Neven Maguire amongst big winners at Irish Restaurant Awards 2025
The awards took place at the Clayton Hotel, Burlington Road with more than 1,000 of the best in hospitality gathering for the exciting evening.
The Irish Restaurant Awards received a record 165,000 public nominations for restaurants, cafés and venues across the country — the highest in the Awards' 16-year history. Pic: Paul Sherwood
Ahead of the national event, regional awards ceremonies were hosted in Kildare, Cork, Sligo and Monagha, where the county-level winners were revealed across a range of categories.
The big winner on thee night was Dede at the Customs House Baltimore, who picked up Best Restaurant while Best Chef was John Kelly of the Lady Helen Restaurant at Mount Juliet Estate.
Chef Neven Maguire received the Outstanding Achievement Award for his contribution to Irish food and hospitality. Pic: Paul Sherwood
Speaking on the night, Seán Collender, President of the Restaurants Association of Ireland said it was 'more important than ever' to celebrate the food and hospitality sector.
He said the awards 'shine a light on the resilience and creativity that defines the industry.'
Best Restaurant — Sponsored by San Miguel: Dede at the Customs House, Baltimore.
Best Chef — Sponsored by BWG Food Service: John Kelly, Lady Helen Restaurant at Mount Juliet Estate.
Best Restaurant Manager — Sponsored by Elavon: Cian Lynch, Uno Mas.
Best Hotel & Guesthouse Restaurant — Sponsored by Frylite: George V at Ashford Castle.
Best Use of Social Media — Sponsored by GRID Finance: Hotel Woodstock. Best Use of Social Media winners. Pic: Paul Sherwood
Employee Excellence Award — Sponsored by Peninsula: Charles O'Reilly, Happy Out x Together Academy.
Best Casual Dining — Sponsored by Musgrave MarketPlace: Crudo.
Gastro Pub — Sponsored by Paynt: McSwiggans.
Best Café — Sponsored by Lavazza: Strandfield.
Best Contemporary Irish Cuisine — Sponsored by FBD Insurance: The Olde Post Inn. Best Newcomer winner. Pic: Paul Sherwood
Best Newcomer — Sponsored by Square: Bearú.
Pub of the Year — Sponsored by istil.39: Sean's Bar.
Best Wine Experience — Sponsored by Bibendum: Bar Pez.
Best Customer Service — Sponsored by Restaurant-insurance.ie provided by Dolmen: Restaurant Chestnut.
Best World Cuisine — Sponsored by National Chef de Partie Apprenticeship & National Sous Chef Apprenticeship Programmes: Rasam Restaurant.
Best Sustainable Practices — Sponsored by Familia Torrees & the Findlater Group: Lir. Pic: Paul Sherwood
Innovator of the Year — Sponsored by Diageo: Bar 1661.
Local Food Hero — Sponsored by Sugar Snap: Johnny Cuddy, Ispini Charcuterie.
Outstanding Achievement Award — Sponsored by Excel Recruitment: Never Maguire, MacNean House & Restaurant.
Best Cocktail Experience — Sponsored by Monin: Darren Geraghty, Hawksmoor.
Food Truck of the Year — Sponsored by Restaurant-insurance.ie provided by Dolmen: Julia's Lobster Truck.
Best Cookery School — Avonmore: Dingle Cookery School.
