Modern day humans with neanderthal genes are suffering from rare but fatal condition: SFU study
The last Neanderthals are believed to have lived around 40,000 years ago and yet there is an element of their DNA still lingering in some modern day humans, and it's causing a rare, but sometimes fatal, medical condition.
According to a new study led by researchers at B.C.'s Simon Fraser University, interbreeding between humans and their ancient cousins is the reason behind a neurological condition believed to be affecting up to one per cent of the population, named Chiari Malformation Type 1.
The study, published in June in the journal Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health, describes how the rare condition occurs when the human skull is too small, and the cerebellum – a crucial part of the brain located at the back of the head responsible for co-ordination, balance and posture – is pushed through a small hole in the skull.
'Part of the brain herniates down into the spinal canal, and then that causes a pinching of the spinal cord, a pinching of the cerebellum,' says the study's co-author, and SFU postdoctoral fellow, Kimberly Plomp.
The defect is so subtle that it is not something that can be seen by looking at somebody, but the consequences it produces can be devastating.
'It can cause headaches, dizziness and numbness if it's a small herniation,' says Plomp.
'If it's a large herniation, it can even be incompatible with life. It could cause death in juveniles.'
Combining fossil data with information garnered from CT scans of people currently living with the condition, researchers were able to compare the shape of modern day skulls to those two million years old.
'Essentially, what we found was that humans with this malformation have more similarities and shapes in their skull, especially in the back bottom bit of their skull, with Neanderthals than they do the humans without the malformation,' says Plomp.
'This really highlights the fact that what we identified in humans with Chiari Malformation are traits that seem to be uniquely influenced by, what we think is, Neanderthal DNA.'
According to Plomp, any modern humans with ancestry outside of Africa today has anywhere between two to five per cent of Neanderthal DNA in their genetic code, derived from the interbreeding that occurred thousands of years ago.
Plomp says the research does little in the way of progressing treatment, which is already 'pretty simple' and sees a neurosurgeon open up the hole in the skull to enable more space, which results in less pinching. But it does lead to an overall better understanding, an evolutionary explanation, as to why humans bear this condition.
While the knowledge that ancient human ancestors interbred with Neanderthals is not new, the impacts of such mating is only now being researched and understood.
Plomp says she hopes the study's findings give way to further research in the future. For the next step, she hopes to conduct DNA analysis to identify the area of genetic code influencing the shape of the skull that leads to the Chiari Malformation, which could aid in potentially identifying people who might have the condition further down the road.
'If we get to the point that we can identify people at risk of these conditions beforehand, then doctors can start making plans ahead of time before it becomes a health issue,' she says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
The real Paleo diet: Neanderthals dined on rotten meat and maggots, study suggests
Lead author Melanie Beasley captured this image of a "maggot mass" for a follow-up study related to the newly released paper. (Melanie Beasley via CNN Newsource) Neanderthals had a voracious appetite for meat. They hunted big game and chowed down on woolly mammoth steak as they huddled around a fire. Or so thought many archaeologists who study the Stone Age. Fresh meat was far from the only thing on the menu, according to a growing body of research that has revealed our archaic cousins ate a varied diet that included pulses and shellfish. Still, a chemical signature in Neanderthal remains that suggests robust meat eating — observed at higher levels than those seen in top predators such as lions and wolves — has puzzled researchers for decades. Now, new research hints at an unexpected Stone Age food. Maggots — the larvae of flies, which hatch in and feed on decaying animal tissue — may also have been a staple of prehistoric diets, a study published Friday in the journal Science Advances suggests. Lead author Melanie Beasley, an assistant professor of biological anthropology at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, found that a taste for maggots could explain a distinctive chemical signature detected in the bones of prehistoric humans, including Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, a species that went extinct 40,000 years ago. The findings back up a hypothesis that had been put forward by Beasley's coauthor John Speth, an anthropologist at the University of Michigan, who has for nearly a decade argued that putrid meat and fish would have formed a key part of prehistoric diets. His work was based on ethnographic accounts of the diets of indigenous groups, who he said found rotten meat and maggots acceptable fare. 'Not a lot of people took notice, because it was like this is an out-there idea. And there wasn't any data,' said Beasley, who heard Speth give a talk in 2017 and subsequently decided to test his hypothesis. Understanding past diets To understand past diets and where an animal sat in the ancient food chain, scientists study the chemical signature of different isotopes, or variants, of elements such as nitrogen or carbon, which are preserved in teeth and bones over thousands of years. Researchers first found in the 1990s that the fossilized bones of Neanderthals unearthed in Northern Europe had particularly elevated levels of the nitrogen-15 isotope, a chemical signature that suggests their meat consumption was on par with hypercarnivores such as lions or wolves. 