Bolton on Trump warning parade protesters will be ‘met with force': ‘That's mouth'
Former national security adviser John Bolton said President Trump's warning to deter protestors from showing up at the Army's 250th commemoration parade later this week is just talk.
'Look, I think that's mouth. I mean, this is performance art and he's trying to show how tough he is,' Bolton said Tuesday during an appearance on CNN's 'AC360.'
'It's a character defect,' he told host John Berman. 'There's no doubt about it. I don't think it's a serious threat.'
His comments come after the president warned demonstrators earlier Tuesday not to attempt to disrupt the list of events slated for Saturday.
'If there's any protester [who] wants to come out, they will be met with very big force,' Trump said Tuesday from the Oval Office. 'For those people that want to protest, they will be met with very big force. And I haven't even heard about a protest.'
Army grade weapons are expected to be displayed on the streets for public viewing while thousands of soldiers are planning to march across Washington. But Bolton said they wouldn't harm individuals who are peacefully gathered.
'The military service members marching in that parade are not going to take action against protesters unless somebody comes up and physically attacks them,' the former White House aide said. 'The whole thing is bluff.'
The issue also comes as many remain outraged over the president's decision to deploy thousands of National Guard soldiers and hundreds of Marines to deter protests in Los Angeles. The demonstrations come in opposition to several raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the Golden State.
'Mobilizing ~700 Marines is a dangerous escalation that blurs the line between military and civilian law enforcement,' Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) wrote in a Monday post on social platform X. 'They're trained for combat — not law enforcement. Deploying them on our streets only inflames tensions.'
'Today it's LA … tomorrow it could be anywhere,' he added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Federal Agents Force Senator to Floor and Handcuff Him After He Interrupts Noem
'I'm worried about this country,' Gov. Gavin Newsom of California said on 'The Daily' for its latest episode. Gov. Gavin Newsom of California appeared on Thursday's episode of the New York Times podcast 'The Daily,' as he engaged in a tense standoff with President Trump over the military's involvement in anti-deportation protests in Los Angeles. Mr. Trump deployed nearly 5,000 National Guard troops and Marines to the city to clamp down on the protests, against Mr. Newsom's wishes, and the state of California responded by suing his administration, accusing it of an 'unprecedented power grab.' Here are six takeaways from Mr. Newsom's conversation with Michael Barbaro, the host of 'The Daily': Newsom accused Trump of inflaming the situation by mobilizing the military. Mr. Newsom argued that law enforcement officers in Los Angeles had routine experience dealing with protests, including at events as innocuous as World Series baseball games, and said that local officers had the situation under control. 'We deal with civil unrest. That's what law enforcement does,' Mr. Newsom said. 'The military's simply not needed. But what he's doing is trying to gin things up to create problems.' A small number of demonstrators have looted, vandalized and set cars on fire, and Mr. Newsom condemned those actions. But he suggested that the response from Mr. Trump was disproportionate. The arrival of the National Guard inflamed tensions, Mr. Newsom said, with protesters flocking in response. 'We had to defend the National Guard. We had to use our own law enforcement to protect them,' he said. 'Just think about how perverse that is.' He questioned the president's mental acuity. Some of the sparring between Mr. Trump and Mr. Newsom this week has centered on their communication — or lack thereof — about the National Guard deployment. They spoke early Saturday morning, a conversation in which Mr. Trump has said he brought up the National Guard. (Mr. Newsom said that was false, calling the president a 'stone-cold liar.') But Mr. Trump then told reporters he called Mr. Newsom a second time, on Monday, to admonish him. Mr. Newsom says a Monday call never happened. The president 'starts making up all these things he claimed he told me about, which honestly starts to disturb me on a different level,' Mr. Newsom said. 'Maybe he actually believed he said those things, and he's not all there. I mean that.' Mr. Newsom added: 'He claimed he had another conversation with me. So there's something going on here.' Mr. Trump, days from his 79th birthday, has not faced the same degree of criticism over his age and cognitive ability as his predecessor, former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., but some of Mr. Trump's rambling speeches have drawn scrutiny. Newsom grew emotional as he talked about his daughter. Responding to comments from the federal border czar, Tom Homan, Mr. Trump said on Monday that he thought the idea of arresting Mr. Newsom over his handling of the protests was 'great.' Mr. Newsom has said Mr. Homan should 'come after me. Arrest me.' But on 'The Daily,' Mr. Newsom revealed that the threat had hit home. 'I have a 15-year-old who quite literally came home from school crying because she was told on her last day of school — God as my witness — because she was told her daddy was getting arrested,' Mr. Newsom said. 'And I said, 'That doesn't matter. That doesn't matter. What matters is what's happening with the military out on the streets. I can handle that, I'll be fine,'' Mr. Newsom said, his voice rasping with emotion. ''But I'm worried about you, I'm worried about this country.'' Mr. Barbaro chimed in: 'I'm sensing some emotion in your voice here.' 'Yeah,' Mr. Newsom replied, momentarily seeming at a loss for words. He said Mr. Trump had 'authoritarian tendencies,' but did not back down from overtures to conservatives. Mr. Newsom has always been willing to joust with Mr. Trump, but lately has seemed more apt to cast the president as an existential threat, and has called the deployment of the military in a domestic setting a crossing of a 'red line.' Referring to a televised speech on Tuesday in which he said 'democracy is under assault,' Mr. Newsom told 'The Daily' that people needed to 'wake up' and resist. 'I just pray that people don't give in — and this was the final words I said — to cynicism, to their own fear and anxiety,' he said. 