Trump shuts down worldwide air quality monitoring program
The State Department is shutting down its air quality monitoring program after over a decade of collecting public data worldwide and reporting it from 80 embassies and consulates around the world.
The information was used for research, and to let foreign service officers decide if it was safe to allow their children to be outside. It has also prompted improvements in air quality in countries such as China.
The State Department told The New York Times that the program was being suspended because of 'budget constraints.'
The department added that the air monitors at embassies would continue to operate for an undetermined period of time, but that live data collected would no longer be sent to an app previously operated and monitored by the department as well as other platforms 'until funding for the underlying network is resolved.'
Health officials and environmental experts told The Times that the decision would harm Americans abroad, particularly those working for the U.S. government.
'Embassies are situated sometimes in very difficult air quality circumstances,' Gina McCarthy, who headed the Environmental Protection Agency during the Obama administration, told the newspaper.
Alongside then-Secretary of State John Kerry, McCarthy expanded the program from China to encompass the wider world.
'You can't send people in risky areas without information,' McCarthy told the newspaper.
'We generally think of risky areas as war zones or something like that. But it's equally important to look at whether their health is deteriorating because they are in a place with such poor air quality,' she noted.
American officials in Beijing put in place air quality monitors on the roof of the U.S. embassy in 2008 and began sharing hourly updates about the levels of PM 2.5, a particulate matter that's one of the most dangerous kinds of air pollutants. The particles can infiltrate the lungs and bloodstream and have been linked to respiratory issues, heart attacks, and other problems.
The information shared by the embassy showed that the air pollution was worse than what the Chinese government was willing to reveal.
'All hell broke loose,' McCarthy told The Times.
The Chinese government attempted to press the embassy to stop sharing the data, but were unsuccessful. Chinese officials argued that the readings were illegal, and they attacked the quality of the science, The Times reported.
In the end, the Chinese government set up its own monitoring system, boosted the budget for pollution control, and subsequently started working with the U.S. to improve air quality.
McCarthy and Kerry announced in 2015 that they were expanding the air monitoring project across other embassies and consulates around the world. They argued that air pollution, much like climate change, needed global data and worldwide solutions.
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences revealed in a 2022 study that when U.S. diplomatic missions began sharing data on local air pollution, the host government enacted new measures. Since 2008, there had been reductions in fine particulate concentration levels in areas with an American monitoring program, leading to a lesser risk of premature death for more than 300 million people.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Trump deploys National Guard to quell immigration protests in LA
US President Donald Trump has deployed 2,000 National Guardsmens to Los Angeles in response to protests over immigration enforcement in the city. The deployment of troops to LA comes after objections from California's Governor Gavin Newsom and a second day of clashes between hundreds of protesters and federal immigration authorities in riot gear. Confrontations escalated in the heavily Latino city of Paramount, south of Los Angeles. Federal agents were based at a Homeland Security office and made use of tear gas, flash-bangs, and pepper balls, while protesters threw rocks and debris at Border Patrol vehicles. Tensions were high after a series of sweeps by immigration authorities the previous day, as the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the city climbed past 100. A prominent union leader was arrested while protesting and accused of impeding law enforcement. The White House announced that Trump would deploy the Guard to 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester.' It wasn't clear when the troops would arrive. Newsom, a Democrat, said in a post on the social platform X that it was 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' He later said the federal government wants a spectacle and urged people not to give them one by becoming violent. In a signal of the administration's aggressive approach, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to deploy the US military. Writing on X, Trump insulted Newsom, saying that he had taken action due to the state leader and mayor of LA both being incapable of stopping protests. The post said: 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' Trump federalised part of California's National Guard under what is called Title 10 authority, which places him above the Governor in the chain of command in California. The US President signed the order shortly before attending a UFC fight in New Jersey, sitting ringside with boxer Mike Tyson. Some 44 people were arrested back on Friday by federal authorities on Friday, prompting protests across LA. DHS later said recent ICE operations in Los Angeles resulted in the arrest of 118 immigrants, including five people linked to criminal organisations and people with prior criminal histories. David Huerta, regional president of the Service Employees International Union, was also arrested Friday while protesting. The Justice Department confirmed that he was being held Saturday at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Los Angeles ahead of a scheduled Monday court appearance. Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called for his immediate release, warning of a 'disturbing pattern of arresting and detaining American citizens for exercising their right to free speech.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump has taught us one thing: Scotland needs more mega-wealthy people
