French court vetoes return of controversial pesticide in farming law
PARIS - France's constitutional court on Thursday blocked the re-introduction of a pesticide accused of harming bees, in the latest twist in a fierce political battle in the European Union's biggest agricultural producer.
The court said the re-authorisation of acetamiprid, part of the neonicotinoid group of pesticides banned in France, as proposed under a farming bill passed last month did not provide sufficient safeguards on the use of the crop chemical.
The planned relaxation of France's neonicotinoid ban fuelled opposition to the legislation, with a petition against it gathering over 2 million signatures, a record for a petition on the website of France's National Assembly.
The court's ruling is a setback for supporters, including most of France's farming unions and conservative politicians, including Senator Laurent Duplomb who gave his name to the bill.
They had argued that acetamiprid is authorised elsewhere in Europe, as it does not pose the same risks as other neonicotinoids banned at EU level, and without it crops like sugar beets and hazelnuts face severe disease losses.
However, the FNSEA and JA, two of France's main farmer unions, welcomed the court's approval of most of the legislation, including steps to simplify planning permission for livestock buildings and water reservoirs for irrigation.
French President Emmanuel Macron, whose centrist allies in parliament were divided over the legislation, would sign the bill into law "as soon as possible" in line with the court's decision, the Elysee said. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
In a Trump-Putin summit, Ukraine fears losing say over its future
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ukrainian rescuers and policemen work at the site of the Russian strike on a bus station in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, on Aug 10. WASHINGTON – For nearly three years of the war in Ukraine, Washington's rallying cry in backing a fight against a Russian invasion was 'no negotiations about Ukraine without Ukraine.' But when US President Donald Trump meets President Vladimir Putin of Russia in Alaska on Aug 15, the Ukrainians will not be there, barring any last-minute invitation. And Kyiv's swift rejection of Mr Trump's declaration that he is already negotiating with Russia over what he vaguely called 'land swaps,' with no mention of security guarantees or arms for Ukraine, underscores the risks for the Ukrainians It also carries political perils for Mr Trump. Ukraine's fear for these past six months has been that Mr Trump's image of a 'peace accord' is a deal struck directly between him and Mr Putin – much as Franklin Roosevelt, Josef Stalin and Winston Churchill divided up Europe at the Yalta conference in 1945. That meeting has become synonymous with historical debates over what can go wrong when great powers carve up the world, smaller powers suffer the consequences and free people find themselves cast under authoritarian rule. Ukraine's president, Mr Volodymyr Zelensky, himself invited such comparisons in a speech to his people hours after Mr Trump raised the spectre of deciding Ukraine's fate in a one-on-one meeting in Alaska, territory that was once part of the Russian empire. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore BTO income ceiling, age floor for singles being reviewed: Chee Hong Tat World Netanyahu says Israel's new Gaza offensive will start soon Singapore 'It's so close': Crowds turn up for Red Lions, mobile column at National Day heartland celebrations Business Singapore can deliver and thrive in a fragmented global economy: Morgan Stanley analysts Asia As global supply chains shift, China's exports of factory robots see a sharp rise Singapore askST Jobs: How to deal with the dread of returning to work after a holiday? Singapore Man's claim amid divorce that his mother is true owner of 3 properties cuts no ice with judge Opinion Anwar's government: Full house but plenty of empty offices (While Mr Putin has made clear that he regards Ukraine as rightful Russian territory dating back to the days of Peter the Great, the Russian leader has not called for the reversal of the US$7.2 million (S$9.25 million) sale of Alaska to the United States in 1867, during a period of financial distress for the empire.) 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier,' Mr Zelensky said, noting that the Ukrainian Constitution prohibits such a deal. Then, in what sounded like a direct warning to Mr Trump, he added: 'Any solutions that are against us, any solutions that are without Ukraine, are simultaneously solutions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead solutions.' Mr Zelensky is the one with the most on the line in the summit. After his bitter Oval Office encounter with Mr Trump in February, which ended in Mr Trump's declaration that 'you don't have the cards right now,' he has every reason to fear Mr Trump is at best an unreliable partner. At worst, Mr Trump is susceptible to being flattered and played by Mr Putin, for whom he has often expressed admiration. But there are also considerable political risks for Mr Trump. Those would be especially acute if he is viewed as forcing millions of Ukrainians into territorial concessions, with few compensating guarantees that Mr Putin would not, after taking a breather of a few years, seize the rest of the country. 'President Trump still seems to be going into this conversation as if Putin is negotiating as a partner or friend,' said Ms Tressa Guenov, director for programmes and operations at the Scowcroft Centre for Strategy and Security at the Atlantic Council. 'That will continue to make these discussions difficult if Ukraine isn't involved.' Mr Trump's personal envoy, Mr Steve Witkoff, raised the possibility of a meeting of Mr Trump, Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin, and in the past week, it looked like that might be a precondition for the session in Alaska. But Mr Trump waved away the notion when asked about it by reporters on Aug 8. A senior administration official said on Aug 9 that the president remained open to a trilateral meeting with Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky, but that the meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Putin was set to go ahead as scheduled. Yet the gap in how Mr Trump approaches these negotiations and how the United States' allies in Europe approach them became all the more vivid on Aug 9. After a meeting of European national security advisers and Ukrainian officials with Vice-President J.D. Vance, who is on a visit to Britain, leaders of the European Union's executive branch and nations including France, Britain, Italy and Germany called in a statement for 'active diplomacy, support to Ukraine and pressure on the Russian Federation to end their illegal war.' They added that any agreement needed to include 'robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity,' phrases Mr Trump has avoided. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' the leaders said. Mr Trump has long sought a direct meeting with Mr Putin, declaring publicly that a problem like Ukraine could only be resolved with a meeting between the two top leaders. He also said last week that he expects to see President Xi Jinping of China before the end of the year. And he seems reluctant to impose more tariffs or sanctions ahead of those meetings. In fact, his deadline for Mr Putin to declare a ceasefire or face crushing 'secondary sanctions' melted away on Aug 8 without a mention from Mr Trump, other than that people should wait for his meeting with Mr Putin. The fact that Mr Trump is even meeting with Mr Putin represents a small victory for the Russian president, Ms Guenov said. 'Trump still has given Putin the benefit of the doubt, and that dynamic is one Putin will attempt to exploit even beyond this meeting,' she added. While Mr Trump has insisted that an understanding between himself and the Russian president is crucial to a broader peace, Mr Putin, Ms Guenov said, would certainly welcome any land concessions Mr Trump is willing to grant. Already the president has signalled that is where these talks are headed. Mr Trump on Aug 8 suggested that a peace deal between the two countries could include 'some swapping of territories,' signalling that the United States may join Russia in trying to compel Ukraine to permanently cede some of its land – the suggestion flatly rejected by Mr Zelensky . 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' said Mr Trump, leaving unclear who the 'we' in that statement was. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both, but we'll be talking about that either later, or tomorrow.' Russian officials have demanded that Ukraine cede the four regions that Moscow claimed to have 'annexed' from Ukraine in late 2022, even as some of that land remains under Ukrainian control. And Russia is seeking a formal declaration that the Crimean Peninsula is once again its territory. (Yalta, where the meeting of three great powers was held 80 years ago, is a resort city on the southern coast of Crimea.) NYTIMES
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
North Korea warns of reprisal against South Korea-US drills amid signs of tensions easing
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox SEOUL - North Korea denounced on Monday a major joint exercise planned by the South Korean and U.S. militaries as "direct military provocation" and warned of counteraction, amid signs of easing tension across the border under a new leader in Seoul. North Korea's Defence Minister No Kwang Chol said its military has an "absolute mission" to defend national security against the large-scale 11-day drills by South Korea and the United States, which he said posed a real and dangerous threat. "The armed forces of the DPRK will cope with the war drills of the U.S. and the (South) with thoroughgoing and resolute counteraction posture and strictly exercise the sovereign right," No said in a statement issued via KCNA state news agency. DPRK is short