'Misinformation' row around demolition of historic Glasgow building
Historic Environment Scotland described the arch as a 'dominant full height Classical Modern entrance' built by renowned cinema architect CJ McNair in 1929. The agency said the 'dramatic' arch formed part of a 'striking and unusual streetscape elevation which is an important feature of one of Glasgow's principal streets'.
The entrance arch of the former ABC cinema, installed in 1929 by CJ McNair and demolished in 2024 (Image: Richard Sutcliffe/Geograph) In August last year, Glasgow Council served the arch and surrounding facade with a demolition notice and it was subsequently torn down. The local authority then approved Vita Group's plans for the site in June, green-lighting student flats along with a ground-floor food hall, a pub, a takeaway and various landscaping works.
However, the plans were 'called in' by Scottish Government ministers last week, who will now make the final decision on the development.
Sweeney said that SNP ministers should send the proposals 'back to square one', but lamented that the arch and facade had already been destroyed.
'A shipping-container stack of student flats with a food hall at the bottom of it. I think we can settle for a better deal than that for Glasgow,' he said.
Sweeney claimed that the McNair arch was 'essentially a concrete pillbox', adding: 'It was structurally sound, and one of Scotland's top structural engineers advised that it was perfectly salvageable in situ.'
READ MORE: 'Glasgow deserves better': Heritage groups slam approval of O2 ABC site plans
A Glasgow City Council spokesperson refuted the claim that the arch did not require demolition.
'After six years of being fully open to the elements, the deteriorating condition of the building was one which could no longer be tolerated in terms of public safety, and that is why a Dangerous Buildings Notice was served for the facade and the relevant structure behind,' they said.
'Public safety is the first and over-riding priority for our officers in such cases, who make decisions from fully informed positions.'
A spokesperson for the Vita Group said any suggestion they had an influence on the decision to demolish the arch was 'entirely untrue'. The developers said they had provided 'no input, advice or recommendations regarding the [demolition] notice'.
A report on the structural condition of the ABC cinema – seen by the Sunday National and prepared in 2019 by the engineering firm Narro Associates – assessed claims made in separate reports prepared for the 'planning application seeking demolition of the entire site'.
The 2019 document refuted many assertions made in the earlier reports, notably about the impact which fires in 2014 and 2018 had had on the structural integrity of the building.
It concluded: 'The main building framing and concrete floors behind the front section would … not deteriorate to the point of demolition being the only viable option available. We therefore do not consider full demolition of the building is necessary at this point.'
Sweeney alleged that the assessments arguing that the arch could not remain in place therefore amounted to 'disinformation'.
Niall Murphy, the director of the Glasgow City Heritage Trust, said he believed the front arch could have been incorporated into the new plans for the site.
'What had been said at the consultation was it [the front arch] was just made out of plasterboard and plywood, it was just a kind of 1930s movie stage set and it was never meant to last,' he said.
READ MORE: Charles Rennie Mackintosh building 'at risk' from O2 ABC plan
'I was like, 'I'm pretty sure that it's got two lift shafts either side of the arch – they'll be very robustly built – and it'll have concrete floor slabs in it, because that's the type of technology you'd be using at the time. Also, it's got this huge cast-iron Saracen screen in it which would also be pretty robust. I don't really think it's going anywhere'.
'It was frustrating then seeing the demolition contractors' guys on site taking it down with jackhammers. If it was made from plasterboard and plywood, why would you be using a jackhammer?
'They were waving at me as I was taking a photograph, the guys on site were actually waving at me. If it's so unsafe, why are they up there being so cavalier? If it was genuinely unsafe, I just thought that was weird.'
He added: 'The sad thing is, having taken it down, you can see straight in and you can see posters up … they've not been touched by the fire.'
Pictures taken for the Sunday National on July 17 show the posters Murphy mentioned untouched by fire, behind where the entrance arch previously stood.
