
Florida police under fire as video of Black man punched, dragged by deputies during traffic stop goes viral
William McNeil Jr.'s lawyers Ben Crump and Harry Daniels say the video, which McNeil took from inside his car, is a clear depiction of brutality, coming as law enforcement officials – from masked ICE agents to local police officers – have been scrutinized for their use of force, particularly against people of color.
The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office argued the viral video doesn't show the full context of the situation.
'Yes, there absolutely was force used by the arresting officers, and yes, that force is ugly,' Sheriff TK Waters said Monday at a news conference. 'Just because force is ugly does not mean it's unlawful or contrary to policy.'
He said he wouldn't stay silent while 'facts and information are buried to advance an anti-police agenda.'
Here's what we know:
New police bodycam video released Monday shows McNeil, 22, opening his car door to speak to an officer, who tells him he was pulled over for driving without his headlights or seatbelt on.
'It's daylight, I don't need the lights. And it's not weather – it's not raining,' McNeil says in the video.
McNeil asked the officer to call his supervisor, refused to give him his license, and closed his door. He locked it as the officer asked him to step out of the vehicle, bodycam video shows.
'Open the door and exit, or we are going to break the window,' the officer says as another patrol car pulls up in front of McNeil's vehicle.
McNeil was warned seven times that he was under arrest and needed to open his door, Waters said.
The video from inside McNeil's car begins with him sitting in the driver's seat, talking to another officer through the passenger side window. He asks the officer to show him the law stating that he must have his headlights on.
One officer then says he's going ahead with breaking the window, according to body camera footage. 'All right, go for it,' a second police officer is heard saying.
Seconds later, the driver's window is smashed in, McNeil is punched in the face, and officers open the door and pull him to the ground next to his car, striking his face again, McNeil's video shows.
McNeil's lawyers say he sustained a tooth fracture, concussion and a traumatic brain injury. He also had cognitive impairment and short-term memory deficits after the traffic stop, they added.
The body camera footage released Monday didn't show the initial strike between the arresting officer and McNeil, Waters admitted.
McNeil was arrested following the incident on February 19 and charged with resisting a police officer without violence, driving on a suspended license and possession of less than 20 grams of marijuana, Waters said. The next day, he pleaded guilty to the resisting and suspended license charges.
D. Bowers, the arresting officer who pulled McNeil over, made no mention of McNeil being punched in his police report. He wrote that the suspect, McNeil, refused to comply, which led him to break the window to open the driver's door.
'Physical force was applied to the suspect and he was taken to the ground,' Bowers continued.
A second officer, however, described in a separate report six punches to McNeil's leg before he stopped resisting, according to the Associated Press.
'He simply asks for a supervisor and then they break his window and beat him yet, somehow, the report failed to mention that,' McNeil's lawyers said in a statement.
Bowers' report also claimed McNeil was 'reaching for the floorboard of the vehicle where a large knife was sitting,' as he was removed from the car. Deputies found a knife while they searched McNeil's vehicle after taking him into custody, according to police reports.
Crump and Daniels said Bowers' report that McNeil reached toward the knife was a 'fabrication,' according to the AP.
'The only time he moves at all is when the officer knocks him over by punching him in his face,' they said. 'Then this young man calmly sits back straight and holds his empty hands up.'
When asked Monday about what he saw in the footage, Waters, the sheriff, said he couldn't see where McNeil's hands were.
Waters said McNeil hadn't filed a complaint or shared his video with the department before it was released on social media. Had he done so, he said, the department would have started an investigation.
The sheriff said the cell phone footage showed there were aspects of the arrest the department needed to investigate, but said he assumed the video was 'intended to inflame the public.'
'The context of this video should tell you everything you need to know,' he said.
A criminal investigation at the sheriff's office began Sunday, as soon as it became aware of the viral footage, Waters said, adding the State Attorney's Office determined Monday no officers involved in the arrest violated any criminal laws.
An administrative review over whether the deputies violated department policies is also ongoing, Waters said.
The arresting officer has been 'stripped of his law enforcement authority' pending the outcome of the administrative review, according to the sheriff.
McNeil's attorney Daniels said he was disgusted but not surprised by the actions of the officers.