'They're the antidote to that, as long as they don't give up.' Still, Mr. Newsom, seen as a likely 2028 Democratic presidential hopeful, struck a conciliatory tone toward conservatives after November's election loss and, on his podcast, hosted right-wing figures like Stephen K. Bannon and Charlie Kirk. And Mr. Newsom maintained that Democrats could learn from them how to win back working-class voters. 'At a certain point, divorce is not an option,' he said. 'I'm learning from these guys — I learn a lot. I listen to Steve Bannon' about economic populism, the governor said. He deplored ICE's tactics but highlighted his work with the agency, reflecting an immigration dilemma. Mr. Newsom endorsed comprehensive immigration reform, and highlighted the fear some families are feeling from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials. 'You had a nine-month pregnant woman arrested,' Mr. Newsom said. 'A 4-year-old that's gone. People are disappearing. People are disappearing. Disappearing.' But Mr. Newsom also said that California Democrats had criticized him for working with ICE, 'which I've done over 10,500 times since I've been governor.' And he distanced himself from the policy of sanctuary cities like Los Angeles, which refuse to coordinate with federal immigration officials. Mr. Newsom pointed out that as mayor of San Francisco, in 2008, he enacted a policy that referred undocumented minors charged with felonies to federal immigration officials. The contrast reflected the dilemma Democrats face on immigration, an issue where voters have increasingly aligned with Republicans in demanding stricter border control measures. Newsom dialed back a threat to withhold federal tax dollars. Even before the conflict over military deployment, Mr. Trump threatened to cut federal funding to California, citing a transgender girl's success in high school track. Mr. Newsom responded by suggesting that California could withhold the taxes its residents pay the federal government. But how the state would do so is not clear, and Mr. Newsom said on 'The Daily' that he would not encourage residents to simply not file federal tax returns. 'That puts those taxpayers at risk — I would never do that,' he said. But how creative, Mr. Barbaro asked, was Mr. Newsom willing to get to carry out this threat? 'Well, I'm trying to be creative, and we're looking,' Mr. Newsom said. 'I have a team of people looking creatively.' Watch their full conversation below, or listen to it here.
The Intercept
36 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Josh Hawley Blames Nonprofits for 'Bankrolling Civil Unrest' in LA Without Evidence
As protests against immigration crackdowns spread from Los Angeles to cities around the United States this week, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., leveraged the perceived unrest to target nonprofits supporting the very communities the Trump administration has put under siege. President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard and the Marines, while the Los Angeles Police Department carried out a brutal response to protests objecting to workers' arbitrary detention by masked ICE agents in Los Angeles. After fueling the chaos in support of Trump's deportation regime, Republicans used the moment to target nonprofit leaders and discredit protesters as 'bought and paid-for flash mobs.' In a letter to multiple nonprofit organizations serving immigrant and Latino communities — including the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, also known as CHIRLA, and Unión del Barrio — Hawley accused the organizations of 'aiding and abetting criminal conduct' by 'bankrolling civil unrest.' 'Credible reporting now suggests that your organization has provided logistical support and financial resources to individuals engaged in these disruptive actions,' wrote Hawley, who chairs the Senate Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, in one version of the letter. 'Let me be clear: bankrolling civil unrest is not protected speech. It is aiding and abetting criminal conduct. Accordingly, you must immediately cease and desist any further involvement in your organization funding, or promotion of these unlawful activities.' The letter demands that the organizations preserve a large number of records from November 5, 2024, onward, including 'donor lists,' 'media or public relations strategies,' and all internal communications and financial documents related to protests. Hawley did not elaborate on any sources for his claims, and he did not immediately respond to The Intercept's request for comment. But in an interview on Fox News, he doubled down on his accusations. 'These aren't spontaneous at all. They're about as authentic as astroturf. They are bought and paid-for flash mobs, and I want to know who's doing the buying and the paying. That's why today I've launched an investigation,' Hawley said on Wednesday. CHIRLA denied fueling violence, saying the group won't be intimidated by the Missouri senator. 'Our mission is rooted in non-violent advocacy, community safety, and democratic values,' wrote CHIRLA executive director Angelica Salas in a statement reported by LAist. 'We will not be intimidated for standing with immigrant communities and documenting the inhumane manner that our community is being targeted with the assault by the raids, the unconstitutional and illegal arrests, detentions, and the assault on our first amendment rights.' The inquiry marks the latest chapter of the GOP's war on progressive-aligned nonprofits. Other Republicans have attempted to target CHIRLA and other nonprofits focused on immigrant rights. On Thursday, House Homeland Security Committee Chair Mark Green, R-Tenn., and Subcommittee Chair Josh Brecheen, R-Okla., launched an investigation into more than 200 nonprofit organizations, including CHIRLA, alleging that they 'helped fuel the worst border crisis in our nation's history.' The congressmen also accused the organizations of 'actively advising and training illegal aliens on strategies to avoid cooperation with immigration officials.' In addition to CHIRLA, the House subcommittee called out Catholic Charities USA and Southwest Key Programs for their resettlement efforts. The letter demands that organizations provide a full accounting of federal grants, contracts, and payments received during the Biden administration, as well as information on whether they've sued the federal government and the services they provide to immigrants.
