
Jewish groups in Chicago say local leaders must ‘stop tolerating hate' after Washington, DC fatal shootings
Jewish organization leaders and allies on Friday called for local elected officials and civic heads to 'stop tolerating hate in the guise of activism' following the fatal shooting this week of two Israeli embassy employees, allegedly at the hands of a Chicago man.
Flanked by officials from the American Jewish committee's Chicago office, the Jewish United Fund, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and several aldermen, the Anti-Defamation League's David Goldenberg said 'this is a major problem here in Chicago, and too many of our elected and civic leaders have not only been silent on the issue, but some continue to fan the flames of hate and antisemitism.'
Although Goldenberg, who is the ADL's Midwest regional director, did not specifically call out anyone by name for their rhetoric, he was critical of Mayor Brandon Johnson for 'elevating people who have a history of being hostile to members (of) the Jewish community.'
The alleged shooter, Chicagoan Elias Rodriguez, was charged Thursday in U.S. District Court with murder after shooting two staff members of the Israeli Embassy in Washington on Wednesday night as they were leaving an event at the Capital Jewish Museum. The two were identified as Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim.
Authorities said Rodriguez 'spontaneously stated on scene to (police) 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza,' and a social media account attributed to the suspect shared a manifesto condemning the deaths of tens of thousands in Gaza and how civil protests had fallen short in stopping the war.
Ald. Deborah Silverstein, 50th, the lone Jewish member of the Chicago City Council, said that 'the unpermitted protests that have overtaken our streets, the unsanctioned encampments on college campuses, the orchestrated walkouts in CPS schools … are not expression of free speech. These are breeding grounds for dangerous ideologies.'
'When our elected leaders enable and praise this behavior, it creates an atmosphere that encourages people to go out and harm Jews,' she said. 'We need our leaders to work to lower the temperature and defuse these extremist organizations that are spreading antisemitism and hate when it comes from within our own parties and from our own political base.'
Johnson has overseen a sharp split among the Chicago City Council over the war in Gaza, including a heated debate over a resolution calling for a ceasefire in which the mayor became a tiebreaker to approve it. It came on the heels of a separate resolution also condemning the October 2023 Hamas attack.
Johnson has described the war in Gaza between Israel and Hamas as 'genocidal,' also calling for 'the immediate releasing of hostages, the end of these acts of terror and the end to this war.'
Johnson committed to lowering the temperature at a Thursday press conference where he and CPD Supt. Larry Snelling addressed the incident.
'There's been so much animus that has been directed towards the Jewish community, and it's our collective responsibility,' the mayor said before pausing and saying, 'to be far more thoughtful about how we express our politics.'
In a statement, Johnson's office reiterated his 'care and support for all Jewish people in Chicago and around the world' and said the mayor 'has consistently spoken out against antisemitism in Chicago,' including after the attack on two Jewish DePaul students, incidents of antisemitic graffiti in the 44th Ward and in condemning the Hamas attacks as 'one of the worst acts of terror we've witnessed.'
Ahmed Rehab, executive director of Chicago's Council on American-Islamic Relations, said he disavowed the violence, but disagreed with the idea local protests sparked it.
He argued protests have 'all been peaceful' and added that local protest groups do not know Rodriguez.
'I'm seeing the re-definition of antisemitism to include legitimate criticism of the genocide in Gaza in order to give cover,' he said. 'I see that as gaslighting.'
Rodriguez participated in protests for progressive causes, including opposition to the war in Gaza, against Amazon's expansion locally and the police response to the death of Laquan McDonald.
The spotlight on Rodriguez's politics also led to false and misleading claims circulated on social media of the alleged shooter's ties to Johnson allies, underscoring how charged the situation has become since Johnson made waves as the first big city mayor to endorse a ceasefire last year.
Several viral social media posts incorrectly purporting to show Rodriguez alongside Johnson and several progressive aldermen in a political group's 'family photo' were seen by hundreds of thousands of users online. Ald. Rossana Rodriguez Sanchez, 33rd, who is also in the picture, confirmed the man falsely identified as the shooter was actually her former political director, Chris Poulos. Poulos confirmed to the Tribune that he was the man in the photo.
'This is exhausting and harmful. They can really put people in danger,' Ald. Rodriguez Sanchez said of the viral, incorrect posts. 'Our message has always been about peace.'
Though some social media users deleted their claims about the photo when Poulos identified himself, Ald. Raymond Lopez, 15th, left several posts of the image up, one with the caption, 'Birds of a feather.'