'The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office has a long history of this kind of needless violence and brutality,' Daniels said in a press release.
'It should be obvious to anyone watching this video that William McNeil wasn't a threat to anyone,' Crump added. 'He was calmly exercising his constitutional rights, and they beat him for it.'
CNN's Jillian Sykes, Isabel Rosales, Meridith Edwards, Devon Sayers, and Jason Morris contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Epstein problem grows: Even his voters want more files released
Loretta Duchesne doesn't have much faith in the government, and that's part of the reason she cast a ballot last November for Donald Trump. The 35-year-old makeup artist from northern Louisiana said she felt Trump would be 'transparent' and 'expose corruption.' She's disappointed that the Trump administration isn't releasing all the records in the Jeffrey Epstein case. 'It feels now more like he's protecting someone or something if he won't reveal it,' said Duchesne, an independent who once voted for President Barack Obama. Duchesne likes Trump policies such as his stance on the border and doesn't regret voting for him. But when it comes to Epstein, she said she doesn't accept the official narrative about the wealthy financier who died in prison awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges and also believes the administration is making a mistake and undermining its credibility by holding material back on the years-old criminal case involving alleged underage victims. Most Trump voters interviewed by USA TODAY share Duchesne's desire to see more Epstein records released, illustrating why the case has become so problematic for a second-term president who has a long, documented history of associating with Epstein and recently has publicly questioned why there remains such a deep interest in a man who died six years ago. Epstein is one of the rare issues where Trump appears to be out of step with his base. USA TODAY spoke with seven Trump supporters, and most believe there is more to be revealed about Epstein and want to see the government be more forthcoming with its documentation of his case. Their suspicions persist despite the Department of Justice releasing a memo July 7 that tried to close the book on the Epstein saga. New York's chief medical examiner ruled Epstein's death a suicide, but some – including many Trump loyalists – have questioned that finding and whether the government is shielding Epstein's potential clients from public view. The DOJ memo reaffirmed the finding that Epstein died by suicide, said there is no 'incriminating client list' and no evidence he blackmailed prominent people. But instead of dispelling speculation about the case, the memo only inflamed things further, putting the administration in the hot seat. Utah resident Shar Kynaston, 75, said she doesn't think Epstein killed himself and believes "he probably had a preferred, high-paying list' of clients. 'I think that there is a cover-up, but I don't know the extent of it,' said Kynaston, a retired federal worker who voted for Trump in all three of his presidential races in 2016, 2020 and 2024. Kynaston wants the Epstein files released, but she still likes Trump. The same goes for Victoria Rivas, 20, a Miami University student and vice president of the Ohio college's Republican club. 'I do think we deserve transparency,' Rivas said. Trump recently pushed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of Epstein grand jury testimony, which the DOJ is doing. But that's just a portion of the records that haven't been released and it's not enough for Rivas, a Trump voter who attended the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee last year when he officially became the party's nominee, just days after he was shot in an assassination attempt. 'That's very picky and choosy,' Rivas said of just releasing grand jury testimony, adding that all the Epstein records should be released. Rivas views the first six months of Trump's second term as 'a lot of promises made and a lot of promises kept,' but on Epstein she said he's falling short. Part of the problem for Trump is that those around him, including high-profile figures in his administration, spent years hyping up the potential for bombshell revelations in the Epstein files. "Show us all the Epstein client list now!!!' Trump's eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., posted on X in 2023. 'Why would anyone protect those scum bags? Ask yourselves this question daily and the answer becomes very apparent!!' The president was more circumscribed in his Epstein comments. Responding in June 2024 to a Fox News interviewer who asked whether he would declassify the files, Trump said: 'Yeah, yeah, I would. I guess I would.' But he added: 'I think that less so, because you don't know − You don't want to affect people's lives if there's phony stuff in there, because there's a lot of phony stuff in that whole world. But I think I would.' Some Trump supporters who spoke to USA TODAY said there was an expectation that more would be revealed. 