Exploring old law allowing ‘push back': Sarma
Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of a programme in Nalbari, Sarma said that a constitutional bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing a case on Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, had said that there is no legal requirement for the Assam government to always approach the judiciary in order to identify foreigners.
'There exists an immigrants expel order, which is an old law. The Supreme Court has said that this law is in force and a deputy commissioner can give permission for immediate pushback under it,' he maintained.
'For whatever reason, our lawyers had not informed us and we too didn't know about it. The entire matter has come to light in the last few days. We will now discuss it further,' he added.
The chief minister said pushing back illegal migrants will continue, adding that the process of identifying foreigners, which had been paused due to NRC-related matters, will now be accelerated.
'And when the identification of a foreigner happens, there will be no need to send the case to any tribunal. We will directly push them back. We have been preparing for it,' he added.
Sarma said the process of pushback will continue, though no person with a case pending before the court will be sent back.
His comments came even as the state witnessed protests over 'harassment' of minorities in the name of detecting illegal immigrants.
Members and supporters of the All Assam Minority Students' Union (AAMSU) wore black badges and displayed placards against the purported recent pushback of Bangladeshis in the state.
They carried out the protest in different parts, including Chirang and Jogighopa, after Eid namaz.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Why Maoists are on the wane in the once-dreaded Red Corridor
Once considered a formidable internal security threat, Maoist insurgency has shrunk from controlling the vast Red Corridor to just 18 districts of the country. The underlying factors are not only the targeted development schemes and sustained counterinsurgency operations, but also internal rifts, ideological rigidity, leadership crises, and alienation of support base, according to security experts and the surrendered members of the outfit. At its peak in the late 2000s, the Red Corridor spanned nearly 180 districts, encompassing a large part of India's population. However, official statistics shows the scale of decline: the incidents of Left-Wing Extremism dropped by more than 50% between 2004-14 and 2014-23, with fatalities falling by nearly 70%. Naxal-related violence had peaked at 1,936 incidents in 2010, but plummeted to 374 by 2024, while deaths dropped from 1,005 to 150. A close examination of Dandakaranya by security experts – a forested expanse covering parts of Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra that was treated by Maoists as their de facto capital for over two decades – indicated some possible reasons behind their waning influence. As disclosed by several surrendered Naxal leaders, the outfit prioritised military preparedness and ideological indoctrination over any tangible development in the regions it controlled, and the very communities which it claimed to be championing suffered. In the recent past, the outfit has reportedly been facing a leadership crisis. The resignation of Muppala Lakshmana Rao, known as Ganapathy, in 2018 is considered to be the turning point. He was succeeded by Basava Raju, but the crisis deepened. He leaned heavily on military offensives rather than 'political outreach and civil engagement', alienating the support base. In May 2025, he was among the Maoists gunned down by security forces in the Maad region of Chhattisgarh's Narayanpur. The CPI (Maoist), through its Dandakaranya Special Zonal Committee, said that Raju's death was a result of betrayal from within, including the People's Liberation Guerrilla Army Company No. 7 that was responsible for his security. While the reported internal rifts have been crucial, operations by security forces have accelerated the collapse of the outfit. The killing of Maoists in Narayanpur during the 21-day-long exercise, hailed by Union Home Minister Amit Shah as a landmark achievement in the battle to eliminate Naxalism, dealt yet another blow to the outfit. Security agencies have reasons to believe that the outfit's decision-making body, Politburo, has now just four active members: Muppala Lakshmana Rao aka Ganapathy, Mallojula Venugopal Rao alias Abhay, Deo Kumar Singh alias Deoji, and Misir Besra. Ideologically, the outfit is said to be losing its relevance with the younger peasants and tribals increasingly focused on education, employment, and integration into mainstream society. In his Mann Ki Baat address last month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke about one Om Prakash Sahu from Gumla in Jharkhand, which was once infested with Naxal activities. '…Om Prakash Sahu ji left the path of violence. He started fish farming. Then he inspired many friends like himself to do the same,' said Mr. Modi, adding that over 150 families of Basia block in Gumla have joined fish farming. Several surrendered leaders and members have advocated shunning of violence. Ginugu Narsimha Reddy, a former Central Committee member who surrendered along with his wife in December 2017, has spoken about finding peaceful solutions. He has also highlighted differences within Maoist groups. The internal disputes, underscored by the surrendered Maoists, are said to be compounded with the outfit being isolated politically.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC stays operation of UP govt's Banke Bihari temple ordinance, forms panel led by ex-HC judge
