NV Energy's proposed rate hike panned by some, praised by others at consumer sessions
NV Energy's bid to raise electric rates drew condemnation from customers and support from non-profits that benefit from the largesse of the utility's charitable foundation at two consumer sessions held Wednesday by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada.
The utility, which provides electricity to most of Nevada, is asking state regulators to approve a revenue increase of $215.7 million that could hike rates by 9% in Southern Nevada. It's also asking to increase shareholder return on equity from 9.5% to 10.25%; level the playing field between rooftop solar and conventional ratepayers; and save low-income Southern Nevadans about $20 a month by eliminating their basic service charge.
'NV Energy is acting like it's so benevolent,' Las Vegan Angel DeFazio told the Current of the proposed elimination of the service charge for customers earning less than 150% of the federal poverty level. 'They're not the good guys. They're passing it on to us. They're just redistributing the cost.'
But representatives of charitable groups and veterans organizations that receive grants from NV Energy voiced support for the rate hike, as did the Asian Chamber of Commerce and Latin Chamber of Commerce.
'My business community relies on energy, relies on being able to open their doors and conduct business. That takes an investment. That takes reliability. That is NV Energy,' said Peter Guzman, president of the Latin Chamber of Commerce.
Guzman said he was not asked by NV Energy to speak on its behalf. The utility's spokesperson did not respond when asked if NV Energy solicited support from the organizations.
Longtime gaming executive and former acting UNLV president Don Snyder, who is currently chairman of the United Way Board of Directors, defended the utility's bid to raise rates. Snyder said the non-profit touches one in four Nevadans through a variety of services.
'We are uniquely positioned to understand the needs of our community, particularly our low income individuals and families,' Snyder told PUC Commissioner Tammy Cordova, who is presiding over NV Energy's rate hike request. Snyder added United Way has a 'longstanding partnership' with NV Energy, its employees, and its foundation, which 'provides financial grants supporting utility assistance for our low income senior citizens.'
Others contend now is no time to raise the cost of electricity.
Dr. Mary House, co-founder of Caring, Helping & Restoring Lives (CHR), urged the commission to hold NV Energy accountable for energy policies that she says disproportionately affect low-income individuals and families.
'They're sacrificing necessary medicines just to pay their bills. They're limiting how much they spend on groceries just to pay their bills,' House said, adding many of the families her organization serves pay a disproportionate share of their income toward electricity.
House added that she has taken steps to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and increase energy efficiency. 'But many households, the ones who I represent, don't have the means to even make those changes.'
NV Energy overcharges at least 80,000 customers, scrimps on refunds
House also encouraged the utility to fully refund overpayments of at least $17 million the utility assessed against some 70,000 customers in multi-family units over a 20-year span.
Angela Hollimen moved to Las Vegas in 2018. The retiree said although she lives with family, making ends meet remains a struggle.
'Since I moved here, I've noticed that everything's been going up,' she said, adding her family has taken all the recommended steps to reduce energy costs. 'Were doing what we're supposed to do, and questioning whether we should have moved here.'
Tracy Puckett, another retiree, said she 'saved and saved' to install a $30,000 rooftop solar array on her home. NV Energy's efforts to tweak its net metering formula will cost her and other solar customers more, extend the time it takes to recoup their investment, and deter more ratepayers from going solar. 'I want my investment to mean something.'
The utility's request to impose peak usage rates on customers drew protests from ratepayers who say the scheme penalizes working people who are not home to run appliances during hours when the system faces less demand.
A customer using 5 kWh would pay $27 more per month, while a customer using 6 kWh would pay $38 more per month, according to data provided by Advanced Energy United, a trade group that represents renewable energy providers.
Total usage during the monthly billing period would be irrelevant.
NV Energy peak usage plan could be costly for Southern Nevadans
Should the PUC turn down the proposal for a peak demand rate, NV Energy wants to increase the basic service charge in Southern Nevada from $18.50 to $24, far less than the projected increase of maximum demand charges.
The proposed changes 'reflect the company and its shareholders' best interests and not its customers',' Julia Hubbard of Solar United Neighbors (SUN), an organization dedicated to educating ratepayers, said at the consumer session. 'When someone goes solar, they are not just saving on future utility bills. They are adding infrastructure to the grid on their dime.'
'This proposal doesn't account for their recent mismanagement of customer classifications, resulting in millions of dollars in overcharges, or lack of real progress on their transportation electrification plan and their community solar program,' Hubbard said, adding the utility, charged with constructing 120 electric vehicle charging stations, has completed 40.
Hubbard said NV Energy's plan to change the way it calculates net metering by calculating excess energy returned to the grid every 15 minutes rather than monthly, would reduce the value of rooftop solar and disincentivize investment in 'a powerful tool that Nevada residents can use to lighten their energy burden while contributing to statewide goals.'