'It all has to come out,' Rivas said. The backlash Trump is receiving on Epstein has raised questions about whether it will dent his image among his base and could potentially be a drag for Republicans in the 2026 midterm election. Rivas doesn't see the issue as "a top concern for our country," and other Trump supporters said the same. Pennsylvania home builder Mark Bass, 65, said he doesn't think Epstein killed himself, doesn't accept that there isn't a client list and believes the administration should release more information. Still, Bass is 'ecstatic' about Trump's presidency. 'I think he's done a fantastic job, he's done more than he's said he's going to do, and I don't think this will make any difference whatsoever,' said Bass, a Republican who voted for Trump in each of the last three elections. Trump has struggled to shake off the Epstein issue, though, and after initially lashing out at supporters who questioned his administration's handling of the case, the president and his team have been seeking ways to placate critics. DOJ officials announced July 22 that they will seek to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, an Epstein associate found guilty of aiding his abuse. Duchesne, the Louisiana makeup artist, said she's moderately disappointed in Trump's handling of the Epstein case. If the truth is so 'vanilla' then why not just release the records, she wondered. 'It makes me look at you sideways,' she said. 'You're deflecting. Why aren't you just releasing?' Contributing: Aysha Bagchi This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump's voters want more Jeffrey Epstein files released


CBS News
9 minutes ago
- CBS News
Manteca residents weigh in on police staffing in community focus group
One per 1,000 — that's the so-called "standard" of how many police officers are needed per 1,000 residents. In Manteca, the police department is trying to change that standard by becoming more efficient. "We're doing a data-driven analysis of our actual numbers, crunching them to see how many officers we actually need for patrol to adequately protect this community," Manteca Police Chief Stephen Schluer said. The Manteca Police Department has 83 officers, with 44 on patrol. On Wednesday, they held a community focus group asking the public to weigh in on what they consider safe staffing levels within the department. "I think our police department has matured, improved a great deal over the last four to eight years," Manteca resident Judy Blumhorst shared. "I think we've turned over. We're using our resources better and we're also able to fund things a little better." The group also discussed topics like overall safety within the city and what residents like and don't like about the department, all to help shape its future and how the city uses its Measure Q sales tax money over the next 20 years. "A lot of it is towards public safety," Blumhorst continued. "This is supposed to be dedicated to public safety, and there is a commission of citizens who are supposed to review and make a report every year. We have no legislative power, but we do have oversight pulpit." This community meeting regarding police staffing has been years in the making. While present at the beginning, the police chief stepped out of the meeting for a reason. "I wanted to be them to be able to speak freely without having police representatives there and get their honest input because that's what we need," Chief Schluer explained. "We need honest input from the public." The last time Manteca police asked for public input like this was more than a decade ago. With residents and the police department coming together, they hope to build a more effective and transparent relationship.


New York Times
9 minutes ago
- New York Times
Prosecutor Fired by Trump Officials Says She Is Set to Take Over Office
A veteran New Jersey federal prosecutor who was appointed as the next U.S. attorney by judges in the state said Wednesday that she was ready to take on the role, even though she had been fired by senior Justice Department officials. The prosecutor, Desiree Leigh Grace, made the statement in a LinkedIn post, calling it an honor to have been selected for the role 'on merit' and saying that she was prepared to begin to serve 'in accordance with the law.' Ms. Grace's defiant post extends the standoff between federal officials in New Jersey and Justice Department officials in Washington who on Tuesday reacted to Ms. Grace's appointment by district judges in the state by summarily firing her. The deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, accused the judges of playing politics and said that Ms. Grace had been removed 'pursuant to the president's authority.' Ms. Grace did not mention her firing explicitly, though her post read as something of a farewell to her law enforcement partners, whom she thanked. 'It was an honor to work with you,' she wrote. The tone of her post suggested that she may not expect to occupy the U.S. attorney role for which she said she was prepared. 'I've served under both Republican and Democratic administrations,' she wrote. 'I've been promoted four times in the last five years by both — including four months ago by this administration. Politics never impacted my work at the Department.' Until Tuesday, Ms. Grace served as the top deputy to Alina Habba, the interim U.S. attorney. Ms. Habba, a former personal lawyer to President Trump, had no prosecutorial experience before she was appointed to the role. Ms. Habba's term ends Friday, according to Mr. Blanche. This is a breaking news story and will be updated.