Best Learning and Development — Restaurant & Hospitality Skillnet: O'Dwyers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
26 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Wendy's bringing its famous square burgers to Ireland as it's set to open restaurant in Cork
Wendy's, renowned for its square hamburgers and 'Frosty' desserts, revealed this morning that it will open the restaurant in October, at Mahon Point Shopping Centre on the outskirts of the city. This comes over a year after the initial announcement that the chain – whose 1980s slogan, 'Where's the beef?', has become part of pop culture folklore – would be entering Ireland through a partnership with Corrib Oil. However, the first outlet will not be located at any of Corrib's petrol stations nationwide, but instead at Mahon Point Shopping Centre, which was Ireland's largest when it opened in February 2005. Wendy's has confirmed that it will use 100pc fresh Irish beef and chicken across the menu, which includes a variety of breakfast and children's options, as well as its square burgers. The opening, which will create 50 jobs in the area, is the first of an expected 10 branches nationwide from the fast-food giant, which operates more than 7,100 restaurants globally, generating $2.24billion (€1.9bn) in revenue last year. 'Ireland is a great market for long-term growth, and we're proud to see our brand come to life here through our partnership with Corrib Oil. Their deep roots in the community and commitment to operational excellence make them an ideal partner to deliver the Wendy's 'globally great, locally even better' experience,' said Michael Clarke, European managing director for Wendy's. Justin Young, centre director of Mahon Point Shopping Centre, said: 'To be part of bringing the very first Wendy's restaurant to Ireland is really special. 'This opening is fantastic news for Cork – not only does it create 50 new local jobs, but it also gives people the chance to enjoy the craveable, high-quality food Wendy's is famous for.' This is not Wendy's first foray into Ireland. In 1981, the chain opened its first store on Grafton Street in Dublin, followed five years later by a store on North Earl Street. At the time, the chain even considered adapting the full Irish breakfast as part of its worldwide menu. In the UK, Wendy's offers a range of menu options at varying prices, generally ranking slightly higher than McDonald's or Burger King. For example, the Wendy's Jr Cheeseburger Deluxe sells for £2.89 (€3.41) in the UK, while comparable items at McDonald's and Burger King cost €1.70 and £1.99 (€2.35) respectively. At €12.85, Wendy's Baconator is nearly double the price of a Double Whopper at Burger King, and a large fries costs €4.12, compared to €3.06 at McDonald's and €4.00 at Burger King. Wendy's also offers an extensive breakfast menu, including savoury croissants, bacon sandwiches and pain au chocolat, alongside a selection of coffees, teas, and its signature flavoured iced 'Frostyccino' coffees. Fans of American cuisine will be delighted by this announcement. And if the chaotic opening of Krispy Kreme in Blanchardstown in 2018 is any indication, expect long queues on opening day if you want to get your hands on a square burger.
Agriland
an hour ago
- Agriland
China extends investigation into EU dairy sector 'subsidies'
Authorities in China have said that the period of its investigation into so-called 'subsidies' paid to the EU dairy sector will be extended. This time last year, China's Ministry of Commerce announced that an investigation had been launched into subsidies paid to European dairy farmers, with one Irish farm scheme specifically cited by the country's authorities. Now today (Monday, August 18), the country's commerce ministry has confirmed the "investigation period" of the case will be extended until next year. A statement from the ministry (translated to English) said: "In view of the complexity of this Ministry of Commerce has decided to extend the investigation period of this case to February 21." No other details were provided by the ministry in its short statement. When first announcing the investigation last year, the ministry had said that the period of subsidy payments under investigation would be from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2024, and the "industry injury" investigation period is a four-year timeframe from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2024. The basis for the investigation is that certain subsidised EU dairy products allegedly impact on China's domestic dairy industry. Representatives of the Chinese dairy industry claimed that certain EU dairy products received subsidies from the EU and its member governments, and that the EU dairy industry "may benefit from a total of 20 subsidy projects". The products under investigation include fresh cheese, processed cheese, blue cheese, milk, and cream, that are used for food consumption directly or after processing. Among the 20 EU subsidy schemes cited in the investigation is an Irish scheme which is referred to on translated versions of the ministry's statements as the "Dairy Equipment Subsidy Scheme". This likely refers to the Dairy Equipment Scheme under the Targeted Agricultural Modernisation Scheme (TAMS). This investigation is seen as part of long-standing trade tensions between the EU and China. The announcement of China's investigation into the EU's dairy industry followed on from an earlier announcement from the European Commission to impose countervailing duties on imports of electric vehicle batteries from China. In September last year, the European Commission formally challenged the Chinese investigation by taking the issue to the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The commission said its decision to go to the WTO was prompted by "an emerging pattern of China initiating trade defence measures, based on questionable allegations and insufficient evidence, within a short period of time".
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Is your boss paid too much?