for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, North Korea's official name. No said the drills staged under the pretext of defense against threat were additional proof of confrontational intent by the two countries that raises hostility and further destabilizes regional security. North Korea routinely denounces military drills by the South and the United States, having called some previous exercises "a rehearsal" for nuclear war on the Korean peninsula, even as Pyongyang conducted a range of missile tests and live fire artillery exercises. South Korea and the United States said last week the annual exercise would begin on August 18 to test command control and troop mobilization under an upgraded security strategy against heightened threat of nuclear warfare by North Korea. However, the allies said a major part of the field exercise would be postponed and conducted separately next month, citing weather conditions. The postponement was widely seen as prompted by South Korea's liberal President Lee Jae Myung, who won a snap election in June, to ease tension with Pyongyang. Ties between the rival Koreas had plunged to some of the most hostile points in recent years, as the North pressed on with developing nuclear attack capabilities and dramatically boosted military ties with Russia. While Pyongyang has publicly rebuffed renewed outreach by Lee and Washington for dialogue, it was making moves seen as reciprocating some South Korean actions to ease tensions. South Korea said on Saturday it had detected the North's military removing some loudspeakers at the border, days after the South began dismantling similar equipment that had blared propaganda across the border. REUTERS
Straits Times
41 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Hundreds march in London to protest Britain's move to recognise a Palestinian state
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox People attending a march in London on Aug 10. They called on the British government to secure the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza. LONDON - Several hundred people marched in London on Aug 10 to demand Hamas release the Israeli hostages held by the Palestinian militant group in Gaza and criticise Britain's planned recognition of the State of Palestine. Joined by several relatives of the hostages, the march ended at the 10 Downing Street office of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has said Britain will recognise a Palestinian state if Israel does not agree to a truce in its war with Hamas. Many of the protesters waved Israeli flags or wore yellow ribbons, a symbol of solidarity with the hostages, whose liberation the organisers of the march argue should be the Labour leader's priority. Of the 251 hostages Hamas seized in its Oct 7, 2023 attack which sparked the war in Gaza, 49 are still held captive, including 27 whom the Israeli army says are dead. Among the demonstrators were Ayelet Stavitsky, sister of dead hostage Nadav Popplewell, and Adam Ma'anit, cousin of Tsachi Idan, who died while held by Hamas. 'I think that the government got it wrong with its foreign policy, that it's time for it to correct and refocus on the hostages,' said Mr Ma'anit, criticising Mr Starmer's planned recognition of a Palestinian state in September. Three people, identified as counter-protesters, were arrested, two of them for violent acts, police said. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore BTO income ceiling, age floor for singles being reviewed: Chee Hong Tat World Netanyahu says Israel's new Gaza offensive will start soon Singapore 'It's so close': Crowds turn up for Red Lions, mobile column at National Day heartland celebrations Business Singapore can deliver and thrive in a fragmented global economy: Morgan Stanley analysts Asia As global supply chains shift, China's exports of factory robots see a sharp rise Singapore askST Jobs: How to deal with the dread of returning to work after a holiday? Singapore Man's claim amid divorce that his mother is true owner of 3 properties cuts no ice with judge Opinion Anwar's government: Full house but plenty of empty offices Israel has faced mounting outcry over the 22-month-long war with Hamas, with United Nations-backed experts warning of widespread famine in besieged Gaza. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is under mounting pressure to secure the release of the remaining hostages, as well as over his plans to expand the Gaza war, which he has vowed to do without the backing of Israel's allies abroad. Mr Starmer's move towards recognising a State of Palestine follows on from similar pledges made by leaders including France's President Emmanuel Macron, as international disquiet over the dire humanitarian in the Palestinian territory grows. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,430 Palestinians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza, whose toll the United Nations considers reliable. Hamas' 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the war, resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. AFP
