Consortium Buyout Of MMH Strongly Supported By Shareholders
The next step towards implementation is an application to the High Court to be heard on 13 June for final orders from the court to approve the scheme. Assuming final orders are made the scheme is scheduled to be implemented around 26 June 2025.
DATE: 29 May 2025
The consolidation of Northland's key infrastructure assets into a single ownership entity took a step closer to becoming a reality today, positioning both Northport Limited and Marsden Maritime Holdings Limited (NZX: MMH) for growth opportunities.
This followed a meeting of MMH shareholders who approved the scheme of arrangement ('scheme') involving the buyout of non-Northland Regional Council ('NRC') shareholders in MMH at $5.60 per share by a consortium comprising NRC, Port of Tauranga ('POT') and Tupu Tonu (Ngāpuhi Investments Fund Ltd, or 'TT').
In a joint statement the consortium partners said: 'Ours is an important strategic partnership that enables us to speak with one voice on any development of these key Northland assets. Our consortium represents both Northland locals and investment for iwi and hapū settlements, alongside the expertise of New Zealand's largest and most efficient port operator, POT. Together we look forward to working with the government on solutions that will not only benefit the local community but also New Zealanders in delivering efficient import and export logistics solutions. Substantial investment will be required from all stakeholders to develop Northport and the land holdings of MMH. But today's successful vote is a significant step forward in bringing together a united commercial ownership structure capable of moving efficiently in achieving development goals.'
The consortium's $5.60 per share offer was within the value range assessed by independent advisers, Grant Samuel, and entry into the Scheme Implementation Agreement to give effect to the scheme was unanimously supported by the independent directors on the MMH board. At a meeting in Whangārei MMH shareholders approved the scheme paving the way for the delisting of MMH shares from the NZX, and bringing full control of Northport under a single ownership umbrella. Prior to implementation of the scheme in late June 2025, MMH owns 50% of Northport, and POT the other 50%.
The shareholding of the consortium comprises, NRC holding 43%, TT 7% and POT 50%. NRC and POT will have equal decision and voting rights. NRC has also committed to set aside a further 7% of its shareholding for other iwi and hapū that could form part of a future Treaty settlement negotiated between iwi and hapū and the Crown, with those shares purchased by the Crown from NRC at market value. Together this provides an opportunity for 14% of Northport to be owned by iwi and hapū of Te Taitokerau.
• NRC comments – Geoff Crawford, Chair
'Partnering with POT and TT brings real strength and alignment to this strategic initiative. This is our single largest investment and a hugely important asset for the future of Te Taitokerau. We believe the consortium represents a better way to structure our investment which will over time have improved benefits and outcomes for our region. Importantly, this proposal keeps ownership of the port in New Zealand, gives Northland a bigger stake and influence over the future direction of this regionally significant infrastructure asset, while at the same time further strengthens our strategic partnership with the country's largest port operator. Our investment in the consortium taking over MMH, significantly increases our holding in the port. I note that our contribution to the proposal is not expected to have any impact on rates. We are funding this extra investment through a mix of borrowing and proceeds from non-strategic assets sales.'
• TT comments – Ben Dalton, Chair
'We are pleased to be working closely with NRC to ensure that Ngāpuhi interests are reflected in the ownership and future of MMH and Northport. We are excited by the prospects that this new partnership brings. Our participation is an example of the commercial capability of TT to invest in Northland, giving confidence that we are serious about securing an ownership interest in strategic regional assets like the port, for the future, and to ensure ownership remains in the North.'
• POT comments – Leonard Sampson, Chief Executive
'We strongly support the rationalisation of the structure and the logic of merging the port with the surrounding land. This simplified structure positions the port operations for any commercial growth initiatives.'
Implementation of the scheme
The next step towards implementation is an application to the High Court to be heard on 13 June for final orders from the court to approve the scheme. Assuming final orders are made the scheme is scheduled to be implemented around 26 June 2025.
Future Port expansion a separate decision
While the consortium parties have agreed to work together, at this stage no decisions have been made by the consortium on the future expansion of the port or capital requirements to achieve this.
