempt from the death penalty because he was 18 years old at the time of the shooting, an age when the brain is still developing. That motion is pending.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
The State Education Department HATES letting the public learn from test results
As we continue to report and analyze the state K-8 test results released this week, we're all too aware that the folks releasing them would much rather no one could make any use of the information. Most of the 'stakeholders' in New York public education would rather avoid any accountability by keeping everyone in the dark. The law requires the State Education Department to do the testing and make the results public — but SED's political masters on the state Board of Regents actually hate standardized testing, and so constantly undermine the entire project. Advertisement Thus, SED for the second year in a row has delayed until August on going public with results from testing done in the spring — though the actual scoring can't possibly take more than a few weeks, and past results came out at the start of the summer. The assessments could, for example, empower parents to realize that their child this fall will move to a school with horrible results for most kids. But seeing the info so late means it's likely too late to do anything about it. Advertisement Another SED trick: Even as it released data for the regular public schools, it held back public reporting on charter schools. At least, SED tried to: An error at the city Department of Education actually led to posting of city charters' data, and the info spread beyond control before the DOE could pull it offline. That was a happy mistake: Last year, SED kept key charter info secret until December. Advertisement SED has plenty of lame explanations for all its delays in sharing information, just as it does for periodically fiddling with the tests so that it's impossible to make meaningful comparisons of data across more than two or three years. But the real cause is state Education Commissioner Betty Rosa, chosen by the regents precisely because she's an ally of the teachers unions and an opponent of charters: The unions hate transparency because it could lead to accountability; charters love it because they're all about accountability. Charters — publicly funded but privately run — are the only New York City public schools that routinely deliver high-quality learning to kids from lower-income black and Hispanic families. That, above all else, is what Rosa and the regents want to keep parents and the public in the dark about.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Supermarket gunman who targeted Black people wants charges dropped, says grand jury was too white
Buffalo Supermarket Shooting BUFFALO, N.Y. (AP) — Attorneys for the gunman who killed 10 Black people at a Buffalo supermarket say the federal charges against him should be dropped because there weren't enough Black people and other minority groups on the grand jury that indicted him. A judge is scheduled to hear arguments Thursday on Payton Gendron's claim that the selection process for the grand jury was flawed. Gendron, who is white, could face the death penalty if convicted in the 2022 mass shooting at a Tops supermarket, which he targeted because of its location in a primarily Black neighborhood. Those killed ranged in age from 32 to 86. Three others were wounded. He is serving a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole after pleading guilty in November 2022 to multiple state charges, including murder. A trial on the pending federal hate crime and weapons counts is expected to begin next year. Gendron's lawyers argue in a court filing that Black and Hispanic people and men are 'systemically and significantly underrepresented' in the lists from which jurors are selected in the Buffalo area. 'To illustrate this point, the grand jury that indicted Payton Gendron was drawn from a pool from which approximately one third of the Black persons expected and one third of the Hispanic/Latino persons expected,' Gendron's lawyers wrote. Exacerbating the problem, they said, was that the data sources used by a vendor to pull the lists together weren't preserved. As a result, Gendron's legal rights to a grand jury drawn from a fair cross section of the community were violated, they said, so the charges should be dismissed. Prosecutors said the arguments 'fail both as a matter of law and fact.' In a written response, the U.S. Attorney's office said Gendron didn't prove a systematic underrepresentation that was caused by the district's jury plan. Any disparities in the racial makeup were within accepted guidance, they wrote, and not caused by the selection process, which draws from voter, driver, tax, disability and unemployment rolls. 'The defendant is charged with killing 10 Black people and injuring three other individuals as part of a racially motivated attack on a grocery store,' prosecutors wrote. 'He now demands that the court dismiss the indictment against him because, in his view, the implementation of the Western District of New York jury plan led to the underrepresentation of certain minority groups — including Black persons.' U.S. District Judge Lawrence Vilardo is scheduled to hear oral arguments on the defense's motion Thursday afternoon. Gendron's attorneys, in an earlier filing, argued that Gendron should be exempt from the death penalty because he was 18 years old at the time of the shooting, an age when the brain is still developing. That motion is pending.
