Campaigners seek judicial review to save Queensbury Tunnel
A judicial review would see judges examine the lawfulness of the decision.Norah McWilliam, leader of the society, said: "We are talking about seven-and-a-half million pounds to permanently destroy the tunnel."Her (the minister's) reason is that there's a safety issue, which we don't accept."The only way to do it is to close the tunnel, which we don't accept."She said there isn't any money to restore the tunnel. We accept that, but there could be at some point in the future."The tunnel could just be left as it is, there is no urgency."She said the society needed to raise £6,500 initially to allow solicitors to prepare a submission to start the case for a judicial review.She said: "If we progress through to a judicial review then it would cost a hell of a lot of money, around £60,000."
The DfT said the continued deterioration of the Queensbury Tunnel meant National Highways had been instructed to carry out works to maintain public safety.The absence of local funding to develop it as a transport link was also a factor in the decision-making process, a spokesperson said.
Re-use of the tunnel as a greenway was first proposed as a Tour de France legacy scheme in 2014 after the Grand Départ of the world-famous cycle race was held in Yorkshire.National Highways inherited the tunnel after the privatisation of British Rail and abandonment would reduce its liabilities.Between 2018 and 2021 it spent £7.2m on strengthening the tunnel, saying the work would "prevent further uncontrolled collapses, ensuring that any future plans for the re-use of the structure can be realised".But it started filling the 1.4-mile (2.25km) tunnel with gravel in 2021 to prevent collapse.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 days ago
- Metro
The disability employment gap affects 16million of us - can the goverment fix it
When Keighley Miles was at school, it was always assumed that she wouldn't be able to find work. 'Nothing was ever mentioned about career options or further education,' the 39-year-old, who was born deaf, tells Metro. 'I can't remember ever being told that I could do whatever I wanted, or anybody talking to me about what life would be like as a deaf adult.' It's no wonder that such a lack of support left Keighley, who lives in Essex, struggling to find consistent work after leaving school – a problem compounded by difficulties communicating. 'We moved from London to Essex when I was 15, and I didn't attend school after that,' she continues. 'It led to depression and left me feeling like I wouldn't ever achieve anything in life.' 40-year-old Holly Donovan can relate, never having a full-time job. Not because they don't want one, but because they cannot find employment that accommodates their disability. 'All I want to do is work, but there aren't enough opportunities for disabled people like me,' says Holly, who uses a wheelchair due to a childhood cancer which left them with chronic pain and a metal rod in their back. 'I'm stuck only living on Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which could be cut under Labour's plans, while my partner has to support me because I can't bring any money in. I'm living in poverty, and I shouldn't be.' The difference in employment rates between disabled and non-disabled people is stark. At the end of 2024, the disability employment gap stood at 28.6% – a 1% increase from 2023. It's a breach that has remained stagnant at around 30% for three decades, and while Labour has promised to get one million people back into work, the workplace hurdles disabled people face are often complex. 'The disability employment gap exists because of a combination of systemic, structural, and cultural barriers,' explains Sue Wray, head of community for Hamelin, a disability charity focused on empowering autistic adults and people with learning disabilities. 'Then there's the issue of assumptions; too many employers still make snap judgements about someone's abilities without really understanding their strengths.' As Keighley and Holly know too well, the roots of the issue often stem way before working age. And while there's no doubt that upcoming generations have benefited from the improvement of special educational needs (SEN) education, many disabled children are still losing out on access to proper education. Talking about their school days in the late nineties, Holly tells Metro: 'There was no form of encouragement; they would just dump me in a corner, isolated, then push me to my next lesson to get dumped again. 'School was something I had to endure rather than taking anything from and nobody taught me about reasonable adjustments, so I had no idea I could ask for them at work opportunities.' When Holly did get their first work experience at a pharmacy as an assistant, it was cut short due to physical pain. 'By the end of the first week, I just burst into tears because I was in too much pain,' they say. 'That was the point when I realised that I didn't know what I was going to do because my body clearly couldn't handle traditional employment.' Research shows that approximately 28% of UK workers use a hybrid model of work, splitting time between home and the office, and around 13% of workers are fully remote. While this may feel like a step towards workplace inclusivity, Holly believes that it doesn't address the base issue: without being able to gain meaningful work placement in the first place, it's nigh on impossible to secure a job – remote or not. 