About NRC
Northland Regional Council has had a major shareholding in commercial port-related activities in Te Taitokerau / Northland since the 1980's. There have been changes over time, with NRC originally owning 72.3% of MMH (previously known as Northland Port Corporation) – a publicly-listed company on the NZX, but today NRC retains a majority shareholding of 53.6% in MMH. MMH owns 150ha of commercial property in Marsden Point along with a 50% shareholding in Northport Ltd ('Northport'), a deep-water commercial port. Port of Tauranga owns the other 50% of Northport. The change in ownership and control of this strategic asset required public consultation and an amendment to the council's Long Term Plan 2024-2034, which happened in March/April – more information about that process is available at www.nrc.govt.nz/MMHproposal
About TT
Tupu Tonu is a Crown-owned investment company tasked with acquiring and building a portfolio of commercial assets that can be offered in future Treaty settlement negotiations with Ngāpuhi. To date, Tupu Tonu has invested approximately two thirds of its $150m initial capital allocation in a range of whenua-based and strategic sectors such as infrastructure and energy, primary industries and commercial property.
About POT
Port of Tauranga (NZX:POT) is New Zealand's largest port and international freight hub. It has container and bulk cargo wharves in Tauranga connected via road and rail to inland ports in Hamilton and Auckland. Its investments include a 50% shareholding in Northport, a 50% shareholding in PrimePort Timaru, a 50% shareholding in logistics company Coda and a 50% shareholding in Ruakura Inland Port.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NZ debt nears $1 trillion as growth moderates, savings fall
At the current rate of growth, we'll hit that landmark inside the next three years. The rate of growth has moderated in the past two years as the Government has sought to curb borrowing, and the housing market, which accounts for the largest chunk of our debt, has been flat. Businesses have also been hunkering down, afraid to invest and expand, and farmers are getting good returns but using them to address high debt levels. But while the rate at which we're borrowing has eased, so too has the rate at which we are saving and growing wealth. The easiest path out of debt is wealth creation, shrinking our net debt and our debt-to-GDP ratio. So going backwards on that front is a cause for concern. The big, ugly numbers In the year to May 31, we hit a total of $872.6 billion in gross debt. That figure is up from $827.3b last year, a rise of 5.4%. It represents an average of $163,717 in raw debt for every Kiwi in the country. The rate of growth is relatively subdued by the standards of previous years. In the first New Zealand Herald Nation of Debt feature, in 2016, the total gross debt figure was $492.5b. We have seen total debt rise 77% since then. That represents an average annual increase of 6.65%. Given we are still coming down from a period of high interest rates, it was not surprising that borrowing growth was subdued, said Reserve Bank adviser for financial stability assessment and strategy, Charles Lilly. 'We're still in a relatively contractionary phase,' he said. 'We want to see stability. We don't want credit debt off the scale and people taking too much risk.' On the downside, a lack of borrowing growth was more of an issue with the financial system if the banks were not willing to lend, he said. 'I think banks are still willing to lend; it's mainly from the demand side, they just don't have customers coming through the door.' Crown debt also continues to rise, despite the Government's efforts to curb spending. Core Crown borrowing (the baseline we've used since 2016) was $238.8b in the year to May 31, 2025. That's up from $215b in the year to May 30, 2024 – an increase of 11%. It follows an increase of 11% for the previous year. While the coalition Government hasn't been able to stop Crown debt rising in double digits, it has at least reduced the annual rate of increase. It was 27% and 17% respectively in the years to May 2022 and May 2023. Crown debt is always a hot political topic. Wellington business editor Jenée Tibshraeny will take a deep dive into the state of the Government books tomorrow in part two of this series. The other side of the ledger Of course, the nominal figures still look scary. So does your mortgage if you don't weigh it against the value of your house. It is important to compare the gross debt figure to our saving rates and assets to add more context. Unfortunately, the latest Stats NZ figures (for the year to March) showed New Zealanders' household net wealth has fallen. Household net worth, the value of all assets owned by households less the value of their liabilities, fell $25.4b to $2.42 trillion in the March 2025 quarter. That is still almost three times the total gross debt figure. But in the year ended March 2025, household net worth fell $23.1b (0.9%), after a rise of $61.2b (2.5%) in the year ended March 2024. We're currently headed in the wrong direction. Most of that fall will be related to house prices, although some of it can be attributed to lower savings rates. Stats NZ's household saving data shows how much households are saving out of their current income (ie current income less current consumption). The data shows savings fell $392 million to minus $1.6b in the March 2025 quarter. Sector by sector Housing It should come as no surprise that the nation's mortgage debt accounts for the bulk of what we owe. Housing debt shot up during the big housing booms in the middle of the last decade and again during the first blush of Covid as stimulus money and low interest rates bolstered property prices. In the year to May 2016, the annual rate of increase for total housing debt was 9.2%, in 2021 it was 11.5%. If we look back further, it topped 16% in 2004. So this year's increase of 4.7% looks modest in comparison. It represents a slight increase on the even more modest 3.3% rise in the year to May 2024. That lift in mortgage debt may reflect the slight uptick in prices late last year and early this year (albeit something of a false start for those waiting on a full-blown housing market recovery). But the level of borrowing has also been lifted by record numbers of first-home buyers coming into the market, and fewer investors, said the RBNZ's Lilly. The former typically need to borrow more from the bank than the latter. If the housing market picks up later this year, as many pundits expect, then we'll likely see the rate of increase in mortgage borrowing follow, he says. Mortgage debt, most of which we owe to Australian banks, is a feature of the New Zealand economy that tends to worry international credit agencies more than our Crown debt. It has been a concern for the Reserve Bank in the past. 'In the current environment, subdued is definitely the theme,' Lilly said. Business Business borrowing barely lifted in the past year – and that is not good news for the economy. At $136.5b in the year to May 31, it was up just 0.6%. Businesses typically borrow to invest in new equipment that will improve productivity or to expand, taking on staff, to grab more market share. None of that stuff has been a feature of the past year. In fact, the opposite has been the case. Many businesses are struggling to survive. Those that desperately need cash to stay in business aren't going to get it from a bank. The struggle for many retail businesses is also highlighted in the relatively anaemic growth in personal consumer lending. At $14.5b, it is up 1.1% in the year to May 31. NZ Herald retail reporter Tom Raynel will take a closer look at the consumer borrowing trends later this week as part of the Nation of Debt series. For larger businesses, issues such as global uncertainty and tariffs would be limiting the appetite to borrow and take risks, Lilly said. It was also the case that the commercial property sector remained very weak, he said. Agriculture Unlike the struggling urban business sector, farmers have been benefiting from strong international export prices in the past year. Numerous commentators have suggested increased spending in the agricultural sector should buoy the regional economies and eventually flow through to the cities. The borrowing data for the past year offers some clues as to why that may take longer than many expect. Total agricultural debt is down 1% for the year to May 31, to $62.8b. Farmers appeared to be using their increased earnings to pay down debt in the first instance, Lilly said. This wasn't a bad thing; it is only a few years ago that the Reserve Bank was highlighting dairy debt as a significant risk to New Zealand's financial stability, he said. By the numbers That big, ugly number in our graphic is New Zealand's total gross debt. It combines the latest Reserve Bank figures for private debt with Treasury numbers for Crown debt and Local Government Funding Agency data on council debt, and IRD's data on student loans. The Reserve Bank figures include housing debt, consumer debt, business debt and agricultural debt to June 30. These are updated monthly by the central bank as part of its brief to monitor and maintain financial stability. The Crown debt figure is taken from the Treasury's Interim Financial Statements (11 months to May 31) and is the figure for core Crown borrowings. This is different from the net core Crown debt figure often used by politicians when discussing debt-to-GDP ratios. We use this (on Treasury's advice) as it is a gross debt figure but excludes debt held by state-owned enterprises, which would have been covered in the Reserve Bank statistics. The debt figure supplied by the Local Government Funding Agency is gross debt for the year to June 30, 2024. It captures all core council activities (Watercare, Auckland Transport, etc) but excludes some commercial activities (eg Christchurch City Council's Orion lines company, Port of Lyttelton, Christchurch Airport) as these would also be included in RBNZ data. Student loan debt is from the IRD statistics to March 2025. COMING UP IN THIS SERIES Tomorrow: Gov't debt: Are higher taxes inevitable? Wednesday: Consumer debt: What are Kiwis borrowing for? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Liam Dann is Business Editor at Large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, as well as presenting and producing videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mad as hell and not taking it any more
The government's Retirement Villages Act review must put people before profits, Brian Peat writes. The review of the Retirement Villages Act 2003 has turned into a slow-motion farce. Every extra month without reform is another month residents remain trapped in unfair contracts — waiting far too long for their own money, paying fees after they have left, and battling disputes in systems stacked in favour of operators. Let us call it for what it is: the government is dragging its heels. Hiding behind phrases like "careful consideration" and "getting it right" is nothing more than political cover for doing nothing while older New Zealanders suffer. This is not a theoretical policy exercise. This is about real people, many in their 80s and 90s, who do not have the luxury of waiting years for fairness and protection. The government has all the evidence it needs to act. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Development has years of reports detailing systemic unfairness. Residents have spoken out repeatedly. International models, for example New South Wales, show that fairer rules including repayment timeframes can be introduced without bankrupting the sector. The worst injustice is "the elephant in the room" — exit payments. Residents' capital is routinely held for months, even years, after they leave. The answer is simple. Require operators to lodge sufficient funds in a government agent trust account, just as landlords must under the Residential Tenancies Act. That would force repayment within a set timeframe and end the industry's excuse that "there's no money until a new resident moves in." That excuse sounds eerily like a Ponzi scheme, especially when one of the "big six" operators openly boasts in its annual report of holding $2.8 billion of interest-free funds from residents. The Retirement Villages Association (RVA) calls this a "resident-funded model". If that is true, why don't residents share in the profits? We all know the answer. The RVA continues to refuse to make any concessions, or even enter into meaningful discussions with the Retirement Village Residents Association (RVResidents) on the urgent issue of a mandated timeframe for repayment of capital. This stance disregards the overwhelming feedback from thousands of residents and their families and, effectively, prolongs financial hardship for many older New Zealanders who cannot afford to wait months, or even years, for what is rightfully theirs. The operators love to boast that "95% of residents are happy". No-one disputes that but happiness does not make an unfair law fair. The Act is broken, and it must be fixed. The government must commit to: — A hard, enforceable deadline for exit payments — no more than 3 to 4 months — Operators, not residents, paying for the repairs and maintenance of operator-owned chattels — An end to ongoing fees after departure — Contracts written in plain English, so residents know exactly what they are signing — A genuinely independent dispute resolution system with real teeth and real consequences I have visited and presented in more than 400 villages across New Zealand. I have heard the stories first-hand. Residents are tired of being told they are "just grumpy old radicals" for daring to demand fairness. RVResidents is no longer a lone voice. We have the backing of Consumer NZ, Grey Power, Citizens Advice, Age Concern, the Law Society, Community Law, Positive Ageing and major superannuation groups. These organisations represent hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders. The message is clear: reforming the Retirement Villages Act is not just a residents' issue — it is a national issue of fairness, dignity and consumer protection. Ignoring this call is ignoring a powerful cross-section of New Zealand society. We are done with hollow promises. We are done with endless process. And we are especially done with ministers claiming to "care about older New Zealanders" while siding with corporate operators. This review will not be judged by the weight of its final report. It will be judged by how quickly it delivers concrete protections. Every day without change is a deliberate political choice. Right now, the choice this government is making is to protect operators over people. The clock has run out and so has our patience. The government's choice is clear: side with the people who built this country, or side with those exploiting them. — Brian Peat is a Dunedin village resident and president of the Retirement Village Residents Association.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
FFA Receives US$60 Million From The US Under Economic Assistance Agreement
Sunday, 17 August 2025, 5:31 pm The Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) has today received the US$60 million payment for 2024, under the Economic Assistance Agreement (EAA) associated with the Treaty on Fisheries with the Government of the United States of America. FFA Director-General Noan David Pakop acknowledged the receipt of the payment, emphasising its importance to the 16 Pacific Island Parties that make up the FFA membership. Earlier this week, the United States Government announced the release of the payment, which will be allocated to the Pacific Island Parties in accordance with the agreed distribution approach. US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau met with Pacific Islands Ambassadors and Representatives based in Washington to confirm the payment and reaffirm the US Government's ongoing support for the EAA. He highlighted the commitment to the annual payment of US$60 million over a 10-year period under the agreement, as well the strong relationship with the Pacific Island States. Advertisement - scroll to continue reading 'This is a positive and welcome development, and a clear demonstration of the US Government's commitment to the EAA, the Treaty, and its cordial relationship with Pacific Island States,' stated FFA Director-General Noan David Pakop. 'We are confident that this initial payment will pave the way for the approval of the 2025 payment and future payments under the EAA.' The Treaty came into force in 1988 and has been in effect for 37 years, involving fishing in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the Pacific Island Parties by US purse seine fishing vessels. Over the years, its terms and conditions, and final packages have been periodically renegotiated. The latest renegotiation was concluded in June 2024, extending the Treaty for the next 10 years (2023-2033) with revised terms, conditions and a new financial package. The Pacific Island Parties are: Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu. About Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA): FFA assists its 17 Members to sustainably manage fishery resources that fall within their 200-mile Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs). FFA provides expertise, technical assistance and other support to its members who make decisions about their tuna resources and participate in regional decision making on tuna management.