'Grass will have one (nitrogen) value, but then the deer that eats the grass is going to have a higher value, and then the carnivore that eats the deer is going to have an even higher value,' Beasley explained. 'So you can track nitrogen through this trophic food web system.' Neanderthal remains, she said, had even higher nitrogen values than carnivores. This was puzzling, however, because modern-day humans, unlike wolves and lions, cannot stomach large quantities of lean meat. Overindulging in it can lead to a potentially lethal form of malnutrition in which the liver fails to break down the protein and rid the body of excess nitrogen. Known today as protein poisoning, the condition was more common among European explorers of North America — who dubbed the illness 'rabbit poisoning' or 'mal de caribou' — given that wild game was far leaner than today's farmed meat. Archaeologists believe that Neanderthals understood the importance of fatty nutrients, and, at least in one location in what's now Germany, processed animal bones on a large scale to extract the fat. Rotten meat might be higher in nitrogen than fresh tissue and may have been responsible for boosting nitrogen levels in Neanderthal bones, Speth's research has suggested. Not long after hearing Speth speak, Beasley, who was previously a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, where she conducted research at its Forensic Anthropology Center, decided to investigate. The research facility, sometimes described as a body farm, was established to study how the human body decomposes. There, she analyzed nitrogen levels in the rotting tissue of donated human corpses left outdoors and the fly larvae that formed in the muscle tissue. The work, conducted over a two-year period, required a strong stomach, she said. Beasley found that nitrogen levels increased modestly over time in the human tissue. However, she observed much higher nitrogen levels in the fly larvae, suggesting that Neanderthals and early modern humans likely consumed animal meat laced with maggots on a regular basis. 'I started getting the (nitrogen) values back, and they were just astronomically high,' Beasley recalled. 'John (Speth) and I started talking: What if it's not just the putrid meat, but it's the fact that … they're never going to be able to prevent flies from coming and landing on the meat, and so fly larva just become part of the delicacy,' she said. The data from her work not only provides insight into the Neanderthal diet but also informs modern forensic science, with nitrogen levels in maggots that form in human corpses helping scientists pinpoint time since death, she noted. 'No brainer' It was a 'no brainer' that Neanderthals ate maggots, said Karen Hardy, a professor of prehistoric archaeology at the University of Glasgow in Scotland. Hardy, who wasn't involved in the study, said the authors provided a 'strong argument in favor of maggot consumption,' although such behavior is unlikely to be conclusively proven because maggot remains do not survive in the archaeological record. 'The surprise element is more to do with our Western perspective on what is edible and what is not,' she added. Today, at least 2 billion people worldwide are estimated to consume insects as part of traditional diets, according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. The study also noted that, according to historical accounts, many indigenous peoples such as the Inuit 'viewed thoroughly putrefied, maggot-infested animal foods as highly desirable fare, not starvation rations.' Many such groups, according to the study, 'routinely, often intentionally, allowed animal foods to decompose to the point where they were crawling with maggots, in some cases even beginning to liquify, and inevitably emitting a stench so overpowering that early European explorers, fur trappers, and missionaries were sickened by it.' Knud Rasmussen, a polar explorer from Greenland, recorded the following culinary experience, cited in the study, in his 1931 book 'The Netsilik Eskimos: Social Life and Spiritual Culture.' 'The meat was green with age, and when we made a cut in it, it was like the bursting of a boil, so full of great white maggots was it. To my horror my companions scooped out handfuls of the crawling things and ate them with evident relish. I criticised their taste, but they … said, not illogically: 'You yourself like caribou meat, and what are these maggots but live caribou meat? They taste just the same as the meat and are refreshing to the mouth.' The study also noted that maggots are not unknown in Western culinary traditions, noting the Sardinian cheese casu marzu is replete with the larvae of cheese skipper flies. Beasley said that Northern latitude groups still process these foods today and consume them safely when prepared following traditional practices. Limitations Beasley's research on modern-day corpses was exploratory and had several limitations, she cautioned. The work, which involved small sample sizes, focused on human muscle tissue, not the tissue or organs of animals that might have been hunted by Neanderthals. What's more, the fly larvae, which came from three different families, might have differed from those that existed in the late Pleistocene, which ended around 11,000 years ago. The study also didn't account for the wide variety of climates and temperatures that would have had an effect on stored meat in the Stone Age. She also added that the human body tissue wasn't cooked, processed or prepared in any way. Beasley has spoken with researchers in Alaska in the hopes of connecting with native groups that would be interested in sharing traditional food preparations. Her goal is to better understand how that might affect the nitrogen level. The new research has 'opened a fascinating line of inquiry' into the culinary practices of Stone Age hunter-gatherers such as Neanderthals, said Wil Roebroeks, professor emeritus of paleolithic archaeology at Leiden University in the Netherlands. He wasn't involved in the research. 