'How am I ever going to compete in a job market where I'll never have the same amount of experience as an able-bodied person of the same age? Last time I went for a remote position, I was fighting against 321 people; it's no wonder that I didn't get it,' says Holly. While the rights of disabled people at work are protected under the Equality Act 2010, many are unaware that they are eligible for support. For example, the government grant scheme Access to Work helps cover additional costs for employers and employees with health issues. In 2023/24, it supported nearly 50,000 people, but the system is under immense pressure. The average wait time for assistance is currently 12 to 16 weeks, with some waiting up to 30 weeks. 'Although it can be life-changing when it works well, delays, poor communication, and inconsistent decision-making have left many unable to access the support they need,' explains Sue Wray. 'In some cases, people have had to turn down employment opportunities altogether due to waiting months for the assistance they were entitled to.' Keighley is one of the scheme's success stories. When her second son was born deaf in 2015, she wanted to lead by example and show him that he could achieve anything he wanted, so set her sights on becoming a childminder. 'In past customer service jobs, I would lose commissions because I'd have to pass clients over to colleagues when I couldn't hear them – but then I met a wonderful lady who was a childminder who offered me a job,' she says. 'Around that time, I also learned about Access to Work and realised that when the time came, I could set up my own childminding business with the right support.' Keighley has since founded her own business, which provides communication support workers for 40 hours a week, enabling her to communicate effectively with parents. But, Keighley stresses, she only found out about Access to Work after meeting other deaf adults at a group for deaf toddlers and children. 'I came across it by chance,' she says. Another government initiative, the Disability Confident scheme, encourages employers to think differently; however, Jane Hatton, CEO and founder of EvenBreak, a not-for-profit career support service for disabled people, believes it 'lacks accountability and meaningful benchmarks'. 'Disability Confident rightly acknowledges that employers must become more inclusive, she adds, 'but data shows that those employers [who have] become 'Disability Confident' don't employ more disabled people than others, so the label is largely symbolic.' EvenBreak is one of the numerous non-governmental organisations making significant efforts to close the gap by collaborating with job seekers and employers to provide support and resources that enhance inclusivity and accessibility. Hamelin is another, and has launched an initiative called Ability Works to support autistic adults and individuals with learning disabilities in securing employment. One person benefitting, is Ederson Silva, 45, who had to start from scratch following an accident that made him a wheelchair user. As the main provider for his family, Ederson had to return to work because even after 30 years of pension contributions, the support provided wouldn't cover the basic needs of his family. However, he tells Metro, he found it challenging to convince recruiters and employers of his employability. 'Vacancies for people with disabilities tend to be very limited; this was the biggest challenge, there are simply fewer opportunities,' he explains from his home in Broughton. 'I was fortunate to have over 22 years of prior experience in my field, and working in a specialised area made it more attractive for companies to value my expertise despite my disability.' After getting in touch with STEM Returners, Ederson was contacted with a 12-week placement opportunity and the scheme supported him through every step. 'At the end, I had the opportunity to become a permanent member of the team and I took it,' he adds. 'I had very little hope of being able to provide a dignified life for my family again. Now, I feel once again a respected professional in the workforce. Being able to give my family the dignity they deserve has been life-changing.' Meanwhile, Holly has joined a UK government initiative called The Work and Health Programme but admits the process is incredibly frustrating. 'It was absolute murder to try and get on it; I'd phone up the DWP hotline and most of them didn't even know the scheme existed,' Holly explains. Although the initiative helped them write a CV and get interviews, no job offers followed. 'I always get great feedback – but they still go with someone who has more experience every time,' she says. 'I feel used as part of a tick box exercise for employers to show that they've looked at disabled people for the job.' Following the announcement of Labour's numerous plans to help disabled people return to work, a DWP spokesperson told Metro: 'We are determined to bring down the disability employment gap and to do this, our £1 billion reforms will help sick or disabled out of poverty and our Keep Britain Working review will provide recommendations for government and employers on how they can better support disabled people and those with ill health who are at risk of falling out of work.' Despite this apparent will to close the gap, many experts feel the solution remains unclear. Others also warn that the government's approach does not take into account some disabled and chronically ill people. More Trending 'If we're serious about closing that gap, we need practical, properly funded support that's delivered efficiently and designed with disabled people, not just for them,' says Sue Wray. 