The change is expected to increase monthly bills for rooftop solar customers by about $11 a month, and would affect customers who apply for net metering after Oct. 1 of this year.
The move would delay return on investment for homeowners who install rooftop solar in the future, Hubbard said.
'People are struggling to pay their energy bills,' she said. 'This is not the time to raise rates.'
The PUC will hold hearings on NV Energy's rate hike request in September. If approved, the changes would go into effect in April 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge tosses defamation lawsuit against Nancy Mace
A federal judge on Wednesday tossed a defamation lawsuit against Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) filed after she took to the House floor to accuse a man of being a predator. U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel ruled that even if the lawsuit could proceed, federal law entitles the Justice Department to step in and largely make Mace immune from damages. Gergel did not address whether Mace actually defamed the man, Brian Musgrave, and acknowledged the ruling means he may have no ability to recover damages even if the congresswoman falsely destroyed his reputation, as Musgrave claims. 'Congress has weighed the risks and benefits….and concluded that libel and related claims against federal officials acting within the scope of their employment are barred under federal law. It is this Court's duty to uphold the rule of law,' the judge wrote. Gergel was nominated to the bench by former President Obama. Musgrave sued Mace in March after she gave a stunning speech on the House floor that included a series of allegations of sexual abuse and voyeurism. Mace, who is now running for governor of South Carolina, celebrated the ruling. 'Today the court proved the US Constitution is the LAW OF THE LAND,' Mace said in a statement. 'They came after me because I stood up for victims and demanded crime be prosecuted. Today's court decision proves their lies and attacks won't break me. I've put my career on the line to fight crime and drafted legislation to strengthen our laws. And I'll never stop fighting for law and order.' Musgrave was one of four men whom Mace singled out in a stunning speech on the House floor in February, in which she lobbed accusations of sexual abuse and voyeurism. In addition to Musgrave, Mace had accused her ex-fiancé and two other men of wrongdoing. Eric Bland, Musgrave's attorney, said the decision allows politicians to 'say and do anything they want' but vowed to 'keep fighting' to clear his client's name. 'It seems patently unfair that a United States citizen who lives a law-abiding life can be grouped and called a rapist and a predator without any proof, and it can be done over and over again with immunity (and impunity),' Bland said in a statement. Mace in the speech claimed to have found a hidden camera on a property that Musgrave owns with Mace's ex-fiancé that had intimate photos of women taken without their knowledge or consent. Musgrave's suit said he didn't place the camera and never had knowledge of it. While he was not the subject of Mace's more serious allegations in the speech, such as her belief she was raped after being 'purposefully incapacitated,' Mace labeled Musgrave along with the three other men as a 'predator.' The lawsuit took aim at the speech, Mace's social media posts and a poster displayed outside her congressional office titled 'PREDATORS' with images of the four men. The case also included claims against some of Mace's congressional staff. Last month, the Justice Department sought to step in and largely replace Mace and the staffers as the defendant by certifying they were acting in the scope of their jobs, making them immune and leaving taxpayers on the hook for damages. Gergel, the judge, agreed that the government could do so on all but one claim: that Mace owes Musgrave damages for violating his constitutional rights, known as a Bivens action. But the judge went on to dismiss that claim, too, finding it isn't permitted in defamation cases and that Mace was protected anyway by the U.S. Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause. Mace has made her accusations against the men a central part of her political identity in recent months. In a May subcommittee hearing she led on private spaces, she showed a blurry screenshot of what her 'naked silhouette' that she said was recorded on a hidden camera on the property that was mentioned in her speech. She launched a bid for governor of South Carolina this month. Among her primary opponents is South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson (R), who she accused of not adequately investigating her allegations. Wilson's office at the time said that Mace 'either does not understand or is purposefully mischaracterizing' Wilson's role.