Analysis: The issue of outlandish CEO pay and compensation continues to be a vexed and contentious topic in workplaces and boardrooms The CEOs of major corporations earn seemingly absurd sums. The Wall Street Journal 's list of the top 10 highest-paid CEOs listed annual pay packages of $60 to $164 million, but these figures sometimes grossly underestimate the value of their total compensation. For example, Elon Musk, who is not even on the Wall Street Journal list, is in line to receive compensation (including stock options and an array of financial awards other than salary) of $29 billion. Jeff Bezos receives a seemingly paltry salary of $80,000, but he also earns $8 million per hour from his holdings in Amazon stock. In the US, compensation packages for CEOs are worth nearly 400 times as much as the compensation package for an average Ireland's CEOs do not typically pull down such staggering sums, the top 10 Irish CEOs all receive compensation worth between €2.9 and €18 million a year. Ryanair's Michael O'Leary is in line to receive a €100 million bonus if he stays with the airline for another three years, and the value of his Ryanair stock holding is said to be more than €1 billion. From RTÉ Radio 1's Drivetime, after 40 years, what has Ryanair done for us? The stratospheric pay awarded to CEOs is not limited to a few outliers. The total expected CEO compensation in the top 100 US corporations is over $17 million, and perhaps as high as $25 million; a figure that includes a bewildering mix of salary, stock options, bonuses and deferred payments. It was not always this way. CEO compensation grew by over 1000% between 1978 and 2023 (a typical worker's compensation grew 24% during the same period). In the 1970s and 1980s, CEOs made 20 to 30 times the pay of an average worker, but they now receive several hundred times as much as their average employee. Are bosses worth the compensation they receive? Classical economists would say that their pay is determined by the market, and that whatever they receive is what they are worth in an efficient market. However CEO pay is not determined by a fair and efficient market, but by consultants, compensation committees and boards of directors that very often include CEOs from other companies. As long as your competitors overpay their CEOs, you will almost certainly fall in line. You can argue that CEO pay is simply a function of the growing value of the company, since a large portion of the compensation comes in the form of stock (including outright grants of shares, options to purchase shares at favorable prices, or preferred shares) so it is a reward for success. If this were true, you would expect that the CEOs of failing companies would not get paid much. From RTÉ Brainstorm, how much are you paid? But examples abound of CEOs reaping big rewards while their companies go down the drain. The obvious example is Musk, who is set to receive the largest compensation package in history mainly from Tesla, at the same time his political adventures were seemingly driving Tesla into the ground. Musk is hardly alone. Before filing for bankruptcy, Pennys and Hertz both paid bonuses in the millions to top executives, and Boeing paid their outgoing CEO (who led the company at the time of 737 MAX crashes) a large severance. Even in companies that are doing well, CEO pay routinely grows more quickly than company value. In the long run, the question of whether CEOs are worth what they receive is a difficult one to answer. If we analyze this using a historical lens, the answer is almost certainly no. The difference between what an average worker makes and what a CEO makes has grown to be almost absurd, and there is little evidence that CEOs who are now making 400 times what their avarage employee receives are that much better than CEOs of the 1970s and 1980s, who managed quite well on 20 to 30 times the average worker's pay. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland in 2019, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg sacked as 737 MAX crisis deepens If we think about this from the perspective of attracting and retaining top talent, the answer is murkier. You could make the case that if you pay your CEO 30 times what the average employee makes and your competitors pay 10 to 15 times that amount, it might be hard to attract and retain the best CEOs. The more interesting question is what difference CEO pay really makes. Would your employees be much better off if CEOs went back to the old days and received 20-30 times the average worker's pay? The answer is probably no. Pay for top executives typically represents about 4% of total company revenue. This figure is relatively small because so much of executive compensation often comes in the form of stock options, deferred compensation or the value of the growth over time in stock prices, making it hard to tie executive compensation directly to the funds an organization has available for other purposes. The bottom line is that if top executives in large organisations made a lot less money, this would not translate into meaningful increases in the pay of average workers or even in the funds that might be available for more productive purposes, such as improving the physical plant or providing better benefits or services for employees. From RTÉ Brainstorm, why money doesn't always motivate employees In the end, CEO pay is probably more of a moral or psychological question than a practical one. That is, it strikes most observers that the rewards given to CEOs are unfairly large. This is made harder to swallow by the fact that the people making decisions to grant such huge amounts to top executives are often themselves top executives, who arguably benefit from this pay inflation. The perception that CEO pay is out of control undermines people's faith in the sorts of institutions that are supposed to look out for everyone's interests. If you believe that a corporation is unfair in the decisions it makes about rewarding top executives, this might undermine your belief about whether other decisions they make (e.g., the rates they charge, the prices they demand) are fair. You can certainly argue that corporations are not doing themselves a favor by overpaying their top executives. If nothing else, it provides the sort of bad press that organizations usually work hard to avoid. Coming back to Tesla, it is bad enough in many people's eyes that Musk continues to have any role in the company, but paying him the largest compensation package in history is like rubbing salt in the wound. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, Tesla sales fall as boss Elon Musk attracts negative attention over his involvement in US politics and the Trump administration Is any CEO ever worth 400 of his or her employees? You might make a case that this was true for Steve Jobs, whose vision drove some of the most profitable products in Apple's history. You might say the same for Henry Ford, who both built an industry and pioneered the then-scandalous idea that paying his employees well was good for business. You might even say the same for Michael O'Leary, who has led Ryanair to become one of the world's largest airlines. There probably are several other examples, but there are also plenty of examples where CEOs presided over the ruin of their companies while making money hand over fist. The proposition that the average boss is worth 400 of his or her employees in terms of contribution is not easily swallowed, and corporations would probably benefit it they could find a way to rein in out-of-control CEO compensation.