'The Connect to Work programme [a new government initiative to help disabled people move into and maintian work] might be a step towards this, but we remain unconvinced that the level of funding is sufficient to make any significant headway, especially as providers are asked to deliver support for a very broad group of jobseekers, including people with mental health conditions, ex-offenders and care leavers, within a relatively small financial envelope.' 'The government needs to stop cutting essential support and start strengthening what already exists,' adds Jane Hatton. 'Just as importantly, the narrative needs to change. 'The idea that disabled people choose not to work is simply untrue and deeply damaging. The government should lead by example and employ more disabled people directly to show what inclusive hiring really looks like.' MORE: Want the ultimate wedding makeup? Charlotte Tilbury's bridal services are the perfect choice! MORE: SURI just dropped the ultimate oral-care bundle – and it's a must for travel MORE: Is 'powder conditioner' the secret to better hair? We unpack the waterless wonder
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Hugely popular EV with 500-mile range could be banned from £3,750 grant
The policy aims to support the switchover to electric and help the UK reach climate goals, but could limit Brit consumers' access to some of the most advanced and affordable EVs on the market A hugely popular EV with 500-mile range is at risk of being banned from the UK's new £3,750 electric car grant due to new government restrictions. The UK government's £650m Electric Car Grant (ECG) subsidises up to £3,750 off the purchase price of new EVs costing under £37,000, in the hopes of accelerating the country's transition away from petrol and diesel vehicles ahead of the 2030 ban on new internal combustion engine (ICE) car sales. However, the scheme contains strict criteria — only manufacturers who meet "minimum environmental standards" qualify. Notably, vehicles manufactured in countries with "poor sustainability records or high carbon emissions" are ineligible for the scheme. It comes after UK drivers were warned over 'avoiding' road instead of having to follow new rule. China, which dominates global EV and battery manufacturing, relies heavily on coal-powered electricity for its factories. According to Transport Minister Lilian Greenwood, in an effort to ensure that the EV shift not only reduces emissions on the road, but also in the manufacturing and supply chain, any manufacturer whose production is powered significantly by coal will be excluded from grant eligibility. As a result, Chinese EVs, including those from BYD and MG, will not qualify. This also includes Chinese smartphone giant Xiaomi 's game-changing entry into the EV market, the new new YU7 electric SUV, which received over 200,000 pre-orders within just three minutes of its launch. The impressive model has an incredible 518-mile range, gets from naught to 60 mph in just 3.23 seconds and boasts a top speed of 157 mph. China's government has strongly protested the measure, arguing the UK is violating World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules by giving "favourable treatment" to certain countries over others. WTO rules prohibit discrimination in international trade. An embassy spokesperson said: "China has abolished all market access restrictions on foreign investment in manufacturing and remains open to international carmakers, including those from the UK, who can fully share in the dividends of China's big market. "We hope the UK's industry policy will observe WTO rules, respect market economy laws and provide an open, fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for the investment and operation of businesses from all countries, including China. The Chinese side is closely following the situation and will resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies." The UK's move comes amid similar tensions in Europe, where EU authorities are investigating Chinese EV imports that threaten the dominance of local auto manufacturers. On July 16, Ms Greenwood told the BBC 's Today programme: "We don't expect any cars that are assembled in China to be eligible for this scheme. The grant is restricted to those manufacturers that reach minimum environmental standards. And, frankly, if you generate a lot of the electricity that powers your factory through coal power stations, then you are not going to be able to access this grant." A Department for Transport (DfT) spokesperson said: "Our electric car grant will give drivers across the UK access to discounts on dozens of new electric car models, helping them save up to £3,750 per car and putting money back into the pockets of working people." So while the policy aims to support to switchover to EVs and help the UK reach its climate goals, it could also limit Brit consumers' access to some of the most advanced and affordable EVs on the market.