All joshing aside, what we can say is that what we are witnessing is nothing less than the rapid erosion of American democracy. This is particularly apparent in the prominence given to oligarchs in positions of power in Washington. As always with Trump, this has not been done clandestinely but in the full, public glare. A man without shame, he has surrounded himself with what might best be described as the filthy rich. Read more Rosemary Goring In that regard, he started as he meant to go on. As Evan Osnos writes in his revelatory new book, The Haves and Have-Yachts: Dispatches on the Ultrarich, Trump embraced the plutocracy on January 20, 2025, the day he took office. Within arm's reach of him as he swore his oath were the world's three richest individuals: Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk. A step away were Sergey Brin, co-founder of Google, and Tim Cook, CEO of Apple. 'There were so many billionaires on stage,' recalls Osnos, 'that the leaders of Congress were relegated to the audience.' Not long thereafter, Trump promoted 13 billionaires to the top ranks of his administration, chief among them Musk, who would soon wield a chainsaw to numerous branches of government and consign thousands of employees to penury. Unelected and unchecked, and pretty much unhindered by the law, Musk and his coevals could do almost whatever they pleased, and thus far they have. Of course, America has always been a place which puts mammon above morals. The pursuit of its fabled dream has had at its heart the amassing of wealth. To become a millionaire was the goal of many of its citizens who believed, misguidedly, that it would lead to that other dream: happiness. As time passed, however, it was not enough to be a millionaire; that was mere shrapnel. The next target was to be a billionaire. First atop that pinnacle was John D. Rockefeller who, through Standard Oil, which refined and marketed nearly 90 percent of the oil produced in America, was the moguls' mogul in what was known as the Gilded Age. In his wake came our own Andrew Carnegie, whose involvement in the steel industry made him so rich he was earning more money than he knew what do with. Rockefeller and Carnegie divided opinion. Muckrakers deemed them unscrupulous, accusing them of bribing political officials, circumventing the law and treating their workers badly. Others took a more benign view, acknowledging that their wealth was often directed towards good causes - in Carnegie's case public libraries, which are, or at least were, one of the bulwarks of a civilised society. Andrew Carnegie (Image: free)Concerned that their path to heaven might be pockmarked with potholes, Rockefeller and Carnegie salved their consciences by remodelling themselves as philanthropists. 'Surplus wealth,' Carnegie wrote, 'is a sacred trust which its possessor is bound to administer in his lifetime for the good of the community.' Whether today's trillionaires feel likewise remains to be seen. The omens do not look promising. As the title of Evan Osnos's book suggests, they are more interested in acquiring yachts the length of Leith Walk than doing anything to elevate humankind. What these people must have are so-called gigayachts – over 100 metres long - which shrinks might say are penis-substitutes. 'Even among the truly rich,' writes Osnos, 'there is a gap between the haves and the have-yachts.' Much of the time, he adds, the yachts 'dwell beyond the reach of ordinary law enforcement. They cruise in international waters, and, when they dock, local cops tend to give them a wide berth; the boats often have private security, and their owners may well be friends with the prime minister.' Sickening, selfish and sinister as all this may be, making you pine for the era of the guillotine, I am not entirely antipathetic to those whose Swiss bank accounts have swelled because of their entrepreneurship. Here in Scotland, where billionaires are rarer than McDonalds on the moon, there is an over-reliance on the state to ensure that everything is properly funded and maintained and that new ventures are allowed to flourish. Read more In my main area of concern – broadly speaking, the arts – dependence on Creative Scotland is unhealthy and monopolist, leading to disenchantment and frustration. Attempting to adhere to the agency's manufactured criteria and its opaque bureaucracy is enough to reduce even the most persistent applicants to apoplexy. There are various individuals and businesses with the means to make a difference, but they are few and far between. Unlike in America, where giving to good causes in the cultural sphere is widespread, no such habit exists in this country. Indeed, the enlightened handful who have sponsored arts events are regarded not with gratitude but suspicion and - in the case of Baillie Gifford's involvement in book festivals - mind-boggling hostility. What's needed is a shift in attitude towards philanthropy, both by those with money and those who need it; such a cultural rethink would allow those with talent to receive help to develop their particular passion. I often think admiringly of the Italian Renaissance and how its flourishing was underwritten in part by the Medicis, whose patronage of Botticelli, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and countless others was pivotal. Sadly, I see no Medici on the horizon. More's the pity, because we need them more than ever. Rosemary Goring is a columnist and author. Her most recent book is Homecoming: The Scottish Years of Mary, Queen of Scots. Its sequel, Exile: The Captive Years of Mary, Queen of Scots, is published next month
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Matteo Manassero and Ryan Fox surge into lead to set up intriguing final round at Canadian Open
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
