A volatile Middle East cannot afford more games of tactical ambiguity
Such unpredictability is not helped by this week's decision by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian to approve a law suspending the country's co-operation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. The UN nuclear watchdog has effectively been left in the dark and is awaiting further official information from Tehran, an IAEA spokesman told The National.
It should not be surprising that Iran – already formally in breach of its non-proliferation obligations – sees little value in acquiescing to demands for greater transparency over its nuclear programme. Israel chose to unilaterally strike targets across the country, killing hundreds of civilians in the process. The US later joined this assault, dropping several of its largest non-nuclear bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. Nevertheless, for Tehran to cut ties with the IAEA would be a strategic mistake.
The agency remains the only trust-building mechanism for Iran to assuage international concerns about its nuclear programme, the condition of which is now shrouded in uncertainty. Threatening to walk away is not leverage, nor would it restore deterrence against further attack. In fact, Iran's going dark would achieve the opposite effect; disengaging from the IAEA would generate more distrust and increase the speculation surrounding the country's nuclear intentions. This does not negate the need to address Israel's nuclear capabilities which are arguably more opaque than Iran's. The need for a region free of nuclear weapons has never been greater.
Iran's unprecedented strike on Qatar's Al Udeid air base upped the stakes for Tehran's near neighbours
The current situation leaves the rest of the Middle East in a difficult position. Iran's unprecedented strike on Qatar's Al Udeid air base upped the stakes for Tehran's near neighbours by demonstrating that Tehran's relationship with its GCC partners would come second to its perceived need for retaliation.
Indeed, although some reports have suggested that Iran's missile salvo was choreographed so as to reduce the risk of casualties, Qatar's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Majed Al Ansari, rightly noted on Monday that Tehran's attack was not 'harmless', having forced the country to close its airspace for several hours, activate its air-defence systems and experience 'reputational damage when it comes to safety and security".
All sides should be aware that the stakes are too high for further games of tactical ambiguity. More strategic nous by Israel and Iran is required. For Iran, there is a path to security and a truly civilian nuclear programme, but it will require Tehran to co-operate with the international community through bodies such as the IAEA, not abandon them. Meanwhile, Israel continues to fuel regional anger and frustration through the appalling violence being meted out by its forces to Palestinian civilians in Gaza and the West Bank even as Iranian missiles struck Tel Aviv and other cities. Agreeing to a ceasefire would be an important step to reducing the volatility gripping much of the Middle East, and starting to work on a long term peace plan for the region.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
Hamas response on ceasefire proposal expected within 24 hours, Donald Trump says
US President Donald Trump said on Friday that it would probably be known within 24 hours whether Hamas is to agree on a "final proposal" for a ceasefire in Gaza. His comments came after Hamas leaders held talks on the final details of the proposal on Thursday, sources told The National. Hamas is expected to agree on a truce and the release of some hostages, but the group is seeking clarification about some issues, the sources said as discussions took place in Cairo. Mr Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had accepted the conditions needed to finalise a 60-day ceasefire agreement, during which the parties would work to end the conflict. When asked on Friday whether Hamas had agreed to the latest terms, he said: "We'll see what happens, we are going to know over the next 24 hours." The main provisions in the proposed deal are a 60-day truce, during which Hamas will release 10 living hostages, as well as the remains of half of those who died in captivity. In return, about 1,200 Palestinians detained in Israel would be released, sources told The National. The proposal also envisions negotiations between Israel and Hamas on ending the war and an Israeli withdrawal from the enclave. The two sides are also reviewing the mechanics of the resumption and distribution of aid in Gaza, where hundreds of thousands are facing hunger and an acute shortage of essential items. Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who has bitterly opposed any deal throughout the war, on Thursday called on far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich to 'join forces' to block a 'reckless deal'. Mr Smotrich this week promised to oppose any deal that ended the fighting. 