Image showing posters on the wall of the former ABC cinema, directly behind where the entrance arch stood (Image: NQ) Both Sweeney and Murphy said that the development of the site should be more sensitive to the architectural history of the area, especially given it borders the Charles Rennie Mackintosh-designed School of Art, which Murphy called 'the most important building in Glasgow'.
Sweeney suggested public ownership of the site as a possibility, arguing it could be developed into a commercially viable, multi-use cultural venue that also incorporates elements of both student and social housing.
A spokesperson for Vita Group said: 'Vita Group is committed to delivering a transformational regeneration project on [[Sauchiehall Street]], bringing approximately £70 million of investment to Glasgow city centre. Our plans for the site include much-needed student accommodation, a public food hall, a courtyard and an events space. This would deliver benefits that extend well beyond the student community and help to revitalise the wider area.
'We fully understand the sensitivities of the site and the importance of heritage considerations. Throughout the planning process, we have worked diligently to ensure that our proposals are viable, appropriate and informed by meaningful engagement with a diverse range of stakeholders.
'To be clear, any suggestion or implication that Vita Group was involved in the issuance of the Dangerous Building Notice is entirely untrue. Vita Group does not currently own the site and was not involved in the decision to demolish parts of the ABC building, providing no input, advice or recommendations regarding the notice. Any suggestions to the contrary are wholly false and without foundation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
13 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Scots selling counterfeit goods less likely to face prosecution as conviction rate plummets
EXCLUSIVE: Popular shopping websites and apps are littered with fake goods but fewer Scots face appearing before court as a result of selling them. The number of Scots facing prosecution for selling counterfeit goods has plummeted in recent years despite a rise in shoppers complaining of being sold fakes. Just four people were convicted in Scotland last year for flogging sham items, compared to 50 successful prosecutions in 2020/21 . Two people were cleared in 2024/25, while a further 19 charges are currently ongoing. There were just two prosecutions in 2023/24, with three individuals cleared. The figures were revealed in a written answer from the Scottish Government to Tory MSP Pam Gosal. The drop in prosecutions comes at a time the UK's entire counterfeit industry is worth more than £8 billion and is proven to have strong links to human trafficking and terrorist organisations. The popularity of websites and apps such as eBay, Vinted and Depop for buying and selling clothing has led to a corresponding rise in criminal gangs flogging fake designer goods. A survey of more than 1,300 online shoppers by Which? found that over the past two years, 32 per cent reported being scammed - most commonly by receiving incorrect or counterfeit goods - on secondhand marketplace apps. Citizens Advice said it had witnessed a 30 per cent rise in complaints about counterfeit goods being sold online in the last year. Experts have warned the brands most commonly faked are Stone Island, Louis Vuitton, Gucci and Prada. eBay and others have since launched authentication services for high end and expensive goods. Gosal said: "Given the SNP's relentless slashing of police budgets, it's little wonder that fewer people are being charged for selling counterfeit goods. Our police force are continually expected to do more with less, but their ever-depleted resources mean they're unable to investigate all crimes – and it's the public who suffer. "Rather than treating frontline policing with contempt, SNP ministers must deliver the necessary resources so our police can do their job." The rise in fakes being sold online led to the Scottish Anti-Illicit Trade Group (SAITG) being relaunched earlier this year, with the aim of combating counterfeiting and intellectual property crime in Scotland. Supported by the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO), the group brings together law enforcement, government and businesses to strengthen Scotland's fight against this illicit trade. A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Decisions on prosecution are a matter for the independent Lord Advocate. The police budget is increasing to a record £1.64 billion this year – up £90 million when compared to 2024-25." A COPFS spokesman said: "We take prosecutorial action based on the facts and circumstances of each case. Careful consideration will be given to any reports of alleged criminal conduct which are submitted by the police, or any specialist reporting agency, to the Procurator Fiscal. "Criminal proceedings will be raised if the reports contain sufficient evidence of a crime and if it is appropriate and in the public interest to do so."