Leader Live
4 days ago
- Leader Live
Air traffic control glitch was caused by radar problem
Nats chief executive Martin Rolfe was summoned to speak with Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander on Thursday morning, a day after thousands of passengers were disrupted by the technical problem which forced the cancellation of more than 150 flights. Airlines are demanding an explanation for what happened. Departures at all airports resumed yesterday and @NATS are working closely with airlines and airports to clear the backlog safely and look after passengers. I will be meeting the NATS Chief Executive today to understand what happened and how we can prevent reoccurrence. — Heidi Alexander MP (@Heidi_Labour) July 31, 2025 A spokesperson for Nats said: 'This was a radar-related issue which was resolved by quickly switching to the back-up system during which time we reduced traffic to ensure safety. 'There is no evidence that this was cyber related.' The PA news agency understands that the back-up system continues to be used by controllers while investigations continue. Ms Alexander said: 'I have spoken with Nats CEO Martin Rolfe who provided further detail on yesterday's technical fault. 'This was an isolated event and there is no evidence of malign activity. 'I will continue to receive regular updates.' The problem happened at Nats' control centre in Swanwick, Hampshire, and affected the vast majority of England and Wales. A Government source said the failure lasted around 20 minutes, and the level of disruption was similar to a day with bad weather. More than 700,000 passengers suffered disruption when flights were grounded at UK airports in August 2023 when Nats suffered a technical glitch while processing a flight plan. Aviation analytics company Cirium said 84 departures and 71 arrivals were cancelled to or from UK airports up to 10pm on Wednesday. Several flights were diverted to other European airports. There was limited disruption on Thursday, with a handful of British Airways flights cancelled because aircraft and crew were out of position. Heathrow and Gatwick airports said they had resumed normal operations. Affected passengers are unlikely to be entitled to compensation as the disruption was outside of airlines' control. But they will be able to claim for expenses such as a reasonable amount of food and drink, a means to communicate and overnight accommodation if required. Ryanair called on Mr Rolfe to resign, claiming 'no lessons have been learnt' since the August 2023 outage. The airline's chief operating officer Neal McMahon said: 'It is outrageous that passengers are once again being hit with delays and disruption due to Martin Rolfe's continued mismanagement of Nats.' Business minister Gareth Thomas was asked whether Mr Rolfe will be 'fired' over the incident. He told Times Radio: 'We are summoning – the Transport Secretary is summoning – in today the chief executive of of Nats to help us get to the bottom of what went wrong yesterday. 'Clearly, an incident happened two years ago and measures were taken then. 'It looks like those measures weren't enough but we need to get to the bottom of what exactly happened, and conversations will take place today.' A former industry chief said it is 'unrealistic' to expect an air traffic management system with no technical failure. Graham Lake, former director-general of air traffic management industry association Canso, told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'If you look at the minutes of outage over a period of years, your availability – system availability – is, frankly, very, very good. So I think it's unrealistic to expect a system where you have no technical failure. 'The failure yesterday was short and sweet, if you like, the recovery was quick – aircraft were operating again very, very quickly.'