The Supreme Court has stayed the operation of Uttar Pradesh government's Banke Bihari temple trust ordinance, which rests administrative control of the shrine with the state, till the high court decides its validity. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly.(HT Photo) A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi refused to entertain the challenges made to the Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, and said the affected parties can approach the high court. "At this stage, we are reminded of the fact that the petitioners' challenge to the Ordinance will doubtlessly take some time in proper adjudication. We, therefore, deem it fit to stay operation of the Ordinance's provisions in the interregnum, only to the extent they grant the state powers to constitute a Trust for managing the temple's affairs," the bench directed. The top court said consequently, the constitution of the Shree Bankey Bihar Ji Temple Trust, as defined in Section 3 of the Ordinance and its composition, as contained in Section 5, shall be kept in abeyance till the question of validity of the Ordinance (or any Act in relation thereto subsequently passed by the state legislature), is finally resolved by the high court. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly, but such an exercise will be subject to the outcome of the proceedings for which the affected persons and the petitioners have been relegated to the high court. The top court in its detailed order uploaded on Saturday also constituted a 12-member high-powered committee headed by retired Allahabad High Court judge Ashok Kumar to look after the day-to-day affairs of the iconic temple. It said, "We are equally mindful that the sum of our directions shall effectively leave the management of the subject temple in limbo yet again, since the ad-hoc arrangement of temple management has been wholly ineffective and inefficient in discharging its duties over the years. "We are pained to observe that the previous administerial deadlock(s) and in-fighting have only worsened the problems plaguing the temple, causing much distress to the pilgrims – who are left without any amenities or redress." The bench said the material on record indicates that despite the substantial donations received by the temple running into hundreds of crores, no tangible steps appear to have been taken by the successive managements for providing essential facilities to the scores of devotees visiting the temple, and the Goswami Shebaits remain divided into factions and continue to litigate before the civil courts, further contributing to administrative inaction. "We are, therefore, satisfied that a high-powered managing committee headed by an impartial person with considerable experience and ability is required to be constituted to run the day-to-day affairs of the temple, apart from undertaking some of the initiatives, which we are illustratively mentioning in the latter part of this order. "There is no gainsaying that the sanctity of safe religious pilgrimage shall never be unjustly denied to all the citizens of this country," the top court said. It also lauded the state government for taking a "fair stand" over the constitution of the committee for the management of the affairs of the temple, and said the panel may deal with a variety of issues for the proper functioning of the temple, including the provision of essential amenities for the devotees. The top court also modified its May 15 order, which gave the go-ahead to the state's scheme to develop the Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor at Vrindavan in Mathura, and allowed the government to use temple fund to acquire five acres of land for developing it as a holding area for the devotees. "It seems to us that the order passed by a coordinate bench requires certain modifications/clarifications. That order purportedly directs for the redevelopment of the temple's vicinity through the employment of temple funds. "However, we find that such directions suffer from a foundational procedural infirmity -- the principal affected parties, including the Shebait Goswamis, who have been administering the temple, were not heard prior to the passing of the said order," it said. The bench further said to allow substantive directions on a matter of such significance to be issued in collateral proceedings, especially in absentia of the necessary stakeholders, may not be in conformity with procedural fairness and judicial best-practices. "That apart, we note that the high court, vide its judgment dated November 8, 2023, had expressly declined the state's prayer to utilise temple funds for land acquisition as part of the proposed redevelopment plan. "That judgment has attained finality, having never been assailed by the state in any appropriate appellate proceedings. In these circumstances, this court could not have, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, effectively set aside the high court's judgment without any formal appeal or challenge being placed before it," the top court said. While directing for modification of the May 15 order, the bench ordered for restoring the legal position to status quo ante.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Why BJP's backing of term 'Bangladeshi language' must be making even SP Mookerjee turn in his grave
