
Body language expert reveals Trump and Putin's key giveaways from their Alaska summit
All eyes were on the two world leaders as they met on the red carpet at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Alaska, and again as they emerged a few hours later from their much-anticipated summit.
While at first it was all "genuine smiles", when the leaders emerged from their private meeting, the lack of a deal was written all over Trump 's face, according to body language expert and psychologist Dr Peter Collett.
Even in their very first handshake, there was plenty to be analysed in terms of body language, Dr Collett says.
Putin was the first to extend his hand, showing "his enthusiasm, delight" and "commitment" to the occasion.
But within the handshake itself were no less than five "hand pats", Dr Collett adds, which offer more insight.
"During the handshakes, we also see several pats," the expert says. Putin got the first, with his "rather tentative and much less dramatic than those produced by Trump".
By contrast, Trump's hand pats were a "status reminder" and "his way of telling Putin that he's the man in charge".
At one stage, the US president allowed his Russian counterpart to pat his hand. Although this allowed Putin to place his hand on top, seemingly asserting his dominance, this signature move of Trump's actually allows him to "flex his muscles", Dr Collett says.
"One of the reasons Trump makes a habit of doing this is that it allows him to flex his bicep and pull the other [person] towards him."
Importantly, he also got the last hand pat of the interaction, Dr Collett adds. "That's what we find with high-dominance individuals, particularly politicians, they always want to have the last touch."
Putin wins on manspreading
Once the pair were sat down in front of the cameras, it was Putin who appeared more dominant, which he achieved through a wider "manspread" than his American counterpart.
The term manspreading first emerged on social media in 2013 when it was used to describe men on public transport who encroach on adjacent seats by spreading their legs wide apart.
"Highly dominant men tend to spread their thighs wide apart," Dr Collett says.
"If you look at the angle between them, when we compare Trump and Putin, we find Putin with a much wider spread, in other words, displaying much greater dominance."
During the news conference, Putin's dominance was also conveyed in his posture, Dr Collett adds.
"In spite of their difference in height, Putin, although he's very short, sits upright, ramrod, looking very confident, whereas poor old Trump is crumpled and turned inwards."
This could reflect him having "a lot on his mind that's bothering him", the expert suggests.
Hand behind back shows dominance
As the two leaders moved around the military base, Trump made a point of placing his hand behind Putin's back.
Traditionally, a show of chivalry, in this context, it was another power play, Dr Collett says.
"It looks like an expression of politeness, but in fact it's a dominance display, because it's the person who's in power, who's superior, calling the shots.
"They're guiding the other individual through the space. And that's exactly what we see here… Trump gets his hand behind Putin and guides him through the next phase of the meeting."
Genuine smiles
Despite the repeated, thinly veiled attempts to appear the most powerful, both leaders had "genuine smiles" for each other, particularly when they first met, according to Dr Collett.
"What's interesting is the high degree of smiling," he says. "It's a very serious, sombre occasion and yet they find time to smile and display their pleasure - not only at meeting each other but about the whole exercise."
The smiles were genuine because they "evolve naturally" and "involved both sides of the face", Dr Collett explains.
"They enlist those special little muscles around the eye, which are an indication of genuine pleasure," he says.
Whereas later on, during the news conference, after the pair failed to negotiate a ceasefire, Trump offered Putin a "fake, flashbulb" smile, evidencing his disdain.
All in the eyes - and the mouth
After the two-and-a-half-hour meeting behind closed doors, Trump's dissatisfaction over the lack of a deal was clear in his body language, Dr Collett says.
He tried to assert what psychologists refer to as "visual dominance" by avoiding Putin's gaze.
👉 Follow Trump100 on your podcast app 👈
This technique is often used by "high-status individuals" to assert power - but it could also be a defence mechanism to "remove the negative stimulus" from the situation, Dr Collett suggests.
"Trump hasn't succeeded in getting a real concession from Putin on this occasion. He's looking away because he doesn't want to be reminded of the individual who's failing to give something he can take to the American public and the world and say, 'hey look, this is what I succeeded in doing'."