'What they are inferring … is open to interpretation,' Lopez told the Tribune. He refused to say whether he meant to imply the shooter was pictured but said he would not take the photo down.
Shlomo Soroka, a lobbyist for the Jewish orthodox organization Agudath Israel of Illinois, told the Tribune on Thursday that Johnson had called that morning to offer condolences and also 'conceded that perhaps he could have done better and can do better in terms of dealing with our community and the sensitivities we have.'
The mayor's office did not respond to a request for comment on the conversation. Soroka said the mayor had given him permission to post about their conversation on social media.
Soroka said he told the mayor 'a lot of the people he surrounds himself with and is associated with are responsible for what happened. There's a movement that has created a climate in which it's acceptable to talk in ways that facilitate violent behavior against Jewish people (that have) nothing to do with the Middle East conflict … you're going to have to be more vocal and call out people that are your friends and allies. And he said, 'You have my word and my commitment.''
But during Friday's press conference, which was also attended by Nancy Andrade, the chair of the city's Commission on Human Relations, Goldenberg and others had harsh words for the mayor. Goldenberg pointed the controversy over the mayor's previous handpicked school board president, Pastor Mitchell Johnson, who resigned last year after coming under fire, in part, for social media posts that were deemed antisemitic, misogynistic and conspiratorial.
'If you're the mayor, you stop appointing and elevating people who have a history of being hostile to members to the Jewish community. And when you find out that they have that history, you get rid of them,' Goldenberg said, adding he was speaking for the ADL. 'Think about Pastor Johnson. The antisemitism isn't what doomed him. It was the 9/11 conspiracies. The antisemitism was known for multiple days, and the mayor continued to allow him to have the job of being the head of the CPS board. It wasn't until he came out that he was in a 9/11 conspiracy theorist and said it was an 'inside job,' that he lost his gig and was forced to step down.'
Johnson appointed Cydney Wallace, a leader on the Jewish Council on Urban Affairs, to fill the vacant Board of Education seat.
Goldenberg on Friday said state elected officials could take concrete steps to curb antisemitism, including passing a pending bill that mandates hate crime training for law enforcement, develop a statewide plan to combat antisemitism and for the state's department of education to implement digital media literacy curriculum so children could spot online hate. The hate crime training bill, Goldenberg said, was being held up by members of the General Assembly's progressive caucus.
'This legislation has now been in the House for two years, and we've had a number of conversations about it,' state Rep. Bob Morgan, the bill's sponsor, told the Tribune Thursday. Members have 'expressed concerns to make sure that whatever this training is, that it's done in a way that really is protecting all communities.'
'It's certainly on top of my mind to make sure we do this and do this quickly,' given Wednesday's shooting, Morgan said.
Abdelnasser Rashid, the first Palestinian-American to serve in the Illinois General Assembly, said he 'had been engaging in good faith' efforts to amend the bill to ensure that those supporting Palestinian rights that wear or display the watermelon symbol or wear a keffiyeh, for example, aren't deemed antisemitic.
Conflating 'advocacy for Palestinian rights with antisemitism … is abominable.'
Leaders have an obligation to call out messaging that 'celebrates and calls for violence against Jews,' Goldenberg said. 'Saying 'Free, free Palestine, in and of itself, is not antisemitic,' he said, but signs or chants about globalizing the intifada or glorifying martyrdom should be 'shut down.'
'The irony that these young folks, 26 and 30-years-old, about to get engaged on a trip to Israel, were gunned down as they exited this (diplomatic) event after dedicating their lives towards the progress of peace is the actual illustration of what is going on on our planet right now with antisemitism,' Beth Ida Stern, the interim regional director of the American Jewish Committee Chicago office said. 'The only solution is for us to coalesce, build understanding, overcome our differences and realize that our similarities are what tie us together as human beings.'
Tribune reporters Jeremy Gorner and Alice Yin contributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
30 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Changes Top Middle East General For Strong Iran Hawk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. has underlined the priority of maritime operations and integrated joint forces in the Middle East with the nomination of a naval officer as the region's top commander ahead of a potential confrontation with Iran over its nuclear program and other threats. President Donald Trump has nominated Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, currently the deputy commander of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), to be appointed to the rank of admiral and serve as its new commander. He has been a strong critic of Iran and supportive of Israel in the past. Only one Navy officer has previously commanded CENTCOM—Admiral William Fallon in 2007—while the role has traditionally been held by Army and Marine generals. Why It Matters Commanding U.S. operations in the Middle East is one of the military's critical roles amid ongoing tensions with Iran and with a fragile truce with the Yemeni Houthis, after the Iranian-backed group multiply targeted U.S. aircraft carriers in response to Trump's airstrike campaign launched in March. Trump has threatened to use military force against Iran if diplomacy fails to achieve a deal to curb its nuclear program. CENTCOM is further engaged in regional security efforts related to Gaza since the war that erupted following Hamas' 2023 October attack on Israel. Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq remain key theaters for CENTCOM's anti-ISIS operations. What To Know If confirmed, Adm. Cooper will succeed commander General Michael Kurilla, who is due to retire this summer. Kurilla, with an army background, has also been strongly critical of Iran. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has endorsed Cooper over Army General James Mingus, the presumed frontrunner, shifting away from Biden administration preferences, The Washington Post reported in April. A fierce critic of Iran's activities in the Middle East, Cooper has repeatedly identified it as a threats to regional security, navigation, and stability. As commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, he played a central role in Operation Prosperity Guardian, the U.S.-led multinational mission safeguarding Red Sea shipping lanes from Houthi missile and drone attacks from 2023. In 2024, he orchestrated the U.S. military's support for humanitarian aid to Gaza, through the establishment of a maritime corridor that boosted aid delivery without deploying troops on the ground, although it faced security challenges and quickly ended. Cooper had visited Israel in January to discuss U.S.-Israeli defense cooperation, according to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Cooper, a 1989 Naval Academy graduate, holds a master's in strategic Intelligence, studied international relations at Harvard and Tufts, and is a graduate of the Army Command and General Staff College. A recipient of the Admiral Elmo Zumwalt Award, he has led Navy ships and crews across key regions, served on the ground in Afghanistan, commanded U.S. naval forces in the Middle East for nearly three years, and led major Navy groups in the Atlantic, Japan, and Korea, including the USS Russell and USS Gettysburg. What People Are Saying Vice Adm. Brad Cooper said on CBS' 60 Minutes in 2024: "For a decade, the Iranians have been supplying the Houthis. They've been resupplying them. They're resupplying them as we sit here right now, at sea. We know this is happening. They're advising them, and they're providing target information. This is crystal clear." Pentagon's press release on Wednesday: "Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced today that the President has made the following nominations: Navy Vice Adm. Charles B. Cooper II for appointment to the grade of admiral, with assignment as commander, U.S. Central Command." What Happens Next His appointment is pending approval by the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company
Have you ever been strapped for cash? Perhaps you took a payday loan, sold a long-term asset or even made an early withdrawal from your 401(k). And chances are, you've later regretted it. This is the situation the City of Chicago finds itself in — and the cost may have been billions. Privatizing public infrastructure is a growing trend among cash-strapped cities that need fast revenue. Back during the 2008 financial crisis, Chicago was broke and needed to raise money. Rather than make the unpopular move of raising property taxes, then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public assets. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) 'If we didn't have money for a long-term debt, you're talking about a serious economic crisis then for Chicago,' Daley said at the time, according to NBC 5 Chicago. So, Chicago City Council struck a deal to lease the city's 36,000 parking meters to investment consortium Chicago Parking Meters LLC, a group of global investors led by Morgan Stanley. The investors paid nearly $1.157 billion to receive the revenue from the meters for 75 years — and the city must reimburse them whenever the parking meters are taken offline, such as for festivals or construction. The deal was essentially rubber-stamped 40-5 in favor by the council, which had only a few days to review it before voting — turning out to be what the Better Government Association later called 'a lesson in 'worst practices.'' Soon after, a report issued by the then-inspector general found the city was paid at least $974 million less than it could have made from operating the parking meters itself over the term of the deal. While an analysis done by 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack — who voted against the deal — found the deal could have been worth $5 to $10 billion, reported NBC 5. Now, a 2024 audit by accounting firm KPMG has found that, with another 58 years still left in the agreement, the private investors have already recouped their initial investment. In 2023, the meters generated a record $160.9 billion in income, bringing the total income from the start of the deal to $1.97 billion. 