logo
Why Asim Munir chose the US for his nuclear threat to half the world

Why Asim Munir chose the US for his nuclear threat to half the world

India Today14 hours ago
The Pakistan Army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, is back to doing what he does best, issuing hate-filled threats towards India to secure his position as the supreme authority of the failing Islamic Republic. In his latest outburst, delivered during a private dinner on US soil, Munir said, "We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us." With this, Munir not only reinforced the fact that nuclear weapons remain in the hands of an irresponsible state, but also expanded his nuclear threat from targeting just India to encompassing "South Asia", or rather, "half the world". But more than the threat itself, it is important from where it was issued — the US.advertisementMunir's nuclear threat came on the day the world marked the 80th anniversary of the US dropping an atomic bomb on Nagasaki in 1945. The American atom bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed 170,000 people by the end of the year.On his second US visit in two months, at a time of warming US-Pakistan relations — with Washington hailing Islamabad as a "phenomenal partner" and the Trump regime looking to tap Pakistan's non-existent energy reserves — Munir's threats from the US are significant.
The remark stood in stark contrast to the spirit of regional peace, and the fact that Munir could make it in the US, India's strategic partner, hints at a troubling shift in Washington's posture towards India under Trump and his administration.As columnist and satirist Kamlesh Singh put it, "Important ye nahin hai ki Munir bhaunka, important ye hai ki Munir Trump ke compound se bhaunka". What's important is the threat was made in the US, not that Munir "barked".So, why did Munir choose the US to deliver the nuclear threat?MUNIR IS LEVERAGING US-PAKISTAN TIES FOR STRATEGIC MESSAGINGMunir's choice of the US as the stage for his provocative remarks appears calculated, and is driven by the recent upswing in US-Pakistan relations under President Donald Trump.On June 18, Munir was hosted for a rare White House luncheon, a gesture typically reserved for heads of state. This was a signal of a renewed US interest in Pakistan, and the recognition of the military as its power centre.His latest visit, followed by his attendance at the retirement ceremony of US Central Command (CENTCOM) Commander General Michael Kurilla in Tampa, provided Munir with a platform to project what's left of Pakistan's military might to both domestic and international audiences.Munir's latest nuclear threat was made in front of the Pakistani diaspora in the US. A few months earlier, when Munir said that Kashmir was Pakistan's "jugular vein" and said that "Hindus and Muslims are different", he was also addressing the diaspora, but that time, in Pakistan."Mullah Munir's rant from American soil is not surprising. From Ayub to Zia and from Musharraf to Munir, each one thought the Yanks are their true friends, only to find sooner than later, being placed in the 'use and throw' category. But the main reason for his nuclear sabre-rattling is India calling Pakistan's nuclear bluff in Operation Sindoor," Security analyst Nitin A Gokhale posted on X.advertisementGokhale suggested Munir's threats were a response to India's bold military strikes during Operation Sindoor, which targeted terrorist camps in Pakistan and even reportedly hit the Kairana Hills, the storehouses of the country's nuclear warheads in a symbolic message.MUNIR'S N-THREAT IS SIGNAL TO DOMESTIC HAWKS, INDIAMunir's remarks also seem designed to reassure hardliners in Pakistan, where his leadership faces scrutiny amid economic and political instability.By invoking Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, Munir probably aimed to project "its strength" and deter India from further military actions like Operation Sindoor.Rishap Vats, a strategic affairs commentator and political science lecturer, wrote on X, saying, "Munir's speech in America was primarily aimed at raising the nuclear spectre in the West, while signalling to India that they have more to lose economically, a framing that is often put to use by 'restrainers' in Delhi."Vats pointed to Munir's attempt to exploit a growing India's economic vulnerabilities, contrasting it with Pakistan, which the field marshal reportedly called a "dump truck full of gravel" with India's "shining Mercedes" in a crude analogy meant to highlight New Delhi's economic stakes in a potential conflict.advertisement"I am going to use a crude analogy to explain the situation... India is shining Mercedes coming on a highway like Ferrari [sic], but we are a dump truck full of gravel. If the truck hits the car, who is going to be the loser?" Munir was quoted as saying in the US by The Print.Major General PK Sehgal (retired), a defence expert, has emphasised the recklessness of such rhetoric."Asim Munir knows that a nuclear weapon is a weapon of deterrence and will in no way be used. If Pakistan, even by mistake, uses nuclear weapons, it will be a catastrophe for all continents, but for Pakistan, it will be physical suicide. Pakistan's very existence will be wiped out," Sehgal told news agency PTI, underscoring the risks of Munir's brinkmanship. Sehgal's statement also suggested Munir's N-threat was more about posturing than intent.MUNIR IS EXPLOITING US-INDIA TENSIONSThe timing of Munir's threat aligns with strained US-India relations, which have been exacerbated by Trump's imposition of a 50% tariff on Indian imports and criticism of India's trade policies and continued purchase of Russian oil.advertisementMunir joked that Pakistan could give "masterclasses" on balancing rival powers, making fun of India's diplomatic vulnerabilities while getting closer to the Trump administration.Pranay Kotasthane, a policy analyst and deputy director at the Takshashila Institute, summed up the Munir-threat saying, "This is nuts"."Field Marshal Munir, while in the US, has declared 'we are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us' ... even as Trump is desperately angling for a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping a nuclear war. US gets played again," Kotasthane wrote on X, suggesting Munir is exploiting Trump's desire for diplomatic wins to amplify Pakistan's strategic relevance.Munir's decision to issue nuclear threats from US soil is a high-stakes move, where he's banking on the Trump administration's favourable disposition toward Pakistan. The presence of top US military officials, including General Dan Caine, at the Tampa event, and the US's affirmation of Pakistan as a key partner for "nuclear security in South Asia", may also have emboldened Munir.However, Munir's remarks also risk backfiring by reinforcing the perception of Pakistan as an unstable and irresponsible nuclear power. But why would Munir care? He has already compared Pakistan to a "dump truck full of gravel".- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India holds firm in US trade talks, eyes EU pact amid tariff tensions
India holds firm in US trade talks, eyes EU pact amid tariff tensions