San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Obama applauds Newsom's California redistricting plan as 'responsible' as Texas GOP pushes new maps
Former President Barack Obama has waded into states' efforts at rare mid-decade redistricting efforts, saying he agrees with California Gov. Gavin Newsom's response to alter his state's congressional maps, in the way of Texas redistricting efforts promoted by President Donald Trump aimed at shoring up Republicans' position in next year's elections. 'I believe that Gov. Newsom's approach is a responsible approach. He said this is going to be responsible. We're not going to try to completely maximize it,' Obama said at a Tuesday fundraiser on Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts, according to excerpts obtained by The Associated Press. 'We're only going to do it if and when Texas and/or other Republican states begin to pull these maneuvers. Otherwise, this doesn't go into effect.' While noting that 'political gerrymandering' is not his 'preference,' Obama said that, if Democrats 'don't respond effectively, then this White House and Republican-controlled state governments all across the country, they will not stop, because they do not appear to believe in this idea of an inclusive, expansive democracy.' According to organizers, the event raised $2 million for the National Democratic Redistricting Committee and its affiliates, one of which has filed and supported litigation in several states over GOP-drawn districts. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Eric Holder, who served as Obama's attorney general and heads up the group, also appeared. The former president's comments come as Texas lawmakers return to Austin this week, renewing a heated debate over a new congressional map creating five new potential GOP seats. The plan is the result of prodding by President Donald Trump, eager to stave off a midterm defeat that would deprive his party of control of the House of Representatives. Texas Democratic lawmakers delayed a vote for 15 days by leaving the state in protest, depriving the House of enough members to do business. Spurred on by the Texas situation, Democratic governors including Newsom have pondered ways to possibly strengthen their party's position by way of redrawing U.S. House district lines, five years out from the Census count that typically leads into such procedures. In California — where voters in 2010 gave the power to draw congressional maps to an independent commission, with the goal of making the process less partisan — Democrats have unveiled a proposal that could give that state's dominant political party an additional five U.S. House seats in a bid to win the fight to control of Congress next year. If approved by voters in November, the blueprint could nearly erase Republican House members in the nation's most populous state, with Democrats intending to win the party 48 of its 52 U.S. House seats, up from 43. A hearing over that measure devolved into a shouting match Tuesday as a Republican lawmaker clashed with Democrats, and a committee voted along party lines to advance the new congressional map. California Democrats do not need any Republican votes to move ahead, and legislators are expected to approve a proposed congressional map and declare a Nov. 4 special election by Thursday to get required voter approval. Newsom and Democratic leaders say they'll ask voters to approve their new maps only for the next few elections, returning map-drawing power to the commission following the 2030 census — and only if a Republican state moves forward with new maps. Obama applauded that temporary timeline. 'And we're going to do it in a temporary basis because we're keeping our eye on where we want to be long term,' Obama said, referencing Newsom's take on the California plan. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach, designed to address a very particular problem in a very particular moment in time.'
Time Magazine
43 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Texas GOP Set to Pass Gerrymandered Map Despite Protests
Texas Republicans are likely to clear a key hurdle in their bid to pass sweeping redistricting plans in the state on Wednesday, despite a two-week-long protest from Democrats and a two-night camp-out from one representative in the Capitol building. Democrat Texas Rep. Nicole Collier stayed locked in the chamber of the Texas Legislature for 48 hours rather than adhere to strict new surveillance rules implemented by lawmakers following a Democratic walkout in protest over a plan to add five more GOP seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. It came after more than 50 state Democratic representatives left Texas for two weeks to deny Republicans a quorum and delay a vote to drastically redraw the state electoral map to the Republican Party's advantage. Republicans issued civil arrest warrants to bring the Democrats back to the state to force their eventual return. New guidelines introduced following that protest prevented party members from leaving the House chambers without a police escort and a signed permission slip. Collier refused to sign the 'permission slip' to leave the chamber, saying that she did not want to 'sign away [her] dignity.' Republicans finally took up the redistricting session on Wednesday morning after achieving the necessary quorum for a vote, meaning Collier and her Democratic colleagues' protests against the plan are likely to come to an end. In a last-ditch effort to delay the redistricting plan, Minority Leader Gene Wu planned to introduce an amendment that would require the new House map to take effect only after the files related to the crimes of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are released. Epstein's files have haunted President Donald Trump and his Administration as both Democrats and many in his own base have called for them to be released this summer. The vote could go well into the evening in Austin, depending on how long the Democrats continue to try to stall the plan. Trump has long called for redistricting in Texas in hopes of protecting the Republicans' thin majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, which currently stands at 219-212. 'I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats,' Trump said in May. It was unclear what legal or Constitutional mechanism he was referring to that entitled him to 5 more seats. With the Democrats having returned from their protest, the Republican representatives now have the numbers necessary to continue their vote, despite their protest to the round-the-clock police escorts to ensure their attendance at Wednesday's session. Read More: The Difference Between Gerrymandering and Redistricting, Explained Collier was joined in her protest on Tuesday by several Democratic State Reps., including Mihaela Plesa, Morales Shaw, Rhetta Bowers, Cassandra Garcia Hernandez, Salman Bhojani and Minority Leader Wu, who remained overnight with Collier, locked into the chamber until the House reconvened in the morning. Former Vice President Kamala Harris called Rep. Collier on the phone to cheer her on on Tuesday: 'You are among those who history will reveal to have been heroes of this moment, so you just stay strong,' she said. 'We are in that room with you.' The GOP's redistricting plan has set off a chain reaction of Democratic responses across the country. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has launched his own plan to redraw his state's maps and pick up more Democratic seats in the state with the most federal representatives. Other Democratic Governors have now joined Newsom, including Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York, who said that if Texas proceeds with its plan, 'we must do the same,' as has Maryland's Democratic leadership.
