‘Let's not bring morale down,' says SC on women short service officers
NEW DELHI: Taking a humanitarian approach, the Supreme Court on Friday asked the Centre not to discharge from service the Short Service Commission (SSC) women Army officers, challenging the denial of permanent commission (PC) to them, asking not to 'bring their morale down' in 'the prevailing situation'.
'In the prevailing situation let's not bring their (Short Service Commission women Army officers) morale down. They are brilliant officers, you can use their services somewhere else. This is not the time that they are asked to roam around in the Supreme Court. They have a better place to be and serve the country,' said, a two-judge bench of the apex court,
The court, which was hearing a batch of pleas filed by 69 officers challenging the denial of PC , fixed the matter for further hearing to August.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan eyeing German missile shield used in Ukraine after BrahMos proves too fast for Chinese systems: Report
Pakistan is reportedly exploring the option of acquiring an advanced air defence system from a German company to counter supersonic cruise missiles , such as India's BrahMos , which have proven highly effective against Pakistan's existing Chinese-made HQ-16 and HQ-9 systems. According to media reports, the system has already been inducted into the Ukrainian armed forces. Last month, Ukraine claimed that the advanced air defence system successfully shot down over 60 targets since its initial deployment last year.. IRIS-T SLM shows effectiveness against supersonic cruise missiles The IRIS-T SLM system, developed by Diehl Defence , has reportedly been very successful in Ukraine, particularly against Russian P-800 Oniks missiles that are similar in performance to the BrahMos. The system was originally meant for Egypt, which had signed a deal for ten batteries, but some of the units were redirected to Ukraine during the ongoing war. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Windows Users Don't Forget To Do This Before Wednesday Read More Undo Introduced in 1990, the IRIS-T SLM has undergone multiple upgrades. It includes a radar, an operations centre, and multiple launchers—each mounted on a compact 20-foot frame. This modular design allows for easier deployment. The cost of one complete unit is estimated at around $200 million. Feature IRIS-T S-400 BrahMos Type Defensive Defensive Offensive Origin Germany Russia India- Russia Role Point area & Defence Long-range air defence High-speed precision strike Max. Range ~40 km ~400 km ~400 km (latest variants) Speed of Target Handling Supersonic missiles Hypersonic threats Supersonic (Mach 3) In service with Germany, Ukraine Russia, India, China India (Army, Navy, Air Force) Designed to defeat Cruise missiles, drones Missiles, aircraft Ground/naval targets Pakistan's defence upgrade comes amid financial troubles Pakistan's interest in the system comes at a time when its existing air defence systems have failed to counter threats like the Indo-Russian BrahMos missile . The country is facing severe economic challenges and has repeatedly sought help from global financial institutions. In the last month alone, Pakistan secured an $800 million loan from the Asian Development Bank and a $1 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund. Live Events Despite its fiscal crisis, the Pakistani government cancelled development projects worth 1,000 billion Pakistani rupees but raised the defence budget by 18%, according to a report by India Today. India objects to defence spending amid international loans India has raised objections to the increase in Pakistan's defence budget while receiving loans from global agencies. It has claimed, 'the loan amount would be used for terror financing rather than their intended use for development.' German defence ties span both sides of the subcontinent While Pakistan is exploring a deal for IRIS-T SLM from Germany, Diehl Defence is also a partner of Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems that is working on an Indian defence project. The two companies are working together to supply an Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS) for six submarines being developed under India's Rs 70,000 crore Project 75I for the Indian Navy.
