
The Atlantic 's August Issue: 'Eighty Years on the Edge,' Examining Eight Decades of Life in the Atomic Age
The August issue also features a striking cover: minimal text over a stark photograph of a 1954 bomb test at Bikini Atoll, an image found in a government archive by the photographer Michael Light. The so-called Yankee test released an explosive yield equivalent to 13.5 million tons of TNT, about 900 times that of Little Boy.
'We are living through one of the more febrile periods of the nuclear era,' Goldberg writes in ' Nuclear Roulette.' The contours of World War III are visible in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, with Russia aided by Iran and North Korea and opposed by Europe and the United States. Pakistan and India, two nuclear states, recently fought a near-war; Iran, which has for decades sought the destruction of Israel through terrorism and other means, has seen its nuclear sites come under attack by Israel and the United States, in what could be termed an act of non-proliferation by force; North Korea continues to expand its nuclear arsenal, and South Korea and Japan are considering going nuclear in response. But, as Goldberg writes, 'the main challenge of the 80 years since the Trinity atomic test has been that we do not possess the cognitive, spiritual, and emotional capabilities necessary to successfully manage nuclear weapons without the risk of catastrophic failure.'
Goldberg writes that the successful end of the Cold War caused many people to believe that the threat of nuclear war had receded, but we forget at our peril: 'We forget that 80 years after the world-changing summer of 1945, Russia and the United States alone possess enough nuclear firepower to destroy the world many times over; we forget that China is becoming a near-peer adversary of the U.S.; we forget that the history of the Nuclear Age is filled with near misses, accidents, and wild misinterpretations of reality.' He continues, 'Most of all, we forget the rule articulated by the mathematician and cryptologist Martin Hellman: that the only way to survive Russian roulette is to stop playing.'
In ' The President's Weapon,' Nichols explores why the power to launch nuclear weapons rests in the hands of a single American. Nichols writes: 'If the commander in chief wishes to launch a sudden, unprovoked strike, or escalate a conventional conflict, or retaliate against a single nuclear aggression with all-out nuclear war, the choice is his and his alone. The order cannot be countermanded by anyone in the government or the military. His power is so absolute that nuclear arms for decades have been referred to in the defense community as 'the president's weapon.'' For nearly 30 years after the Cold War, fears of nuclear war seemed to recede. Then relations with Russia froze over and Donald Trump entered politics. Nichols now asks: Even though this has been the system since the end of World War II, does it still make sense today? This will be joined by an additional article from Nichols, also in the August issue, on how Hollywood taught a generation to fear nuclear catastrophe.
Please reach out with any questions or requests to interview The Atlantic 's writers on their reporting for the issue.
Press Contacts:
Anna Bross and Paul Jackson | The Atlantic

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
China hawks skeptical of Trump chip deal
Trump on Monday agreed to allow tech giants Nvidia and AMD to secure export licenses to sell their advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips in China in exchange for a 15 percent cut of the profits. The White House said Tuesday that more such deals could be on the table. The unusual deal doesn't just raise legal questions. Experts say the U.S. should be wary of turning over American-made technology that could boost its adversary's AI capabilities, at a time when the two countries are fiercely competing for dominance. The security concerns appear to be a two-way street. China urged tech companies there to avoid any purchase of Nvidia's H20 chip, citing security issues. The move once again has Trump at odds with Congress's China hawks, who argue the administration is shortchanging America's national security interests to make a buck. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (Ill.), the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, in a statement said the most troubling part of the deal was a contradiction at the heart of the policy. 'The administration cannot simultaneously treat semiconductor exports as both a national security threat and a revenue opportunity,' he said. 'By putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee.' The same panel's GOP chair, Rep. John Moolenaar (Mich.), said there are 'questions about the legal basis' for such a deal. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities,' he said in a statement.