The shape of Trump's mouth is another tell-tale sign of his discontent.
He pursed his lips on several occasions, which denotes "self-restraint", while his "oxbow mouth" showed his vulnerability, according to Dr Collett.
"Politicians are quite fond of using this particular mouth posture because they think it makes them look determined," he says. But the tensed chin is a "fascinating giveaway", he adds.
"It's almost as though they believe consciously that somebody is going to punch them on the chin. So when you see politicians doing that mouth posture, it's quite often because they're feeling vulnerable because they feel the need to protect themselves.
"And that's my feeling - Trump was full of promise, but he came away with nothing, and we find that revealed in his little mouth postures".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
8 minutes ago
- The Guardian
West Virginia to deploy hundreds of national guard troops to Washington DC
West Virginia is to deploy 300 to 400 national guard troops to Washington DC at the request of the Trump administration, the state's governor said on Saturday. West Virginia governor Patrick Morrisey's office said in a statement that the deployment is 'a show of commitment to public safety and regional cooperation' and the state will provide equipment and 'approximately 300-400 skilled personnel as directed'. The deployment comes after Donald Trump ordered hundreds of Washington DC national guard troops to mount a show of force and temporarily took over the city's police department to curb what the president depicts as a crime and homelessness emergency in the nation's capital. Data compiled by the DC police department shows that violent crime was actually at a 30-year-low when Trump returned to office in January, and has declined a further 26% since then. Last weekend, Trump ordered the district's homeless residents to leave, or face forcible relocation, after his motorcade passed a handful of unhoused people en route to his golf course outside the city. On Thursday, local officials cleared away one of the roadside encampments Trump had complained about, arguing that they could do so in a more humane fashion than untrained federal forces. A justice department order to replace the Washington police chief, Pamela Smith, with DEA head Terry Cole as the city's 'emergency police commissioner' ran into problems after a challenge in federal court by the DC attorney general, Brian Schwalb. Without issuing a direct ruling on the challenge, US district judge Ana Reyes indicated that Smith has to remain in charge. But efforts to increase federal control of the district resumed on Saturday with the order to deploy West Virginia's national guard. Drew Galang, a spokesperson for Morrisey, said the state's national guard received the order to send equipment and personnel to DC late on Friday and was working to organize the deployment. A White House official told Reuters on Saturday that more national guard troops were being called in to Washington to 'protect federal assets, create a safe environment for law enforcement officials to carry out their duties when required, and provide a visible presence to deter crime'. The Chamberlain Network, a veteran's group that describes itself as 'dedicated to protecting democracy', commented on X that the order for West Virginia's national guard to police DC was 'pulling them away from their core mission of protecting our communities'. 'From floods to winter storms, we count on our Guard on in a crisis,' the group said. 'They should be home, ready to respond—not on a political policing mission.' Since arriving in Washington last week, about 800 national guard troops under Trump's direct control have served as a visible presence in public areas, assigned to administrative and logistical duties as well as 'area beautification' work, according to the Wall Street Journal. Defense officials had said they would not be carrying weapons but 'weapons are available if needed but will remain in the armory,' the US army said in a press release. A US official told Reuters that a formal order authorizing the national guard troops to carry firearms would be issued but it would largely affect military police officers with sidearms. The White House also said on Saturday that national guard in DC are conducting patrols on foot and in vehicles around the national mall and Union Station, adding that the troops are not making arrests at this time. Trump has indicated that he may take similar actions in other Democratic-controlled cities. A federal judge in San Francisco is expected in the coming weeks to issue a ruling on whether Trump violated the law by deploying national guard troops to Los Angeles in June without the approval of California's governor, Gavin Newsom. Typically the national guard is deployed only instances where a state governor requests it. However the DC national guard reports directly to the president.


Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia's Lavrov discusses Alaska summit's outcome with Turkish, Hungarian counterparts
Aug 17 (Reuters) - Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held calls on Saturday with his Turkish and Hungarian counterparts, the Russian foreign ministry said, hours after a summit between the U.S. and Russian presidents yielded no deal on ending the war in Ukraine. President Donald Trump, who hosted President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday for bilateral talks aimed at ending the war that Russia launched with a full-scale invasion on Ukraine in early 2022, said that Kyiv should make a deal with Moscow because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not." The phone call between Lavrov and Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan took place at Turkey's initiative, the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement on its website. "The foreign ministers exchanged views on the outcomes of the high-level Russia–U.S. meeting held in Alaska on August 15," the ministry said in its short statement. Turkey has tried to keep diplomatic channels open to both sides during the war, acting as a NATO member, a partner for both Russia and Ukraine, and a potential mediator. Lavrov also held a call with Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto, the Russian foreign ministry said, in which "the parties discussed issues related to the Ukrainian crisis in the context of the outcomes of the Russia–U.S. summit." Hungary has maintained close ties with Russia throughout the war, often opposing EU sanctions and continuing energy cooperation with Moscow, and drawing criticism from Western allies of Kyiv. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Saturday after the Putin-Trump meeting that "the world is a safer place than it was yesterday," while other European leaders reiterated in their joint statement that "it will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory."


Sky News
23 minutes ago
- Sky News
Zelenskyy prepares for fresh White House visit - as Putin issues first comments after summit
Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said he is preparing for his meeting with Donald Trump - as Vladimir Putin issued his first comments following the US-Russia talks on the war in Ukraine. The Ukrainian president will fly to Washington DC for the next stage of talks on Monday, which could pave the way for a three-way meeting alongside the Russian leader, Mr Trump has said. It comes following a high-profile summit between the US president and Mr Putin, held in Alaska on Friday. The US president had heavily previewed the talks, threatening sanctions for Russia should there be no agreement on a ceasefire. But a short news briefing following the summit ended with no mention of a ceasefire, no agreement on how to end the war, and little clarity about the next steps. On Saturday, Mr Trump appeared to change his stance on what he hopes to achieve from the talks, indicating he wants a permanent peace settlement rather than a ceasefire, and announced the follow-up meeting with Mr Zelenskyy. In a post on X, the Ukrainian president said he was grateful for the invitation and added: "It is important that everyone agrees there needs to be a conversation at the level of leaders to clarify all the details and determine which steps are necessary and will work." However, he said Russia had rebuffed "numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing", which "complicates the situation". Mr Zelenskyy continued: "If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater - peaceful coexistence with its neighbours for decades. "But together we are working for peace and security. Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war." 23:24 The Ukrainian president's last visit to the White House earlier this year descended into a fiery spat with Mr Trump and his vice president JD Vance that saw him leave early. Mr Putin issued his first statement on Saturday afternoon following the Friday's summit, describing the talks as "timely and quite useful" - but said the "removal" of what he calls the "root causes" of the crisis "must underlie the settlement". He continued: "We definitely respect the US administration's position which wants the hostilities to stop as soon as possible. So do we, and we would like to move forward with settling all issues by peaceful means. "The conversation was very frank and substantive, which, in my view, moves us closer towards making necessary decisions." In calls on Saturday, Mr Trump told Mr Zelenskyy that the Russian leader had offered to freeze frontlines elsewhere if Kyiv agreed to withdraw from the eastern Donetsk and Luhansk regions, a person familiar with the matter told the Reuters news agency. US envoy Steve Witkoff told Ukraine's leader that Mr Putin had said there could be no ceasefire without this, and that the Russian president could pledge not to launch any new aggression against Ukraine as part of an arrangement. Meanwhile, European leaders who make up the "coalition of the willing" are set to hold a conference call tomorrow ahead of the crunch talks between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy. In a statement on Saturday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the US leader's efforts had "brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine" and that his leadership "in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended". He said he supported the next phase of talks, but added: "In the meantime, until (Putin) stops his barbaric assault, we will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions."