logo
Air India victim's family fear he's been mistakenly cremated as somebody else

Air India victim's family fear he's been mistakenly cremated as somebody else

Yahoo6 days ago
Fiongal Greenlaw-Meek was killed when a London-bound Air India flight crashed in Ahmedabad.
The family of a man who was killed in the Air India crash are seeking answers after it was discovered that they were given the wrong remains.
Fiongal Greenlaw-Meek, 39, and his husband Jamie, 45, were among the 242 people on board the London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner when it crashed into a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport on 12 June, killing all but one person on the plane.
Mr Greenlaw-Meek's mother Amanda Donaghey, returned to the UK with her son's coffin but DNA tests carried out in the UK showed his remains were not inside.
His sister Arwen Greenlaw has now told BBC's Newsnight that she fears her brother's remains have been mistakenly cremated as someone else – and may never be returned to the family.
She said: 'The worst case scenario is that he has been cremated as somebody else – then we need to know that in order to move on.
'Somebody mislabelled remains – that has added trauma.'
Donaghey flew to India after the crash in order to find her son's remains, providing a DNA sample at Ahmedabad's Civil Hospital to assist the identification process.
But Greenlaw told Newsnight that it was 'a chaotic scene' and it was only once back in the UK that the family discovered the remains had been mislabelled when the casket was found to have 'the remains of two different people'.
She told Newsnight: 'It has been the equivalent of losing him twice.
'Mum had seen the situation there, smelt the smells, seen the sights, seen the crash site. I think for her that made it more real to be able to see that.'
Greenlaw said the situation was made worse because her brother's remains had been found in the clear-up.
She added: 'We are not naive. We understand it must have been a horrendous situation and my heart goes out to those who did the clear up – but we know Finn's remains were found.
'At that point you would expect the remains to come home. If he had not been matched we could get our heads around that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour councillor ‘horrified' by own cutting throats comment at rally, jury told
Labour councillor ‘horrified' by own cutting throats comment at rally, jury told

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Labour councillor ‘horrified' by own cutting throats comment at rally, jury told

A Labour councillor who called at an anti-racism rally for far-right activists' throats to be cut has told a jury he felt 'horrified' after realising what he had said. In the wake of rioting after the Southport murders last summer, Ricky Jones, 58, described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists', his trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court heard. He told jurors on Wednesday that his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them. A video showing Jones addressing the crowd in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year, went viral on social media after the protest. Wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, the councillor said: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays. 'They don't give a shit about who they hurt. 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jones, who at the time worked as an official for the Transport Salaried Staff's Association (TSSA) union, later sent an edited version of his speech video to union members, the court heard. Asked by his defence barrister, Hossein Zahir KC, why he edited the video, Jones replied: 'When I had time to view the footage after the demonstration, I was shocked at what I had actually said. 'I was horrified. 'Under no circumstances did I want to portray that to anybody, so I edited that last bit out.' The unedited video was eventually posted on social media platform X, formerly Twitter, where it attracted millions of views, the trial heard. Jones told jurors he felt 'very emotional and very upset' after receiving pictures, the day before the rally, of National Front stickers that had been left on a train, which had razor blades hidden behind them – supposedly so that people who tried to remove the stickers would injure themselves. He had also received reports from union members that more razor blades had been found stuck between seats, Jones added. 'I was very concerned about what had happened on the train. 'I was thinking, this (the speech) is a good opportunity to raise what happened.' The father-of-four and grandfather described the mood in the crowd at the time as 'happy and joyful', adding: 'There clearly wasn't any upset or anger from any people in that scene, because they clearly knew it was about what happened on the train.' Prosecutor Ben Holt, cross-examining, told the defendant: 'Your words about slitting people's throats were not cheerful or happy.' Jones replied: 'I totally agree, I'm ashamed.' The defendant however denied intending to encourage violence towards far-right protesters. 'What violence could have anyone caused to those people in the train?' Jones said. 'It was nonsensical – I didn't believe there was a risk.' Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the alleged incident. He was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton Police Station that night. The demonstration had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau. It followed the disorder in parts of the UK last summer after the Southport murders. Jones, of Dartford, denies one count of encouraging violent disorder. The trial continues.

More than 140 people report crimes to Al Fayed investigation
More than 140 people report crimes to Al Fayed investigation

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

More than 140 people report crimes to Al Fayed investigation

The Metropolitan Police says 146 people have now come forward to report a crime in their investigation into former Harrod's boss Mohammed Al Fayed. In a video update sent to victims, Scotland Yard said women and men had reported crimes, and a number of new witnesses had also contacted the force to give evidence. The Met is currently conducting an investigation into how it handled historical allegations, including sexual assault and rape, perpetrated by Al Fayed - who died in 2023 aged 94. It is also looking into whether there may have been others who could face charges for enabling or assisting his behaviour. The force has previously said it was investigating at least five people. In the update, Detective Inspector Karen Khan said the Met was working with international agencies, including foreign police forces. She said it was "difficult" to say when the investigation might be concluded because of the sheer number of survivors who had come forward. She also asked for victims and witnesses to continue to come forward but acknowledged there was a "reluctance" to trust the police by some. Last month, the force wrote to alleged victims apologising, saying it was "truly sorry" for the distress they have suffered because Al Fayed will never face justice. The latest figure is more than double the 61 people who the Met said had reported allegations the last time it released a number in October. Harrods said more than 100 victims of Al Fayed's abuse had entered its compensation scheme in July. Al Fayed owned the luxury department store between 1985 and 2010. The store started issuing compensation at the end of April and the scheme remains open for new applications until 31 March 2026. Eligible applicants could receive up to £385,000 in compensation, plus treatment costs, if they agree to be assessed by a consultant psychiatrist, Harrods said in March. They are also offered a meeting with a senior Harrods' representative to receive an apology in person or by video, as well as a written apology. The extent of Al Fayed's predatory behaviour was brought to light by a BBC documentary and podcast, broadcast in September 2024. Al Fayed: Predator at Harrods heard testimony from more than 20 female ex-Harrods employees who said Al Fayed sexually assaulted or raped them. Since then, dozens more women have come forward with similar experiences. Responding to the BBC investigation at the time, Harrods' current owners said they were "utterly appalled" by the allegations and that his victims had been failed - for which the store sincerely apologised. It was only after the broadcast that the Met revealed it had been approached by 21 women before Al Fayed's death, who accused him of sexual offences including rape, sexual assault and trafficking. Despite this, he was never charged with any offences. In October, the Met said 40 new allegations including sexual assault and rape had been made against Al Fayed, covering a period between 1979 and 2013. These allegations were in addition to the 21 it had already received. Two complaints against the Met Police for its handing of allegations against Al Fayed are being investigated by the force under the direction of the Independent Office for Police Conduct. Met to investigate handling of Al Fayed complaints More than 100 victims of Al Fayed abuse claim compensation

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store