'We must not stop the war without victory,' Mr Ben-Gvir told Israel's public broadcaster. 'What do you think will happen if we stop the war now? That Hamas will hand out flowers?' His comments came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepares to visit Washington next week. The Gaza war broke out in October 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking about 240 hostage. The group is believed to still have about 50 hostages, with fewer than half of them thought to be alive. The Hamas attack prompted a devastating assault by Israel that has so far killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, health authorities in Gaza have said. The war has displaced the majority of the enclave's estimated two million population, with many having been forced to flee more than once, and destroyed swathes of built-up areas. Mediators from Egypt, Qatar and the US have been trying in vain since March to broker a deal for a ceasefire and the release of hostages.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Hamas ceasefire response expected within 24 hours, Trump says
More than 90 killed by Israeli strikes and shootings on Wednesday and Thursday Hamas in talks on final details of Gaza ceasefire US plans nuclear talks with Iran in Oslo next week, Axios reports One killed in Israeli drone strike on vehicle in Beirut At least 57,130 Palestinians killed and 135,173 wounded since Gaza war began
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Sensible statesman or 'Never here Keir'? Starmer buffeted by a year of headwinds
Not since Winston Churchill took power just as France was falling to Nazi Germany in 1940 has a British prime minister entered Downing Street to face such an onslaught of international turbulence. When he took power after victory in the July 4 election last year, both Germany and France's leaders were politically emasculated and US President Joe Biden's authority was tumbling. Then Donald Trump was elected president and the political landscape turned into disarray. In his first year in office, Keir Starmer, 62, has had to leverage Britain's modest authority on the international stage to find some form of normality in a world of wars in Europe and the Middle East. Weakened But the sensible global statesman persona has come at some cost, with a neglected domestic front weakening his authority, which in turn could damage his international standing. Even his own MPs are muttering about 'never here Keir' due to the machine-gun diary entries that have sent him abroad. That unintentional absence, on top of several misguided policies, has seen Labour's standing in the polls plummet, threatening its 'super majority' of 156 MPs and letting in the hard-right populist Reform party of Nigel Farage. The prime minister's authority with Labour MPs reached its lowest ebb on Tuesday after he had to heavily water down a welfare-reform bill to avert a rebellion by more than 120 members. The huge increase in support gained at the general election had already been curtailed by Mr Starmer's questionable stance, shortly after the October 7 Hamas killings, when he suggested that Israel had the right to withhold water to Gaza. Four of the new MPs entering the Commons were all Muslim independents, largely elected on a pro-Palestinian vote and all in former Labour seats. Tremors for that loss of popularity have been felt in the latest polling that extraordinarily suggests Reform would get the majority of seats, 271, if a general election was held today, with Labour second on 178, Lib Dems on 81 and the Conservatives fourth with just 46. Fresh start It all looked so different a year ago when The National watched as Mr Starmer, accompanied by his wife Victoria, walked into Downing Street and announced that he would restore level-headed government, fix the economy, spur house building and revive the NHS. There is a festering problem around Gaza, which I'm fearful people won't forget Jon Cruddas Minutes earlier his predecessor, Rishi Sunak, had departed, ending 14 years of Conservative rule that in the chaotic, mismanaged post-Brexit years had resulted in a decline in Britain's global standing. Labour had been handed a toxic legacy by the Tories, including a £20 billion black hole in finances, unchecked migration and a hollowed-out military and NHS. 'The inheritance was abysmal and that needs replaying,' said Labour's policy thinker Jon Cruddas, who retired as an MP at the election. John Slinger, who became an MP for the first time last year, suggested that a 'poisoned chalice was quite deliberately bequeathed by the Tories', impeding Labour's ability to grow the economy without resorting to tax rises. That, agreed another Labour backbencher, was 'cunning, did us damage and we've paid a political price'. Ultimately most people in Labour would acknowledge that 'they haven't got everything right' but it had faced circumstances 'more challenging than any government in living memory', said Joe Dromey, general secretary of the Labour-leaning Fabian Society. 