'It certainly gives a fresh — if that is the right word here — perspective on Neanderthal and other Late Pleistocene humans' diets,' Roebroeks added.
CBC
37 minutes ago
- CBC
Mountain roads and coal mines cut grizzly bears off from habitat, study finds
A new study found that grizzly bears have had to change their movements across the Canadian Rockies, becoming more constrained over time as they avoid human development like coal mines, highways, large reservoirs and towns. Analyzing 20 years worth of GPS collar data from over 100 grizzly bears, the research, published in Conservation Science and Practice, found that humans have had a significant impact on the way bears move across an 85,000 square kilometre landscape in southern B.C. and Alberta. "There already has been quite a bit of connectivity loss for grizzly bears in the southern Canadian Rocky Mountains," said Eric Palm, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Montana. Any new coal mines, towns or highway roads would create more barriers for grizzly bears to move around and find food, he said — potentially having bigger ramifications down the road. "Since that baseline is already pretty high, any additional losses could eventually have population-level effects for grizzly bears," he said. In January, the province lifted a moratorium on coal mining in the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains, opening the door for suspended projects to resume. More human development on the horizon — like new and resuming coal mine projects — could further threaten bear habitats, Palm said. "In B.C. and Alberta there are a lot of proposed coal mine expansions of existing mines, and then there are also some new mines that are being proposed," he said. "Building new coal mines in each one of these areas … expands the footprint of human infrastructure [which] can affect connectivity by usually inhibiting animals moving from one habitat patch to another." Looking for food, finding trouble Using computer simulations to predict how more development will impact bears in the future, the study found that those habitat patches would be further disconnected, restricting movement. Palm explained that grizzly bears in the Canadian Rockies rarely venture out into the prairies, staying confined to the mountains. But there, bears are more constrained, as humans typically develop infrastructure in valley bottoms where some food sources thrive. The researchers found that when food was scarce, both male and female bears risked coming closer to roads to search for it with forest along roadsides being home to attractive foods such as grasses, flowering plants and buffaloberries. Tal Avgar, a wildlife ecologist and assistant professor at the University of British Columbia who contributed to the study, said a "grizzly bear that wants to live a long and happy life needs to avoid humans as much as possible." The most recent count in Alberta shows 235 grizzly bear mortalities were caused by humans in the period between 2013 and 2022. Most known grizzly bear deaths in the province are caused by humans. In May, two female grizzly bears were killed by trains in separate incidents in Banff National Park. "Sometimes humans are associated with where the food is, but in general, we know that bears would like to avoid being close to humans. They would like to avoid being on infrastructure used by humans," Avgar said. A potential threat to bear populations "If genes are being inhibited from flowing from one area… eventually some of these populations could become more isolated from each other," Palm speculated. Though this study was limited in scope to the data on grizzly movements, Palm said there was room to further research the potential for new infrastructure to limit not just the bears' mobility, but also how that could impact their breeding. Although the threat of new development is concerning, Palm said much work is being done to help increase habitat connectivity in the Rockies, such as wildlife crossings over or under roads that help animals move across human infrastructure. "Now there is a lot of vulnerability between different species and how much they adopt using these crossings, and sometimes these crossings are very successful, and sometimes less so," Avgar said. While wildlife crossings are still helpful in building habitat connections, Avgar said, that solution is limited to roads. "There are definitely situations where we can't actually provide those crossing structures [such as] human settlement or a mine," he said. "We can't build a bridge above it. It's an area that the bears are going to avoid to some extent. "The main thing that we need to keep in mind is that when we plan development, we want to plan it at the large landscape scale, keeping in mind that we still allow populations of animals to move across that landscape, and if we blocked one path, maybe leave other paths open for future development."