A slip of the pen by an inspector of Lodhi Colony, New Delhi, has turned into a nightmare for the BJP in West Bengal, blunting its chances of seriously challenging Mamata Banerjee in the 2026 elections. Perhaps the inspector should have sent that letter to the Bangladesh high commission. But no. The inspector sent it to Banga Bhavan, West Bengal's state guest house in Delhi, which doubles as the office of the state resident commissioner, and requested the services of a translator for the 'Bangladeshi language'. The police, he explained, had detained some suspected Bangladeshis who had produced documents in a language that could not be understood. And, so, the services of a translator, please. Mamata Banerjee saw red at 'Bangladeshi language' -- unquestionably a faux pas as no such thing exists. They speak Bengali across the border as do the people of West Bengal. But the BJP, instead of putting a lid on the debate over the error, tried to justify it – an abomination that would have made even SP Mookerjee cringe. The BJP's founding father was a Bengali bhadralok whose mother tongue was Bengali. Not Bangladeshi. For Mamata Banerjee, already fuming at the BJP for allegedly harassing migrant labour from West Bengal in BJP-ruled states, labelling them Bangladeshis and deporting them, it was a heaven-sent cause celebre to ratchet up her rhetoric against the BJP and kickstart her 2026 campaign with a bang.'Scandalous, insulting, anti-national, unconstitutional,' she thundered on X where she shared the controversial letter. 'See now how Delhi police under the direct control of Ministry of Home, Government of India (read Amit Shah aka BJP), is describing Bengali as 'Bangladeshi' language!' Now,the BJP could have nipped the sticky issue in the bud, passing off the 'Bangladeshi language' offence as an inadvertent error by the inspector. But instead, in an inexplicable act of self-harm, it tried to explain the error and shot itself in the foot. BJP Bengal leaders struggled to contain the damage. But Amit Malviya hit the ball out of the park. In a lengthy tweet, he said, 'Delhi Police is absolutely right in referring to the language as Bangladeshi in the context of identifying infiltrators. The term is being used to describe a set of dialects, syntax and speech patterns that are distinctly different from the Bangla spoken in India. The official language of Bangladesh is not only phonologically different but also includes dialects like Sylheti that are nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis. 'There is, in fact, no language call 'Bengali' that nearly covers all these all these variants. 'Bengali' denotes ethnicity, not linguistic uniformity. So when the Delhi Police uses 'Bangladeshi language,' it is a shorthand for the linguistic markers used to profile illegal immigrants from Bangladesh – not a commentary on Bengali as spoken in West Bengal,' Malviya concluded. This attempt to justify the term 'Bangladeshi language' has not gone down well with many in West Bengal who view it as a slur on the mother tongue Bengali. It is a language for which an entire population fought and won nationhood in 1971: Bangladesh. In the early 1950s, Islamabad declared Urdu the sole national language of Pakistan, triggering protests in the east over Bengali being marginalised. The language movement that swept East Pakistan culminated on 21 February 1952 when around 30 people died in police firing at Dhaka University. Since then, 21 February is observed as 'Bhasha Dibash' or language day on a mammoth scale in Dhaka and, on a much smaller scale, in Kolkata. In 1999, the UN declared 21 February International Mother Tongue Day. Bengalis in India have their own language day, 19 May, when, in 1961, 11 Bengali speaking persons died in police firing at Silchar in Assam's Barak Valley while protesting the government's decision that Assamese would be the state's sole official language. The Barak Valley, comprising three districts, is Bengali-dominated and protests there against the marginalisation of Bengali forced the Assam government to roll back its decision on its only-Assamese policy. Just as the speakers of every other language take pride in their mother tongue, so do the Bengalis. It is also the second most spoken language in India after Hindi, the seventh most spoken language in the world and an entire nation was born because of this language. And Rabindranath Tagore, who wrote in Bengali, is the first Nobel laureate from Asia. For literature. He also gave us our national anthem. In Bengali. And Bangladesh's, too. Now, Bangladeshis speak the same language as people from West Bengal. Yes, there are distinct dialects like Sylheti, perhaps a little tough to understand for the untrained ear but Sylheti is Bengali. Like Cockney is English, though often hard for a standard English speaker to understand. Dialects are defined as "sub-forms of languages which are, in general, mutually comprehensible'. So, what's the big deal about Sylheti? For the BJP, the defence of the reference to 'Bangladeshi language' spells trouble as it reinforces the Trinamool Congress's charge that the BJP is a party of outsiders – bahiragata – alien to Bengali thought and culture. That strategy worked for the TMC in the 2021 elections and again in 2024. In the forthcoming elections, too, the BJP may have to pay through its nose for failing to feel the pulse of Bengali Asmita and doggedly defend an error by a poorly-lettered inspector who should have known better.