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kate Forbes business and economy prowess is major SNP loss
All too often in politics, economic and business matters are covered by soundbites which are at best banal and at worst downright ridiculous. In terms of the latter, we should remember those Conservative politicians who told us all that Brexit was going to be good for the UK economy, while keeping a straight face. You got the impression that some, though surely not all, even believed the utter nonsense they were peddling. The Tory Brexiters constitute an extreme, but crystal clear, example of just how dismal politicians can be on business and the economy. What is plain is that too much of the narrative on matters business and economic from politicians, having listened to it over the years and decades, tends to demonstrate either a lack of understanding or a disposition to trot out learned ideologies without thinking about what is being said, or both. Ms Forbes, in contrast, has understandably won the respect of many people in the business community and others interested in economic issues. And a significant proportion of these individuals will not agree with Ms Forbes's political outlook, notably her passion for independence. This relatively broad respect surely speaks volumes about the Deputy First Minister's abilities when it comes to the economy and business. While she is not alone in the political sphere in being a serious thinker on the economy, my experience over years and decades from speaking to politicians is this is a far rarer trait than many people might expect. All too often among politicians, coherent arguments around economic matters are absent. Since she became Deputy First Minister in May last year, I have had two sit-down interviews with Ms Forbes covering a broad range of business and economic issues. Unlike many interviews with politicians on such matters - where there is much dispensable because it amounts to hot air or sheer spin with no supporting arguments that stack up - there was plenty of substance and original thought from Ms Forbes across the full range of topics covered. And there was a refreshing big-picture view on the major issues. In an interview in June last year, Ms Forbes revealed the greater income tax burden for higher earners in Scotland relative to the rest of the UK would be kept 'under review', taking into account 'how easy it is for taxpayers to shift'. However, Ms Forbes flagged figures from HM Revenue & Customs showing more people had come to Scotland from the rest of the UK than had moved in the opposite direction, against the backdrop of devolved income tax. And she highlighted the part 'progressive' taxation played in funding the Scottish child payment for lower-income households north of the Border amid UK austerity. That said, when asked if she thought there had been too great a divergence in the income tax burden for higher earners in Scotland compared with those elsewhere in the UK as things stood, Ms Forbes replied: 'No but I think we keep it under review.' Read more She added: 'I was…public finance minister when income tax was first devolved and I recall at the time us making it clear that we would follow the Adam Smith principles of taxation and one of the commitments that we made was to always keep the divergence under review to understand the behavioural impact because I want to be independent but we are devolved and that has implications for how easy it is for taxpayers to shift.' It was a most considered response, on a topic that has undoubtedly been highly controversial among the business community and more broadly over the years. And it signalled what was to come. When I spoke to Ms Forbes again in June this year, she said: 'The First Minister was very clear when he became leader that he didn't believe that you could continually raise income tax, and that we should provide certainty. And that's what last year's Budget delivered - the Budget announcement last year for this financial year. And the programme for government then built on that in May - being very clear that there wouldn't be further divergence from the rest of the UK on income tax for the remainder of this parliament. 'And the reasons for that is because certainty matters in a world that seems to be constantly in flux with lots of global headwinds and challenges of recruitment for businesses. The more certainty that we can provide, the better.' There was much focus on the strained relationship between the Scottish Government and the business community ahead of John Swinney being appointed First Minister and Ms Forbes taking up her Cabinet roles in May last year. Read more Ms Forbes was swift to engage with the business community after becoming Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Gaelic. And in the interview in June last year, when asked whether she saw it as difficult to balance maximising economic growth with social justice, Ms Forbes replied: 'No, it is not difficult to balance at all. I have never seen even an iota of difference in our desire for resilient public services, for eradicating child poverty, for protecting our environment, and our economic objectives, for the very simple reason that we can't achieve those objectives without economic growth.' She added: 'So when I look at our mission to eradicate child poverty, clearly we are investing substantially in the