Associated Press
37 minutes ago
- Associated Press
'Shocked' and 'sickened' Democrats react with fury to video of Padilla's removal
WASHINGTON (AP) — When videos first rocketed around the Internet Thursday afternoon showing security officers forcibly removing Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla from a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in California, senators in both parties were already gathered together for a long series of votes. There are strict rules against using cellphones on the Senate floor. But senators immediately shared the video with each other anyway. 'I showed it to as many people as I could,' said Democratic Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware. That included Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., who she said seemed 'as shocked as we were.' The videos, which showed officers aggressively pushing Padilla out of Noem's press conference and eventually restraining him on the floor outside the room, shook Senate Democrats to the core. Beaten down politically for months as President Donald Trump has returned to power and ruled Washington with a united Republican Congress, the Democrats' anger exploded as they skipped their traditional Thursday flights home and stayed on the floor to speak out against the incident, calling it the latest and most inflammatory example of what they say is Trump's gradual assault on democracy. The incident came just days after U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver was indicted on federal charges alleging she assaulted and interfered with immigration officers outside a detention center in New Jersey. 'What was really hard for me to see was that a member of this body was driven to his knees and made to kneel before authorities,' said New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, his raised voice booming through the Senate chamber walls. 'This is a test. This is a crossroads. This is a day in which the character of this body will be defined.' Washington Sen. Patty Murray said it was the closest she had come to tearing up on the floor in her 32 years in the Senate. Maryland Sen. Angela Alsobrooks said she was so angry she was shaking. Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine waved around a pocket Constitution and said the administration is trying to make Padilla and others 'afraid to exercise their rights.' Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said what he saw 'sickened my stomach' and demanded immediate answers 'to what the hell went on.' Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren called for an investigation. 'This is what a dictatorship looks like,' said Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen. 'We have to stand up.' Pleading for Republicans to speak out against the incident, New Jersey Sen. Andy Kim said that 'this is not a time to put your finger up in the air and figure out which way the wind is blowing, to try to think through what type of reaction might come from the White House if we speak out against this.' Senate Republicans were mostly silent on the situation. Thune said that he would have a response, 'but I want to know the facts, find out exactly what happened.' Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she had seen a clip of the video on the Senate floor and it was 'disturbing,' though she said she didn't know the details of what came before it. 'It looks like he's being manhandled and physically removed, and it's hard to imagine a justification for that,' Collins said. Other Republicans were less sympathetic. Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, the No. 2 Republican, raised his voice when asked about the incident and said that Padilla should have been at work in Washington. He said he had not watched the video. 'Was he being disruptive?' asked South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, who also had not seen the video. 'He got what he wanted, he's on video.' Padilla was forcibly removed from the press conference after introducing himself and saying he had questions for Secretary Noem amid immigration raids in his state that have led to protests. Video shows a Secret Service agent on Noem's security detail grabbing the California senator by his jacket and shoving him from the room as he yells, 'Hands off!' Later video shows Padilla on his knees and pushed to the ground with several officers on top of him. In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said Padilla 'chose disrespectful political theater and interrupted a live news conference.' They defended the officers' conduct and claimed erroneously that Padilla did not identify himself and said Secret Service believed him to be an attacker. The Democrats described Padilla, the son of immigrants from Mexico, as a 'kind and gentle person' and said that disrespect is not a crime in the United States. They also invoked the end of Trump's last presidency, when a mob of his supporters attacked the Capitol and sent them running. 'I have never, ever — other than January 6 — been so outraged at the conduct of an administration,' said Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz.
