SKM urges all parties to clarify stance on Punjab's land pooling policy at live-streamed meeting
The land pooling policy, under which the Punjab government plans to acquire over 40,000 acres of land across the state—primarily in Ludhiana district—has faced widespread opposition from farmers and their unions.
The meeting aims to hold both ruling and Opposition parties accountable regarding land pooling and other key policy matters concerning the farming sector in general.
'We have sent invites to political parties like the AAP, Congress, BJP, SAD and BSP, whose MLAs are present in the Vidhan Sabha. Besides these, we have also invited Left parties like the CPI, CPI(M), CPI(ML), Revolutionary Marxist Party of India (RMPI), and the five-member recruitment committee, a rebel faction of the SAD. We are yet to receive confirmation from anyone. However, designated seating will be arranged for all invited political representatives. Let's see who comes and what they say,' said Reminder Singh Patiala, member of the SKM's national coordination committee, while speaking to The Indian Express on Thursday.
Apart from the land pooling policy, the all-party meeting will focus on Punjab's water crisis and water distribution, free trade agreements with the US and other countries, and the deteriorating condition of cooperative societies in the state.
'These are pressing issues that affect the future of farming and rural livelihoods, and we expect every political party to share their position transparently,' said Harinder Singh Lakhowal, another member of the SKM's national coordination committee.
The meeting will begin at 11 am on Friday. Each political party will be given time to present its views and suggestions. This will be followed by a direct question-and-answer session between farmer leaders and party representatives.
Attendance inside the main meeting hall will be restricted to nominated senior leaders from the SKM-affiliated farmer unions and political leaders.
Other attendees will be able to watch the proceedings on LCD screens installed inside Kisan Bhawan, and the event will also be live-streamed, said SKM leaders.
'This will be a rare, head-on interaction where party representatives must explain their stands openly in a live discussion,' said Buta Singh Burjgill, president of the Bharatiya Kisan Union (Dakaunda) and a member of the SKM's national coordination committee.
Meanwhile, Bharatiya Kisan Union (Ugrahan), the largest farmer union in Punjab and also a member of SKM, has announced it will not participate in the meeting. 'We have no hope from any political party. Though we are part of the SKM, we believe in struggling for our rights rather than relying on political assurances. Hence, we will not be part of this meeting,' said Jhanda Singh Jethuke, senior vice-president of BKU (Ugrahan), in a statement issued to The Indian Express.
Around 35 farmer unions of Punjab will be part of this meeting, however, according to the SKM.
As part of a broader campaign under the banner 'Save Land, Water, and Punjab', the SKM's Punjab unit has also announced a series of protests in the coming weeks. These include a massive farmers' rally on August 24 at Mullanpur Mandi in Ludhiana against the land pooling policy and tractor and flag marches across villages affected by the land pooling policy on July 30, said Raminder Singh Patiala.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Can Bhagwant Mann govt tide over farmer discontent as 2020-like protest brews?