Miami Herald
20 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
New Miami U.S. Attorney sworn in by Attorney General Bondi in Washington
Former Miami-Dade County Judge Jason A. Reding Quiñones was sworn in Wednesday as the new U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. But the afternoon ceremony making his appointment by President Donald Trump official didn't happen in the district's home base, Miami, according to tradition. Nor was he sworn in by the district's chief judge, which has been customary for decades. Reding Quiñones was administered the oath of office by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi at the Justice Department in Washington — indicating that the nation's first top federal prosecutor confirmed by the Senate earlier this month will be an ardent loyalist as the Trump administration carries out its agenda against illegal immigrants, gangs and drug traffickers. 'I think it's unusual, if not rare — in the old days, the chief judge would swear in the U.S. Attorney,' said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond who carefully follows presidential nominations. 'I'm wondering how the judges in the Southern District will feel about this. It seems like an unnecessary affront to them.' Tobias said the symbolism of Reding Quiñones' being sworn in by Bondi, a former Florida Attorney General, is unmistakable, noting how she has aggressively led the Trump administration's confrontations with federal judges over immigration disputes, higher tariffs and government cutbacks. There has also been widespread speculation that Bondi might move a potential grand jury investigation from Washington to South Florida to look into the Obama administration's role in the FBI probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, which brought the Trump campaign under intense scrutiny. 'I wondered at first why he would be the first U.S. Attorney to be confirmed by the Senate; it didn't make sense,' Tobias said. 'But I now think it does make sense, making Florida first.' On Aug. 2, Reding Quiñones secured a 52-44 confirmation vote along party lines in the U.S. Senate — Illinois Sen. Richard Durbin was the only Democrat to vote for him. Reding Quiñones, 44, will now head the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, replacing interim U.S. Attorney Hayden O'Byrne, as he oversees about 250 prosecutors and support staff in one of the busiest districts in the country. READ MORE: Trump picks U.S. attorney in Miami. As criminal prosecutor, he received poor evaluations 'As the son of a Cuban political refugee and a proud Miami native, I am deeply honored by the trust and confidence that President Trump, Attorney General Bondi, and the United States Senate have placed in me,' Reding Quiñones said in a statement. 'As the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, I will work tirelessly to protect the American people, restore impartial justice, and defend the rule of law without fear or favor.' Several colleagues touted Reding Quiñones as the new U.S. Attorney, while others privately questioned whether his loyalties would be to Trump and Bondi or to the federal prosecutors in South Florida. 'I think it's very special that Judge Reding Quiñones was the first U.S. Attorney confirmed by U.S. Senate since President Trump was inaugurated,' said Coral Gables lawyer Jesus Suarez, chairman of the 11th Judicial Nominating Commission in Miami-Dade, which had recommended him as a county judge to Gov. Ron DeSantis. 'I'm confident he will bring the same kind of fearless respect for the rule of law we have seen from AG Pam Bondi and the rest of President Trump's DOJ,' he said. Jon Sale, a prominent white-collar defense attorney and the former First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, said: 'That AG Bondi performed the swearing in personally demonstrates that Jason is held in high esteem by the Department of Justice. 'As a result of the confidence shown by AG Bondi, the district will benefit from getting more high visibility cases,' he said. 'Jason's many years in public service, including his time on the bench and protecting our country in the military, show he is up for the challenges of this position and qualifies him to be an excellent U.S. Attorney.' Reding Quiñones, formerly a federal prosecutor in the Miami office, was appointed as a Miami-Dade County judge last year by Gov. DeSantis and is a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve. After graduating from Florida International University's law school in 2008, he began his career practicing corporate law and then did a stint as military lawyer for the U.S. Air Force before joining the Justice Department in Washington in 2018. Later that year, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami hired Reding Quiñones as a prosecutor in the major crimes section, the starting place for most newly hired assistants. During his four years in the major crimes section, which focuses on lower-level felony cases, Reding Quiñones received poor evaluations from supervisors who cited his incompetence, the Miami Herald learned. In turn, Reding Quiñones filed a complaint against the U.S. Attorney's Office, claiming it was discriminating against him as a white man whose temporary work as an Air Force reservist prevented him from performing at the same full-time level as other federal prosecutors in the major crimes section. Reding Quiñones then took an extended leave from the office in 2020-2021 to serve in the Air Force Reserve. When he returned to his prosecutor's job, Reding dropped his discrimination complaint and agreed to be reassigned to the civil division, which deals mostly with non-criminal prosecutions. In the civil division, Reding Quiñones received satisfactory job evaluations. READ MORE: Miami U.S. Attorney, first Haitian-American in post, to resign before Trump takes office