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court Grants Relief To Man Detained Over Interfaith Union
The Supreme Court has granted bail to a man who faced imprisonment under Uttarakhand's Freedom of Religion Act following his marriage to a woman from a different religious background. The apex court emphasized that both individuals were consenting adults who entered into matrimony with complete awareness of each other's religious affiliations and with the full knowledge and presence of their respective families. In delivering its judgment, the court articulated that the state lacks any legitimate grounds to object to the couple's cohabitation, particularly given that their union was conducted according to the wishes and approval of both families involved. This judicial pronouncement underscores the constitutional principle that adult citizens possess the fundamental right to make personal choices regarding marriage and residence. The case centers around Aman Siddiqui, who also goes by the name Aman Chaudhary, and his subsequent arrest following complaints filed by extended members of his wife's family along with certain unspecified organizations. The formal complaint was lodged at Rudrapur police station in Udham Singh Nagar district, leading to charges under Section 3/5 of the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act as well as Sections 318(4) and 319 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The legal proceedings took a challenging turn when the Uttarakhand High Court initially rejected Siddiqui's bail application, resulting in his incarceration for approximately six months. This prolonged detention occurred despite arguments from his legal representation that the marriage was an arranged union conducted through proper family channels rather than any clandestine or coercive arrangement. Defense counsel presented arguments emphasizing the legitimate nature of the matrimonial alliance, noting that the marriage had been arranged through traditional family processes. However, the legal team acknowledged that certain individuals and organizations had raised objections to the union following its completion, leading to the criminal charges and subsequent arrest. The lawyer representing Siddiqui provided assurances to the court that, upon the granting of bail, the couple would establish their residence independently from their respective families. This arrangement was proposed to ensure they could continue their married life peacefully without external interference or pressure from opposing parties. The Supreme Court's decision reflects a broader judicial approach that prioritizes individual rights and constitutional freedoms over religious or social objections to interfaith marriages. The court's reasoning centers on the fundamental principle that adult citizens possess the autonomy to make decisions about their personal relationships and living arrangements without unwarranted state intervention. This ruling carries significance beyond the immediate case, as it reinforces legal precedents supporting interfaith marriages conducted between consenting adults. The judgment emphasizes that marriages performed with family knowledge and consent, regardless of religious differences, deserve legal protection rather than criminal prosecution. The apex court has directed the trial court to facilitate Siddiqui's immediate release from custody, bringing an end to his extended detention. This directive ensures swift implementation of the bail order and allows the couple to resume their married life while any remaining legal proceedings continue through appropriate channels. The case highlights ongoing tensions between religious conversion laws and constitutional protections for personal freedom, particularly in matters of marriage and religious choice. The Supreme Court's intervention serves as a reminder that individual rights must be balanced against community concerns while ensuring that legal frameworks do not infringe upon fundamental freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Brazilian coup trial: Bolsonaro admits to finding 'alternative ways' to remain in power - what former President said in court
Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro (AP) Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has admitted at his trial in the Supreme Court that he allegedly took part in meetings to seek ' alternative ways' to remain in power after his defeat in the 2022 elections. But he has denied involvement in staging any coup. After two hours of questioning, he stated, 'We studied other alternatives within the constitution,' as reported by the Guardian, following the swearing-in of current President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro, a far-right leader, admitted that other options under consideration were the deployment of military forces and the suspension of civil liberties, but did not go through any of them as 'there was no climate for it; no opportunity'. He said that his allies had even considered the declaration of a state of siege. The former chiefs of the air force and the army had previously said that they were not complicit in Bolsonaro's plans during those meetings, although the former navy commander pledged his alliance with Bolsonaro. The trial Bolsonaro and 33 of his allies were charged in February for trying to stage a coup after losing the presidential elections in 2022. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Husband Leaves Sick Wife For His Mistress. When He Returns For Her Inheritance, She Does This Learn It Wise Undo Now, Brazil's top court has started a trial for the eight of them, including Bolsonaro. In the coming months, judges will hear from the other 26 defendants. The case arises from when the Presidential Palace in Brasilia, the Supreme Court, and Congress were stormed by thousands of Bolsonaro supporters in an attempt to oust the newly sworn-in President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in 2023. If convicted, Bolsonaro could face up to 12 years in prison for allegedly staging a coup, as reported by AP. The first to testify was Lt. Colonel Mauro Cid, who signed a plea bargain and his testimony, along with evidence from the federal police, forms the basis of the trial. He testified that the former president had orchestrated some kind of 'fraud' in the electronic voting system as well as edited a draft decree that included the arrest of various authorities. What if Bolsonaro is found guilty Even if he is found guilty, Bolsonaro would still be able to appeal to the Supreme Court's full panel. If the former president is not convicted on all counts, Brazil's top prosecutor could do the same. Meanwhile, Bolsonaro's lawyers could prolong the trial by requesting clarifications on individual judges' rulings. This process will be over by the second half of the year, according to legal experts.