Scottish child payment. That investment comes through progressive taxation because of a growing and thriving economy but it can't happen without the creation of well-paid, secure jobs, and that is where a growing economy creates the jobs.' Another measured, thought-through answer. It might seem like common sense to many. However, such sense is not anywhere near as common among politicians on such topics as many people would probably imagine. Labour, for example, has shunned the huge boost to the UK economy that would come from rejoining the European single market, seemingly because such a move is not viewed as politically expedient. And it is worth noting, in a general context, there are significant numbers of people in the business community too who fail to grasp the bigger economic picture. Asked in June if she believed the overall relationship between the Scottish Government and business had improved over the last year, Ms Forbes replied: 'I think so. I mean, the first meetings I had when I became Economy Secretary was with all the business organisations one by one, to understand what their top asks were.' Ms Forbes declared the Scottish Government had since then worked through the first programme for government, then the Budget last December, and then the most recent programme for government 'to try and deliver against those asks'. She said: 'I think the business community understand that we can't do everything overnight, but we can either stop doing things that would otherwise have made the cost of business higher, or do things that lower the cost of business. The most recent programme for government led with economic growth and prosperity. So our sentiment, my sentiment is pro-economy, pro-prosperity, pro-business.' This is a message that seems, on the face of it, like it should go down well with the business community. Of course, this is also the broad message from Mr Swinney. And senior figures in the business community, including those who do not agree with the First Minister's politics, have praised Mr Swinney's willingness to engage and listen, and take action. That said, there is no escaping the reality that Ms Forbes's decision will leave a big gap for the SNP to fill on business and the economy.
Scotsman
11 hours ago
- Scotsman
Michael Stewart embraces Hearts statement by Tony Bloom regarding challenging Rangers and Celtic
The pundit embraces Tony Bloom statement regarding challenging the Old Firm Sign up to our Hearts newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Michael Stewart has asked a teasing Hearts and Rangers themed question as Tony Bloom's investment rolls into Gorgie. Most Hearts fans were left delighted when they heard that the majority shareholder at English Premier League side, Brighton and Hove Albion, would be investing £9.86m in their club. He has now made a statement at a question and answer event for the Foundation of Hearts, outlining that he'd be disappointed if at least one league title was not won with Hearts in the next decade. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Bloom also went on to say that it's not good for Scottish football to be a 'one or two club show' and that The Jambos could potentially come second as soon as this season. The statement of intent has gone down a treat with Hearts fans as well as with supporters across the board of non old firm sides. Former Hearts midfielder turned outspoken pundit, Michael Stewart believes the statement from Bloom was a positive one and is refreshing for the Scottish game. Whereas his Premier Sports Social Club counterpart and former Rangers man, Alan Hutton wasn't so sure. Stewart believes Bloom statement will breed 'greater interest' in Scottish game Speaking on the Social Club, Stewart said: 'Forget even about Hearts fans, remember the way neutrals felt when Aberdeen went on an unbelievable run at the start of last season, it is exactly what is needed, I could not agree more with what Tony Bloom is saying. 'Greater competition breeds greater interest and it is brilliant to hear. Also you are talking about a guy who has a track record with clubs that he has been involved with, the main one being Union Saint Gilloise, he's done brilliant with his connection at Como as well where he's brought in players that have been sold for big money. For him to be coming out and talk about looking to win at least one title in the next decade, I think that is music to the ears of all neutrals in Scottish football.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Stewart then went on to half-jokingly ask Alan Hutton if he thinks Hearts will win a title before Rangers, to which the former right back responded with a swift 'no.' Bloom's track record speaks for itself Whether you agree with Stewart or not, there is no denying that he is 100% accurate when talking about Bloom's track record. Union Saint Gilloise hadn't won a Belgian top tier title for 90 years and were languishing in the second division before Bloom came along and transformed them into Pro League champions last year. Furthermore, during his time at Brighton he has turned them into a prominent Premier League side, who are arguably one of the best run clubs in the English top flight. The Seagulls have brought in talent such as Moises Caicedo, Alexis Mac Allister and Leandro Trossard over the past five years and have made a profit of over £200m on these players alone.