Hindustan Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

India holds firm in US trade talks, eyes EU pact amid tariff tensions

In a key meeting of the Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Foreign Secretary and the Commerce Secretary briefed members on India-US relations and ongoing trade negotiations, sources said on Monday Regarding the upcoming US delegation visit for trade negotiations, the government indicated there is no change in schedule.(REUTERS) The government outlined three categories under which the US has been imposing tariffs. The issues included Global Tariffs - measures applied to all countries, not just India, sector-specific tariffs - designed to attract certain industries to the US, such as automobiles, leather, and textiles and revenue-oriented tariffs - targeting sectors like agriculture and oil for revenue generation. Officials stressed that negotiations with the US are continuing, but India will not compromise in the agriculture and dairy sectors. The government is actively assessing the impact of tariffs in consultation with stakeholders, including exporters, and is exploring alternative trade partnerships. Talks on trade agreements with the EU are being expedited, and new agreements with other countries are also under consideration. On broader ties, the government noted that India-US relations remain strong beyond trade. Recent developments include resolutions passed at the UN Security Council and the QUAD on the Pahalgam attacks, the extradition of Tahawwur Rana from the US, and the designation of TRF as a terrorist organisation. There has been no India-US dialogue regarding Pakistan in the current trade discussions. Committee Chairperson Shashi Tharoor confirmed that around 50 questions were raised in the meeting. He reiterated that trade is only one dimension of the India-US partnership. On Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir's nuclear threat remark, the government stated that such statements are unacceptable, especially when made from the soil of a friendly country. Regarding the upcoming US delegation visit for trade negotiations, the government indicated there is no change in schedule. On whether the nuclear threat issue would be raised with Washington, officials deferred to the Foreign Secretary but affirmed that such rhetoric is unwelcome. Commenting on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy following his conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the government noted that if the war ends, 25 per cent of existing tariffs--imposed due to India's purchase of Russian oil--would be lifted. However, India remains focused on addressing the remaining 25 per cent tariff impact.