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Are you overdoing it on electrolytes? Quebec poison control says calls are on the rise
Electrolyte drinks may quench your thirst on a hot day or after a gruelling workout, but Quebec's poison control centre is warning they're not without risks. Centre antipoison du Québec is reporting a sharp increase in exposure cases related to electrolyte supplements. The number of reported cases has increased by 30 per cent in the province over the past four years. According to data from the centre, cases involving electrolyte and mineral supplements increased to 763 as of 2024, up from 584 in 2020. Children under the age of five make up a significant portion of calls received by the centre, rising to 121 cases last year from 89 in 2020. Dr. Josh Wang, a toxicologist at the poison control centre and incoming president of the Canadian Association for Clinical Toxicology and Poison Centres, said the reason for the uptick is still unclear. 'It's hard to speculate. The numbers certainly show an increase in reporting to the poison centres,' said Wang, who also works as an emergency room physician at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC). 'It's not clear to me from the data that we have what the reason is, however.' Generally safe, but don't overdo it While many products, including well-known brands like Gatorade and Pedialyte, are generally safe, Wang said problems can occur when people overdo it or take them without proper guidance. 'As an emergency physician, I frequently advise patients who are dehydrated to take these,' he said. 'But when [people] take it upon themselves to take supplementation, it's important to know what their medical problems are, and perhaps [seek] counsel from a pharmacist or doctor if there's any doubt in terms of the safety, for overdose or interactions.' He mentioned that one popular hydration drink, Prime, contains 700 milligrams of potassium, 'the same as two bananas.' That could pose a risk for people with kidney issues. 'If [people] have kidney problems, difficulty eliminating, extra potassium in their diet or from beverages could be potentially a risk,' he said. So, if you feel parched, should you choose an electrolyte drink or stick to the old standby — water? Wang assured that most products are safe when used as directed, but said to keep it simple. 'Generally, if you're thirsty, you should drink water. I think that's a good rule of thumb,' he said. If you opt for electrolyte drinks, he noted that 'it's easy to go over, make arithmetic errors, and too much of a good thing can be a bad thing.' Symptoms depend on the mineral Symptoms of overdoing it vary depending on the mineral. 'Some of them can cause diarrhea, nausea, vomiting. In more extreme cases, they can cause decreased mental status,' Wang said, pointing to magnesium. 'Calcium... can be associated with constipation.' Potassium, he said, is 'my most respected electrolyte in terms of overdose risk, danger for cardiac disturbances and dangerous cardiac rhythms that could lead the patient to present to the emergency department.' Advice for parents He also urged parents to keep all supplements safely stored away. 'Keeping supplements and medications out of lock and key, away from the reach and away from the curious eyes and fingers of little ones,' he said. 'I continue to encourage it to all my patients and all the people that ask me about it.' Wang said the Quebec poison centre is a great resource, and when in doubt, people can call the team at 1-800-463-5060. 'Specifically, in regard to overdose, we provide very efficient, very rapid advice,' he said.
