
What is Ed Miliband's ‘postcode pricing' plan for energy bills and how would it work?
The government is weighing up a change to the way UK households and businesses pay for electricity, where homes in the South of England could pay more than those in Scotland.
Zonal electricity pricing, which is being dubbed 'postcode pricing' for bill payers, splits the UK into parts with different electricity rates for each.
In Scotland, renewable power, including wind and hydroelectric, amply provides for all the nation's power needs, and prices there could drop significantly.
Meanwhile, in the South and Midlands of the UK, peak power demand requires far more fossil fuels to be used, which would mean higher prices compared to Scotland.
Proponents of the plan insist that it could slash energy prices for everyone and end an effective subsidy which parts of the UK provide to the south, where wind and solar farms are scarce.
But critics say the plan does not solve the underlying problem which plagues the UK's grid, that household prices are tied to those of expensive natural gas.
They also point out that prices for homes in the south could go up.
But Energy Secretary Ed Miliband insisted the reforms were far from finalised and that bill hikes were out of the question.
He told LBC: 'I'm not going to take a decision that is going to raise prices in some parts of the country. That is not what I'm going to do.
'Honestly, this is about reforms to cut prices for people, that is my absolute bottom line here.'
Campaigners have long called for a faster uptake of green energy and also more insulation for draughty homes in order to cut bills.
In theory, green energy is cheaper than fossil fuels because the fuel - wind and solar power - are both free, while oil, gas and coal are expensive to extract, process and transport.
In practice, because wind and solar energy only come during sunny and windy periods, the grid needs to top itself up with gas-fuelled electricity. This costs a lot more and is used as a gauge for domestic electricity pricing.
Dale Vince, the green entrepreneur who set up the energy firm Ecotricity, told the Today programme that he thought zonal pricing was a 'terrible idea'.
He warned that in the areas where most people live in the UK, such as Southern England, 'people will pay more'.
'That's a gift for the people who say we can't afford green energy,' he said.
What is 'zonal pricing'?
Zonal pricing is where different areas of the UK pay different rates for electricity.
The idea behind this is that it is unfair for those who live close to wind and solar farms which provide cheap, low-carbon energy to pay the same as those who live far away.
Proponents of zonal pricing, such as Greg Jackson, the boss of Octopus Energy, say this would lower bills for everyone since more wind power could be used. On particularly windy days suppliers are sometimes paid to switch wind generation off.
This is because the grid was designed for coal-fired power stations and it needs to be overhauled, Mr Jackson.
Smaller zones could be priced using renewables instead.
How would it work?
The UK would be divided into zones. If you live in a zone with more renewable power generation, you and your business will pay less for electricity.
This will reward those who support cheap, green energy projects in their area and could prove a boon for Scottish and northern English manufacturing, as the UK suffers the highest industrial electricity prices in Europe.
Many of the smaller zones would use a much higher percentage of renewable energy.
How much would household energy bills be affected?
This is still unknown. It would depend on where these zones are and how, precisely, the benefits of cheaper renewable power are calculated.
Would southerners pay more?
Homes in the South of England would pay more than everyone else in this scenario, but it is yet to be decided if they will pay more than they currently pay.
This is largely down to whether zonal energy is paired with other reforms in electricity pricing, which could cut prices for everyone.
Recent surges in electricity prices have been down to high natural gas prices.
Natural gas supplies less than a third of UK power with low-carbon sources such as wind, solar, hydro and nuclear power providing more than half.
But because gas-powered stations can be quickly turned on to pick up the slack on windless days or when demand surges, they attract higher prices, driving up the costs for all users.
A reform to this system could help cut costs for most customers.
How would it come into effect?
The government would have to give this plan a green light.
