IFEEDER Releases New Animal Feed Consumption Data
The Demand for Animal Food Is Strong
Arlington, Va, Feb. 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Institute for Feed Education and Research (IFEEDER), in collaboration with the American Feed Industry Association (AFIA) and North American Renderers Association's (NARA) research arm the Fats and Proteins Research Foundation (FPRF), announced today that quantifies the amount of feed consumed by America's major livestock, poultry and aquaculture species. In 2023, U.S. livestock, poultry and farmed aquaculture consumed approximately 283.6 million tons of feed, according to the IFEEDER report.
'The new IFEEDER feed consumption data demonstrates the vital role that feed mills, ingredient suppliers, liquid feed manufacturers, renderers and row crop farmers play in keeping animals fed throughout their lives, which, in turn, provides Americans with nutritious meat, milk and eggs,' said Lara Moody, IFEEDER's executive director. 'On behalf of our project partners AFIA and FPRF, IFEEDER is pleased to make this data readily available as part of its ongoing mission to advance understanding and trust in a sustainable animal feed supply chain.'
The project, conducted by researchers at , which has conducted similar studies in the past for IFEEDER, used a ration cost optimization model to quantify the consumption of feed ingredients for the major animal species. Excluding harvested forages and roughages, the study found that in 2023, beef cattle consumed the most feed at 76.7 million tons, followed by broilers at 61.5 million tons, hogs at 60.9 million tons, dairy cattle at 48.7 million tons, egg-laying hens at 17.7 million tons, turkeys at 10.9 million tons, horses at 5.3 million tons, sheep and goats at 1.2 million tons, and aquaculture at 615,800 tons.
The report primarily examined nearly 70 unique feed ingredients used among the studied species, finding that by weight, corn tops the list at 159.4 million tons, followed by soybean meal at 35.4 million tons, corn distillers' dried grains at 32.6 million tons, wheat middlings at 5.6 million tons, and canola meal at 5.2 million tons. Recognizing that feed often complements harvested forages and roughages (e.g., corn silage, alfalfa hay, other hay, legume silage, corn stalks, sorghum silage, and wheat straw) in ruminant diets, DIS calculated that dairy and beef cattle, sheep, goats and horses consumed 267.4 million tons of those ingredients. The report also found that an astonishing 37% of total feed consumption (excluding harvested forages and roughages) came from 'circular' ingredients, which are coproducts or byproducts from the human food industry or other industrial processes that might otherwise go to landfill.
'Many Americans may be surprised to learn that U.S. feed mills and rendering facilities work closely with their local bakeries, food processors and ethanol facilities to capture nutritious ingredients, some of which might otherwise go to waste, and through a highly regulated process, safely feed them to animals,' said Moody. 'With more than one-third of production animal diets' consisting of circular ingredients, our industry is doing its part to reduce waste.'
Five states topped the list in the tonnage of feed ingredients fed to animals in 2023, including Iowa at 29.1 million tons (primarily to hogs, beef cattle and egg-layers), Texas at 24.4 million tons (primarily to beef cattle, dairy cattle and broilers), Nebraska at 17.3 million tons (primarily to beef cattle and hogs), North Carolina at 15.5 million tons (primarily to hogs, broilers and turkeys), and Kansas at 15.3 million tons (primarily to beef cattle, hogs and dairy cattle).
The full report, along with infographics and a multimedia map that allows users to search by species, state or ingredient, are available at .
IFEEDER thanks ED&F Man Commodities, the National Corn Growers Association and Westway Feed Products for providing financial contributions to support this research project.
One hundred percent of IFEEDER donations support funding for research, education and sustainability initiatives on behalf of the U.S. animal food industry. Learn more about IFEEDER at .
Attachments
Total Animal Feed Consumption in 2023
The Demand for Animal Food Is Strong
CONTACT: Victoria Broehm - AFIA Senior Director of Communications Institute for Feed Education and Research (703) 558-3579 vbroehm@afia.orgSign in to access your portfolio
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
6 hours ago
- CBS News
Powerball jackpot grows to $643 million after no winners in Monday drawing
The Powerball lottery jackpot — the biggest of the year — is swelling after nobody won in Monday night's drawing. The jackpot is now $643 million, with the next drawing set for Wednesday night. Although no one took home the full prize, two Powerball players won $1 million each, according to Powerball. A single Powerball ticket costs $2. The rules of the game are as follows: Players choose five numbers from 1 to 69, and one number between 1 and 26, to be their "Powerball." To win the jackpot a player must match all six numbers on their ticket to the drawn six-number combination. The odds of winning the top prize are 1 in 292 million, according to Powerball. But these chances don't stop Americans from spending roughly $103 billion on lottery tickets annually, according to data from Motley Fool. Powerball is played in 45 states plus Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Drawings are held every Monday, Wednesday and Saturday at 11 p.m. Eastern time, with the results broadcast live from Florida Lottery draw studio in Tallahassee, Fla., and streamed on The first Powerball drawing was in 1992.
Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
Our Communications Have A Credibility Problem
Jennifer Best is the head of marketing for AmICredible, the smart platform where credibility starts with you. If the potential for misinformation makes you not want to read anything online, you aren't alone. A 2024 Pew Research report noted that 40% of Americans who get their information online say inaccuracy is the aspect they dislike the most, a number that's increased nearly 31% over the past five years. For the better part of a decade, we're increasingly aware that misinformation and disinformation exist, yet few understand the difference. Misinformation, or the inadvertent spreading of false or misleading information, is typically when people don't realize they are sharing something false. Its more sinister counterpart is disinformation, when a blatant and coordinated attempt to confuse and mislead is malicious and intentional. These challenges are leading to an erosion of our trust in media and online news platforms. A 2023 study from the University of Southern California found that frequent, habitual users on Facebook forwarded six times more fake news than occasional or new users. Once false information spreads, it's much harder to control or limit. The Online Credibility Conundrum The internet thrives on sensationalism, not credibility. Online platforms prioritize content that gets a lot of engagement (clicks, shares and comments) regardless of how factually accurate it might be. After all, doing so is good for business; it keeps users engaged, stock prices climbing and board members happy. But it does little to stem the spread of misinformation, not to mention that it's not always easy to differentiate legitimate news from clickbait. You might be asking yourself, 'Is everything I read online false or misleading?' No, but based on the research, odds are that there is misinformation in your news and social feeds right now. Nearly 80% of Americans are concerned that the information they see online is fake, false or a deliberate attempt to confuse people. You're definitely not alone. While some may be quick to blame recent advancements with artificial intelligence (and there are plenty of challenges there to choose from), the reality is this: The Internet Age democratized the sharing of content, giving writers the opportunity to create and publish what they believe is an authoritative piece of content and maximize its visibility, regardless of factuality or truth. The internet leveled the playing field for online content creators. This is when the sharing of misinformation online began—not with the launch of social media or recent advancements with AI, although both of these have perpetuated the spread of misinformation. The problem has now become too large to ignore. Communications In The Era Of Misinformation As communications professionals, we know much of our professional value lies in our ability to be influential. Our corporate reputation becomes our personal brand, and it's how we present ourselves in public, speak to the media and make the case for investment when budgets are tight. When we speak publicly either for ourselves or our organizations, we need to do so with great authenticity, empathy and credibility. What we say demonstrates our values and contributes to the larger narrative. Getting it right can make a career; getting it wrong can send stock prices tumbling. Trust is the new currency of the workplace. It's won and lost, and you always have room for more. You can't be successful without it, especially in corporate communications. Changing The Narrative More professionals are taking notice of the importance of the quality of and credibility in communications. The Oxford-GlobeScan Global Corporate Affairs 2025 Survey Report reflects its increased importance. Whether you are speaking on behalf of an organization or for your personal brand, here's how to start changing the status quo and to bring trust back to the table. • If it seems too outrageous to be true, be skeptical. Question everything. Before sharing, check several reputable sources and use tools and platforms to help you identify potential blind spots and verify factuality and credibility. • Stop, look and listen. Stop and take a moment before you do anything. There is great power in the pause. Firing off one reactive and rushed comment on social media can sideline a career. Look closely at what you're posting and read it through before you even consider sharing. Even the majority of influencers don't verify what they share. Verify your claims and content with reputable sites. • If you spot misinformation, report it. Whether you choose to question or inform the person who posted it, or report misinformation to the online platform directly, you have an opportunity to help solve this challenge. The only way we bring trust and credibility back to our online conversations is by making small, incremental changes. Rather than ignoring the problem, we each need to become part of the solution. Nothing changes if nothing changes. The next time you read something that seems too good to be true, you know what to do. Forbes Communications Council is an invitation-only community for executives in successful public relations, media strategy, creative and advertising agencies. Do I qualify?
USA Today
13 hours ago
- USA Today
Gen Z has become lonely and antisocial. We have only ourselves to blame.
I'm not surprised that Gen Z has different drinking habits from other generations. I just wish we weren't so opposed to being social. Over the past several years, it has become apparent that Gen Z is pulling back from many of the social habits of previous generations. In part due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in part because of other cultural forces, Gen Z is rapidly becoming a more reclusive generation, and one that socializes differently. But now, it is becoming clear that young people are going out less and staying in more, in part because we are less inclined to drink alcohol. The decision for Gen Z and all Americans to cut back on drinking isn't a bad thing, but young people need replacements for the social interactions that going to a bar or house party provides. We're becoming too isolated. Opinion: Gen Z's risk-averse behavior makes love elusive. Are we all going to die alone? Gen Z does consume less alcohol, but we're also far less social Americans are drinking less overall. While there are conflicting reports about Gen Z's unique habits, it is clear that we were ahead of the curve. While other age groups have seen declines in the number of people who say they drink over the past year, this decline has been consistent for those under 35 since the pandemic. I am one of those young people who forgoes drinking on a typical basis. I'll indulge here and there on special occasions, but I am far from a frequent drinker. Health reasons drive my decision-making, as they likely do for many sober-curious individuals out there. More Americans are realizing just how bad alcohol is for you, with Gen Z leading the charge. Opinion: Gen Z is a lonely generation that is drinking less. This could be bad. Still, I try to tag along with my friends even when they are drinking and I am not. Young people need to be more secure in their decision not to drink, rather than removing themselves from the situation altogether. Gen Z has to find ways to become more social Generation Z, born between 1997 to 2012, is dealing with loneliness and anti-dating epidemics. I don't think we need to drink more, but we have to stop pulling back socially. We're missing out on social settings, choosing instead to stay home. We all know the likely causes. The crosswinds of the pandemic, work-from-home culture and a pullback from the bar scene have turned us into homebodies. What we don't know are the solutions. But we have to find some. Young people need to become more involved in activities, whether that be community organizations or just doing something regularly with friends. Something has to fill the void that is left by our withdrawal from the bar and party scene. Something as simple as going out for a group dinner with friends, or doing something active with others, can go a long way. Believe me, I understand that the bar scene is unattractive to many of us, and that trying to cut back on alcohol is a virtuous decision, but something has to replace the positive social benefits that alcohol provides. We can't all be homebodies – otherwise, the loneliness problems that our generation faces are likely to worsen. Young people are approaching their social lives differently, but right now, it's hurting us. We all need to put in more effort in order to change that dynamic for the better. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