American Press
20 minutes ago
- American Press
Trump warns of 'severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to stop war after summit
President Donald Trump warned Wednesday that there will be 'very severe consequences' if Russian President Vladimir Putin does not agree to stop the war against Ukraine after the two leaders meet for a summit later this week in Alaska. Trump made the comment in response to a question from a reporter after announcing this year's Kennedy Center Honors recipients in Washington. He did not say what the consequences might be. The remark came soon after Trump consulted with European leaders, who said the president assured them he would make a priority of trying to achieve a ceasefire in Ukraine when he speaks with Putin on Friday in Anchorage. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy joined several of Kyiv's main allies in the virtual meeting with the U.S. leader, and Zelenskyy told the group that Putin 'is bluffing' ahead of the planned summit about Russia's ability to occupy all of Ukraine and shake off sanctions. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said afterward that 'important decisions' could be made in Alaska, but he stressed that 'fundamental European and Ukrainian security interests must be protected.' Merz convened Wednesday's meeting in an attempt to make sure European and Ukrainian leaders are heard ahead of the summit. He stressed that a ceasefire must come at the beginning of negotiations. He told reporters that Trump 'also wants to make this one of his priorities' in the meeting with Putin. At a separate appearance in France, French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump 'was very clear' that the U.S. wants to achieve a ceasefire at the summit. Following Friday's summit, Macron added, Trump will 'seek a future trilateral meeting' — one involving Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy. He said he hoped that it could be held in Europe 'in a neutral country that is acceptable to all parties.' Merz, who described Wednesday's conversation as 'constructive and good,' said the Europeans made clear that 'Ukraine must sit at the table as soon as there are follow-up meetings.' European allies have pushed for Ukraine's involvement in any peace talks, fearful that discussions that exclude Kyiv could otherwise favor Moscow. The Ukrainian president, who traveled to Berlin to join the meeting alongside Merz, has repeatedly cast doubt on whether Putin would negotiate in good faith. He said Wednesday that he hoped an immediate ceasefire will be 'the central topic' in Alaska, but also argued that Putin 'definitely does not want peace.' Zelenskyy said Putin 'is trying to apply pressure … on all sectors of the Ukrainian front' in an attempt to show that Russia is 'capable of occupying all of Ukraine.' Putin is also bluffing that sanctions 'do not matter to him and are ineffective,' he added. 'In reality, sanctions are very helpful and are hitting Russia's war economy hard.' The stakes for Europe Trump has said he wants to see whether Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year, describing Friday's summit as 'a feel-out meeting' where he can assess the Russian leader's intentions. Yet Trump has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He has also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender. Trump on Monday ducked repeated chances to say that he would push for Zelenskyy to take part in his discussions with Putin, and the president was dismissive of Zelenskyy and his need to be part of an effort to seek peace. Trump said that following Friday's summit, a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders could be arranged, or that it could also be a meeting with 'Putin and Zelenskyy and me.' The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the European Union, might secure favorable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them. The overarching fear of many European countries is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine. Merz said that 'if there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and the Europeans should and must increase the pressure' on Moscow. Land concessions a non-starter for Kyiv Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30% of the Donetsk region that it still controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the Ukrainian leader categorically rejected. Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine would not give up any territory it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. He said diplomatic discussions led by the U.S. focused on ending the war have not addressed key Ukrainian demands, including security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and ensuring that Europe is included in negotiations. Three weeks after Trump returned to office, his administration took the leverage of Ukraine's NATO membership off the table — something Putin has demanded — and signaled that the EU and Ukraine must handle security in Europe now while America focuses its attention elsewhere. Senior EU officials believe Trump may be satisfied with simply securing a ceasefire in Ukraine and that he is probably more interested in broader U.S. interests and great power politics, aiming to ramp up business with Russia and rehabilitate Putin.