'It has been a very tumultuous situation especially since the re-election of Donald Trump, with the geopolitical order being turned on its head and unleashing of trade wars.' Rioting While absorbing the economic shock of what the Tories left behind, Mr Starmer was jolted into dealing with his first crisis. After the murders of three girls at a Taylor Swift dance class, the country exploded in a series of anti-migrant riots. That was three weeks after Labour came to power. Most commentators agreed Mr Starmer handled the crisis well, resolving another Conservative inheritance of overcrowded prisons by rapidly clearing space for the 200 or so convicted rioters. If it seemed things settled for a while then the political power battle between his chief of staff, former civil servant Sue Gray, and others in Downing Street culminated in the former's departure in October. There were other early speed bumps such as revelations about 'freebies' given to ministers, which in Mr Starmer's case was for accepting director's box tickets to Arsenal football matches, suits and glasses. Gaza mood change Those early controversies subsided only to be replaced by the hastening global crisis and the Gaza situation in particular. Labour looked to position itself as tougher on Israel than the Conservatives, which had shown lukewarm support, by introducing a modest arms embargo, agreeing to not oppose international arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and restoring UNWRA aid funding. That placated some MPs for some months, as did the January ceasefire, but with Israel embarking on its revised security plan for Gaza and recommencing military action in March the mood in parliament 'dramatically changed', said Mr Slinger. 'With civilian suffering on a totally unacceptable scale the actions we've taken have become more condemnatory and the Israeli government doesn't like it, but the way they're acting now in Gaza, you just cannot have humanitarian suffering on that scale,' he added. But that change has come too late for some party stalwarts. Mr Cruddas warned that Labour's initial stance had 'damaged the credibility of the moral character of the government'. 'There is a festering problem around Gaza, which I'm fearful people won't forget, and it's not just about our relationship with Muslim voters it's a wider question of our ethical approach to what's been happening across the Middle East,' he said. Labour's Gaza position had 'created a rupture with Muslim voters', the back bench MP source said, which was why independent MPs such as Shockat Adam won their seats. The majority of MPs in the Commons now support UK recognition of a Palestinian state, Mr Adam told The National, 'yet the government doesn't seem to listen'. He also described the UK's sanctioning last month of two Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, as 'tokenistic gestures' in a government's stance that was 'extremely disheartening and disappointing'. Trump sweeteners Surprisingly to some, despite having no previous experience, Mr Starmer has added polish to his reputation through his international work. Labour was savvy enough to sweeten Mr Trump before his election win and since then the Prime Minister has trodden a careful path to avoid both sycophancy and confrontation. That allowed Britain to become the first country to sign a trade deal with America, although potential US tariffs remain a concern. 'He's proven to be smart and agile in not getting boxed in, in a very difficult international environment,' said Mr Cruddas. 'He's played that quite well.' Despite opposing politics, Mr Starmer had 'surprised quite a few people' with his constructive Trump relationship that 'paid off' with the trade deal, added Mr Dromey. An example of that came when Mr Starmer delicately navigated the potential maelstrom fallout of the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's White House confrontation with Mr Trump in February. He was behind some form of reconciliation that has secured continued US backing for Ukraine and, with Mr Starmer's urging, greater Nato-wide support for defence spending. Trade deals have also been struck with India and the EU that will help the economy and defence is receiving significant uplift, albeit at the cost of the international aid budget. U-turn But domestic disquiet is growing among Labour MPs deeply concerned at welfare payment cuts and the axing of winter fuel payments to pensioners. These have resulted in government U-turns which can have an eroding effect over time on a prime minister's authority. That was also not helped by the 'narrative of decline and defeatism' of the government blaming the Tories for the UK's dire state, said Mr Cruddas. 'Talking down the country is not helpful, he needs to be much more positive and assertive,' he advised. But Mr Slinger argued that their policies will see the economy grow and that people's anger being 'exploited by Reform will dissipate'. His backbench colleague suggested that even after a year in office 'most governments are unpopular … it's the nature of things.' Mr Starmer has until August 2029, at the latest, to improve his fortunes if he wishes to win a second term.