'It's just one of those deals that I would beg people never to replicate anywhere in the United States,' Waguespack told NBC 5. Still, many Americans can relate to the situation that faced Mayor Daley. When we're desperate for funds, we can make rash decisions that negatively affect our long-term financial health. Almost 4 in 10 (37%) U.S. adults would not be able to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings, according to the Economic Well-Being of US Households in 2024 report from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And while many of these people say they could cover the expense some other way, such as using a credit card, borrowing from family or friends or selling something, 13% would not be able to pay the expense by any means. About 58% of Americans are 'living paycheck to paycheck and experienced a cash emergency in the past 12 months,' according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report from peer-to-peer lending platform SoLo Funds. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it These 'cash-poor' Americans may not be who you think they are. Forty percent have a full-time job and one in seven cash-poor households earn more than $75,000 per year. The top unexpected expenses, according to the report, are auto repairs, medical bills and utility bills — common expenses that can happen to any of us. To cover these expenses, some may turn to short-term financing options that could end up costing them more money in the long term. For instance, buy now pay later (BNPL) services come with an average borrowing cost of 23%, according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report, which can increase substantially if the borrower incurs repeat late fees. Another option is a payday loan, which is one of the most expensive ways to borrow. The industry average cost of borrowing for payday loans is 35%, according to the report, but origination fees, late fees and processing fees can push this as high as 49% of the principal borrowed. Increased borrowing and missed payments can also affect your credit score, which in turn can limit your future ability to borrow. People might also look to sell long-term assets such as stocks, bonds or mutual funds, but this too can have long-term financial costs. If you're 30 years from retirement and sell $10,000 of an asset today that's earning 7% per year, then you'll have about $76,000 less when you retire due to the loss in compounding interest. Plus, research has shown that time out of the stock market can be costly — and missing the best days in the market can be devastating to your long-term returns. And, if you make an early withdrawal from a tax-deferred account such as a 401(k), you'll also pay a 10% tax penalty. To avoid high-cost borrowing in an emergency or cashing out long-term investments during a downturn, start by building an emergency fund that could cover unexpected expenses. A rule of thumb is to have three to six months' income in an accessible account, such as a high-yield savings account. While desperate times may call for desperate measures, it's worth consulting with a financial advisor (or a free counseling service) to discuss your options before getting saddled with debt or selling long-term assets. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

41 minutes ago
Johnson tries to protect fate of megabill from Trump-Musk crossfire
Speaker Mike Johnson is working to keep the focus on the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" on Friday as all eyes remain on President Donald Trump and Elon Musk amid their bitter public feud. Johnson is pushing the House-passed bill that advances Trump's legislative agenda, which is being negotiated in the Senate. Musk has publicly criticized the bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" and encouraging members of Congress to "kill the bill." Musk's criticism reached a boiling point on Thursday -- ending with an explosive spat between the president and the tech billionaire. On Friday morning, Trump told ABC News that Musk had "lost his mind." Johnson was once one of Musk's most powerful boosters on Capitol Hill. Johnson met with Musk repeatedly and would even talk him through legislation by phone. Musk even addressed a meeting of House Republicans in March. Asked by ABC News if it was a mistake to trust Musk, Johnson dismissed the question and turned the focus back to the bill. "I'm not going to engage in this back-and-forth stuff. I don't think the American people care much about Twitter wars. I think they care about us accomplishing our legislative agenda, and the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' does that." Johnson reiterated Friday that he has a job to do -- and it's not to get involved in the Musk-Trump squabble. Still, Johnson engaged in the online battle Thursday, responding to a Musk post criticizing the speaker. Several other House Republicans are weighing in on the dispute and whether Musk's influence and strong opinions about the megabill could influence its passage. "I think Elon probably did change the trajectory of this bill two or three days ago when he came out against it because people trust the guy who can land rockets backwards more than they do the politicians," Republican Rep. Thomas Massie said. Massie was one of two House Republicans who opposed the bill when the House voted on it last month. GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene sided with both Trump and Musk on different aspects of the bill -- favoring Musk on the price tag. She said ultimately she thinks the focus should be on passing Trump's agenda. "I don't think lashing out on the Internet is the way to handle any kind of disagreement, especially when you have each other's cell phones," Greene told reporters Friday. "I hope this gets worked out, but I will tell you right now that people are going to be focused on making sure that we get the agenda that we voted for." Republican Rep Troy Nehls, a staunch Trump ally, called for an end to the spat between the president and Musk, saying "enough is enough." Despite Musk publicly clashing with the head of their party -- even seeming to suggest the House should impeach the president -- some Republicans didn't go out of their way to bad mouth the billionaire. "Elon Musk can use his funds as he sees fit," Republican Rep. Ralph Norman said when asked if he's worried Musk would primary Republicans. "Again, he's a patriot and if he disagrees, I respect the honesty, really." Republican Rep. Warren Davidson called for unity. "I just hope that people that I care a lot about get along, that they mend, that they patch up their relationship," he said. "It's disappointing to see them arguing in public that way." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries capitalized on the clash, calling it a "welcome development." "To the extent that the developments of this week will make it more likely that we can kill the GOP tax scam, that's a welcome development," he said.