Experts warn Israel-Iran war outcome uncertain despite US involvement and Fordow claims

Time of India

5 hours ago

Experts warn Israel-Iran war outcome uncertain despite US involvement and Fordow claims
Amid recent statements from US President Donald Trump on June 22, claiming the successful destruction of Iran's
Fordow nuclear facility
, experts are expressing doubts that American involvement will secure Israel's broader strategic objectives in its ongoing conflict with Iran.
Israel's campaign against Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs has escalated in recent weeks, with growing speculation that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu aimed to draw in the United States. However, military analysts, security experts, and former diplomats caution that even with US military assistance, Israel's objectives, reportedly including regime change in Tehran, may not be achievable and could lead to
regional destabilization
.
Also read:
US forces bomb Iranian nuclear sites; 'Fordow is gone' says Trump
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
Strategic goals in doubt despite targeted strikes
While Israel may have achieved operational success in striking specific Iranian targets, experts argue that these actions are unlikely to result in long-term strategic outcomes. Concerns persist about Israel's capacity to maintain a prolonged aerial campaign, particularly in the face of potential Iranian retaliation.
Live Events
'There is a dominant trend in Israel going back to the formation of the state that has suggested to politicians that violence will deliver a solution to what are political problems,' said Toby Dodge, professor of international relations at the London School of Economics. 'My gut feeling is Iranian regime is more stable than has been suggested.'
Analysts also point to Iran's decentralized defense system, which mirrors Hezbollah's network and complicates efforts to degrade its capabilities through conventional airpower.
Fordow strike claim raises risk of escalation
Trump's assertion that the Fordow facility, buried beneath nearly 90 meters of rock, has been destroyed remains unverified. Military specialists question whether US bunker-busting bombs could successfully penetrate the site and warn that such action could trigger retaliation against American assets.
Also read:
Steve Bannon's backroom role? Secret talks with Trump raise questions about U.S Iran strike strategy
'Subcontracting the Fordow job would put the United States in Iran's sights,' wrote former US Ambassador Daniel C. Kurtzer and former National Security Council official Steven N. Simon in
Foreign Affairs
. 'Iran would almost certainly retaliate by killing American civilians.'
Experts note that escalation following such retaliation could draw the US into regime-change operations, a strategy unpopular among the American public.
Operational momentum risks undermining strategy
Questions have been raised about the coherence of Israel's approach, which appears heavily reliant on airpower with limited capacity for sustained conflict. Resource constraints, including fatigue among air crews, missile interceptor shortages, and aircraft maintenance cycles, may inhibit Israel's ability to continue high-tempo operations.
Andreas Krieg, associate professor at King's College London's Department of Defence Studies, said, 'We'd learned the lesson that air power alone doesn't work. And then we learned in Iraq and Afghanistan that even massive numbers of boots on ground doesn't work.'
Krieg also emphasized that Iran's command structure is designed to withstand decapitation efforts. 'You can take out key nodes, but the best [Israel] can hope for in killing Khamenei would be to trigger the succession crisis which in any case had been anticipated,' he said.
Also read:
Trick or TACO? Why has Trump set a 2-week deadline for Iran?
Netanyahu's assumption that Trump would commit US forces to the campaign may also be politically flawed, particularly given low public support for intervention and growing divisions within Trump's base.
In the absence of deeper US involvement, and with indirect talks between Iran and European countries underway in Geneva, analysts believe diplomatic avenues may still hold. Former NATO commander Wesley Clark has described successful air campaigns, such as Kosovo in 1999, as tools to bring adversaries to the negotiating table, not to achieve regime change.
'If Khamenei has the sense to step back, if America doesn't come in,' said Dodge, 'then Israel has stuck its finger in a hornets' nest.'