With about a year and a half to go for the Punjab Assembly elections, a 2020-like protest is brewing in the state against the controversial land pooling policy, putting the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on a sticky wicket. The policy that was rolled out in June and hailed as the 'future of urban development' has been criticised by farmers, the Opposition, and even some sections of the AAP. The policy aims to acquire over 65,000 acres of land from 164 villages for urban development projects and promises monetary compensation, commercial and residential plot returns, and long-term value appreciation. While the Bhagwant Mann government has repeatedly stressed that the policy is voluntary and farmer-friendly, farmer organisations such as the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM), SKM (Non-Political), and Kisan Mazdoor Morcha (KMM) have expressed concerns about it almost immediately after rollout. The July 30 tractor march across all 164 affected villages has set the tone for what seems like a 2020-style protest. 'Resistance is building across villages as people are becoming aware of the harmful effects. They have not yet started full-scale protests,' said SKM's national coordination committee member Balbir Singh Rajewal. The protest epicentre is Ludhiana, where the government has proposed to pool 40,000 acres of land, of which 20,000 acres have been earmarked for industrial areas. Here, people in the villages of Malak, Aligarh, Pona, and Agwar Gujaran (Jagraon) were among the first to put up boards declaring that AAP leaders were not welcome. They were soon joined by several others across the state. In some villages, AAP sarpanches are leading the protests while the party's block presidents in Jodhan and Dakha in Ludhiana, and Kotkapura in Faridkot district have resigned in protest against the policy. Some senior party leaders have also voiced their concern about the policy. On July 24, AAP's Anandpur Sahib MP Malvinder Singh Kang urged his party to hold dialogue with farmer bodies to 'win their trust before moving ahead'. He later deleted the post. The party's Ropar MLA, Dinesh Chadha, told farmers of his constituency that 'even an inch of land would not be acquired without their consent'. Taking note of the growing dissent, the Mann government tweaked the policy on July 22. It increased the annual compensation from Rs 50,000 per acre to Rs 1 lakh with an annual hike of 10% and permitted farmers to cultivate the land till physical possession is taken, among other benefits. However, demanding a complete rollback, farmers' unions have rejected the changes, terming them 'cosmetic'. 'Mann must be reminded of our 2020 struggle against the farm laws. He wants to acquire our fertile land. We won in 2020 and we will win this fight too,' said Joginder Singh Ugrahan, president of the BKU (Urgahan). What has seemingly cornered the AAP further is the Opposition's united stand against the policy. Since the policy's rollout, the Congress, Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) and BJP have been organising rallies, dharnas and outreach campaigns at the district-level. State Congress chief Amrinder Singh Raja Warring last week said if elected to power in 2027, the party would scrap the policy. Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) president Sukhbir Singh Badal, while accusing the AAP of 'hoodwinking farmers', referred to the scheme as a 'land-grabbing policy'. The BJP has called the policy 'anti-farmer and deceitful' and promised to take the farmers' concerns to Governor Gulab Chand Kataria, with state BJP chief Sunil Jakhar submitting a memorandum to him in this regard. 'While the BJP is not fully welcome in villages, at least we are not facing protests and that is a relief,' said a BJP leader, referring to the backlash that party leaders faced in the run-up to last year's Lok Sabha polls. Will AAP calibrate its stance? Since the backlash in rural areas, which are seen as an AAP stronghold, the ruling party leadership has seemingly gone silent. While CM Mann, who hailed the policy as 'remarkable', has not spoken about it since the protests began, AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal also avoided the subject during his Punjab visit on July 31 and August 1. However, a day later, Mann said his government 'will do what the people and farmers want'. 'We are not dictators,' he added. For the party, which swept rural Punjab in 2017, farmer distrust and seemingly waning support from the community are a big blow as fears of the party ceding space to the BJP mount. 'The anger we had against the BJP in 2020, we feel it for AAP now. We are starting to regret bringing the AAP to power,' said Didar Singh Malak, a farmer in Malak village in Ludhiana district. Sources in the housing and urban development department said the government was planning to 'go slow' on the policy's implementation. 'Instead of aggressively rolling the policy out across the state, the government is likely to implement it in a few zones like Ludhiana, Mohali and Patiala,' a source said, adding a few realtors had consented to the acquisition of 300 acres in Ludhiana, 150 acres in Patiala, and 50 acres in Mohali. Another source said successes in small clusters would be demonstrated before seeking broader farmer participation. Farmer unions, however, seem to be in no mood to relent and have decided to escalate the protests through a series of mahapanchayats. While the SKM (non-political) will hold a mahapanchayat in Ludhiana on August 7, the KMM and SKM will hold theirs on August 20 and 24, respectively. The KMM will also hold a statewide motorcycle march on August 11, while a permanent dharna by the Zameen Bachao Punjab Bachao Sangharsh Committee has been going on outside the Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority (GLADA) office since July 20.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Surjewala hits out at Haryana govt over ‘steep hike' in collector rates