Zonal pricing is one idea being considered within a broader review of the UK's electricity market, which was kicked off by the last government.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Hamilton by-election result: Sir John Curtice's warning for Anas Sarwar and how he rates Reform vote surge
Labour has won the Hamilton by-election - but Professor Sir John Curtice is far from convinced it means Anas Sarwar will become the next first minister. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Labour's Davy Russell was victorious in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, coming away with 31.5 per cent of the vote. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, this is down from the 33.6 per cent share of the vote the party gained in this constituency back in 2021. In that election, Labour came second. Political scientist Sir John Curtice of Strathclyde University. Picture:|Mr Sarwar has already lauded the victory as the first step on the road to electing a Labour government at next year's Scottish Parliament election - a move that would see him becoming first minister. But Prof Curtice has warned of caution in this aspiration, saying the SNP was still likely to be the largest party in Scotland after the 2026 election. Curtice on Labour's fortunes Speaking to the BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Prof Curtice said: 'This was an election for a seat last contested in 2021 and that is frankly now a long time ago. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The SNP then got nearly half the vote and Labour got little more than a fifth. Last year the Labour Party came first in Scotland, five points ahead of the SNP and the SNP was in trouble. 'If you take in the opinion polls, what's happened in Hamilton, and the ups and downs in Labour and SNP support since 2021, we see Labour at 31 per cent and the SNP at 31 per cent. 'So the contest always looked to be close and that's what's been proven in the end. Labour has done slightly better and the SNP slightly worse, but there is nothing in the result to suggest Labour has turned around the polls. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'But equally what's true is there are no signs in this result that the SNP are making much progress in reversing the losses from last year. 'The recent message from opinion polls are the SNP is running at just over 30 per cent, Labour is around 20 per cent, so it seems a reasonable expectation that such a result would not mean Anas Sarwar is Scotland's next first minister.' Labour candidate Davy Russell wins the by-election and celebrates alongside party leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy Jackie Baillie. | Lisa Ferguson What Curtice says about the result for Reform Prof Curtice said the results also showed Reform UK is 'making political weather north of the Border'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The polling expert said the by-election result could not be seen as a victory for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, mainly because of how well Reform UK fared. Writing in The Times, Prof Curtice said: 'Once again it is Reform's political prospects that now look brighter. 'As in the English local elections, so in Hamilton the party outperformed its current standing in the polls, winning as much as 26 per cent of the vote. 'Hitherto politicians in Scotland have comforted themselves with the thought that Nigel Farage could never make the political weather in a country that voted against Brexit and which seems less concerned about immigration. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'However, as in the rest of the UK, that is not a thought that is credible any more.' Mr Farage's party came third in the Hamilton by-election with 26.2 per cent of the vote - well above the 19 per cent they are sitting at in the national polls for Scotland. It is estimated around one in four Conservative voters in Scotland from last year's general election have switched to Reform, along with one in six Labour voters. Prof Curtice said: 'Reform UK is damaging both of the principal unionist parties in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.


Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Ask women if burka is genuinely their choice, says Reform UK's Richard Tice
Women who wear burkas should be asked if it is 'genuinely their choice', Reform UK's deputy leader has said amid a row over calls to ban the garment. Richard Tice said the issue should be subject to a 'national debate' as he entered the count for a Holyrood by-election on Thursday night. His comments followed the sudden resignation of Reform's chairman Zia Yusuf, who had described a call from the party's newest MP to ban the burka as 'dumb'. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Friday, Mr Tice said: 'I think it is right that we should have a debate about whether or not the burka is appropriate for a nation that's founded in Christianity, where women are equal citizens and should not be viewed as second class citizens.' Asked whether he supported a ban, he said he was 'pretty concerned' about whether the burka was a 'repressive item of clothing', adding: 'Let's ask women who wear the burka, is that genuinely their choice?' Wearing face-covering clothes is currently banned in seven European countries – France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Austria and Bulgaria – while other countries have enacted partial bans. On Wednesday, Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin asked Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support such a ban. A day later, Mr Yusuf said on social media that it had been 'dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do'. Shortly after that, he announced that he was quitting as Reform's chairman, saying that working to get the party elected was no longer 'a good use of my time'. Party leader Nigel Farage said he had had only 10 minutes' notice that Mr Yusuf was going to resign, adding he was 'genuinely sorry' that his chairman had decided to stand down. Mr Yusuf's resignation was accompanied by that of Nathaniel Fried, who was announced earlier this week as the head of a party team examining spending at Reform-controlled Kent County Council. Mr Fried said that as Mr Yusuf had 'got me in' it was 'appropriate for me to leave with him'. The resignations came as Reform UK hoped to win or come a close second in a by-election for the Holyrood seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. In the end, the party came third with 7,088 votes, 869 votes behind the SNP and 1,471 behind the winning Labour candidate.