Will convey displeasure to US over Munir's nuclear threat from American soil—Centre tells House panel
Will convey displeasure to US over Munir's nuclear threat from American soil—Centre tells House panel

The Print

time32 minutes ago

  • The Print

Will convey displeasure to US over Munir's nuclear threat from American soil—Centre tells House panel

MPs who attended the meeting said Misri told the Lok Sabha Committee on External Affairs headed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor that New Delhi's position remains that BRICS was not an anti-Western grouping but should be seen instead as a 'non-Western grouping'. The committee, it is learnt, was told by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri that US President Donald Trump's imposition of steep tariff on Indian exports was not just a response to New Delhi's purchase of Russian crude oil but could also be connected to its presence in BRICS. New Delhi: The Centre told a parliamentary committee Monday that New Delhi will convey to Washington DC its displeasure over Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, delivering nuclear threats from the soil of the United States, sources told ThePrint. Sources said Misri told the MPs that India would not tolerate such nuclear blackmail. ThePrint exclusively reported on 10 August that Munir, speaking at an event in the US, said, 'we are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' 'India's position will be conveyed to the US,' sources quoted Misri as having said. Misri is also learnt to have told the panel that the US's trade deficit with India may also have been a trigger for Trump, who first announced the imposition of 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the US and later raised it to 50 percent citing the 'direct or indirect import of Russian oil'. The foreign secretary is learnt to have added that India will not cross certain 'red lines'—a reference to US's demand for India to open up its agriculture and dairy sectors—in its trade negotiations with Washington. 'The three issues that India believes could have acted as a trigger for Trump are purchase of Russian crude oil, trade deficit and India's presence in the BRICS multilateral grouping. India's position is very clear. Misri said New Delhi never considered BRICS to be an anti-Western bloc but believes it can be categorised, if at all, as a non-Western bloc,' an MP who was part of the meeting told ThePrint. Sources in the Indian establishment have previously argued that New Delhi's sale of processed Russian crude oil was necessitated by various European countries, who stopped importing from Moscow, becoming dependent on supplies from India. Apart from Misri, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal was also present in the meeting that lasted over three hours. The officials told the MPs that the latest developments would not have any impact on India's 'friendship' with the US. 'Trade is just one aspect of India-US relations. There are many positives also,' one official is learnt to have told the committee. The officials added that India's trade relations, including defence purchases, would not be affected by Trump's announcements. In response to questions from MPs, they underlined that India is not trying to 'enhance' or recalibrate its relations with China or Russia in light of the US President's remarks and announcements. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: Proxy pushback: After Rajnath, now Gadkari & Venkaiah; BJP is running out of patience with Trump

How can Pakistan General give Nuclear-threat from land of a friendly nation, ask MPs in Parliament
How can Pakistan General give Nuclear-threat from land of a friendly nation, ask MPs in Parliament

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How can Pakistan General give Nuclear-threat from land of a friendly nation, ask MPs in Parliament

NEW DELHI: Members of Parliament raised with govt the 'nuclear sabre-rattling' by Pakistan army chief Asim Munir while in the US, as they asked how could such a statement be made from the soil of a "strategic ally" like America, while also pointing out that Munir's earlier statement that was a precursor to the Pahalgam terror attack too had a US link. The govt is said to have indicated that it may take up the issue with the US embassy. At the meeting of the parliamentary standing committee on foreign affairs Monday, sources said MPs Asaduddin Owaisi, Deepender Hooda and John Brittas asked foreign secretary Vikram Misri about Munir's nuclear threat while he is on a visit to the United States. While Misri said the ministry of external affairs has responded to the objectionable remark, pointing out that it is habitual of Pakistan, and that India will not give in to "nuclear blackmail", Misri was asked how could such a serious threat be issued from the United States. According to sources, Owaisi pointed out that even Munir's earlier incendiary statement preceding the Pahalgam terror attack was given to the Pakistani diaspora in the US. Sources said the issue was latched on to by other members. Interestingly, the parliamentary committee chairman Shashi Tharoor interjected to tell the foreign secretary that govt could take up with the American representative in New Delhi the issue of the use of American soil to issue such a threat to India. According to sources, Misri said that the issue will be taken up with the US official here. The remark by Munir has caused much consternation in the country, with the Pahalgam terror attack under his watch and following his statement appearing to add greater significance to his threats now. Later, confirming the development, Tharoor told reporters that members asked questions about Munir's "nuclear sabre-rattling".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store