The Congress general secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala on Sunday hit out at the chief minister Nayab Singh Saini-led government in Haryana over a 'steep hike' in collector rates for property registration, saying that this move will be a blow to the common man's dream of owning a house. Congress general secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala. (File) The state government has already dismissed as 'unfounded and misleading', the claims of a section of the Opposition leaders that the collector rates have been hiked by more than 130%. 'The arbitrary increase in collector rates twice in just eight months and without public consultation, logical reasoning, or defined parameters is a proof of the government's economic mismanagement and incompetence,' Surjewala said addressing a news conference here. 'In 2022, the BJP had promised 'a permanent home for all.' But today, even building a house with hard-earned money has become impossible. Now, by hiking collector rates further their dreams are being crushed.' The senior Congress leader alleged that there is a nexus between the government and the builders behind the sudden increase in the collector rate. He said that the state government had in this year's budget set a target of earning ₹16,555 crore from 'stamp duty and registration fees' as against ₹14,000 crore in the year 2024-25, adding it was now eyeing to earn a substantial amount from the hiked collector rates. He said the hiked collector rates will effectively increase stamp duties on registering sale deeds of immovable properties. 'An analysis of the last five years reveals that the government has increased collector rates by 50% to 250% for plots, houses, flats, commercial properties, shops, and agricultural land,' Surjewala claimed. He said that the burden on common people by hiking collector rates comes at a time when the prices of sand, gravel, bricks, cement, steel and other construction materials have already increased manifold in the last five years. 'Isn't this hike just a scheme to help BJP-affiliated soon as rates increase, builders jack up prices for ongoing projects. Who pockets the profits? What is the logic, criteria, or basis for these hikes?' he asked. Accusing the government of turning Haryana's cities into 'garbage dumps' with stray cattle, potholed roads, stinking waste piles, and overflowing drains, he asked: 'Why hike in collector rates when basic amenities are missing?'
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
HC dismisses plea challenging validity of CG's school fee regulation
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the state's school fee regulation law and the rules framed under it. After considering the arguments, a Division Bench comprising Justice Sanjay K Agrawal and Justice Sachin Singh Rajput observed that the constitutional validity of a law cannot be questioned merely on the grounds of hardship caused to individuals, particularly when the rules are framed in the public interest. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The petitions were filed by an association of private schools contesting the Chhattisgarh Non-Governmental Schools Fee Regulation Act, 2020, and the corresponding rules. The petitioners claimed the legislation violated Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution. According to the association, fee regulation under the Act would pose serious financial challenges for unaided private schools that receive no govt aid. They argued that CBSE-affiliated member schools rely entirely on fees collected from parents to cover salaries of teaching and non-teaching staff, infrastructure maintenance, and other statutory obligations. However, the court cited the precedent set in R.N. Goyal v. Ashwani Kumar Gupta and Others, reiterating that a rule serving the general public good cannot be invalidated solely because it causes inconvenience to a particular group or individual. The court held that the 2020 Act and its rules are constitutionally sound and do not suffer from unreasonableness. "Consequently, we find no justification to strike down the Act or the rules, as they are neither unconstitutional nor violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution," the bench stated. Further, the court noted that the petitioner societies and associations cannot invoke Article 19, as its protections extend only to citizens. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Since the petitioners are not individuals but legal entities, they are not entitled to claim rights under Article 19(1). This, too, constituted a ground for dismissal. The court emphasised once again that individual hardship does not warrant invalidation of legislation enacted in the wider public interest. It reiterated that where rules framed under Article 309 serve the general good, their impact on specific individuals or institutions cannot form a basis for declaring them unconstitutional. In conclusion, the court found no merit in the challenge to the 2020 Act and rules. The writ petitions were accordingly dismissed, with parties directed to bear their own costs. However, the judgment clarified that members of the petitioner associations are not barred from seeking relief through the appellate mechanism available under Section 13 of the 2020 Act, should they feel aggrieved.
